Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | ||
Vid and Strming Pltfrms-1: The next generation of video media and the next generation of regulation: the policy and regulatory scenarios, how and by whom?
| ||
| Presentations | ||
The next generation of video media and the next generation of regulation: the policy and regulatory scenarios, how and by whom? Columbia University, United States of America The next generation of video media and the next generation of regulation: the policy and regulatory scenarios, how and by whom? Reviewing the toolsets and the institutions. This is a continuation of extensive work by the author on next-generation video media and their impact on the wider digital environment. The main research question for the paper is a 3-step:
Video traffic accounts for 82% of all global internet traffic. YouTube and Netflix alone account for almost a third of Internet traffic. Given those magnitudes it is important to analyze:
This paper will take recent work by the author a step forward by looking at the regulatory remedies that are likely— the options and their advantages and drawbacks. The first question is about investments. It requires projections of data flows for a widespread next-gen video system, the expansion, in percentage, of today’s networks, and the implication on enduser prices, and in turn affordability and constraints on buildouts. This part of the paper will be data-driven, based on processing and transmission needs for an upgraded video. The methodology will be that of network engineering and network economics. The second question is about regulation. Given that these developments will happen – the only question is only how soon—it is important to be prepared to explore the likely regulatory options: antitrust remedies; national content quotas; access requirements; subsidies; public service media; requirements on platforms and data centers; and more. Some of this echoes traditional issues, but there are new ones and new variations. And the next question then is by what kind of institutions such regulation would be handled, nationally and globally. For this segment, the methodology is that of regulatory economics and law. The discussion will review each option and analyze it. The provisional conclusion is that infrastructure investments are extensive, especially in the processing, and will significantly lag for low density areas and poor countries; that the trend towards concentration will increase significantly and expand globally; and that regulatory policies need to be thought through rapidly in order not to be overwhelmed by predictable problems. Exploring the next generation of video infrastructure issues is novel and forward looking. I will add a research agenda for the TPRC community to consider for their future work. Related Literature Zvezdan Vukanovic, TV and AI Author, on next-generation video Herman Narulla, Virtual Society Lee Rainie, The Metaverse in 2040 Melissa Haikkila, Six ways we can regulate AI
| ||
