Conference Agenda

Tips to navigate the program:

  • Overview of all papers on a specific day: click on the day (e.g. Date: Thursday, 24/Aug/2019). To download papers, you will need to access the session by clicking on its title first.
  • Program index: click on the Authors tab below.
  • Location name: to display all sessions taking place in that room
  • Search box: to search for authors, papers and sessions.

Please notes that changes in the program might occur.

If your name is not displayed in the program, please register in our conference system.

If your paper information is not up to date, please send us an email at

Registration to the conference closes on August 1st, 2019:

Session Overview
CFGE-2: What is new in Mergers and Acquisitions?
Thursday, 22/Aug/2019:
10:30 - 12:00

Session Chair: Daniel Metzger, Rotterdam School of Management
Location: D -107

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'

EPS-Sensitivity and Merger Deals

Sudipto Dasgupta1, Jarrad Harford2, Fangyuan Ma3

1Chinese University of Hong Kong, CEPR and ABFER; 2University of Washington; 3Chinese University of Hong Kong

Discussant: Nelson Camanho (Queen Mary University of London)

Announcements of mergers where the target is offered stock very often discuss the impact of the deal on the acquirer’s earnings per share (EPS), especially when the deal is EPS-accretive for the acquirer. In this paper, we document that the acquirer’s EPS-sensitivity affects how deals are structured, the premium that is paid, and the types of deals that are done. We provide evidence that EPS-sensitivity of acquirers is another manifestation of short-termism, driven by institutional investor horizon as well as components of managerial compensation contracts. Our results suggest that the relative popularity of deals financed in cash since early 2000 could be a consequence of acquirers’ EPS-sensitivity and low value-multiple acquirers pursuing high value-multiple targets. EPS-sensitivity is also consistent with the overall pattern of “like-buys-like” that has been documented in the literature for stock deals.

efa2019-CFGE-2-1042-EPS-Sensitivity and Merger Deals.pdf

A BIT Goes a Long Way: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Cross-border Mergers

Brandon Julio1, Vineet Bhagwat2, Jonathan Brogaard3

1University of Oregon, United States of America; 2George Washington University; 3University of Utah

Discussant: Anjana Rajamani (Erasmus University)

We examine whether Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs), an external governance mechanism, reduce impediments to cross-border mergers by protecting the property rights of foreign acquirers. BITs have a large positive effect on cross-border mergers. The probability and dollar volume of mergers between two given countries more than doubles after the signing of a BIT. The increase is driven by deals flowing from developed economies to developing economies and is concentrated in target countries with medium levels of political risk. The results suggest BITs are effective in encouraging foreign investment, particularly in the developing world.

efa2019-CFGE-2-705-A BIT Goes a Long Way.pdf

Listing Gaps, Merger Waves, and the New American Model of Equity Finance

Gabriele Lattanzio1, William L. Megginson1, Ali Sanati2

1University of Oklahoma; 2American University, Washington DC

Discussant: Christoph Schneider (Tilburg University)

We document that the U.S. economy has experienced over the last 25 years sharply declining numbers of listed firms, excessive volumes of mergers and of private equity investments, and abnormally high aggregate valuations for U.S. listed corporations. We synthesize and empirically analyze these trends and their interconnections and document the recent emergence of a new model of equity finance in the United States. We show that the listing gap identified by Doidge, Karolyi, and Stulz (2017) was caused by an unprecedented merger wave occurring between 1997-2001, which directly reduced the number of listed firms, and by the rise of the private equity industry, which curtailed new listings through IPOs. Our model of equity financing well explains changes in the number of listed U.S. firms before and after the 1997-2001 transition to a new equilibrium. We conclude that this new model of equity finance has yielded net financial and developmental benefits for the U.S. economy, although the merger waves have increased industrial concentration and the privatization of equity finance has almost certainly increased income inequality. We conclude by presenting preliminary evidence that this new model of equity financing is emerging in other developed countries.

efa2019-CFGE-2-1684-Listing Gaps, Merger Waves, and the New American Model.pdf

Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Conference: EFA 2019
Conference Software - ConfTool Pro 2.6.129+TC
© 2001 - 2019 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany