We study patterns and implications of global asset allocations of European insurers and banks using newly available supervisory data. We show that the total assets of insurance companies and pension funds (ICPF) far exceed the amount of government bonds outstanding in Europe, and that countries with a large ICPF sector tend to have a large corporate bond market. Despite high levels of international investments, the characteristics of domestic financial markets still loom large in insurers’ and banks’ portfolio allocation, with two newly documented international portfolio frictions playing a prominent role. First, when investing abroad, insurers and banks do not offset attributes of the domestic markets (such as the composition of fixed-income markets, interest rates, and sovereign credit risk), which we label “domestic projection bias.” Second, subsidiaries of multinational groups act like local entities, which we label the “going native bias.” We propose a theoretical framework to explain our empirical findings and discuss the broader policy implications for European capital market deepening and integration, monetary policy transmission and financial stability, and a multi-sectoral approach to regulatory design.

Two currencies circulate in parallel in China, the mainland CNY and the offshore CNH. This implements capital controls as long as their exchange rate is pegged. This paper characterises this peculiar system by isolating the conventional channels through which monetary and liquidity policies sustain it. Using a rare instance of exogenous transitory increases in the supply of money, we find causal evidence that they depreciate the exchange rate and we pin down the interest elasticity of the demand for reserves. Using an instrument for changes in the demand for money, we quantitatively decompose the success of the peg into the joint contribution of monetary and liquidity policies. Using a model of offshore exchange rates and money creation by banks, we show that a menu of policies can be used, and has been used, to smooth fluctuations of the exchange rate of the yuan with the US dollar.

We analyse the role of preferred habitat (PH) demand in the transmission of Quantitative Tightening (QT) and Quantitative Easing (QE) programmes. For this, we combine granular data from Bank of England QT and QE auctions with secondary market bond level transaction data. We find that when dealers traded on behalf of pension funds and insurance companies, their bidding at QE auctions was less elastic, in line with PH demand theory. In contrast, during QT auctions, there is no evidence of significant PH demand pressures. To account for the observed asymmetric demand effects during QE and QT, we build on and extend the constant elasticity demand model by Vayanos and Vila (2021), so that the PH demand elasticity can depend on available bond supply. We show that the decreased role of the PH demand channel during QT is consistent with the increased government bond issuance post the COVID-19 pandemic.