Conference Agenda

Tips to navigate the program:

  • Overview of all papers on a specific day: click on the day (e.g. Date: Thursday, 24/Aug/2019). To download papers, you will need to access the session by clicking on its title first.
  • Program index: click on the Authors tab below.
  • Location name: to display all sessions taking place in that room
  • Search box: to search for authors, papers and sessions.

Please notes that changes in the program might occur.

If your name is not displayed in the program, please register in our conference system.

If your paper information is not up to date, please send us an email at efa2019@novasbe.pt.

Registration to the conference closes on August 1st, 2019: www.conftool.com/efa2019

 
Session Overview
Session
CFGT-3: Blockholders and Investor Activism: Theory
Time:
Thursday, 22/Aug/2019:
15:30 - 17:00

Session Chair: Amil Dasgupta, London School of Economics
Location: D -111

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations

Large Shareholders and Financial Distress

Christian Opp

The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America

Discussant: Sergey Kovbasyuk (Einaudi Institute)

I examine large shareholders' externalities on other claim holders when firms are financially distressed. I develop a tractable dynamic model of the interplay between these blockholders and regular equity holders. Blockholders' information acquisition and investment decisions play a pivotal role in distressed firms’ access to finance, affecting both total firm value and its distribution across claims. The impact on distress costs is non-monotone; whereas blockholders' information exacerbates debt overhang for intermediate levels of distress, it increases firms' survival chances in deep distress. These findings reveal that frictions delaying block acquisitions to "last minute" rescue interventions can in fact be efficiency-enhancing.

efa2019-CFGT-3-1209-Large Shareholders and Financial Distress.pdf


Dark Knights: The Rise in Firm Intervention by CDS Investors

Andras Danis1, Andrea Gamba2

1Scheller College of Business, Georgia Institute of Technology; 2Warwick Business School, University of Warwick

Discussant: Matthias Efing (HEC Paris)

We document an increase in cases where credit default swap (CDS) investors intervene in the restructuring of a distressed firm. In our theoretical analysis, we focus on the case of intervention by protection sellers and show that—contrary to popular belief—it is not reducing firm value. Allowing a protection seller to intervene, while ex post costly to the protection buyer, also reduces the probability of costly liquidation. As a result, ex ante borrowing costs go down, and investment and firm value both increase. Under certain assumptions, investment reaches first-best. One counter-intuitive result is that even though the probabil- ity of liquidation is zero, the lender buys CDS protection and the CDS spread is positive. Asymmetric information between protection buyers and sellers can de- stroy this beneficial equilibrium, and we argue that improved transparency in the CDS market can restore it. Our results suggest that the empty creditor problem could be partially solved by protection seller-intervention.

efa2019-CFGT-3-789-Dark Knights.pdf


Blockholder Disclosure Threshold and Hedge Fund Activism

Guillem Ordonez-Calafi1, Dan Bernhardt2,3

1University of Bristol, United Kingdom; 2University of Illinois; 3University of Warwick

Discussant: Jing Zeng (Frankfurt School of Finance and Management gGmbH)

Hedge fund activists discipline corporate management in exchange for trading profits obtained by secretly acquiring shares in target companies prior to intervention. We show how blockholder disclosure thresholds regulate market transparency and hence the extent of activism. We characterize how disclosure thresholds structure the complex interactions between (a) initial investors in a firm---who value the value-enhancing disciplining effects of activism on management, but incur costs trading with activists who know their own value-enhancing potential; (b) activists---who value higher thresholds when establishing equity stakes, but incur costs if high thresholds reduce real investment or discourage managerial misbehavior; and (c) firm managers---who weigh private benefits of value-reducing actions against potential punishment if activists intervene. When managerial behavior is sufficiently unresponsive to threats of activism, initial investors and society value tighter disclosure thresholds than activists whenever the costs of activism tend to be low, making the probability of activism insensitive to the level of activist trading profits. In contrast, activists value tighter thresholds when managerial behavior is responsive to potential activism.

efa2019-CFGT-3-434-Blockholder Disclosure Threshold and Hedge Fund Activism.pdf


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Conference: EFA 2019
Conference Software - ConfTool Pro 2.6.128+TC
© 2001 - 2019 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany