Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 19th Aug 2026, 21:29:37 EET
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | ||
04 SES 06 E: How to Promote Inclusive Teaching Practices in HE: Piloting an Innovative Research Instrument Based the “Inclusivity Tips for CHARM-EU Educators” toolkit
Research Workshop | ||
| Presentations | ||
04. Inclusive Education
Research Workshop How to Promote Inclusive Teaching Practices in HE: Piloting an Innovative Research Instrument Based the “Inclusivity Tips for CHARM-EU Educators” toolkit 1: University of Pécs; 2: Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary //CHARM-EU Diversity, Equity, Inclusion Office Presenting Author:Topic During the research workshop, we address how European higher education institutions can move beyond deficit-based models of human diversity and disability toward inclusive, rights-based, and pedagogically sustainable frameworks (Varga et al., 2021; Gallagher et al., 2004; Pollack, 2009; Armstrong, 2011; Doyle, 2020) that support diverse learners, including students with disabilities and neurodivergent students (Bjarnason, 2004; Moriña et al., 2020; Goodall et al., 2024; Márquez-González et al., 2025). Our contribution is grounded in recent empirical research examining educators’ and students’ perceptions of inclusive teaching and assessment practices (Tószegi, 2023, 2024), using the Inclusivity Tips for CHARM-EU Educators toolkit developed within the CHARM-EU European University Alliance (Fazekas, 2021; Fazekas–Vinkovits, 2023). The workshop highlights the toolkit’s capacity to function as a scalable and transversal instrument that can be adapted across institutional, national, and disciplinary contexts within the European Higher Education Area. Research Questions
Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used Methodological Approach Empirically, the workshop builds on mixed-method research conducted within a European university context, involving the adaptation and application of the CHARM-EU Inclusivity Tips as a research instrument. Quantitative data were collected through open and closed questions, including Likert-scale questionnaires completed by educators and students, complemented by qualitative insights from open-ended responses. The methodology includes cross-group comparison and scale validation, linking educator self-reflection with student perceptions of institutional inclusivity. The educator questionnaire consisted of 55 items organised under eight thematic pillars and was completed by lecturers at the University of Pécs (N = 108). Most items were evaluated using a Likert scale, supplemented by two multiple-choice questions and one open-ended question. Student responses were analysed using Likert-scale items embedded in the EBAV (University Acceptance Opinion Scale), validated in Hungarian as a student assessment tool (Losada Puente et al., 2021), based on the Index for Inclusion (Booth & Ainscow, 2002). The shared European toolkit enables methodological comparability, transferability, and scalability. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings The workshop is expected to confirm that advancing inclusive higher education requires a shift away from deficit-based and narrowly defined accommodation models toward systemic, rights-based, and pedagogically sustainable approaches aligned with human rights and biopsychosocial models of disability. Inclusion emerges as a dynamic and continuous process that must be embedded in everyday teaching, assessment, and institutional practices rather than treated as an exceptional or individualised response. The empirical findings discussed are expected to reveal a recurring gap between educators’ and students’ positive attitudes toward inclusivity and the practical implementation of inclusive teaching and assessment strategies. While awareness of diversity and inclusion is generally high, limited experience and structural constraints often hinder the consistent application of inclusive pedagogical practices. These findings underline the importance of structured reflection tools that support educators in translating inclusive principles into concrete action. A central outcome of the workshop is the validation of the Inclusivity Tips for CHARM-EU Educators as a scalable, transversal instrument for inclusive development in European higher education. The research demonstrates that the toolkit can be successfully adapted across institutional, linguistic, and national contexts while maintaining methodological comparability. Beyond individual self-reflection, the toolkit shows potential as a shared European framework for professional development, institutional learning, and quality enhancement. Finally, the workshop highlights the alignment of the CHARM-EU Inclusivity Tips with Universal Design for Learning principles as a viable pathway for moving from individual accommodations toward proactive learning environments that benefit diverse student populations. By situating local empirical findings within a European alliance context, the workshop reinforces inclusion as a shared European responsibility. It contributes transferable insights to support evidence-informed institutional change across the European Higher Education Area. References Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2002). Index for inclusion: developing learning and participation in schools. Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education (CSIE) Bracken, S. & Novak, K. (2019). Transforming Higher Education Through Universal Design for Learning. An International Perspective. Routledge. Dolmage, J. T. (2017). Academic Ableism: Disability & Higher Education. University of Michigan Press Doyle, N. (2020). Neurodiversity at work: A biopsychosocial model and the impact on working adults. British Medical Bulletin 135(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldaa021 Gallagher, D. J.; Heshusius, L., Iano, R. P. and Skrtic, T. M.(2003) Challenging orthodoxy in special education: dissenting voices. Denver, Colorado: Love Publishing. Goodall, G., Hardonk, S., Mjøen, O. M., Witsø, A. E., Horghagen, S., Flatholm, M. L., & Kvam, L. (2024). Disability and the transition from higher education to employment: Exploring attitudes among Norwegian frontline workers towards work inclusion. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 61(3), 392-409. Fazekas, Á. S. (2021). Inclusive Education. In CHARM-EU Pedagogical Guidelines: Theoretical Background to the CHARM-EU Educational Principles. European University Alliance. Fazekas-Vinkovits, Á. S. (2023). A zümmögő szavak és ami mögöttük rejlik: Befogadás és sokszínűség érvényesítése a CHARM-EU Európai Egyetemi Szövetségben. Fogyatékosság és társadalom : a fogyatékosságtudomány és a gyógypedagógia folyóirata, 2023(1), 62–79. https://epa.oszk.hu/04800/04858/00001/pdf/EPA04858_fogyatekossag_es_tarsadalom_2023_1_062-079.pdf Losada Puente, L., Fiuza Asorey, M. & Baña Castro, M. (2021). What Defines Inclusion in Higher Education Institutions? Validation of an Instrument Based on the ‘Index for Inclusion’. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 69(1), 91-105. DOI: 10.1080/1034912X.2021.1992752 Márquez-González, L. M., Martínez-Murciano, M. C., Olmos-Raya, E., & Pérez-Jorge, D. (2025, July). The response to disability in higher education: an analysis of programs and services for people with disabilities: the case of the University of La Laguna. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 10, p. 1561841). Frontiers Media SA. Moriña, A., Perera, V. H., & Carballo, R. (2020). Training needs of academics on inclusive education and disability. SAGE open, 10(3), 2158244020962758. Rose, D. H., Meyer, A., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and Practice. CAST Professional Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282236.n30 Tószegi, Z. J. (2023). Neurodivergens hallgatók a felsőoktatásban. In EDUCATIO 32:4 pp. 677-687. Tószegi, Z. J. (2024). Út az inkluzív kiválóság felé – speciális szükségletű, köztük neurodivergens hallgatók szolgálatában: Vizsgálódás az inklúzió egy folyamatelvű modellje mentén a Pécsi Tudományegyetemen (2010-2024), valamint nemyetközi partnerintézmények gyakorlatainak tükrében. PTE BTK Oktatás és Társadalom Neveléstudományi Doktori Iskola. Varga, A., Vitéz, K., Orsós, I., Fodor, B. & Horváth, G. (2021). Diversity and Inclusion in Higher Education. Képzés és Gyakorlat, 19(1-2), 70-8. https://doi.org/10.17165/TP.2021.1-2.7 | ||
