Conference Agenda

Tips to navigate the program:

  • Overview of all papers on a specific day: click on the day (e.g. Date: Thursday, 24/Aug/2019). To download papers, you will need to access the session by clicking on its title first.
  • Program index: click on the Authors tab below.
  • Location name: to display all sessions taking place in that room
  • Search box: to search for authors, papers and sessions.

Please notes that changes in the program might occur.

If your name is not displayed in the program, please register in our conference system.

If your paper information is not up to date, please send us an email at efa2019@novasbe.pt.

Registration to the conference closes on August 1st, 2019: www.conftool.com/efa2019

 
Session Overview
Session
CFGT-2: Capital Structure: Theory
Time:
Thursday, 22/Aug/2019:
13:30 - 15:00

Session Chair: Daniel Ferreira, London School of Economics
Location: D -111

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations

Conflicting Priorities: A Theory of Covenants and Collateral

Jason R Donaldson1, Denis Gromb2, Giorgia Piacentino3

1Washington University in St Louis; 2HEC Paris; 3Columbia University, United States of America

Discussant: Radoslawa Nikolowa (Queen Mary University of London)

Debt secured by collateral has absolute priority in the event of default—it is paid ahead of unsecured debt, even if unsecured debt is protected by negative pledge covenants prohibiting new secured debt. We develop a model of how this priority rule leads to conflicts among creditors, but can be optimal nonetheless: borrowers’ option to use collateral in violation of covenants allows for the dilution of existing debt, and hence prevents under-investment, whereas creditors’ option to accelerate debt following a covenant violation deters dilution, and hence prevents over-investment. The optimal investment policy is implementable via a mix of different types of debt, including secured and unsecured debt with tight and loose covenants. The model is consistent with a number of stylized facts about debt structure, covenants, and their violations.

efa2019-CFGT-2-900-Conflicting Priorities.pdf


Optimal leverage, transparency and the decision to go public

Giulio Trigilia

University of Rochester, United States of America

Discussant: Jan Starmans (Stockholm School of Economics)

I introduce variable and heterogeneous degrees of informational asymmetries between a firm's insiders and its outside investors in an otherwise standard costly-state-verification model. I find that the optimal capital structure can be implemented by a simple mixture of debt and equity, and the optimal leverage ratio falls with a firm's profitability -- consistently with the evidence but unlike the prediction of existing theories. This framework yields a set of highly profitable zero-leverage firms, and can account for the low-leverage anomaly. When firms are allowed to increase their transparency by incurring an upfront cost, the model delivers a new theory about the decision to go public or stay private based purely on the optimal allocation of cash flow rights. Public firms have lower flotation cost, higher bankruptcy costs and lower transparency relative to private ones. Consistently with the empirical evidence, firms are more likely to go public when interest rates are low, when they need to raise larger external capital and when equity market analysts generate better information about firm performance.

efa2019-CFGT-2-1989-Optimal leverage, transparency and the decision to go public.pdf


Equity Issuance Methods and Dilution

Mike Burkart, Hongda Zhong

London School of Economics and Political Science

Discussant: Max Bruche (Humboldt University of Berlin)

We analyze rights offerings and public offerings in a setting where better informed current shareholders strategically choose to subscribe. When all current shareholders have wealth to participate, rights offerings achieve the full information outcome and dominate public offerings. When some current shareholders are wealth constrained, rights offerings lead to more dilution of their stakes and lower payoffs, despite the extra income from selling these rights. When firms can choose the floatation method, either all firms choose the same offer method or high and low quality firms opt for rights offerings while firms of intermediate quality select public offerings.

efa2019-CFGT-2-1950-Equity Issuance Methods and Dilution.pdf


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Conference: EFA 2019
Conference Software - ConfTool Pro 2.6.128+TC
© 2001 - 2019 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany