Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | ||
33 SES 05.5 A: General Poster Session
General Poster Session | ||
| Presentations | ||
33. Gender and Education
Poster Gender Competencies in Competency-Based Education: An Analysis of Czech Curriculum Reform Independent Researcher, Czech Republic (Czechia) Presenting Author:One of the current global educational trends sees a shift towards competency-based education (CBE), emphasising the need for students to obtain skills and knowledge useful for future life. Competency-based education responds to accelerating production of knowledge, technological change, and evolving labour market demands by focusing on learning outcomes and attained competencies rather than on acquisition of knowledge (Mulenga & Kabombwe, 2019; Moon, 2007). In many countries, competency-based education is implemented within competency-based curricular documents which organise aims, content, and assessment around explicitly formulated key competences and expected learning outcomes (Curry & Docherty, 2017; Anderson-Levitt & Gardinier, 2021; OECD, 2018). At the same time, gender equality is increasingly highlighted as one of the key priorities of education with the focus on integration of gender dimension and gender perspectives within the education process and content. Gender equality is considered in national education and equality strategies and is debated in connection to curricular reforms and revisions (Donovalová, 2024). With the emergence of these trends, gender competencies are becoming important competences both for students and teachers. The Czech curriculum has recently undergone a major curriculum reform, resulting in a new Framework Educational Programme for Basic Education. The revised curriculum is explicitly oriented towards competency-based education and states that developing key competences and basic literacies for the 21st century is a central aim of the reform, alongside a stronger focus on equality and gender issues. These declarations are aligned with strategic documents concerning education in Czechia: The Czech Strategy for the education policy of the Czech Republic up to 2030+ (2018) and Gender Equality Strategy 2021–2030, both of which highlight the development of competencies and gender equality to play a more prominent role within the education system. This qualitative documentary analysis aims to map the approach towards gender competencies within the Czech education system and to thematize and conceptualize gender competencies. While previous research has documented an implementation gap between political and strategic commitments and their translation into educational practice (Nehoda et al., 2024), there is limited evidence on how this gap manifests within competence frameworks especially concerning gender competencies. The study aims to answer these research questions: (1) How do Czech political and strategic documents conceptualize gender competencies in education? (2) To what extent does the new curricular framework align with the aforementioned documents concerning gender competencies? (3) What expectations regarding teachers’ gender competencies are formulated and how do these expectations relate to the curriculum’s competency-based approach to gender equality? The study employs policy borrowing which examines how global trends in education are adopted and adapted by local actors and conceptualises educational reforms as globally circulating agendas that are selectively translated and recontextualised in national contexts (Steiner-Khamsi, 2014). This perspective examines how competency-based education and gender equality appear as legitimising discourses in Czech policy and curricular texts, and to what extent they are translated education practise. The study draws on the concept of gender competence as an integrated configuration of knowledge, skills and attitudes. The initial deductive coding framework is based on the concept of gender competencies by Mahr et al. (2021), which conceptualises gender competence as (a) knowledge of gender-related issues and inequalities, (b) skills to apply this knowledge in educational practice, and (c) approaches/communication that enable gender-sensitive interaction and reflexive professional conduct. This study provides an integrated analysis of how gender competence is operationalised – whether it is explicitly articulated, framed through broader concepts such as diversity and inclusion, or rendered invisible through generalised competence language. It presents implications for curriculum design and teacher education and provides a relevant example for other education systems undergoing similar reforms. Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used This study is designed as a qualitative documentary analysis (Bowen, 2009). It examines strategic and policy documents concerning education, recently revised curricular document and a competency framework for future teachers and maps how gender competence is conceptualised within the Czech educational system and curricular document which during the last two major curriculum reform shifted towards competency based education (Češková, 2021) and which declares stronger focus on gender issues in education. Czechia is a suitable example of an education system that recently underwent a major curricular reform that explicitly aims to strengthen a competency-based orientation. It presents an analytical contradiction – while national policies and strategies simultaneously articulate commitments to gender equality in education, the country performs comparatively weakly on the EU Gender Equality Index, suggesting a potential gap between strategic commitments and their implementation within education. The analysed data set consists of four interconnected national documents: (1) the Strategy for Education Policy of the Czech Republic until 2030+, (2) the revised Framework Educational Programme for Basic Education, (3) the Competence Framework for Teacher Education Graduates, and (4) the Gender Equality Strategy 2021–2030. In addition, the analysis draws on the official webpage on the national curriculum portal presenting key competences as supplementary data of the competence framework. These sources were selected to capture how commitments and expectations travel across levels of governance and professional regulation. The documents are analysed through qualitative content analysis. The qualitative content analysis is used to comprehensively describe the conceptualization and thematization of gender competencies and to map the approach towards gender competencies throughout different documents. The documents were coded using both deductive and inductive coding. To operationalise the gender dimension, the study applies the concept of gender competence. First, deductive coding is based on Mahr et al. (2021), defining gender competence as (a) knowledge of gender-related issues and inequalities, (b) skills to apply this knowledge in educational practice, and (c) approaches/communication enabling gender-sensitive interaction and reflexive professional conduct. Second, inductive coding was used to capture emergent patterns, including generalisation (gender competence under broader concepts of equality, diversity etc.), abstraction, omission, and contradictions across documents. Cross-document comparison was used to assess the alignment between strategic commitments, curricular formulations of student competences, and expectations for teachers’ professional competences. This approach provides a robust methodological framework for examining and conceptualizing gender competencies and offers valuable insights into the implementation of supranational education trends within the Czech education system. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings The analysis of the policy and strategic documents, curricular document and competence framework shows an uneven and non-systematic approach towards conceptualization and subsequent implementation of gender competencies within the Czech education system. While all the policy and strategic documents formulate competencies and gender equality as two of the key concepts and agendas within education, this emphasis does not align with the operationalisation of gender competencies in the curricular document nor the competence framework. The analysis shows clear implementation gap – the policy and strategic declarations do not Gender-related commitments are more explicit at the level of strategic policy than in the core competence formulations of the curricular framework. In particular, references to equality appear frequently in abstract or neutral language, while direct phrasing of gender issues is limited. The cross-document comparison is expected to reveal partial coherence and non-systematic approach: while the curriculum and teacher framework may include generic expectations linked to inclusive education and non-discrimination, an explicit conceptualisation of gender competence as a distinct, developable competence with concrete pedagogical implications is lacking. The teacher competence framework is positions gender equality largely at the level of professional attitudes and communication, with less emphasis on structured competence development (e.g., recognising gendered patterns in learning environments, curriculum content and assessment). The operationalisation of gender competencies is not systematic – there is no clear alignment across the analysed documents in terms of definitions, scope, or expected learning/professional outcomes. This suggests that without explicit and coherent operationalisation of gender competence, competence-based reforms risk remaining at the level of rhetorical commitment rather than providing structural support for gender equality. References Anderson-Levitt, K., & Gardinier, M. P. (2021). Introduction contextualising global flows of competency-based education: Polysemy, hybridity and silences. Comparative Education, 57(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1852719 Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Curry, L., & Docherty, M. (2017). Implementing Competency-Based Education. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 10, 61–74. https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v10i0.4716 Češková, T. (2021). (Klíčové) kompetence v českém vzdělávání: Proč si navzájem nerozumíme? Studia paedagogica, 26(3), 7. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2021-3-1 Donovalová, A. (2025). Gender in the Curriculum: Analysis of National Curricular Documents of Czechia, Estonia, Ireland, and Sweden. ORBIS SCHOLAE, 18(3), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2025.3 Mahr, F., Dalke, K., Roden, R. C., Keisling, A. K., & Petrovic‐ Dovat, L. (2021). Gender competence in medical education. The Clinical Teacher, 18(5), 490–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13366 Moon, Y. (2007). Education reform and competency-based education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(2), 337–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029267 Mulenga, I. M., & Kabombwe Y. M. (2019). Understanding a competency-based curriculum and education: The Zambian perspective. Journal of Lexicography and Terminology, 3(1), 106-134. Nehoda, Y., Piast, N., Nosovets, N., Belan, T., & Rozhkova, L. (2024). Achieving gender equity in present-day educational settings. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7, 2024spe013. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024spe013 OECD. (2018). The Future of Education and Skills Education 2030: The Future We Want. E2030 Position Paper. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2018/06/the-future-of-education-and-skills_5424dd26/54ac7020-en.pdf Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2014). Cross-national policy borrowing: Understanding reception and translation. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 34(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2013.875649 33. Gender and Education
Poster Gender Dynamics in Pair Work: Challenges and Pathways to Equity in Classroom Interaction 1: Nazarbayev Intellectual school of Science and Mathematics in Nura district of Astana, Kazakhstan; 2: Nazarbayev Intellectual school of Science and Mathematics in Turkestan, Kazakhstan Presenting Author:Pair work is widely recognised as one of the most effective and psychologically comfortable forms of organising the learning process in secondary education. It promotes active student engagement, cooperation, communication skills, and shared responsibility for learning outcomes. Through dialogue and joint problem-solving, students are encouraged to articulate their reasoning, negotiate meanings, and construct knowledge collaboratively. However, despite its pedagogical advantages, the organisation of pair work also presents challenges related to students’ individual characteristics, social interaction, and classroom dynamics. One factor that remains insufficiently explored in everyday teaching practice is the role of gender in shaping students’ experiences of pair work. Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used This study adopts a mixed-methods classroom-based research design to explore gender dynamics in pair work and their influence on students’ interaction, comfort, and perceived learning effectiveness. The research was conducted in a lower secondary school context and focused on physics lessons. Participants were Grade 9 students (aged approximately 14–15) from a Nazarbayev Intellectual School in Kazakhstan. Four student groups participated, with an average of 9–10 students in each group. Pair work was organised in mixed-gender and same-gender configurations. Data were collected through classroom observations, two structured questionnaires administered before and after the intervention, and analysis of formative assessment data. Observations focused on interaction patterns, participation levels, and collaboration strategies. The questionnaires captured students’ perceptions of comfort, motivation, responsibility, and preferences regarding pair work. Data analysis combined descriptive statistical analysis with qualitative analysis of observation notes and open-ended responses. Ethical principles were observed throughout the study, including voluntary participation, informed consent, and anonymity. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings The findings of this study demonstrate that gender dynamics in pair work influence students’ classroom interaction and emotional comfort more than academic performance. Analysis of questionnaire data and classroom observations indicates that students’ perceptions of pair work vary depending on the gender composition of pairs, although learning outcomes remain largely comparable. According to the questionnaire results, 62.5% of respondents reported that working in a gender-mixed pair did not improve the effectiveness of their learning, describing the experience as ‘the same as usual,’ ‘unchanged,’ or stating that gender does not play a role and that outcomes depend primarily on individual characteristics. At the same time, 25% of students evaluated their work in mixed-gender pairs positively, noting increased responsibility, improved focus, or greater engagement. The remaining 12.5% of respondents expressed uncertainty when answering questions related to effectiveness. Students also identified specific challenges associated with working in mixed-gender pairs. The most frequently reported difficulties included stereotypes related to social gender roles (37.5%), personal characteristics of a partner of another gender (25%), shyness (12.5%), and fear of appearing incompetent in front of a partner of another gender (12.5%). Notably, 12.5% of students reported no disadvantages in mixed-gender pair work. Despite these challenges, the study found no significant differences in academic achievement attributable to the gender composition of pairs. The findings support a flexible, gender-aware approach to organising pair work that promotes equitable and inclusive classroom interaction. References Baram, M. (2016). Gender differences in high school students’ interests in physics. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(1). Abraham, J., & Barker, K. (2015). Exploring gender differences in motivation, engagement and enrolment behaviour of senior secondary physics students in New South Wales. Science Education, 45(1), 59–73. Ding, N., & Harskamp, E. (2016). How partner gender influences female students’ problem solving in physics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(5), 331–343. Aytekin, E., & Isiksal-Bostan, M. (2018). Middle school students’ attitudes towards the use of technology in mathematics lessons: Does gender make a difference? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(1), 1–21. Taasobshirazi, G., & Carr, M. (2008). Gender differences in science: An expertise perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 20(2), 149–169. Sharma, M., & Bewes, J. (2011). Self-monitoring, confidence, academic achievement and gender differences in physics. Journal of Learning Design, 4(3). Zayas-Minkalender, E., Marshman, E., Schunn, C. D., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Singh, C. (2019). Large gender differences in physics self-efficacy at equal performance levels: A warning sign? Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings. 33. Gender and Education
Poster Gender Representation in Primary School Life Studies Textbooks 1: Ankara University, Turkey (Türkiye); 2: Middle East Technical University, Turkey (Türkiye) Presenting Author:From a very young age, children are exposed to gender stereotypes through advertising, media and pop culture (Fine, 2010) to which educational materials such as school textbooks also contribute. Textbooks carry dominant social values and norms embedded within society contributing to the construction of gender norms through both textual and visual representations. Visuals are especially powerful in early childhood, as children often engage with images more directly and intuitively than with written text. Therefore, it can be said that visuals in the textbooks play crucial role in shaping gender norms in early schooling. Turkey represents a particularly relevant case due to ongoing debates on gender equality, curriculum reform, and value education. In Turkish education system -which is highly centralized and one curriculum is applied nationwide- textbooks are centrally approved, published and distributed free of charge to students under the authority of the Ministry of National Education (MoNE). This ensures the same textbooks being used at the same grade levels throughout the country. Within this centralised system, textbook visuals constitute a particularly powerful medium through which gender norms and roles are represented and normalised for young learners. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the visuals containing gender findings in Life Sciences (Hayat Bilgisi) lesson textbooks provided by MoNE. Life Sciences lesson was selected for this study due to its important role in supporting children’s adaptation to society by promoting learning through experience and providing essential knowledge for everyday life. It is only taught in first three grades and is a foundational lesson that provides the conceptual and pedagogical groundwork for later disciplines such as Science and Social Studies. As this subject plays a key role in shaping children’s early understandings of identity, belonging, and social relations, examining gender representation and normative gender roles within its content becomes extremely important. Previous research conducted at international level has mostly focuses on either foreign language -particularly English as foreign language- textbooks (Handayini & Tungka, 2023; Parham, 2013; Xiong et al., 2017; Fithriani, 2022) or children’s books (Lestari & Yulindrasari, 2020; Adam & Harper, 2021). Similar to international literature, research focusing on language and children books can widely be found within the national literature (Kartal & Kocasavaş, 2024; Güney, 2016) In the context of analysing Life Lesson textbooks, researchers tends to prioritise textual analysis (Hatay Uçar & Çetinkaya, 2021) or earlier editions of textbooks (Güzel Candan & Ergen, 2014; Sarıtaş & Şahin; 2017; Karaboğa, 2020; Akcan & Türkmenoğlu, 2021), while current textbooks created under the Maarif Model and their visual content remain underexplored. According to the given context he main research questions of the study are: How are female and male figures represented in the visual images of Life Studies textbooks? How are domestic and non-domestic roles distributed across genders in these images? What types of activities, behaviors, and social roles are associated with which genders? By addressing these questions, the study contributes to the international discussions about gender representation in educational materials by providing evidence from the Turkish context. Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used This study adopts a qualitative research design and employs document analysis as its primary method. Document analysis involves the systematic examination of written materials that contain information about the phenomena under investigation (Yıldırım & Şimşek, 2013). Specifically, the study involves a content analysis of the visual materials presented in Life Studies textbooks. In 2024, the national curriculum in Turkey was revised with the introduction of the Century of Türkiye Maarif Model, which led to an update of school textbooks across all subjects. The implementation of the revised curriculum and textbooks has been carried out gradually. During the 2024–2025 academic year, the new textbooks were introduced at Grades 1, 5, and 9. In the 2025–2026 academic year, which is the current implementation phase, the updated textbooks are used in Grades 1 and 2 at the primary level, Grades 5 and 6 at the lower secondary level, and Grades 9 and 10 at the upper secondary level. Given this phased implementation, the sample of the study consists exclusively of Grade 1 and Grade 2 Life Studies textbooks, as these represent the most recent and fully implemented materials at the primary level under the revised curriculum. At the time of submission, the study is ongoing, and the analysis of visual representations in the textbooks is currently being conducted. The unit of analysis consists of visual images that include human figures. Images that do not depict people (e.g., objects, landscapes, symbols) are excluded from the analysis. In the later stages, a coding guide focusing on gender roles and related themes will be developed prior to the analysis in order to ensure the reliability of the study. The visuals in the textbooks will be analyzed using MAXQDA software, and the findings will be used to formulate recommendations for Life Studies textbooks. The analysis is designed to follow a two-stage process. In the first stage, images will be systematically coded and quantified to identify patterns of gender distribution across categories. In the second stage, the findings will be interpreted qualitatively to examine how visual representations may reflect or reproduce gendered norms and expectations. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings As the research is still ongoing, it is not possible to present definitive findings at this stage. However, while the first-grade Life Studies textbook mainly focuses on school, family and self-awareness—resulting in a more limited range of contexts—the second-grade textbook introduces a wider variety of social settings, allowing for more diverse representations of gender roles. Based on the initial examination of the visuals in the first-grade Life Studies textbooks, several observations can be shared. For instance, some gender-typed representations remain visible, such as women being portrayed more often as teachers and men in authority-related or technical occupations. At the same time, visuals that challenge traditional gender role divisions can also be identified. Images depicting mothers and fathers jointly engaging in domestic tasks such as cooking, cleaning and childcare suggest an effort to present shared household responsibilities rather than assigning these roles exclusively to one gender. Such representations may indicate a shift towards more balanced gender norms compared to earlier textbook studies conducted in the Turkish context. Previous research in Turkey has shown gendered patterns in textbook visuals, particularly the overrepresentation of women in domestic roles and men in occupations associated with power and authority. This study, however, is expected to reveal a more nuanced and balanced portrayal of gender roles. Should this tendency be confirmed, the study will contribute to the literature by highlighting the potential impact of recent curriculum reforms on the visual construction of gender norms in early childhood education. References •Adam, H., Harper, L.J. Gender equity in early childhood picture books: a cross-cultural study of frequently read picture books in early childhood classrooms in Australia and the United States. Aust. Educ. Res. 50, 453–479 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00494-0 •Akcan, E., & Türkmenoğlu, Ö. A. (2022). Hayat Bilgisi Ders Kitaplarının Farklılıklar Açısından İncelenmesi. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 42(1), 423-459. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.951327 •Candan, D. G., & Ergen, G. (2014). 3. Sınıf Hayat Bilgisi Ders Kitaplarının Temel Evrensel Değerleri İçermesi Bakımından İncelenmesi. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.12780/UUSBD283 Fine, C. (2010). Delusions of gender: How our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference. Norton. •Fithriani, R. (2022) Gender Stereotypes in Educational Texts: A Comparative Study of Indonesian and International Primary English Textbooks. Discourse and Interaction, 15, 53-76. •Handayani, Dian & Tungka, Novalita. (2023). The Representation of Gender Equality in The Illustration of English Textbooks for Senior High School. PARAFRASE Jurnal Kajian Kebahasaan & Kesastraan. 23. 129-137. 10.30996/parafrase.v23i2.8592. •Karaboğa, M. T. (2020). Sosyal Bilgiler Ders Kitaplarında Cinsiyet Rolleri. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 15(1), 4847-4881. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.686709 •Kartal, N. & Kocasavaş, Y. (2024). 8. Sınıf Türkçe Ders Kitabında Yer Alan Görsellerin MEB Taslak Ders Kitabı Kriterlerine Göre Değerlendirilmesi. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, (39), 543-566. DOI: 10.29000/rumelide.1469436. •Lestari, M. Does Gender in Children’s Books Matter? Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Early Childhood Education (ICECE 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210322.008 •Li, Lekai & Xiong, Tao & He, Jing. (2017). The Representation of Gender in a Popular Primary School EFL Textbook Series in China. International Journal of Education and Practice. 5. 79-87. 10.18488/journal.61.2017.55.79.87. •Nail GÜNEY.(2016).6. Sınıf Türkçe Ders Kitaplarında Toplumsal Cinsiyet İncelemesi.Journal of Turkish Studies •Parham, Fatemeh. (2013). Gender Representation in Children's EFL Textbooks. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 3. 10.4304/tpls.3.9.1674-1679. •Sarıtaş, E., & Şahin, Ü. (2018). HAYAT BİLGİSİ DERS KİTAPLARINDA TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET ROLLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty(48), 463-477. •Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (Genişletilmiş 9. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık. | ||