Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 19th Aug 2026, 20:17:40 EET
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | ||
00 SES 0.5 WS B: (NW 24) From Eye Movements to Instructional Design
Tuesday Morning Workshop - no registration required
| ||
| Presentations | ||
00. Central & EERA Sessions
Research Workshop From Eye Movements to Instructional Design 1: HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Netherlands, The; 2: Heidelberg University of Education; 3: The University of Education Freiburg; 4: HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht; 5: The University of Education Schwäbisch Gmünd Presenting Author:Bring a Laptop Many students experience difficulties when interpreting statistical graphs that are not easily identifiable from written answers alone. As a result, these misinterpretations may remain unnoticed in traditional assessment formats. Eye-tracking research offers a way to complement such data sources by providing additional insight into how students visually engage with graphs while reasoning. Recent studies (Abt et al., 2025; Boels et al., 2025; Schreiter & Vogel, 2025) have shown that students’ conceptions and difficulties when interpreting statistical graphs are reflected in their gaze behaviour. By combining gaze data with students’ verbal explanations, eye-tracking vignettes make it possible to analyse how students attend to and integrate different elements of a graph when constructing an interpretation. In this way, the combination of visual and verbal data can support a more fine-grained understanding of students’ reasoning processes (Dvir & Ben-Zvi, 2023). However, such process-oriented data are rarely translated into formats that are meaningful and usable for teacher education. The Eye Teach Stats project addresses this gap by developing eye-tracking vignettes that combine students’ answers, verbal explanations, and eye-movement data to support teachers in diagnosing students’ misinterpretations. These vignettes present authentic scenes from educational practice and offer opportunities for analysis and reflection without the pressure to act (Rutsch et al., 2018). They are designed to support the development of teachers’ diagnostic competence by focusing on how students’ systematic errors and underlying conceptual difficulties can be identified and interpreted when working with statistical graphs. This workshop introduces teacher educators and researchers to the use of eye-tracking vignettes as a tool to support teachers in diagnosing and dealing with misinterpretations of statistical graphs (i.e., dotplots, case-value plots, histograms, and boxplots) by taking a practice-oriented approach in which participants engage directly with eye-tracking vignettes to explore students’ reasoning processes. In the workshop, participants will first be introduced to the background of eye-tracking research in statistical graphs and its relevance for understanding students’ reasoning in the context of statistical graphs. The focus is not on technical aspects, but on how eye-movement data can be interpreted and used as a resource for professional learning. Participants will then work collaboratively with an example vignette. They will identify patterns in students’ reasoning and possible misinterpretations and discuss how these insights can inform instructional decisions. Finally, participants will connect their experiences with eye-tracking vignettes to their own contexts in teaching, teacher education, or research by reflecting on how eye-tracking vignettes can be integrated into their own practice and considering how this approach can be used across domains, such as mathematics and science, to explore students’ reasoning in different contexts. By the end of the workshop, participants will be familiar with the structure and use of eye-tracking vignettes, gain experience in analysing students’ reasoning using multiple data sources, and consider how this approach can be integrated into their own teaching, teacher education, or research contexts. Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used Requirements: participants need to bring a laptop or tablet. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings . References Abt, M., Loibl, K., Leuders, T., Van Dooren, W., & Reinhold, F. (2025). Understanding student errors in comparing data sets with boxplots. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-025-10387-z Boels, L., Bakker, A., Van Dooren, W., & Drijvers, P. (2025). Secondary school students’ strategies when interpreting histograms and case-value plots: An eye-tracking study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 118(3), 479–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10351-3 Dvir, M., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2023). Informal statistical models and modeling. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 25(1), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2021.1925842 Schreiter, S., & Vogel, M. (2025). Students’ local vs. global views of data distributions: A cross-grade-level analysis using eye-tracking. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10352-2 Rutsch, J., Rehm, M., Vogel, M., Seidenfuß, M., & Dörfler, T. (Hrsg.) (2018). Effektive Kompetenzdiagnose in der Lehrerbildung: Professionalisierungsprozesse angehender Lehrkräfte untersuchen. Wiesbaden: Springer. | ||
