Conference Agenda
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |||
AP 11: Public Policy and Asset Prices
| |||
| Presentations | |||
ID: 150
A New Keynesian Model for Financial Markets 1Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, United States of America; 2Arizona State University Which levels of interest rates along the yield curve are consistent with stable economic activity? We use expectations at the daily frequency reflected in financial market prices to extract the state of the economy within a textbook New Keynesian model. We use these real-time estimates to derive neutral and optimal monetary policy rates at each horizon. The model identifies perceived demand and supply shocks on each day, along with their persistence and associated risk premiums. We find that financial markets started to predict the post-COVID surge in inflation by mid-2021 and inflation risk premiums turned positive soon thereafter. The resulting inflation forecasts from the model are at least as accurate as several leading alternatives.
ID: 260
Fiscal Imbalances and Asset Returns: Cross-Sector Fluctuations under the Aggregate Budget Constraint 1USI Università della Svizzera italiana and SFI; 2Shanghai Jiao Tong University; 3UCSD; 4Hong Kong University We express the aggregate budget constraint of the economy as nesting the budget constraints of the private, public, and external sectors (e.g., equities, Treasuries, and foreign assets). This formulation implies that valuation ratios in one sector may capture fluctuations in future real returns and cash-flow growth in other sectors. Exploiting the cross-sector restrictions implied by the aggregate constraint, we show that fluctuations in the government surplus-to-debt ratio robustly predict equity returns. The magnitude of this cross-sector predictability is on par with the own-sector predictability associated with the dividend–price ratio. We then develop a model in which distortionary taxes generate these time-series dynamics and use the cross-sector forecasts to calibrate the implied magnitude of the tax distortions.v
ID: 1042
Did I make myself clear? The Fed and the market under the 2020 monetary policy framework 1Duke University; 2Oxford University; 3University of Texas at Dallas We study the impact of the Federal Reserve’s communication on financial markets following the adoption of its revised policy framework in 2020. We propose a channel whereby market uncertainty stemming from perceived policy errors can raise risk premia. Post-framework communication introduced uncertainty about the Fed’s reaction function. Market concerns about policy mistakes amid incoming data drove up term premia, undermining easy financial conditions the Fed initially sought. While short-rate expectations were anchored by forward guidance, term premium sensitivity to inflation news increased. The subsequent shift in Fed’s words and eventual actions helped stabilize premia, mitigating adverse macroeconomic news.
| |||