Conference Agenda
| Session | ||
34 SES 03 B: Research on global citizenship education
Paper Session | ||
| Presentations | ||
34. Research on Citizenship Education
Paper Managed Multiculturalism and the “Global Other” in GCSE Citizenship Studies Textbooks: A Critical Discourse Analysis 1: Faculty of Education, Shenzhen University, People's Republic of China; 2: Department of Education Policy and Leadership, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR; 3: Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment Department, UCL Institute of Education, UK Presenting Author:This study addresses a critical gap in the scholarship on citizenship education by examining the decolonisation of knowledge within UK GCSE Citizenship Studies textbooks. The study is vital because, as the UK's educational system attracts a global student body, its curriculum must include international and multicultural perspectives, and diversifying education is essential for protecting the well-being of minority student groups. Despite policy intentions, prior research suggests citizenship education has become marginalised, unevenly delivered, and often taught by non-specialists, with its radical potential underdeveloped. Textbooks, as "authorised condensations of curricular knowledge," play a key role in this dynamic, yet there is limited analysis of how they systematically construct national identity and global relations through post-colonial narratives. This study contributes by critically dissecting these narratives and evaluating the substantive engagement with decolonisation, offering evidence-based insights for curriculum reform aimed at fostering genuinely critical and transformative citizenship.
Therefore, the core objectives of this study are to assess how UK GCSE Citizenship Studies textbooks address multicultural issues and respond to decolonisation demands through cultural discussion. Specifically, the study aims to analyse how three GCSE Citizenship Studies textbooks construct meanings regarding Britishness iconography, belonging, and the world “outside the UK”, thereby judging whether these textbooks perpetuate colonial thinking or genuinely integrate decolonisation political practices into civic education.
Accordingly, this study is guided by three core research questions examining the representation of knowledge in UK GCSE Citizenship Studies textbooks: (A) To what extent are British and foreign content presented in the textbooks examined?(B) Is multicultural content, knowledge, pedagogy, and fairness demonstrated evenly across the textbooks? and (C) To what extent do the textbooks provide learners with opportunities to develop intercultural communicative competence oriented toward decolonisation?
The analysis is framed by an integrated theoretical and methodological approach. The primary theoretical framework is Critical Multicultural Education, understood through "the critical lens of knowledge decolonisation" (McKivett & Paúl, 2023; Udah, 2024). This research operationalises James A. Banks' Five Dimensions of Multiculturalism as "operational theoretical lenses for critical text analysis." This framework serves to deconstruct textbook content across: Content Integration (examining inclusion of marginalised perspectives); Knowledge Construction (evaluating epistemic justice); Equity Pedagogy (assessing inclusive learning design); Prejudice Reduction (investigating stereotype dismantling); and Empowering School Culture and Social Structure (analysing engagement with structural inequalities). Accordingly, Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is employed to examine "how textbook narratives are constructed," treating language as a form of social meaning-making shaped by power, and analysing texts through complementary micro (textual features) and macro (socio-political context) lenses.
To address the research questions through this CDA approach, the study is guided by the operationalised theoretical framework of James A. Banks' Five Dimensions of Multicultural Education (Content Integration, Knowledge Construction, etc.). This framework directed the analytical scrutiny towards specific discursive patterns. For instance, to examine the representation of foreign content (RQ1), the analysis draws on the notion of 'the other' as a discursive construction, using CDA to examine "how alterity is produced through lexical choices, comparisons, and implied hierarchies, and how these moves organise citizenship imaginaries across the textbooks." The findings on managed multiculturalism, distorted global images, and sanitised Commonwealth narratives are thus the direct products of this methodological synthesis, where the theoretical lenses shaped the interrogation of the textual evidence gathered from the three textbook sources. Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used This study employs a qualitative research design centred on textual analysis. The primary research instruments are three currently available GCSE Citizenship Studies textbooks used in England, selected as the corpus for analysis. Specifically, the examined textbooks are those produced for the major awarding bodies: AQA (2021), Pearson Edexcel (2023), and Cambridge OCR (2025). The rationale for this selection is that each textbook "is designed to align with the official GCSE Citizenship Studies subject content and assessment requirements." Furthermore, "Selecting one textbook per awarding body enabled comparison across widely used commercially published resources, while holding constant the national curricular framework through which citizenship is defined and taught." The core methodology is Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), utilised as both "an epistemological orientation and a methodological strategy for examining how textbook narratives are constructed and how they operate within wider socio-political conditions." The study draws on the commitments outlined by Fairclough (2003) and Luke (2002), which stress reading texts in relation to their broader sociohistorical conditions. The analysis proceeds through a complementary set of "micro" and "macro" lenses. "Micro-level analysis attends to textual organisation, lexical choices, semantic and logical relations, modality, voice, and figurative language (including metaphor), to identify how particular narratives, images, activities, and assumptions are assembled and made persuasive." Subsequently, "Macro-level analysis then situates these textual patterns within wider cultural and institutional structures, focusing on how discourses are enabled, constrained, and legitimised through prevailing power relations and policy imaginaries." In practice, the analysis began with a close reading to identify recurring representations of "British" and "non-British" elements. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings The findings demonstrate that multiculturalism is predominantly constructed as a “settled national achievement” and a matter of social cohesion, which “obscures structural histories of racism, exclusion, and unequal citizenship.” Furthermore, non-British societies are mobilised as “comparative objects” and “cautionary tales”, through deficit framings that affirm British civility and governance as normative benchmarks. A third key pattern is the sanitisation of colonial history via “Commonwealth narratives” that recast imperial relations as a benevolent, familial partnership, thereby “legitimising British leadership and obscuring imperial violence”. Finally, critical engagement is carefully managed: while inequality or injustice is sometimes acknowledged, it is subsequently reframed through “depoliticisation and responsibilisation,” redirecting attention from structural power relations to individual behaviour or external problems. The study concludes that these textbooks are not neutral carriers of knowledge but active “discursive artefacts” that participate in the governance of citizenship. They “reproduce a British-centric and hierarchical postcolonial landscape” by prioritising the cultivation of “adaptive citizenship, emphasizing personal responsibility and harmonious integration, over the development of “transformational citizens” capable of critiquing and challenging structural inequalities and colonial legacies. Consequently, they “fail to foster students’ critical and continuous understanding of multiculturalism” within the contemporary socio-political context and instead facilitate the construction of a “neo-colonial cognitive system.” The primary contribution and outcome of this study is to provide a rigorous, theory-driven deconstruction of the legitimising mechanisms within mainstream educational resources. By making these implicit knowledge politics visible, the study underscores the urgent need for a paradigm shift in citizenship education from a logic of “management” to one of “transformation.” This necessitates textbooks that explicitly frame the UK’s diversity and inequalities as direct outcomes of “colonial history, immigration policies, and global political economy,” and pedagogical designs that foster genuine intercultural communicative competence, critical historical literacy, and an understanding of citizenship for social justice. References Apple, M. W. (2014). Official Knowledge: Democratic Education in a Conservative Age (3rd edn). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203814383 Banks, J. A. (2013a). Multicultural education: Approaches, developments and dimensions. In Cultural Diversity and Education (pp. 83–94). Routledge. Banks, J. A. (2015b). The dimensions of multicultural education. In Cultural Diversity and Education (pp. 3–22). Routledge. Davies, I., & Chong, E. K. M. (2016). Current challenges for citizenship education in England. Asian Education and Development Studies, 5(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-05-2015-0015 DfEE/QCA. (1998). Education for citizenship and the teaching of democracy in schools—Final Report of the Advisory Group on Citizenship (Crick Report). https://www.teachingcitizenship.org.uk/resource/the-crick-report-1998/ Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge. Held, M. B. E. (2019). Decolonizing Research Paradigms in the Context of Settler Colonialism: An Unsettling, Mutual, and Collaborative Effort. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918821574 Johnson, L., & Morris, P. (2012). Critical citizenship education in England and France: A comparative analysis. Comparative Education, 48(3), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2011.588885 Keating, A., Kerr, D., Benton, T., Munday, E., & Lopes, J. (2010). Citizenship education in England 2001-2010: Young people’s practices and prospects for the future: The eighth and final report from the Citizenship Education Longitudinal Study (CELS). Kerr, D. (2003). Citizenship Education in England: The Making of a New Subject. Journal of Social Science Education. https://doi.org/10.4119/jsse-287 McKivett, A., & Paul, D. (2024). Recreating the future—Indigenous research paradigms in health professional education research. Medical Education, 58(1), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15154 Pashby, K. (2016). The global, citizenship, and education as discursive fields: Towards disrupting the reproduction of colonial systems of power. In Globalization and Global Citizenship (pp. 69–86). Routledge. Udah, H. (2024). Decolonising Research for Justice: Ethical Imperatives and Practical Applications. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23,. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241294040 Yang, Y., & Montgomery, D. (2011). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the Multicultural Teaching Scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(3), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282910378983 34. Research on Citizenship Education
Paper Acquiring Democracy-related Competencies Through Digital Learning Projects in Global School Partnerships Otto-Friederich-University of Bamberg, Germany Presenting Author:This presentation addresses the question of which democracy-related skills students can acquire through digital learning projects that are integrated into global school partnerships. It presents a study focusing on students’ experiences and how these relate to the framework conditions of the learning setting. Data was collected via a pre-post survey of Tanzanian participants in a digital learning week, which was carried out at the end of 2024 in cooperation between four Tanzanian and four German schools. The study demonstrates that digital learning projects in global school partnerships can contribute to the acquisition and development of democracy-related competencies. Democracy is more than a modus of government; according to Oskar Negt, it is a ‘way of life [Lebensweise]’ (Negt, 2016:13). This way of life is the foundation of the governmental form. Edelstein, for example, speaks of a ‘democratic habitus [demokratischer Habitus]’ (Edelstein, 2005). Therefore, democracy is founded on values, attitudes and an ethos that must be embedded in routines of exchange and communication. In addition to knowledge, it requires specific skills and competencies. Various democracy-related pedagogical approaches (Himmelmann, 2001; Veith, 2010; Council of Europe, 2018) share the understanding, that educational programmes cannot rely solely on the cognitively mediated subjects, but must also be linked to learning through and in democracy. Therefore, participatory spaces in schools and in the wider social environment are relevant (Himmelmann, 2013). As democratic negotiations and decision-making often occur beyond the national level, and as the issues to be resolved are frequently global in nature, the glocal condition (Robertson, 1995) must be incorporated into education that promotes democracy. Digitality as a sign of the present (Stalder, 2017) is a transnational social phenomenon that affects the lives of individuals and changes the conditions of social coexistence. It influences communication processes, decision-making, and the handling of conflicts. The link between democracy and digitality stems from the fundamental changes communication media and, consequently, in the formation of opinions and forms of participation (Krommer, 2021; Schulz et al., 2018). Furthermore, the validity of knowledge and information is now subject to social resonance spaces and referential systems. Against this backdrop, the concept of digital literacy (Samaniego, 2023) is receiving increasing attention, with links being made to citizency as digital citizenship (Choi, 2016). The Council of Europe (Council of Europe, 2024), for example, is promoting conceptually this connection between digital and democracy-related areas of competence. One focus of this relationship is the development of values, particularly critical thinking skills (Culp, 2019; Culp, 2023). With the support of the PROBONO Foundation (Germany), a digital project week was held at the end of 2024, involving four tandems of Tanzanian and German schools. The subject was 'Nutrition at the heart of the SDGs' and the week was structured around interlocking digital and analogue activities. This allowed the students to familiarise themselves with the topic and its local characteristics (e.g. crop rotation in agriculture), learn about their partners' contexts through collaborative work and presentations, and develop a broader understanding of the topic through cooperative reflections on Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Digitality was therefore the medium of the project week (learning through digitality), with the setting encouraging education that promotes democracy (learning in and through democracy) through a focus on understanding, negotiation processes and changing perspectives. The presentation of the study will focus on which democracy-relevant competencies were stimulated in this setting and whether factors that cause differences in competency stimulation could be identified. Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used For the study, a paper-and-pencil survey was conducted with Tanzanian participants of the digital learning project using a pre-post design. Seventy-seven students took part in the initial survey and 67 took part in the follow-up survey. The sample was determined by their enrolment in the school's facultative partnership group. The survey was conducted in Tanzania due to the limited number of studies available on digital use in teaching and learning situations in this country. The questionnaire collected anonymised data on the socio-economic background of the students’ families, including information on the mother's level of education, information on participation in the school partnership, data on private and school internet access, and private use of social media and school internet use. The initial survey also included open-ended questions about previous experience with partnership activities and expectations for the project week. The follow-up survey included open-ended questions about experiences gained from working with students from another continent, preferences regarding activities, and potential challenges to equal active participation. The questionnaires are available in paper form and in as a digital version. The study as a whole used a triangulation of methods. Initially, a qualitative content analysis procedure was employed (Mayring, 2014; Schreier, 2012), followed by a structuring procedure that incorporated additional data components (Kuckartz & Rädiker, 2023). The first part was based on the open questions. These were processed in two steps: first, they were coded using an inductive category system based on democracy-related competence models (Council of Europe, 2018). The code system was then differentiated deductively based on the codes. The aim was to be able to describe in detail the areas of competence stimulated during the project week. The coding guide was then validated through double coding. In the second part of the study, clusters were formed in two ways. Firstly, the data obtained was grouped together by school to create school-specific group for comparison. Secondly, content clusters were formed from the categories and subcategories. While the school groups were correlated with the aggregated school-specific data (e.g. internet use in class), the category-based clusters were correlated with the social background data. The analysis of the data was continuously fed back into the research group for validation. For the planned presentation of the study, the results will be condensed and discussed in relation to the conceptual framework. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings It can be concluded that the students gained relevant democratic experience through the digital learning project, and that it inspired them to develop relevant democratic skills and capacities. They also reported on experiences related to values and attitudes. In terms of knowledge, they learned about the variety of living conditions, interests and conflict situations. In terms of values, they report an increasing appreciation of diversity, which is accompanied by greater openness towards others. They also report that they succeeded in participating actively and responsibly in the exchange process. They believe that their communication skills have improved, in terms of both language and cooperation, and thus in terms of negotiating when interests diverge. Their statements suggest an increased level of self-efficacy, a relevant attitudinal component for acting in complex situations, as highlighted by the Council of Europe's competence model. (Council of Europe, 2018:44). These results support the thesis that education promoting democracy does not necessarily have to focus on democracy itself, but that relevant competencies can also be acquired in educational settings with different themes. However, the learning setting examined also suggests that the quality, and thus the sustainability, of educational processes depends on certain conditions. Learning experiences can become more relevant to democracy if the learning setting transcends the familiar social environment; if the chosen topic is both rooted in everyday life and of global relevance; and if it is implicitly related to democracy, as in this case via the Sustainable Development Goals; and if learning is situated between the local and global levels, thus including concrete experiences, their transcendence and reflection. References Choi, M. (2016). A Concept Analysis of Digital Citizenship for Democratic Citizenship Education in the Internet Age. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(4), 565–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1210549 Council of Europe. (2018). Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture (RFCDC), Volume 1 Context, concepts and model. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Council of Europe. (2024). Contextualising competences for democratic culture in digital citizenship education. A guidance document. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Culp, J. (2019). Democratic Education in a Globalized World: A Normative Theory. Taylor & Francis. Culp, J. (2023). Democratic Citizenship Education in Digitized Societies: A Habermasian Approach. Educational Theory, 73(2). Edelstein, W. (2005). Demokratie lernen und leben: Demokratische Kompetenzen und einen demokratischen Habitus erwerben Einführende Bemerkungen zum 10. Gespräch über Bildung „Demokratie lernen durch Handeln“ der Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, Berlin, 11. November 2005. Berlin. Himmelmann, G. (2001). Demokratie-Lernen als Lebens-, Gestaltungs- und Herrschaftsform. Wochenschauverlag. Himmelmann, G. (2013). Competences for teaching, learning and living democratic citizenship. In M. Print & D. Lange (Hrsg.), Civic Education and Competences for Engaging Citizens in Democracies (S. 3–7). Sense Publishers. http://www.ciando.com/ebook/bid-841379; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-172-6_1 Krommer, A. (2021). Mediale Paradigmen, palliative Didaktik und die Kultur der Digitalität. In U. Hauck-Thum & J. Noller (Hrsg.), Was ist Digitalität? Philosophische und pädagogische Perspektiven (S. 57–72). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62989-5_5 Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2023). Qualitative Content Analysis. Methods, Practice and Software (2. ed. Aufl.). SAGE Pulibcations. Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt. Negt, O. (2016). Der politische Mensch. Demokratie als Lebensform. Steidl. Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-Space and Homogeneity-Heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Hrsg.), Global Modernities (S. 25–44). Sage Publications. Samaniego, J. M. (2023). A cartography of digital literacy: conceptual categories and main issues in the theorization and study of digital literacies. Digital Education Review(43), 68–86. https://doi.org/0.1344/10.1344/der.2023.43.66-84 Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Sage Publications. Schulz, W., Losito, B., Agrusti, G., Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., & Friedman, T. (2018). Becoming citizens in a changing world. IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2016 International Report. Springer Open. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-73963-2; https://www.doabooks.org/doab?func=fulltext&uiLanguage=en&rid=27170 Stalder, F. (2017). The Digital Condition. John Wiley & Sons. Veith, H. (2010). Das Konzept der Demokratiekompetenz. In D. Lange (Hrsg.), Demokratiedidaktik. Impulse für die politische Bildung (S. 142–156). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92534-9_11 | ||