Session 8.1: Methodology: Methodological gaps and ways forward (II)
Since its development, Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) has grown in maturity and is now a standalone methodology but it still faces a variety of methodological challenges. This session aims to address the methodological gaps in S-LCA and propose solutions and a way forward. Topics include social life cycle impact assessment, using S-LCA databases, software solutions to conduct S-LCA, and primary data collection. Presentations in this session aim to further the methodological development of S-LCA
Social impact categories for bioeconomy sectors: a particular focus on the subcategory “respect of indigenous rights
1UCD School of Biosystems and Food Engineering, University College Dublin, Ireland; 2BiOrbic, Bioeconomy SFI Research Centre
Social sustainability in the construction sector - the example of carbon reinforced concrete
RWTH Aachen University, Institute of Sustainability in Civil Engineering, Germany
The Life Cycle Initiative’s Ten Principles for LCSA: Review of case studies and perceived feasibility
1Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, ISM, UMR 5255, F-33400, Talence, France; 2World Resources Forum Association, Leuphana University of Luneburg, Luneburg, Germany.
Social and Environmental Impacts of Powering Electric Vehicles with Lithium-ion Batteries Studied Through Life Cycle Analysis.
1University of Iceland, Iceland; 2University of Twente, Netherlands
WEIGHTING METHODS FOR SELECTION OF SUBCATEGORIES IN SOCIAL LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT
1Universidade Federal Rural do Semi Arido, Brazil; 2Universidade Federal do Ceará, Brazil; 3Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Brazil
Identifying the social issues in SLCA: a bottom-up delphi-fuzzy approach.
1Federal University of Semiarid region, Brazil; 2Federal University of Technology – Paraná, Brazil; 3University of Calgary, Canada; 4Federal University of Ceará, Brazil