Conference Agenda

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 28th June 2025, 01:26:07am CEST

 
 
Session Overview
Session
AP 18: Asset Return Dynamics
Time:
Saturday, 23/Aug/2025:
11:30am - 1:00pm

Session Chair: Adlai Fisher, UBC
Location: 1.003-1.004 (Floor 1)


Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
ID: 1278

Why Does Volatility Demand Fall During Market Turmoil? A Market Maker Perspective

Kris Jacobs, Anh Thu Mai, Paola Pederzoli

University of Houston, United States of America

Discussant: Charles Martineau (University of Toronto)

End users typically are net long VIX call options to hedge against market downturns, but paradoxically reduce these net long positions during periods of market turmoil. We explain this puzzle by considering a demand system with different demand curves for market makers and end users in a zero net supply market, and we use the time series of end users’ and market makers’ net positions to estimate the latent demand curves. Our findings indicate that both demand curves shift right during periods of market turmoil, but market maker demand reacts more strongly, especially for options with short maturities. These high-risk periods are therefore characterized by reduced net long positions of end users, higher volatility returns, and wider bid-ask spreads.

EFA2025_1278_AP 18_Why Does Volatility Demand Fall During Market Turmoil A Market Maker Perspective.pdf


ID: 1270

The Stock-Bond Correlation: A Tale of Two Days in the U.S. Treasury Market

Grace Xing Hu1, Zhao Jin2, Jun Pan3

1PBC School of Finance, Tsinghua University; 2School of Finance, Central University of Finance and Economics; 3Shanghai Advanced Institute of Finance, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Discussant: Vincent Gregoire (HEC Montreal)

Motivated by the central importance of U.S. Treasury (UST) and the increasing concern over its resilience, we construct a high-frequency measure of stock-bond correlation to capture UST safety, and more importantly, its vulnerability. On days with highly negative stock-bond correlations, UST serves as the premier safe asset with widening convenience yield and decreasing term premium. By contrast, on days with high stock-bond correlations, UST becomes a source of risk with increased volatility and term premium. Prominent bond risk days captured by large increases of our stock-bond measure are FOMC announcements, the 2020 dash for cash, and the 2021 inflation surge.

EFA2025_1270_AP 18_The Stock-Bond Correlation.pdf


ID: 1817

What Drives the Aggregate Net Payout Yield? A Structural Investment Approach

Ilan Cooper1,4, Xuenan {Erica} Li2, Paulo Maio3, Chunyu Yang4

1University of Haifa, Israel; 2Hanken School of Economics, Finland; 3CKGSB, China; 4BI Norwegian Business School, Norway

Discussant: Bradley Paye (Virginia Tech)

We inspect the sources of the variation over time in the aggregate net payout yield (cy)

from the “capital supply-side" perspective by combining a structural investment model and a dynamic present-value relation. Consistent with prior “capital demand side" results for cy, variance decompositions (based on different VAR specifications) indicate that nearly all the variation in cy stems from the “cash-flow" channel, namely predictability of future investment cost growth, while the predictability of future investment returns (“discount-rate" channel) plays a negligible role. Our results clarify the importance of investment fundamentals, namely the cost of investment and marginal Q, in explaining cy.

EFA2025_1817_AP 18_What Drives the Aggregate Net Payout Yield A Structural Investment Approach.pdf


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: EFA 2025
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.154+TC
© 2001–2025 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany