Preliminary Conference Agenda

档案、图书等文献资源因在跨时空传播历程中不断地被解构与重构而动态地、多重地参与人类记忆构建。本文借助记忆理论，深度解析文献资源参与记忆建构的层次、维度、系统，进而设计包含面向个体记忆解构、面向社会记忆重塑、面向文化记忆凝聚三个渐进、共生的文献资源语义组织模型，并结合文献单元的结构与特征，逐层阐释信息采集加工、数据关联发现、知识聚合服务的语义组织实现过程。在此基础上，选取青岛早期工人运动文献进行实证研究，论证语义内容集成、语义内外关联、语义多维增值的步骤，探索面向记忆建构的文献资源语义组织具体实现路径。

随着元宇宙、AIGC等新兴技术的发展与应用，文化遗产资源创新活化的内容与形式得到了积极的拓展与丰富，文化资源馆藏机构需要在新型服务模式下重构资源开放保障措施，以更好应对不同场景下资源开放与利用的服务需求。本文遵循扎根理论研究方法的指导原则和研究过程，对12家海外博物馆的政策文本进行深入分析后提炼出博物馆数字资源开放框架，从利益相关者、权利与责任以及适用范围入手考察了博物馆数字资源开放获取的政策构成，使用其他12家海外代表性博物馆进行理论饱和度检验，通过对24家海外博物馆的政策分析发现博物馆重视开放授权环节，但质量较低、数字化不完善等因素限制了开放效果的提升与优化空间。研究针对传统服务模式下GLAM机构的数字资源开放获取过程搭建了参与主体与开放因素框架，并对博物馆文化遗产资源开放的现实状况进行了分析阐释，为文化遗产资源活化利用提供参考与借鉴。

The development of archival documentary heritage is related to the realization of its own historical, cultural and social values. This study follows a logical sequence from theoretical analysis to empirical research. In the theoretical analysis section, we analyze the motivation for the development of digital narratives of archival documentary heritage from the aspects of policy, technology and media. In the empirical research section, after researching the current situation of the development of archival documentary heritage in China, we found that most archival institutions have the problems of a single narrative approach, lack of narrative technology, unsound narrative standards, and lack of publicity and promotion in the process of developing digital narrativization of archival documentary heritage. Subsequently, this study proposes four optimization strategies for the development of archival documentary heritage, namely, optimization of narrative mode, synthesis of narrative tools, unification of narrative standard, and enhancement of publicity and promotion, and constructs a narrative framework for the development of archival documentary heritage based on the digital narrative theory, which explains the objectives of the organization of archival information, mining of archival content, and visualization of results in the process of the development of archival documentary heritage, and provides a clear explanation for the development of digital narrative. The framework explains the organization of archival information, the mining of archival content and the visualization of results in the process of archival documentary heritage development, and provides feasible suggestions for the application of digital narrative to archival documentary heritage development.

【目的／意义】发展我国网络档案信息资源建设，构建统一行动框架是推进数字中国建设战略的重要举措之一。【方法／过程】基于全球代表性实践展开调查与分析，梳理不同类型的网络档案信息资源建设实践及其要素，使用文本分析方法构建总结性行动框架，后基于要点、问题讨论我国行动框架的更优设计。【结果／结论】框架内容依托建设主体、建设对象、建设过程、建设成果、建设保障五大要素及其相互关系来呈现。我国实践可在遵循框架核心要点的基础之上，面向不足展开更优设计。核心要点包括：加强多元主体协作；完整识别对象的主题和来源属性；以开发基础设施级数据服务为建设导向。同时，也需结合不足与最新理论、实践从发展广泛多元的实践基础，紧跟技术与社会演变升级策略，变革建设思想与理论三个方面升级框架设计。

This study seeks to unravel the connotations and influencing factors of nonprofit utilization of digital resources of ancient books in preservation institutions, laying a solid foundation for enhancing the efficacy of ancient book digital resource services. Interviews were conducted with three sets of audiences: the providers of ancient book digital resources, the users, and policy makers. Integrating the grounded coding results, the 3E theory, and the MOA framework, we defined the essence of nonprofit utilization of digital resources of ancient books and established a theoretical framework for its influencing factors. We discovered that the concept can be decomposed into three dimensions: economy, effectiveness and efficiency. The influencing factors' theoretical framework covers eight dimensions, namely digital platform, database resources, staff, management, funding, technology, users, and macro-environment. This encompasses 20 main categories such as data structure, institutional design, and staff philosophy, involving three mechanisms of operation: drivers, opportunities, and abilities.