Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 19th Aug 2026, 21:29:10 EET
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | ||
14 SES 05.5 A: General Poster Session
General Poster Session | ||
| Presentations | ||
14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Poster The study of Parent-Teacher Relationship Quality in the Preschool. National Chengchi University, Taiwan Presenting Author:I am investigating the quality of parent-teacher relationships in preschool education, seeking to understand what constitutes a “high-quality” partnership between parents and teachers and how it can be fostered. Strong home-school partnerships are widely recognized as crucial for young children’s development. International frameworks like NAEYC’s Developmentally Appropriate Practice emphasize engaging families as essential partners, and across Europe it is affirmed that parents are “the most important partners” in early education. Research consistently shows that positive parent-teacher relationships benefit children’s learning and well-being. Yet, my review found a gap: in my country (Taiwan), few studies examine preschool parent-teacher relationship quality, and those few often borrowed a business-oriented “customer relationship” model. This approach treats the teacher as a service provider and the parent as a customer, focusing narrowly on trust, satisfaction, and commitment. I argue that this is an inadequate lens for education. Parents and teachers are not in a buyer-seller relationship but rather are equal collaborators in supporting the child. The research question guiding my study is: What is the nature of a high-quality parent-teacher relationship in preschool, and how can we enhance it in practice?
In summary, this proposal presents a study that not only fills a local research gap but also resonates with broader efforts to strengthen parent-teacher partnerships internationally. Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used This qualitative study employed semi-structured interviews to explore the nature of high-quality parent-teacher relationships in preschool. I interviewed 12 participants—six preschool teachers and six parents—selected through purposive sampling based on their experience of particularly positive relationships. Interviews (60–90 minutes each) were guided by an open-ended protocol addressing communication habits, collaboration practices, and mutual perceptions. All interviews were audio-recorded with consent and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed thematically through inductive coding. I identified key codes (e.g., “trust,” “frequent communication”) and clustered them into broader categories reflecting the features of strong parent-teacher partnerships. Credibility was ensured via peer debriefing and triangulation with literature. Ethical standards were followed throughout: participants signed informed consent forms and confidentiality was protected. Reflexivity was maintained via journaling to bracket personal biases. This rigorous approach provided a rich understanding of the elements that support effective preschool parent-teacher relationships. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings This study reveals that high-quality parent-teacher relationships in preschool are best understood as collaborative partnerships centered on the child, not transactional service relationships. Both parents and teachers see each other as equal partners working toward a shared goal: the child’s development and well-being. Compared to elementary settings, preschool relationships tend to be more intimate and frequent, supported by daily contact and the dual caregiving-educational role of teachers. Five key characteristics emerged from interviews: (1) frequent, open communication; (2) comfort and emotional intimacy; (3) child-focused collaboration; (4) active cooperation; and (5) a partnership mindset. These features clustered into two core dimensions: the “interpersonal dimension” (emotional connection and mutual respect) and the “task-oriented dimension” (effective collaboration and shared responsibilities). Within these, seven enabling factors were identified, including positive communication practices, mutual trust and appreciation, emotional attunement, aligned expectations, recognition of contributions, a strong child-centered focus, and flexible yet clear norms for interaction. Building on these findings, I propose four guiding principles for cultivating quality parent-teacher relationships: (1) prioritize the child’s well-being as common ground; (2) engage with authenticity and warmth; (3) establish shared expectations while remaining adaptable; and (4) invest intentionally in the relationship itself. These principles encourage a shift from viewing parents as “clients” to co-educators. This study not only enriches our understanding of relationship quality in early childhood settings but also offers practical insights for educators and policymakers. Schools may implement orientation sessions or structured dialogue routines, while teacher education programs can include relationship-building strategies. Ultimately, when parents and teachers cooperate harmoniously, children benefit from a more secure, consistent, and nurturing developmental environment. Sharing these findings at ECER will foster international dialogue and promote stronger family-school partnerships across contexts. References Addi-Raccah, A., & Ainhoren, R. (2009). School governance and teachers’ attitudes to parents’ involvement in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(6), 805–813. Baker, A. J. L. (1997). Improving parent involvement programs and practice: A qualitative study of teacher and parent perspectives. School Community Journal, 7(1), 9–35. Chen, Z.-L., Chang, J.-W., Liao, F.-S., & Chen, Y.-J. (2019). 從幼兒園聯絡簿探究親師關係 [Investigating parent-teacher relationships through the kindergarten communication book]. 幼兒教育年刊 (Annual Report of Early Childhood Education), 12, 219–242. Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R., & Cowles, D. (1990). Relationship quality in services selling: An interpersonal influence perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 68–81. Minke, K. M., Sheridan, S. M., Kim, E. M., Ryoo, J. H., & Koziol, N. A. (2014). Congruence in parent-teacher relationships: The role of shared perceptions. Elementary School Journal, 114(4), 527–546. National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). (2009). Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8 (Position Statement). Washington, DC: NAEYC. Petrogiannis, K., & Penderi, E. (2014). The Quality of Parent-Teacher Relationship Scale in the Kindergarten: A Greek Study. International Research in Education, 2(1), 1–21. Pirchio, S., Tritrini, C., Passiatore, Y., & Taeschner, T. (2013). The role of the relationship between parents and educators for child behaviour and wellbeing. International Journal about Parents in Education, 7(2), 145–155. Powell, D. R., Son, S.-H., File, N., & San Juan, R. R. (2010). Parent–school relationships and children’s academic and social outcomes in public pre-kindergarten. Journal of School Psychology, 48(4), 269–292. Xu, J. (2008). 幼兒園良好親師關係之探究 [An exploration of good parent-teacher relationships in kindergartens]. 幼兒教保研究期刊, 1, 13–29. 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Poster Sustaining Atayal Culture Through Culturally Responsive Pedagogy: Teachers’ Practices and Children’s Perspectives National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan Presenting Author:This study aimed to examine: (1) the implementation of culturally responsive teaching practices in an Indigenous preschool in Taiwan, and (2) Indigenous children’s childhood experiences from their own perspectives, including their family and preschool lives. From a historical perspective, the long-term impacts of colonialism have gradually weakened Indigenous peoples’ sense of self-identity and cultural consciousness. Scholars have argued that culturally responsive early childhood curricula constitute a critical starting point for reducing disparities between Indigenous and non-Indigenous children (Nguyen, 2011). However, existing literature remains limited in both depth and diversity regarding culturally responsive curricula for diverse populations, particularly Indigenous children (Durden, Escalante, & Blitch, 2015). Moreover, many early childhood educators working with Indigenous children lack sufficient cultural awareness and the capacity to implement culturally responsive teaching practices effectively (Brayboy & Maughan, 2009; Sleeter, 2011). Thus, this study selected an Indigenous preschool as a research site in Taiwan because it explicitly aims to sustain the children’s cultural value through its pedagogical practices. The findings can reveal how Indigenous knowledge can be respected, integrated, and sustained in early childhood education. In addition, influenced by the growing field of childhood studies and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, scholars have increasingly emphasized the importance of recognizing children’s voices and employing methodologies that enable children to express their own experiences. Consequently, a growing body of research has explored children’s perspectives on school experiences (e.g., Hsieh, 2025; Pyle & Alaca, 2016). Nevertheless, studies that foreground the voices of Indigenous children remain extremely rare, and their perspectives have largely been marginalized or unheard (Kaplun et al., 2016; Trudgett & Grace, 2011). Given that the teachers in this Indigenous preschool sought to sustain Indigenous culture through their pedagogical approaches, it was particularly important to explore how children themselves perceived and interpreted their experiences of school and family life. Accordingly, this study addressed the following research questions: (1) What culturally responsive teaching practices were implemented in an Indigenous preschool, including the integration of Indigenous knowledge into the curriculum, collaborative partnerships between teachers and parents, and the incorporation of Indigenous languages and multiliteracies into curricular activities? (2) What were Indigenous children’s childhood experiences, as expressed through their perspectives on preschool and family contexts? The conceptual framework of this study consists of two key components. The first emphasizes the centrality of Indigenous cultural knowledge (Kitson & Bowes, 2010; Verron & Christie, 2007). Early childhood curricula for Indigenous children should be grounded in children’s lived experiences, perspectives, and ways of knowing, including knowledge derived from families and communities. Building trusting and collaborative relationships with parents, as well as integrating Indigenous languages and multiliteracies into the curriculum, are also essential (Kitson & Bowes, 2010; Long et al., 2013; Sisson et al., 2020). This component guided the analysis of culturally responsive curriculum practices. The second component emphasizes listening to children’s voices. Children actively construct their lived experiences and are capable of articulating them in meaningful ways (Freeman & Mathison, 2009). Clark (2017) further argues that children’s perspectives should be taken seriously and given due consideration. Attending to children’s voices enables educators to critically reflect on educational practices and enhance the quality of early childhood education. As Indigenous children constitute a minority group in Taiwanese society, their voices are often marginalized in educational research. By presenting a case of an Indigenous preschool that foregrounds Indigenous children’s perspectives, this study contributes to international discussions on culturally responsive pedagogy and children’s rights, aligning with European traditions in childhood studies that view children as social actors and uphold their right to participation and expression. Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used This study adopted a qualitative case study approach. The research site was a preschool located in a Northern Atayal community in Taiwan. The preschool consisted of a single mixed-age classroom staffed by two teachers. Owing to the abundance of natural resources surrounding the preschool and the fact that many parents were engaged in fruit cultivation and agricultural work, the teachers designed the curriculum with a focus on nature and food culture. In addition, the classroom was organized into several learning areas, including block play, language, dramatic play, cognitive games, and art, to support children’s free exploration. The primary participants in this study included two teachers, each with at least five years of teaching experience at the preschool; nine Atayal children; three parents; and one community elder. Ethical approval was obtained from the research ethics committee prior to data collection. All participants were fully informed of the research procedures and provided informed consent before the study commenced. Data were collected through multiple qualitative methods, including classroom observations, interviews with teachers, parents, and the community elder, and the collection of curriculum design documents. To elicit children’s perspectives, the researcher first asked parents to provide 8–10 photographs depicting their children’s everyday family lives. These photographs were used as prompts during child interviews. The children were invited to describe what was happening in the images, thereby offering insights into their family experiences. In addition, children were provided with cameras and invited to take photographs within the preschool to capture places they liked and to explain the reasons for their preferences. This participatory approach enabled the researcher to gain a deeper understanding of children’s school experiences. A total of 30 photographs taken by children were collected. The study also gathered children’s drawings based on themes such as “my family,” “my teacher,” “my favorite place at school,” “my favorite school activities,” and “Atayal cultural activities.” The children were encouraged to express the meanings beyond their art works. To respect children’s rights and agency, participation in each activity was entirely voluntary. Children were free to decide whether they wished to participate and to determine the duration of each interview. All interview data were transcribed verbatim. The researcher organized and coded the transcripts for each participant and conducted thematic analysis across the data sets. To enhance the credibility of the findings, member checking was conducted with the teachers to confirm the accuracy and interpretation of the data. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings The findings revealed that teachers strongly recognized the importance of sustaining Atayal culture. Accordingly, their culturally responsive curriculum was characterized by following children’s interests, integrating community resources, and actively involving parents. Teachers observed that children were particularly engaged in hands-on and highly interactive activities, such as outdoor exploration. In response, teachers collaborated with parents, community elders, wild-plant experts, and art teachers to draw on local resources and introduce children to the surrounding natural environment, including orchards and vegetable gardens. Through these experiences, children were guided to develop a deeper understanding of Atayal culture. To further enhance parental involvement, teachers invited parents to participate in cooking activities at the preschool. In addition, teachers incorporated simple Atayal language commands into daily routines, enabling children to engage with the Indigenous language in meaningful and everyday contexts. From the children’s perspectives, they particularly enjoyed learning experiences that emphasized interaction and active participation, which was consistent with teachers’ observations. Children perceived teachers not only as instructors, but also as companions and helpers, and they expressed a sense of comfort in seeking support from teachers. In terms of family life experiences, children described having large families with close kinship ties, reflecting key characteristics of Indigenous family culture. However, opportunities for children to participate in community-based cultural activities with their families were limited. Moreover, the children demonstrated an emerging sense of Indigenous identity (Guilfoyle et al., 2010). They understood that they were Indigenous and were able to recognize certain features of Atayal culture. Elements of Atayal culture frequently appeared in the children’s drawings and photographs, and the children were able to describe the meanings of these cultural symbols. Taken together, these findings suggest that in contexts where families have limited opportunities to sustain Atayal culture, culturally responsive curricula implemented in preschools play a necessary and critical role. References Brayboy, B. M. J., & Maughn, E. (2009). Indigenous knowledges and the story of the bean. Harvard Educational Review, 79(1), 1–21. Clark, A. (2017). Listening to young children: A guide to understanding and using the mosaic approach (3rd ed.). National Children’s Bureau. Durden, T., Escalante, R., & Blitch, E. (2015). Start with us! Culturally relevant pedagogy in the preschool classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 43(3), 223–232. Guilfoyle, A., Saggers, S., Sims, M., & Hutchins, T. (2010). Culturally strong childcare programs for Indigenous children, families and communities. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 35(3), 68-76. Hsieh, M. F. (2025). ‘This is my favorite book’: Exploring children’s perspectives on books and reading. Early Childhood Education Journal, 53, 489-505. Long, S., Volk, D., Baines, J., & Tisdale, C. (2013). “We’ve been doing it your way long enough”: Syncretism as a critical process. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 13, 418–439. Kaplun, C., Knight, J., Grace, R., Dockett, S., Perry, B., Comino, E., & Kemp, L. (2016). Gudaga goes to school study: Methods used in understanding school transitions and early education experiences of an urban Aboriginal cohort. Educational Studies, 42(1), 54-71. Kitson, R., & Bowes, J. (2010). Incorporating Indigenous ways of knowing in early education for Indigenous children. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 35(4), 81-89. Ngyuen, M. (2011). Closing the Education Gap: A Case for Aboriginal Early Childhood Education in Canada, A Look at the Aboriginal Headstart Program. Canadian Journal of Education, 34(3), 229-248. Sisson, J. H., Whitington, V., & Shin, A. M. (2020). “Teaching culture through culture”: A case study of culturally responsive pedagogies in an Australian early childhood/primary context. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 34(1), 108-126. Sleeter, C. (2011). An agenda to strengthen culturally responsive pedagogy. English Teaching, 10 (2), 7–23. Trudgett, M., & Grace, R. (2011). Engaging with early childhood education and care services: The perspectives of Indigenous Australian mothers and their young children. Kulumun. Indigenous Online Journal, 1, 15-36. | ||
