Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
|
Agenda Overview |
| Session | ||
PANEL_9
| ||
| Presentations | ||
Utilizing qualitative research to inform and improve community mental health services: Examples from the Association for Regional Development and Mental Health (EPAPSY) Utilization of research findings is a crucial part of evidence-based mental health service development. The Association for Regional Development and Mental Health (EPAPSY), the largest NGO in the mental health field in Greece, has made it part of its mission to develop practice-relevant research as guide for service evaluation and development. In this panel we present examples of qualitative studies that have been carried out with this aim. In the attempt to standardize provision of brief psychotherapy as part of the Association’s long-standing Mental Health Day Centre, the difficulties in ending psychotherapy were found to be an obstacle; thus, the qualitative study of therapists’ perspectives on managing termination in brief psychotherapy. The recent creation of an Early Intervention in Psychosis unit necessitated reaching out to young people with first episode psychosis. This in turn made apparent our limited understanding of the factors that facilitate or hinder your people’s timely help-seeking; thus, an investigation of the duration-of-untreated-psychosis from the perspective of people’s experiences of help-seeing and treatment. The even more recent creation of a program of psychosocial intervention for the prevention of youth violence and delinquency led to a needs assessment study in the local community to identify appropriate partnerships and optimum strategies and alliances to build a sustainable community initiative to prevent youth violence. Finally, the recovery based mission of EPAPSY led to adopting the WHO QualityRights Toolkit, a collaborative tool for evaluating human rights and quality of care, for the evaluation of its services. Here we will present the current pilot use of the Toolkit in selected EPAPSY services. The specific presentations will showcase examples of practice-led and practice-relevant research, that may be conducted in the context of mental health associations to support the evaluation, planning and development of services. Presentations of the Panel Working with endings: Therapists’ perspectives on managing termination in brief psychotherapy Termination in the context of brief psychotherapy, and its effective management, often presents a challenge for therapists. The aim of this study is to explore how therapists experience and manage the ending of brief psychotherapy within a community mental health setting. Adopting a phenomenological perspective, it examines how therapists experience and ascribe meaning to the issue of ending, as well as the factors that appear to shape their management of this process. The study involved eight (8) mental health professionals, with varying levels of experience, working in community psychiatry. Data were generated through semi-structured interviews lasting 50–60 minutes. Analysis was conducted using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), a method particularly suited to investigating subjective experience and its meaning-making processes. The findings highlight themes related to therapists’ personal histories of loss, the difficulties and challenges they encounter in their clinical work, and the use of good practices in managing endings. Overall, the study underscores the influence of therapists’ personal experiences on how they approach termination, as well as the importance of reflection, supervision, and personal analysis in sustaining the therapeutic role. Duration of Untreated Psychosis: A thematic analysis of service-users’ subjective experiences of diagnosis and seeking treatment The aim of the present study is to investigate the subjective, lived experiences of service users and their families regarding the onset of psychosis and the pathways in seeking appropriate treatment as well as the barriers they may have encountered during this process. Six in-depth individual interviews were conducted (4 service users and 2 mothers). The study took place between May - October 2023 within a Day Centre for Psychosocial Rehabilitation, located in Athens, Greece. Recruitment was purposeful following the snowball sampling technique. Thematic analysis was utilized for the analysis of data produced from narratives. Duration of Untreated Psychosis (DUP) for participants in the present study ranged between 3-9 years. Six themes emerged. All participants experienced trauma in the family prior to the onset of prodromal symptoms. The second theme refers to the first indications that seem to mobilize the family regarding the early onset of psychosis (emergence of positive symptoms, sleep disorders, academic failure and social withdrawal). The third one refers to individual’s and family’s sensitization and orientation towards psychic life. The role of the therapeutic alliance and stigma also emerges as a critical parameter implicated in early intervention. A prominent theme is the lack of information made available to the wider public regarding the availability and accessibility of services. The present qualitative study identified a number of factors contributing to treatment delay for first episode psychosis, including both intrapsychic and organizational level parameters that are responsible for long DUP in our Greek sample. Risk and protective factors of youth violence and delinquency: A needs assessment study in the community Given that juvenile delinquency is a multifaceted mental health issue, community-based prevention interventions for youth at risk should take place in a continuum so that individual, family, school, and social risk and protective factors are simultaneously addressed. A needs assessment study is then necessary to adjust prevention practices to the current state as well as the desired goals through the incorporation of different “voices” of the local community. Along these lines, eighteen focus groups with adolescents and young people, parents, teachers, and stakeholders of the local community were conducted in four municipalities in Northern Athens (Greece) where the program of psychosocial intervention for the prevention of youth violence and delinquency, entitled “It’s Up to You(th)”, is implemented by the Association for Regional Development and Mental Health (EPAPSY). In total, 163 participants were interviewed according to an original interview guide focusing on both risk and protective factors of youth delinquency. Thematic analysis of the transcribed interviews revealed seven main themes with regard to risk and protective factors, including the feeling of instability among young people, the normalization of violence and its internalization as an acceptable way to resolve differences, the lack of trust to (significant) others as well as the desire for a meaningful relationship with adults, the need for common spaces and a culture of dialogue, and the need of inspiration for values and principles. The risk and protective factors resulting from the thematic analysis are also presented comparatively with respect to the different groups and regions participating in the study. Based on this user participation approach, the findings of the needs assessment study shed light on the importance of embracing different community agents and local groups in the co-construction of a selective prevention strategy against youth violence. Evaluating quality of care in community mental health facilities through the W.H.O. QualityRights Toolkit In this presentation we outline and reflect upon the process of evaluating three community mental health facilities of EPAPSY through the W.H.O. QualityRights Toolkit. The Quality Rights Toolkit is a structured process for assessing quality of care and human rights in mental health facilities, introduced by the World Health Organisation in 2012. It is designed as a tool for collaborative research, engaging outside experts, facility professionals, service users and carers. More than an assessment tool, it intends to foster continuous development and empowement, whereby all parties involved engage in long-term monitoring and improving the standard of care in the facilities they partake. In the assessment process, data collected through interviews with service users, professionals and carers, systematic observation and archive review is collectively examined by an assessment committee, which formulates a report for each facility. We are currently piloting the use of the Toolkit in a supported accommodation facility, a mobile mental unit and a day centre of the NGO EPAPSY, in view of extending its use in all EPAPSY units, mental health units of collaborating institutions and eventually at national level. The talk will focus more on this innovative process, and the challenges it poses, than on the results regarding the specific facilities. | ||