Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 19th Aug 2026, 21:28:49 EET
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | ||
04 SES 14 D: European and International Perspectives on Inclusive Education
Paper Session | ||
    | ||
04. Inclusive Education
Paper Panel Discussion Theme Description: Inclusive Education in European and International Contexts Nazarbayev Intellectual Schools, Turkestan Presenting Author:Panel Discussion Theme Description: Inclusive Education in European and International Contexts This panel discussion focuses on inclusive education as a key priority in contemporary European and international educational agendas. Inclusive education aims to ensure equitable access, participation, and learning outcomes for all learners, particularly those from marginalized or underrepresented groups, including students with disabilities, linguistic minorities, migrants, and learners from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds. Despite strong policy commitments across Europe and globally, significant gaps remain between inclusive education principles and their practical implementation. This panel seeks to critically examine these gaps through comparative and interdisciplinary perspectives. The panel is guided by the following research questions:
The discussion is grounded in a multi-layered theoretical framework drawing on inclusive pedagogy theory, social justice theory, and the capability approach. Inclusive pedagogy theory emphasizes teaching strategies that respond to learner diversity without marginalization. Social justice theory provides a normative lens for examining equity, participation, and redistribution within education systems. The capability approach, as developed by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum, enables analysis of how educational structures expand or restrict learners’ real opportunities to achieve valued outcomes. Together, these frameworks support a critical examination of inclusive education beyond access, focusing on participation, agency, and educational quality. In terms of methodological approach, the panel adopts a comparative and mixed-methods perspective. Contributions draw on qualitative research, including case studies of inclusive school practices, policy document analysis, and interviews with educators, school leaders, and policymakers. Quantitative evidence from international datasets, such as cross-national surveys and European monitoring reports, is also incorporated to identify broader patterns and trends. This methodological diversity facilitates cross-country comparison and enables reflection on how inclusive education policies are shaped by national contexts while influenced by international frameworks. The intended purpose of the panel is threefold. First, it aims to critically assess the current state of inclusive education by bridging theory, policy, and practice. Second, it seeks to identify effective strategies and transferable lessons that can inform educational reforms at both national and European levels. Third, the panel aspires to foster dialogue and collaboration among researchers, practitioners, and policymakers, encouraging the co-construction of inclusive solutions that are contextually responsive and internationally informed. The European and international dimension is central to the panel’s contribution. European policy initiatives, such as the European Education Area and the Council of Europe’s commitments to equity and human rights, provide a shared framework for inclusive education while allowing for national diversity. By situating European experiences alongside international perspectives, the panel highlights both common challenges and innovative practices across regions. This transnational dialogue strengthens understanding of inclusive education as a global concern that requires coordinated, evidence-based, and ethically grounded responses. Overall, the panel offers a critical and forward-looking exploration of inclusive education, emphasizing the importance of equity, collaboration, and international exchange in shaping more inclusive education systems. Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used The panel adopts a comparative, mixed-methods methodological approach to examine inclusive education across European and international contexts. This approach enables the integration of empirical evidence with theoretical analysis, allowing for a nuanced understanding of how inclusive education policies and practices are developed, implemented, and experienced in diverse settings. Qualitative methods form a central component of the panel. These include comparative case studies of inclusive education initiatives in selected European countries and non-European contexts, focusing on policy implementation, school-level practices, and stakeholder experiences. Policy document analysis is employed to examine national education strategies, legislative frameworks, and international policy instruments related to inclusive education, such as European Union policy communications and international conventions. In addition, semi-structured interviews with educators, school leaders, policymakers, and support professionals provide in-depth insights into the opportunities and challenges of inclusive education in practice. Quantitative data sources complement the qualitative findings and support cross-national comparison. These include secondary analysis of international and European datasets, such as large-scale surveys, monitoring reports, and statistical indicators on participation, access, and learning outcomes of diverse learner groups. Where applicable, descriptive statistical analysis is used to identify trends, disparities, and patterns related to inclusive education across different education systems. The panel also draws on existing empirical studies and peer-reviewed research as key sources of evidence. This synthesis of prior research allows for critical reflection on methodological strengths, limitations, and gaps in the current knowledge base. Methodological triangulation across data sources and research instruments enhances the reliability and validity of the discussion. The panel discussion format itself serves as an interactive methodological space, enabling dialogue between different disciplinary perspectives and national contexts. Audience engagement is encouraged to reflect on methodological challenges, ethical considerations, and future research directions in inclusive education research. Overall, this methodological approach supports evidence-informed, comparative, and internationally relevant insights into inclusive education. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings The panel is expected to generate a set of conceptual, empirical, and practical outcomes that contribute to current debates on inclusive education in European and international contexts. While recognizing the diversity of education systems and socio-cultural conditions, the discussion is anticipated to reveal common structural challenges in the implementation of inclusive education, including gaps between policy commitments and classroom practices, insufficient professional support for educators, and persistent inequalities affecting marginalized learner groups. At a conceptual level, the panel is expected to refine understandings of inclusive education by integrating perspectives from inclusive pedagogy, social justice theory, and the capability approach. This theoretical synthesis is likely to highlight the importance of moving beyond access-focused interpretations of inclusion toward approaches that emphasize meaningful participation, learner agency, and educational quality. Empirically, comparative analysis across European and international cases is expected to identify patterns of effective inclusive practices, such as collaborative teaching models, whole-school approaches, and multi-agency support structures. At the same time, the findings are likely to demonstrate how contextual factors—such as national policy frameworks, resource allocation, and cultural attitudes toward diversity—shape the success or limitations of inclusive education initiatives. In terms of practical outcomes, the panel aims to formulate evidence-informed recommendations for policymakers, educational leaders, and practitioners. These recommendations are expected to support the design of inclusive education strategies that are flexible, context-sensitive, and aligned with European and international human rights commitments. Additionally, the panel is expected to stimulate future research collaboration by identifying methodological gaps and shared research priorities across countries. Overall, the panel’s conclusions are anticipated to underscore the value of European and international cooperation in advancing inclusive education and to contribute to the development of more equitable, sustainable, and learner-centered education systems. References Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. Ainscow, M., Booth, T., & Dyson, A. (2006). Improving schools, developing inclusion. Routledge. Council of the European Union. (2018). Council Recommendation on promoting common values, inclusive education, and the European dimension of teaching. Official Journal of the European Union. European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. (2017). Raising the achievement of all learners in inclusive education. Odense, Denmark. European Commission. (2020). Achieving the European Education Area by 2025. Brussels. Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(4), 365–379. Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press. OECD. (2012). Equity and quality in education: Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. OECD Publishing. OECD. (2023). Education at a glance. OECD Publishing. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press. Slee, R. (2018). Inclusive education isn’t dead, it just smells funny. Routledge. UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report: Inclusion and education – All means all. Paris: UNESCO. United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. United Nations. 04. Inclusive Education
Paper Inclusive Support on School Placement for Pre-service Student Teachers with Disabilities: A European Perspective University of Limerick, Ireland, Ireland Presenting Author:This paper examines how disability related support is organised, enacted, and constrained within school placement, a core and high stakes component of initial teacher education. Rather than focusing on individual beliefs or identities, the analysis examines organisational arrangements, support structures, and coordination mechanisms, framing inclusion as a design and implementation issue at organisational level. School placement emerges as a critical site where rights-based commitments to inclusion are either realised or diluted through fragmented provision across higher education institutions and schools (European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education, 2012). The paper argues that inclusion during placement should be understood as a systemic and organisational issue rather than an individual accommodation problem (OECD, 2012). The analysis is guided by the following research question, how is responsibility for disability related support during school placement understood and enacted across institutional boundaries in initial teacher education, and what conditions enable or constrain inclusive practice in this space. The study is grounded in a social model of disability, shifting attention away from individual deficit towards the relational, organisational, and structural conditions that produce disabling practices (Danforth et al., 2016). This is complemented by third space theory, which conceptualises school placement as a boundary space where professional roles, responsibilities, and forms of expertise overlap but are not always coherently aligned (Bhabha, 2004). Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used Drawing on qualitative interview data and quantitative survey data generated with disability support services and external school placement tutors, the paper examines how inclusion is interpreted and operationalised through everyday support practices, communication routines, and accountability arrangements. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings Findings indicate that fragmentation does not arise from resistance to inclusion, but from organisational conditions that obscure responsibility and limit collective action. Unclear role boundaries, confidentiality requirements, time pressures, and competing institutional priorities contribute to uneven and contingent support practices. As a result, inclusion is frequently individualised and negotiated on a case-by-case basis, reinforcing disabling conditions within school placement rather than addressing them systemically. The paper contributes to inclusive education research by conceptualising school placement as a boundary space, where policy intentions are mediated through organisational practice, highlighting the need for clearer structures, shared responsibility, and coordinated support to enable genuinely inclusive initial teacher education across European contexts. References Bhabha, H. K. (2004). The location of culture. Routledge. Danforth, S., Gabel, S. L., Cosier, M., & Ashby, C. (Eds.). (2016). Disability studies meets teaching and teacher education. Peter Lang. European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. (2012). Teacher education for inclusion across Europe: Challenges and opportunities (Synthesis report). https://www.european-agency.org/resources/publications/teacher-education-inclusion-across-europe-challenges-and-opportunities European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. (2018). European agency statistics on inclusive education: Key findings. https://www.european-agency.org/news/easie-key-findings Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). Equity and quality in education: Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264130852-en | ||