Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 15th June 2024, 02:28:45am IST

 
 
Session Overview
Session
P40.P1.CR: Paper Session
Time:
Tuesday, 09/Jan/2024:
9:00am - 10:30am

Location: Rm 3098

Trinity College Dublin Arts Building Capacity 16

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
ID: 367 / P40.P1.CR: 1
Crisis Response in Education Network
Individual Paper
Orientation of proposal: This contribution is mainly a practioner, policy maker or community member contribution.
ICSEI Congress Sub-theme: Ongoing system and school implications arising from the COVID-19 crisis

Relationships Between Teachers’ Instructional Leadership Practice With Students’ Thinking Styles And Attitude Towards E-Learning In Selected Secondary Schools In Kuala Lumpur

Norzetty Md Zahir1, Ahmad Najmuddin Azmi2, Chua Yan Piaw3, Loo Fung Ying4, Shahrizal Norwawi5

1MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, MALAYSIA; 2MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, MALAYSIA; 3UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA, K.LUMPUR, MALAYSIA; 4UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA, K. LUMPUR, MALAYSIA; 5MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, MALAYSIA

Abstract:

The Malaysian education system is in a transition from face-to-face classroom learning to e- learning. E-learning is fast becoming a common method of acquiring knowledge in a local and global environment. Nevertheless, given the inherent complexity of schools, instability during this on-going Covid-19 pandemic and increasing demands on students’ thinking skills, there is a growing importance attached to embed the e-learning in schools. As the frontliners during the recent Covid-19 pandemic the aspiration to arm the students with the 21st-century learning skills thereupon the systems aspirations in the Malaysia Education Blueprint (MEB) could be materialised became more prominent. Global research suggests that current Covid-19 crisis would change the relationship between teachers and their students within the e-learning platform. Current research, however, are largely focused on the expansion of higher order thinking skills and to-date, studies on the relationship of teachers' instructional leadership practices, students’ thinking skills and their attitude to e-learning are scarce. Thus, this study investigates the levels of students’ thinking styles and their attitudes towards e-learning. In this survey study, the data of this non- experimental design’s study will be collected by using three on-line questionnaires. The instruments use in this research are: (1) Teachers' Instructional Measurement Rating Scale (TIMRS) adapted from PIMRS (2) The Yan Piaw Creative Critical Styles Test (also known as YCREATIVE-CRITICALS) for measuring students’ creative and tcritical thinking skills and the last instrument is (3) Students’ Attitude Towards E-learning (SeTeL) to ascertain students’ attitude towards e- learning. Data will be analysed quantitatively using structural equation Modelling (SEM). The findings of the study will serve as an indicator for teachers in secondary schools to determine if instructional leadership is the best leadership style in increasing students' thinking styles and attitude toward e-learning. The study's findings would be useful for related educational institutions and bodies in developing teachers' leadership by encouraging the development of a more structured leadership curriculum for school teachers in general and sharing the implementation with other secondary schools across the country.

Besides, the expected outcome of this is study, which is to capture the instructional leadership practices among teachers in particular, that would contribute to school improvements. In other words, the findings would contribute to upskilling educational leaders who, at their best, would shape a wholistic future thinkers and leaders. The significance of the study is the contribution to instructional leadership practices enacted by the secondary school teachers and its contribution to the implementation of Higher Order Thinking Skills and e-learning among students in educational organisation within the purview of the Ministry Of Education. Finally, the findings of the study can be used as a reference in enhancing Malaysian secondary students’ thinking styles and their attitude towards e-learning for school effectiveness and improvement.

Keywords: Teachers' Instructional Leadership,Thinking styles, Attitude towards e-Learning, School Effectiveness and Improvement, Covid-19 pandemic

References
1) Chua, Y. P. (2004). Creative and critical thinking styles. Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.
2) Hallinger, P., Adams, D., Harris, A., & Jones, M. S. (2017). Review of conceptual models and methodologies in research on principal instructional leadership in Malaysia: A case of knowledge construction in a developing society. Journal of educational administration.
3) Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
4) Harris, a., Jones, M., Adams, D., & Cheah, K. (2019) Instructional leadership in Malaysia: A review of the contemporary literature. School Leadership & Management, 39(1), 76-95.
5) Hirsh, Å., & Segolsson, M. (2019). Enabling teacher-driven school-development and collaborative learning: An activity theory-based study of leadership as an overarching practice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(3), 400-420.
6) Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & Chen, G. D. (2007). An activity-theoretical approach to investigate learners’ factors toward e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1906-1920.
7) Ministry of Education (2012a). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya: National Printers.


ID: 431 / P40.P1.CR: 2
Crisis Response in Education Network
Individual Paper
Orientation of proposal: This contribution is mainly an academic research contribution.
ICSEI Congress Sub-theme: Ongoing system and school implications arising from the COVID-19 crisis

Preliminary Insights On The Potential Of Research-Practice Collaboration To Create Enabling Spaces For Collaborative Knowledge Creation With Young People in Schools In The Western Cape, South Africa

Magriet Cruywagen

University of Glasgow

The COVID-19 pandemic had a far-reaching effect on how children, young people, parents and teachers experience, and engage with, teaching, learning, schools and the education system. Many argue that the pandemic’s effects, which compounded the already present impacts of the 2008/09 financial crisis, climate change, the fourth industrial revolution and widespread polarisation, will be felt by young people well beyond the immediate crisis. Any exploration of the future of teaching, learning and education must factor in the interconnected challenges that these learning communities navigate if “the disconnect between decision making in complex systems and the lived experiences of people affected by those decisions” is to be closed (Scharmer 2018, p.140). Against this backdrop, this paper explores how a diversity of perspectives may be engaged through research-practice collaboration in reimagining the future of education.  

Nine out of ten young people in the world live in low- and middle-resource countries. This paper focuses on the experiences of young people, as well as the school communities they are part of, in the South African context, particularly in the Western Cape province and outlines aspects of an emergent, multi-level research-practice collaboration with four ordinary, fee-paying, public schools, two primary and two secondary schools, in the Metro East District of the Western Cape Education Department in the first half of the 2023 school year (January – June). 

The mode of delivery of the intervention at the core of the collaboration varied across the schools as the approach was adapted to fit each site’s contextual constraints and opportunities. However, a shared objective across the schools was to ensure that the intervention was offered to as many English-speaking Grade 7 or 9 students as possible and that the mode of delivery was organised to be as inclusive as possible.  

The intervention was developed as an embedded activity, with all schools opting to have it run during the school day, and as such the school leaders and staff were essential collaborators. The groups that participated in the intervention were guided through a series of exercises and activities that prompt individual, and collaborative reflection on their identity, how they see themselves as learners, their experiences of learning and the ways they make sense of, and engage with, learning spaces. 

Beyond merely recounting the narrative of a social researcher’s collaboration with two primary and two secondary schools this paper highlights key reflections about the potential of multi-level research-practice collaborations to foster enabling spaces for collaborative knowledge and value creation within schools, with a particular focus on the potential of collaboration with young people.

References
Chapman, C. and Bell, I. 2020. Building back better education systems: equity and COVID-19. Journal of Professional Capital and Community. Vol. 5 (3-4),227-236.
Educational International, 2020. Survey Report | Covid-19 and Education: How Education Unions are Responding. 6 May 2020. [Available here].
Enslin, P. 2003. Citizenship Education in Post-Apartheid South Africa. Cambridge Journal of Education. Vol. 33 (1), 173-83.
Greenhow, C., Lewin, C. and Staudt Willet, K.B. 2020. The educational response to Covid-19 across two countries: a critical examination of initial digital pedagogy adoption, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2020.1866654
Jansen, J and Farmer-Phillips, T. 2021. Teaching In and Beyond Pandemic Times.African Sun Media,SUN PReSS
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1smjn5p
Jansen, J and O’Ryan, E. 2020. LEARNING UNDER LOCKDOWN, voices of South Africa's children. CNA: Johannesburg. 
Hesse-Biber, S.N. 2017. The practice of qualitative research: engaging students in the research process, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Honey-Rosés J. et al. 2020. The impact of COVID-19 on public space: an early review of the emerging questions – design, perceptions and inequities. Cities & Health, DOI: 10.1080/23748834.2020.1780074
International Commission on the Futures of Education. 2020. Education in a post-COVID world: Nine ideas for public action. Paris, UNESCO.
Kaffenberger, M. 2021, Modeling the long-run learning impact of the COVID-19 learning shock: Actions to (more than) mitigate loss. International Journal of Educational Development. Vol. 81, 1-8.
Mundy, K. and Hares, S. 2020. Equity-Focused Approaches to Learning Loss during COVID-19. CGD Blog. 16 April 2020
Pascal, C. and Bertram, T. 2021. What do young children have to say? Recognising their voices, wisdom, agency and need for companionship during the COVID pandemic, European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, Vol. 29 (1), 21-34.
Peschl, M.F., and Fundneider, T. 2013. Theory-U and Emergent Innovation. Presencing as a method of bringing forth profoundly new knowledge and realities, MPRA Paper.
Peschl, M.F., and Fundneider, T. 2014. Designing and enabling interfaces for collaborative knowledge creation and innovation. From managing to enabling innovation as socio-epistemological technology. Computers and Human Behavior. Vol. 37, pp. 346–359.
Peschl, M.F., and Fundneider, T. 2014a. Why space matters for collaborative innovation networks. On designing enabling spaces for collaborative knowledge creation, International Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering (IJODE) Vol. 3, 3/4, pp. 358–391.
Peschl, M.F., and Fundneider, T. 2016. Design as Anticipation and Innovation. Co-creating a future by learning from the future as it emerges. 2016 Design Research Society 50th Anniversary Conference. 27-30 June 2016. Brighton, United Kingdom.
Scharmer, C.O. 2018. The essentials of Theory U. Core principles and applications. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Whalley, B., France, D., Park, J., Mauchline, A. and Welsh, K. 2021. Towards flexible personalized learning and the future educational system in the fourth industrial revolution in the wake of Covid-19. Higher Education Pedagogies, Vol. 6 (1), 79-99.
World Economic Forum. 2020. A Global Framework for Youth Mental Health: Investing in Future Mental Capital for Individuals, Communities and Economies. May 2020.
World Economic Forum. 2020a. Appendix B: Global Risks Perception Survey and Methodology. In: The Global Risks Report 2020.
World Economic Forum. 2021. The Global Risks Report 2021. 16th Edition. 
Zeller-Berkman, S., Barreto, J. and Sandler, A. 2020. Amplifying Action: Theories, Questions, Doubts, and Hopes Related to the “Action” Phase of a Critical Participatory Action Research Process. Harvard Educational Review. Vol. 90 (2). Summer 2020.


ID: 345 / P40.P1.CR: 3
Crisis Response in Education Network
Individual Paper
Orientation of proposal: This contribution is mainly an academic research contribution.
ICSEI Congress Sub-theme: Leading schools and education systems that promote equity, inclusion, belonging, diversity, social justice, global citizenship and/ or environmental sustainability

Social Justice Imperatives for Undocumented Immigrant Students: Equitable Practices and Inclusive Leadership

Karen Ramlackhan

University of South Florida, United States of America

There has been an increase in the past few decades in the number of international migrants worldwide. Critical crises such as political instability, economic uncertainty, and safety contribute, as seen in recent events in Afghanistan, Ukraine, Haiti, and in the Americas. Migration politics remains contentious in the United States, especially with undocumented immigrants. There are over 10.5 million undocumented immigrants (Krogstad et al, 2019). This population has remained steady since 2008 with the majority from Mexico, however, there is an increasing number from Asian and Central American countries (Capps et al, 2020).

The politics of the US has shaped educational policies, practices, experiences, and post-secondary trajectories of undocumented students. These children have the right to attend a public school in the U.S. until twelfth grade, so schools have the responsibility to provide protected spaces for them (Gonzales, 2011). Fear of deportation, family separation and immigration raids on communities also impact schooling (Ee & Gándara, 2019). Research indicates that undocumented status of children and/or their parent is associated with higher levels of anxiety and depression during adolescence and fewer years of schooling (Yoshikawa et al, 2013), decreases in academic achievement, and bullying (Bellows, 2019; Nienhusser & Oshio, 2019). School leaders, administrators, and educators must understand immigration policies and its impact on students’ lives (Dabach, 2015), families and communities, and develop an awareness for advocacy (Mangual Figueroa, 2017).

Principals’ awareness of the impact legal status has on children and families may lead to decision making processes and practices that create cultures of belonging and care in schools (Jaffe-Walter et al, 2019) and assist with access to resources such as for university or legal counsel (Jefferies, 2014). Without administrative supports, students may feel worried and unsafe to discuss immigration status (Kam, et. al, 2018). Therefore, necessitated is collective leadership that consists of various personnel, including educators and parents, with relevant expertise for problem solving and collaboration (Leithwood & Mascall, 2008).

This study explored the lived and educational experiences of undocumented students at the intersection of public education and immigration policy. The research questions were: 1. How do undocumented students address challenges in educational contexts? 2. What are the contextual dynamics that contribute to the barriers experienced and how are these addressed? In this qualitative study, participants were recent high school graduates who are undocumented and/or lived in mixed status families. Information was garnered from these data sources: recorded semi-structured interviews, content analysis of related documents, and journal reflections. Thematic analysis yielded the following themes, 1. Relations of power and trust, 2. Mechanisms of equity and inclusion 3. Empowerment of educators and students. Each of these themes were discussed within the extant research and through the frameworks of collective leadership and culturally responsive and sustaining practices. It is important to understand how politics, policies and practices shape the experiences and postsecondary trajectories of undocumented students. This multifaceted analysis at the intersection of immigration policy and education praxis unearths inquiries to be addressed for educational research in relation to interrogation of systems and structures whereupon injustice functions.

References
Bellows, L. (2019). Immigration enforcement and student achievement in the wake of
secure communities. AERA Open, 5(4), 1-20.

Capps, R., Gelatt, J., Soto, A., and Van Hook, J. (2020). Unauthorized Immigrants in the United States: Stable Numbers, Changing Origins. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.

Dabach, D. B. (2015). "My student was apprehended by immigration": A civics teacher’s breach of silence in a mixed-citizenship classroom. Harvard Educational Review, 85(3), 383-412.

Ee, J., & Gándara, P. (2019). The Impact of Immigration Enforcement on the Nation’s
Schools. American Educational Research Journal, 1-32.

Gonzales, R. G. (2011). Learning to be illegal: Undocumented youth and shifting legal
contexts in the transition to adulthood. American Sociological Review, 76 (4),
602-619.

Jaffe-Walter, R. (2018). Leading in the Context of Immigration: Cultivative Collective
Responsibility for Recently Arrived Immigrant Students. Theory into Practice, 57, 147-153.

Jefferies J. (2014). Fear of Deportation in High School: Implications for Breaking the Circle of Silence Surrounding Migration Status. Journal of Latinos and Education, 13, 278-295.

Kam, J.A., Gasiorek, J., Pines, R., & Steuber Fazio, K. (2018). Latina/o Adolescents’ Family Undocumented-Status Disclosures Directed at School Counselors: A Latent Transition Analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 65(3), 267-279.

Krogstad, J.M., Passel, J.S., & Cohn, D. (2019, June 12). 5 facts about illegal immigration in the U.S. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/06/12/5-facts-aboutillegal-immigration-in-the-u-s/

Leithwood, K., & Mascall, B. (2008). Collective Leadership Effects on Student
Achievement. Educational Administrative Quarterly, 44(4), 529-561.

Mangual Figueroa, A. (2017). Speech or silence: Undocumented students’ decisions to reveal their citizenship status in school. American Educational Research Journal. 54(3), 485-523.

Nienhusser, H.K. & Oshio, T. (2019). Awakened hatred and heightened fears: “The
Trump Effect” on the lives of mixed-status families. Cultural Studies > Critical
Methodologies, 19(3), 173-183.

Yoshikawa, H. & Kholoptseva, J. (2013). Unauthorized Immigrant Parents and Their Children’s Development: A Summary of the Evidence. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: ICSEI 2024
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.150+TC
© 2001–2024 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany