Conference Agenda

Tips to navigate the program:

  • Overview of all papers on a specific day: click on the day (e.g. Date: Thursday, 24/Aug/2017). To download papers, you will need to access the session by clicking on its title first.
  • Program index: click on the Authors tab below.
  • Location name: to display all sessions taking place in that room
  • Search box: to search for authors, papers and sessions.

Please notes that changes in the program might occur.

If your name is not displayed in the program, please register in our conference system.

If your paper information is not up to date, please send us an email at efa2017@uni-mannheim.de.

 
Session Overview
Session
FMG-1: Financial Crises
Time:
Friday, 25/Aug/2017:
8:30am - 10:00am

Session Chair: Elena Carletti, Bocconi University
Location: O145

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations

Hasty Deleverage and Liquidity Spiral: Evidence from Margin Trading of Individual Stocks (withdrawn)

Jing Chen, Ya Tang, Jianguo Xu

Peking University

Discussant: Mike Mariathasan (KU Leuven)

A sudden stop on margin trading triggers a hasty deleverage and speedy crash on China stock market in summer 2015, which provides an almost natural experiment to study liquidity spiral in financial crises. We employ stock-level margin trading data to study the deleverage-illiquidity-return joint dynamics. Evidence reveals that 1) hasty deleverage simultaneously crashes stock prices and liquidity; 2) stocks under greater deleverage pressure are more likely to be stuck in liquidity shortage; and 3) liquidity shortage amplifies stock price declines. Speedy rebound after the crash suggests existence of overshooting. We also find evidence that liquidity dry-up is responsible for the overshooting.

EFA2017-731-FMG-1-Chen-Hasty Deleverage and Liquidity Spiral.pdf

Systematic Liquidity and Leverage

Bige Kahraman1, Heather Tookes2

1University of Oxford; 2Yale University

Discussant: Satchit Sagade (Goethe University Frankfurt)

Does trader leverage exacerbate the liquidity co-movement that we observe during crises? We exploit the threshold rules governing margin trading eligibility in India to identify a causal relationship between trader leverage and the extent to which a stock’s liquidity covaries with the liquidity of other stocks. We find that trader leverage causes sharp increases in comovement during severe market downturns. For our sample of stocks, the estimates suggest that the trader leverage channel explains about one third of the increase in liquidity commonality that we observe during crises. Consistent with downward price pressure due to the deleveraging of traders who rely on borrowing, we also find that leverage causes stocks to exhibit large increases in return comovement during crises.

EFA2017-434-FMG-1-Kahraman-Systematic Liquidity and Leverage.pdf

Sovereign Risk and Bank Risk-Taking

Anil Ari

University of Cambridge

Discussant: Filippo De Marco (Bocconi University)

I propose a general equilibrium macroeconomic model in which strategic interactions between banks and depositors may lead to endogenous bank fragility and default, associated with a persistent drop in investment and output. With some opacity in bank balance sheets, depositors form expectations about bank risk-taking and demand a return on bank deposits according to their risk. This creates strategic complimentarities and possibly multiple equilibria: in response to an increase in funding costs, banks may optimally choose to pursue risky portfolios that undermine their solvency prospects. I bring the model to bear on the European sovereign debt crisis, in the course of which under-capitalized banks in default-risky countries experienced an increase in funding costs and raised their holdings of domestic government debt. The model is quantified using Portuguese data and accounts for macroeconomic dynamics in Portugal in 2010-2016. Policy interventions face a trade-off between alleviating banks' funding conditions and strengthening risk-taking incentives. Liquidity provision to banks may eliminate the good equilibrium when not targeted. Targeted interventions have the capacity to eliminate adverse equilibria.

EFA2017-297-FMG-1-Ari-Sovereign Risk and Bank Risk-Taking.pdf


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Conference: EFA 2017
Conference Software - ConfTool Pro 2.6.113+TC
© 2001 - 2017 by H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany