Modeling single crystal plasticity is essential for understanding the behavior of polycrystalline materials such as metals and alloys. The mechanical properties of such materials depend on the microstructure of individual grains and their interaction through grain boundaries. Single crystal plasticity aims to model the behavior of an individual grain based on the microscopic lattice structure. It can be expressed mathematically using the concept of multisurface plasticity. Applying the principle of maximum plastic dissipation leads to an optimization problem where the individual slip systems of the crystal, represented by yield criteria, define the constraints of the optimization problem.
In the framework of rate-independent crystal plasticity models, the set of active slip systems is possibly non-unique, which makes the algorithmic treatment challenging. Typical approaches are either based on an active set search using various regularization techniques [3] or simplifying the problem in such a way that it becomes unique [1]. In computationally extensive simulations, the problem needs to be evaluated multiple times. Therefore, a stable, robust, and efficient algorithm is required to obtain satisfactory results.
Recently, an alternative strategy based on the infeasible primal-dual interior point method (IPDIPM [2] has been presented in [4], which handles the ill-posed problem without perturbation techniques. Through the introduction of slack variables, a stabilization of the conventional active set search approach is reached. The introduction of barrier terms with related barrier parameters continuously penalizes the violation of the feasibility of the intermediate solution. This talk especially focuses on the treatment of the barrier parameter and the related speed of convergence.
[1] M. Arminjon. A Regular Form of the Schmid Law. Application to the Ambiguity Problem. Textures and Microstructures, 14:1121–1128, 1991.
[2] A. S. El-Bakry, R. A. Tapia, T. Tsuchiya, and Y. Zhang. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 89(3):507–541, 1996.
[3] C. Miehe and J. Schr ̈oder. A comparative study of stress update algorithms for rate-independent and rate-dependent crystal plasticity. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 50:273–298, 2001.
[4] L. Scheunemann, P. Nigro, J. Schröder, and P. Pimenta. A novel algorithm for rate independent small strain crystal plasticity based on the infeasible primal-dual interior point method. International Journal of Plasticity, 124:1–19, 2020.