Conference Agenda

Tips to navigate the program:

  • Overview of all papers on a specific day: click on the day (e.g. Date: Thursday, 24/Aug/2017). To download papers, you will need to access the session by clicking on its title first.
  • Program index: click on the Authors tab below.
  • Location name: to display all sessions taking place in that room
  • Search box: to search for authors, papers and sessions.

Please notes that changes in the program might occur.

If your name is not displayed in the program, please register in our conference system.

If your paper information is not up to date, please send us an email at efa2017@uni-mannheim.de.

 
Session Overview
Session
APE-7: Testing Asset Pricing Models
Time:
Friday, 25/Aug/2017:
8:30am - 10:00am

Session Chair: Raman Uppal, EDHEC
Location: SN163

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations

In Search of Preference Shock Risks: Evidence from Longevity Risks and Momentum Profits

Zhanhui Chen, Bowen Yang

Nanyang Technological University

Discussant: Irina Zviadadze (Stockholm School of Economics)

Time-preference shocks affect agents' preferences for assets with different durations. We consider longevity risk as the sources of time-preference shocks and model it in the recursive preferences setting. This implies a consumption-based three-factor model, including longevity risk, consumption growth rate, and the market portfolio, where longevity has a negative price of risk. Empirically, both the Fama-French three-factor model augmented by longevity risk and the consumption-based model explain many well-known cross-sectional portfolios. Notably, we find that longevity risk and the momentum factor share a common business cycle component. Prior winners (losers) provide hedging against mortality (longevity) risk and thus have higher (lower) expected returns, because winners have shorter equity durations than losers. Time-varying longevity risk captures most momentum profits over time, including the large momentum crashes observed in the data.

EFA2017-444-APE-7-Chen-In Search of Preference Shock Risks.pdf

Asset Pricing with Beliefs-Dependent Utility and Learning

Tony Berrada1, Jerome Detemple2, Marcel Rindisbacher2

1University of Geneva, Swiss Finance Institute; 2Boston University

Discussant: Alexandre Jeanneret (HEC Montréal)

This paper studies equilibrium in a pure exchange economy with unobservable Markov switching growth regimes and beliefs-dependent risk aversion. Risk aversion is stochastic and depends nonlinearly on consumption and beliefs. Equilibrium is obtained in closed form. The market price of risk, the interest rate and the stock return volatility acquire new components tied to fluctuations in beliefs. A three-regime specification is estimated using GMM. Model moments match their empirical counterparts for a variety of unconditional moments including the equity premium and volatility. Dynamic features of the data, such as the countercyclical behaviors of the equity premium and volatility, are also captured. Model volatility provides a good fit for realized volatility. A new factor, the Information Risk Premium, is found to be a strong predictor of future excess returns. These results are obtained with an estimated risk aversion fluctuating between 1.43 and 1.8.

EFA2017-1163-APE-7-Berrada-Asset Pricing with Beliefs-Dependent Utility and Learning.pdf

Heterogeneous Taxes and Limited Risk Sharing: Evidence from Municipal Bonds

Tania Babina1, Chotibhak Jotikasthira2, Christian Lundblad3, Tarun Ramadorai4

1Columbia University; 2Southern Methodist University; 3UNC Chapel Hill; 4Imperial College Business School

Discussant: Paul Ehling (BI Norwegian Business School)

Heterogeneity in the taxation of asset returns can create ownership clienteles. Using a simple model, we demonstrate that an important consequence of tax-policy-induced ownership segmentation is to limit risk-sharing, creating regions of the aggregate demand curve for the asset that are downward-sloping. As a result, the constraints of the ownership clientele impact the asset price response to variations in asset supply and demand, and make the assets' price more sensitive to movements in idiosyncratic risk. We test these predictions on U.S. municipal bonds, where cross-state variation in state tax privilege policies results in different levels of home-state-biased ownership of local municipal bonds. In states with high tax-induced ownership segmentation, we find greater susceptibility of municipal bond yields to demand and supply variation, heightened sensitivity of yields to local political uncertainty, and greater difficulties in raising capital for public projects.

EFA2017-1485-APE-7-Babina-Heterogeneous Taxes and Limited Risk Sharing.pdf


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Conference: EFA 2017
Conference Software - ConfTool Pro 2.6.113+TC
© 2001 - 2017 by H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany