Conference Agenda

 
 
Session Overview
Session
FI 15: Financial intermediation and the economy
Time:
Saturday, 24/Aug/2024:
9:00am - 10:30am

Session Chair: Martina Jasova, Barnard College, Columbia University
Location: Reduta | Columned Hall (floor 1)


Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
ID: 1033

Canary in the Coal Mine: Bank Liquidity Shortages and Local Economic Activity

Raj Iyer1, Shohini Kundu2, Nikos Paltalidis3

1Imperial College and CERP; 2Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles; 3Durham University, United Kingdom

Discussant: Karsten Müller (National University of Singapore, NUS Business School)

This paper investigates the relation between bank liquidity and local economic activity. We find that an increase in deposit rates offered by banks within a geographic region is associated with contractions in economic activity. As a region heads to an economic downturn, deposit growth slows down, prompting banks to increase deposit rates to support their balance sheet. This increase in deposit rates reflects the liquidity squeeze experienced by banks due to deteriorating economic conditions, which in turn serves as an indicator of an impending economic contraction.

EFA2024_1033_FI 15_Canary in the Coal Mine.pdf


ID: 1838

How do supply shocks to inflation generalize? Evidence from the pandemic era in Europe

Viral Acharya2, Matteo Crosignani3, Tim Eisert1, Christian Eufinger4

1Nova SBE; 2NYU Stern; 3New York Fed; 4IESE

Discussant: Isha Agarwal (University of British Columbia)

We document how the interaction of supply chain pressures, heightened household inflation expectations, and firm pricing power contributed to the pandemic-era surge in consumer price inflation in the euro area. Initially, supply chain pressures increased inflation, especially in manufacturing sectors, through a cost-push channel and raised inflation expectations. Subsequently, the cost-push channel intensified as firms with high pricing power increased product markups in sectors witnessing high demand, including in services sectors that were initially not exposed to supply chain constraints. Eventually, even though supply chain pressures eased, these firms were able to further increase markups due to the stickiness of inflation expectations. The resulting persistent impact on inflation suggests supply-side impulses can generalize into broad-based inflation via an interaction of household expectations and firm pricing power.

EFA2024_1838_FI 15_How do supply shocks to inflation generalize Evidence.pdf


ID: 1762

LASH Risk and Interest Rates

Laura Alfaro1, Saleem Bahaj2,3, Robert Czech3, Jonathan Hazell4, Ioana Neamtu3

1Harvard Business School; 2University College London; 3Bank of England; 4London School of Economics

Discussant: Kristy Jansen (Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California)

We introduce a framework to understand and quantify a form of liquidity risk that we dub Liquidity After Solvency Hedging or "LASH" risk. Financial institutions take LASH risk when they hedge against losses, using strategies that lead to liquidity needs when the value of the hedge falls, even as solvency improves. We focus on LASH risk relating to interest rate movements. Our framework implies that institutions with longer duration liabilities than assets - e.g. pension funds and insurers - take more LASH risk as interest rates fall, because solvency concerns rise in a low rate environment. Using UK regulatory data from 2019-22 on the universe of sterling repo and swap transactions, we measure, in real time and at the institution level, LASH risk for the non-bank sector. We find that at peak LASH risk, a 100bps increase in interest rates would have led to liquidity needs close to the cash holdings of the pension fund and insurance sector. Using a cross-sectional identification strategy, we find that low interest rates caused increases in LASH risk. We then find that the pre-crisis LASH risk of non-banks predicts their bond sales during the September 2022 LDI crisis, contributing to the yield spike in the bond market.

EFA2024_1762_FI 15_LASH Risk and Interest Rates.pdf