Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 19th Aug 2026, 20:19:14 EET
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | ||
29 SES 08 A: The Potency of Not-Knowing: Some Inflexions in Arts Education Research
Research Workshop | ||
| Presentations | ||
29. Research on Arts Education
Research Workshop The Potency of Not-Knowing: Some Inflexions in Arts Education Research 1: ESMAE/i2ADS, Portugal; 2: FPCEUP/CIIE/i2ADS, Portugal; 3: FBAUP/i2ADS, Portugal Presenting Author:This research workshop adopts a phenomenological and post-structuralist perspective to examine the concept of not-knowing as a conceptual framework through which its potential future can be explored. It presents an image of not-knowing, whose potency lies, on the one hand, in indeterminacy and sensible intuition, which allow it to emerge continuously, and, on the other, in a form of anarchism yet to come, understood as an ethical condition for the possibility of its experience. This image is developed through the work of Rancière, Lyotard and Malabou, alongside artistic practices associated with Rothko, Cage and Feldman, and through revisiting the lived experiences of libertarian schools and pedagogies that continue to offer glimpses as critical horizons of emergence and resistance. Accordingly, the research workshop does not merely trace the pathways of not-knowing in contemporary arts education. Its main aim is to bear witness to the potency of the unpresentable that not-knowing embodies, particularly when it is intentionally brought into play within educational and artistic contexts today. The research workshop also considers pedagogical approaches that embrace alterity and incompleteness in their practices and ways of thinking, showing how these invite us to inhabit the ungovernable and engage with the indeterminacy arising from anarchism and processes of transformation without rupture.
What is the use of the concept of not-knowing in Tampere? This articulator of meaning asserts itself as a decisive political contribution to rethinking all ways of teaching, learning and coexisting. In a time excessively marked by the obsession with measurability, productivity and the standardisation of skills, not-knowing introduces a critical interruption in the dominant regimes of knowledge, opening space for doubt, listening and experimentation. Assumed here pedagogically, not-knowing deactivates rigid hierarchies between those who teach and those who learn, allowing the classroom to become a space of co-investigation and shared vulnerability. This posture shifts the focus from the transmission of content to the creation of emergency conditions dedicated to one's own thinking, sensitivity, relationship and political imagination. Not-knowing thus becomes a practice of emancipation. In Arts Education, in particular, not-knowing is structuring, as it legitimises error, deviation and the unfinished as engines of the creative process. By refusing normative models of excellence and by welcoming minority, corporeal and situated forms of expression, not-knowing contributes to work processes that are more inclusive, more critical and more committed to social transformation. More than a gap to be overcome, not-knowing asserts itself as an active political force, as it is the emergence of a gesture to be announced that destabilises certainties, redistributes voices and inaugurates possibilities of existence yet to be imagined. Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used This proposal presents a methodology of action (performance)-research (creation)-reflection (collective balance), based on the conception of a performative research workshop in four voices, centred on the concept of not-knowing as an epistemological, ethical and political position. We start from the hypothesis that not-knowing, far from constituting a gap, can operate as a critical force capable of interrupting hegemonic regimes of knowledge production and making room for more emancipatory forms of existence. The methodological device articulates performative practice and theoretical research, structured in four voices: (1) the voice of instituted knowledge, which mobilizes normative academic discourse; (2) the voice of not-knowing, very marked by hesitation, silence and fragmentation; (3) the voice of the body, which introduces somatic (sound-visual) and, above all, non-verbal knowledge; (4) and the voice of alterity, which summons situated knowledge and marginalized narratives. The friction between these voices constitutes a performative field where the very conflict between regimes of knowledge becomes sensitive. The process is developed along three axes: prior theoretical research, a collaborative laboratory of performative experimentation, and public presentation in the context of a congress, understood as a moment of knowledge production in action. The methodology explicitly takes on a political dimension here, by questioning devices of epistemic authority, and legitimising bodily, affective and relational forms of knowledge. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings As expected outcomes in a not-knowing research workshop, it is anticipated: - The production of contributions to the debate on critical epistemologies in a restricted, extended and expanded group in the community. - The experimentation with alternative formats of academic communication. - And the creation of replicable performative devices in pedagogical and research contexts. References BUTLER, Judith. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. Fordham University Press. DERRIDA, Jacques. (1997). De l’hospitalité. Calmann-Lévy. HARAWAY, Donna. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. MALABOU, Catherine. (2004). Que faire de notre cerveau? Bayard. MALABOU, Catherine. (2012). The new wounded: From neurosis to brain damage. Fordham University Press. MIGNOLO, Walter D. (2011). The darker side of Western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Duke University Press. RANCIÈRE, Jacques. (1987). Le maître ignorant. Fayard. ROLNIK, Suely. (2018). Esferas da insurreição: Notas para uma vida não cafetinada. n-1 edições. | ||
