Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 15th Sept 2026, 10:37:47am EEST
External resources will be made available 5 min before a session starts. You may have to reload the page to access the resources.
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
STE PS_B6: Special Session KICK 4.0 1/2 Location: Room U I6 Session Chair: Claudius Terkowsky, TU Dortmund University Session Chair: Johannes Kubasch, University of Wuppertal Session Chair: Nils Kaufhold, TU Dortmund University Special Session: Exploring Human–AI Collaboration in Cross-Reality Laboratories: From Opportunities to Risks – and Back Again (Kick 4.0) | |
| Presentation 2 | |
9:18am - 9:36am
Redesigning a Problem-Based Wind Channel Laboratory with AI and AR Support: An Evaluation of Learning Effectiveness and AI Literacy TU Dortmund University, Germany The rapid diffusion of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) has intensified the need to foster AI literacy in higher education. Although students frequently use AI tools, their ability to apply them critically and purposefully remains limited, underscoring the relevance of instructional formats that integrate structured AI use. This study examines the rede-sign of a bachelor-level wind channel laboratory in chemical engineering. The traditional cook-book-style experiment was converted into a problem-based learning (PBL) format aligned with the SOLO taxonomy and the European Commission/OECD AI literacy framework. In the revised structure, students autonomously engage with theoretical content, select one of two problem scenarios, and use LLMs for planning, conceptual understanding, data interpretation, and reflec-tion. Pre- and post-tests, motivation and technology acceptance questionnaires, and an instrument on generative AI use were employed. Qualitative results indicate increased student autonomy, deeper engagement with aerodynamic concepts, and improved efficiency compared to the in the years 2024 implementation. Students used LLMs across the first three AI literacy domains engag-ing, creating, and managing consistent with the laboratory’s intended learning outcomes. Supervi-sors observed higher motivation and more purposeful inquiry, while the restructured script re-duced time pressure and improved clarity. | |
