Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 19th Aug 2026, 20:16:21 EET
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | ||
26 SES 16 B: Using AI and International Successful School Principalship (ISSPP) Research to Prepare the Next Generation of Principals to Lead Amidst Multiple Complexities
Research Workshop | ||
| Presentations | ||
26. Educational Leadership
Research Workshop Using AI and International Successful School Principalship (ISSPP) Research to Prepare the Next Generation of Principals to Lead Amidst Multiple Complexities 1: Northern Arizona University, United States of America (NAU); 2: Umeå University, Sweden (Umu); 3: University College London (UCL) Presenting Author:The Fourth Industrial Revolution has accelerated advances in information technologies, particularly Artificial Intelligence (AI), profoundly shaping education systems worldwide. Recent breakthroughs, such as generative AI tools including ChatGPT, are influencing teaching, learning, and school administration by offering opportunities for increased efficiency, personalized instruction, and expanded access to learning (Chen et al., 2022; Lee et al., 2023; Peters et al., 2023). At the same time, these technologies introduce significant challenges related to data security and privacy, academic integrity, algorithmic bias, and the risk of misinformation (Guo et al., 2023). In response, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD, 2024), drawing on foundational educational philosophies (e.g., Dewey, 1916; Kant, 2015) and contemporary analyses, advocates for human-centric AI in education grounded in democratic values, equity, transparency, safety, and well-being. School principals and head teachers in pre-kindergarten through grade 12 (PK–12) settings must navigate these AI-driven opportunities and risks alongside persistent and emerging influences, including socioeconomic inequities, cultural and political pressures, and environmental uncertainty. Successfully leading schools amid these intersecting complexities is essential for promoting academic excellence, student well-being, and equitable outcomes. Concurrently, educational leadership researchers and professors bear responsibility for preparing and supporting principals to lead effectively in digitally mediated and highly contextualized environments. This 90-minute interactive workshop explores innovative approaches to principal preparation and development by integrating AI with empirical insights from the International Successful School Principalship Project (ISSPP). As the longest-running and most extensive cross-national study of successful school leadership, spanning more than 20 countries, ISSPP provides a robust evidence base for understanding how principals lead successfully across diverse contexts. The workshop is guided by four core ISSPP research questions: (1) How do socioeconomic, cultural, political, and professional contexts shape school practices and valued outcomes, particularly in high-need communities? (2) How is “school success” conceptualized and measured across national and cultural contexts? (3) What enablers and constraints influence school success in different settings? (4) What similarities and differences characterize the values, beliefs, and practices of successful principals across contexts and policy environments? Methodologically, ISSPP draws on ecological systems theory (Bronfenbrenner, 1995) to examine leadership within interacting social and organizational layers. The project employs a comparative, mixed-methods design, incorporating semi-structured interviews with principals, district officials, teachers, parents, and students; teacher surveys; and cross-case analyses to enhance trustworthiness (Creswell & Creswell, 2017; Denzin, 2012; Patton, 2002). Building on ISSPP metasyntheses of qualitative case studies (e.g., Authors, 2021), this workshop demonstrates how empirically grounded leadership knowledge can be coded into leadership domains and translated into an AI-enabled “Principal Mentor” framework. This framework is designed to simulate principled, context-sensitive reasoning while embedding human-centric guardrails aligned with OECD (2024) AI principles. The workshop structure emphasizes active engagement. It begins by framing the contemporary challenges facing principals in AI-infused educational systems, introduces ISSPP’s ecological framework and key findings, and outlines the development methodology of the AI Principal Mentor. Participants then examine demonstrations using authentic leadership dilemmas, followed by facilitated discussion of ethical, pedagogical, and practical implications. Researchers, educators, and policymakers will critically reflect on AI’s role in principal preparation and professional support, with attention to adaptation across diverse national and local contexts. By bridging long-standing qualitative leadership research with emerging AI tools, this workshop advances values-based leadership development and supports adaptive expertise for sustainable school success in an increasingly complex and unpredictable global landscape. Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used The methodology for this workshop proposal integrates the International Successful School Principalship Project (ISSPP)'s established research approach with a novel process for developing an AI-supported tool, the "AI Principal Mentor." ISSPP investigates school leadership through ecological systems theory (Bronfenbrenner, 1995), conceptualizing principals' practices within dynamically interacting micro- (school-level), meso- (community and district), exo- (policy), and macro- (sociocultural and global) systems. This lens captures how schools operate, develop, and achieve success in complex, unpredictable environments. ISSPP employs a comparative, mixed-methods design to address its research questions, drawing on multiple data sources for rigor and trustworthiness (Creswell & Creswell, 2017; Patton, 2002). Sampling targets principals leading successful schools in their contexts, defined by local criteria such as improved outcomes in high-need communities. Data collection includes semi-structured qualitative interviews with stakeholders (district/municipality officials, governors, principals, teachers, parents, and students) and whole-school teacher surveys. Comparative analyses within and across schools and countries enhance validity (Authors, 2021; Denzin, 2012). To develop the AI Principal Mentor App, ISSPP's cumulative empirical base—particularly metasyntheses of qualitative case studies from over 20 countries (Authors, 2021)—serves as the foundational knowledge base. These metasyntheses synthesize hundreds of interviews, surveys, and documents, identifying leadership practices, values, and sense-making associated with sustained success in diverse contexts. Findings are treated as interpretive claims, enabling conceptual translation while preserving contextual nuances, guided by ISSPP's ecological framework. A secondary analytic process re-examines these metasyntheses, coding findings into four domains aligned with ISSPP research questions: contextual influences on operations (RQ1), perceptions of success (RQ2), What enablers and constraints influence school success in different settings (RQ3), and principals' values/behaviors (RQ4), Codes emphasize recurring themes like adaptive expertise, moral leadership, and stakeholder collaboration. Translation into AI design includes conceptual operationalization, embedding codes to simulate leadership reasoning rather than fixed responses. The AI is constrained by OECD (2024) human-centric principles—transparency, responsibility, well-being, and risk awareness—to avoid technocratic biases, positioning it as a learning partner that acknowledges uncertainty and trade-offs. Rigor is ensured through triangulation with original case studies, metasyntheses, and established theories (Denzin, 2012). Credibility draws from validated frameworks like instructional, transformational, and moral leadership. This methodology ethically mobilizes qualitative research into AI tools, supporting principals without supplanting human judgment. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings In conclusion, this workshop proposal underscores the transformative potential of integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) with robust empirical research from the International Successful School Principalship Project (ISSPP) to prepare principals for leading schools amid escalating complexities. By grounding AI in metasynthesized findings from over 20 countries, the "AI Principal Mentor" emerges as a values-based pedagogical tool that fosters contextual sense-making, adaptive expertise, and ethical decision-making. This approach aligns with human-centric principles (OECD, 2024), ensuring AI enhances rather than undermines democratic education values, inclusivity, and well-being. The session's interactive structure—framing challenges, introducing ISSPP insights, demonstrating AI applications through dilemmas, and facilitating critical discussions—empowers participants to reflect on and adapt these innovations to their contexts. It highlights methodological contributions, demonstrating how long-standing qualitative programs can be ethically repurposed for AI-supported professional development, making tacit leadership knowledge accessible and actionable. Broader implications extend to educational policy and practice: Principals equipped via such tools can better mediate AI's possibilities (e.g., personalized learning) and risks (e.g., privacy breaches), promoting equitable outcomes in high-need communities. However, ethical considerations remain paramount—AI must prioritize transparency and risk management to avoid exacerbating inequalities. Future research should explore longitudinal impacts of AI in principal training across diverse systems, refining designs for cultural responsiveness. Ultimately, this workshop invites a collaborative dialogue on reimagining leadership preparation in a digital era, bridging research and practice to cultivate principals who thrive in unpredictability, ensuring quality education for all. By leveraging ISSPP's ecological framework, it advances sustainable, human-centered leadership development, contributing to global educational resilience. References Authors. (2021). International Successful School Principalship Project: Metasynthesis and cross-case analyses [Specific publication details to be added based on actual citation]. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995). Developmental ecology through space and time: A future perspective. In P. Moen, G. H. Elder Jr., & K. Lüscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 619–647). American Psychological Association. Chen, Q., Gong, Y., Lu, Y., & Tang, J. (2022). Classifying and measuring the service quality of AI chatbot in frontline service. Journal of Business Research, 145, 552-568. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). Sage Publications. Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80-88. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education (1966 ed.). Free Press. Guo, S., Zheng, Y., & Zhai, X. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education research during 2013–2023: A review based on bibliometric analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 29(13), 16387-16409. Kant, I. (2015). On education (Vol. 26). Ship of Theseus Press. (Original work published 1803). Lee, S. J., & Kwon, K. (2024). A systematic review of AI education in K-12 classrooms from 2018 to 2023: Topics, strategies, and learning outcomes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100211. Mattig, R. (2024). Overcoming ‘intellectual aristocracy’ through Bildung: A new look at the work of Wilhelm von Humboldt by bringing together the history of education and the history of ethnography. In L. Foran & G. Lazaroiu (Eds.), Novelty, innovation and transformation in educational ethnographic research (pp. 70-80). Routledge. OECD. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: Human-centric principles for democratic values, inclusive growth, sustainable development, and well-being [Specific OECD report details to be confirmed]. Patton, M. Q. (2022). Impact-driven qualitative research and evaluation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research design (Vol. 2, pp. 1165-1180). Sage Publications. Peters, M. A., Jackson, L., Papastephanou, M., Jandrić, P., Lazaroiu, G., Evers, C. W., ... & Fuller, S. (2024). AI and the future of humanity: ChatGPT-4, philosophy and education–Critical responses. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 56(9), 828-862. | ||
