Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 15th Sept 2026, 10:38:34am EEST
External resources will be made available 5 min before a session starts. You may have to reload the page to access the resources.
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
STE PS_B7: Special Session KICK 4.0 2/2 Location: Room U I6 Session Chair: Claudius Terkowsky, TU Dortmund University Session Chair: Johannes Kubasch, University of Wuppertal Session Chair: Nils Kaufhold, TU Dortmund University Special Session: Exploring Human–AI Collaboration in Cross-Reality Laboratories: From Opportunities to Risks – and Back Again (Kick 4.0) | |
| Presentation 5 | |
3:42pm - 4:00pm
Integrating LLMs and PINNs in a Computational Fluid Dynamics Course: AI Literacy, Cognitive Load, Effectiveness and Motivation in Remote Laboratories TU Dortmund, Germany This paper presents the integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) into a Computational Fluid Dy-namics course based on deep learning and constructive alignment. The course included a lecture and a computer laboratory, conducted via Jupyter-Hub.NRW, enabling students to access remote Python environments and hardware. A survey of 14 students revealed that LLMs, primarily ChatGPT, were used mostly for programming assistance and debugging, while support for mathematical and physical understanding or generating examples was moderate, and planning activities was rare. Exam results indicate that per-formance differences were driven by cognitive levels as defined by the SOLO taxonomy rather than by AI versus traditional content, suggesting lim-ited intrinsic motivation toward AI. Students actively engaged with three AI Literacy Framework domains—Engaging with AI, Creating with AI, and Managing AI—while the fourth, Designing AI, was addressed through hands-on PINN tasks in lectures and laboratories. These activities exceed secondary education expectations of the AI Framework and represent a tertiary-level deepening of AI Literacy competencies. The findings highlight how AI can support numerics education, enhance learning outcomes, and provide a framework for developing advanced competencies in designing and critically evaluating AI systems in higher education. | |
