Conference Agenda
| Session | ||
30 SES 05.5 A: General Poster Session
General Poster Session | ||
| Presentations | ||
30. Environmental and Sustainability Education Research (ESER)
Poster Gendered Differences in Psychological Involvement with Climate Change and Sustainability in Finland University of Helsinki, Finland Presenting Author:Climate change is a central driver in the current era of poly-crisis. Despite widespread awareness and scientific consensus (Lee et al., 2015), effective climate action remains insufficient (Finnish Environmental Institute, 2024). Thus, there exists knowledge-action gap related to climate change (Kirsten, 2025). This gap is shaped by structural factors (Middlemiss, 2018), systemic barriers (Markard et al., 2012) as well as psychological obstacles (Gifford, 2011). We focus on citizens’ psychological involvement with climate change and sustainability. We define this involvement to include individuals’ understanding, sense of responsibility and efficacy, resources, everyday challenges, personal contribution, alignment of actions with personal values, and whether they feel heard in societal discussions related to climate change. We view this involvement as a prerequisite for active environmental citizenship and agency, which are key aims of Environmental and Sustainability Education (ESE). Climate concern and action are also gendered, as prior research has consistently shown that women express greater concern about climate change than men, especially in industrialized Western contexts (Davidson & Freudenburg, 1996; Echavarren, 2023) and engage more frequently in pro-environmental behaviors (Desrochers & Zelenski, 2023). However, gender has usually been usually treated as a single, uniform predictor of environmental concern with a focus on mean level differences (e.g. McCright & Dunlap, 2011). This approach may overlook variation in genders. Previous research suggests that, for example, conservative white men differ drastically from other men in their climate views (McCright & Dunlap, 2011). Additionally, psychological research indicates that men exhibit more psychological variation for example in certain personality traits and economical preferences (Borkenau et al., 2013; Thöni et al., 2021; Thöni & Volk, 2021). This provides reason to suspect more variation regarding climate views. In the public discussions there is a worry of widening gender gap among young men and women in their political ideologies (e.g. Burn-Murdoch, 2024), and some research suggests that young men are increasingly identifying with right-wing ideology and women with left-wing ideology (Milosav, 2026), while other studies find this effect to be small-to-medium at large and heavily culture-dependent (Nennstiel & Hudde, 2025). Because right-wing and conservative values are linked to lower levels of climate concern (McCright & Dunlap, 2011), we analyze whether a wider gap in psychological involvement exists among younger people. Thus, we investigate the following questions: How do Finnish citizens perceive and evaluate their psychological involvement with climate change and sustainability? Are there gendered differences in psychological involvement? Do genders differ with their variation in psychological involvement? Does the connection between psychological involvement and gender remain after controlling for other background variables? Are gendered differences more pronounced among younger people? These questions are important for ESE as they shift focus from a knowledge-based approach toward understanding the complexity of psychological involvement. This challenges ESE to develop more nuanced and inclusive pedagogical strategies that can foster agency even among those currently disengaged. Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used The data analyzed are from the 2024–2025 wave of the Citizen Barometer (Kansalaisbarometri), an annual national survey conducted by the University of Helsinki, which is a representative sample (n = 1013) of Finnish adult population. We developed a novel survey measure consisting of nine 7-point Likert-scale statements to assess psychological involvement with climate change and sustainability. These items measure perceived understanding, personal responsibility, perceived knowledge sufficiency, concrete resources, perceived position or efficacy, everyday challenges, personal contribution to problems, representation of concerns and conceptions of good life related to climate change. The questionnaire was developed by the Research and Development group Eduteam at the Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR). In addition to the climate items, the survey included variables for age, region, gender, language, education, political interest, and political ideologies (left-right and liberal-conservative). For the analysis, we calculated weighted means and share of agreement percentages for the total population and separately by gender. We utilized weighted distributions, distributional overlap, and effect size indices, including the overlap coefficient (OVL), area under the curve (AUC), and Cliff’s delta. Finally, we conducted weighted linear regression models to determine whether the connection between gender and psychological involvement remains after controlling for demographic and ideological background variables. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings Overall, respondents reported high perceived understanding but more moderate levels of responsibility, resources, and value alignment. Notably, many expressed doubts on their ability to meaningfully influence climate outcomes. To address the climate crisis, it is critical to acknowledge that just adding knowledge is not sufficient, as various psychological factors pose obstacles for citizens’ climate action. Low belief in self-efficacy can prevent climate action, and therefore ESE should also focus on addressing emotional, ethical and political concerns and strengthening citizens climate competences and opportunities to contribute meaningfully to solving climate crisis. Clear gender differences emerged: women consistently expressed stronger perceived responsibility, resources, and alignment with sustainability values, whereas men reported lower involvement and showed greater variation across several items. Distributional analyses revealed that variation among men was not bimodal but reflected a broad dispersion across the scale. Regression models showed that gender remained a robust predictor of several dimensions even after accounting for age, education, ideology, and political interest. Gendered effects were generally more pronounced among respondents aged 30 or under. Gendered patterns highlight how responsibility and agency are unevenly distributed. Climate and sustainability education should acknowledge the multiple forms of climate thinking and develop more nuanced and inclusive pedagogical strategies for all subgroups. References Borkenau, P., McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2013). Do men vary more than women in personality? A study in 51 cultures. Journal of research in personality, 47(2), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.12.001 Burn-Murdoch, J. (2024). A new global gender divide is emerging. Financial Times, 26, 2024 Davidson, D. J., & Freudenburg, W. R. (1996). Gender and Environmental Risk Concerns: A Review and Analysis of Available Research: A Review and Analysis of Available Research. Environment and Behavior, 28(3), 302-339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916596283003 Desrochers, J.E., Zelenski, J.M (2023). Why are males not doing these environmental behaviors?: exploring males’ psychological barriers to environmental action. Curr Psychol, 42, 25042–25060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03587-w Echavarren, J. M. (2023). The gender gap in environmental concern: Support for an ecofeminist perspective and the role of gender egalitarian attitudes. Sex Roles, 89(5–6), 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01397-3 Finnish Environmental Institute (2024). Suomalaisten kulutuksen hiilijalanjälki. [The carbon footprint of Finnish consumption]. https://www.ymparisto.fi/fi/suomalaisten-kulutuksen-hiilijalanjalki Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66(4), 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566 Kirsten, F. (2025). The environmental concern-behavior gap in South Africa. Environment and Behavior, 57(1–2), 118–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139165251318098 Lee, T. M., Markowitz, E. M., Howe, P. D., Ko, C.-Y., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2015). Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nature Climate Change, 5(11), 1014–1020. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2728 Markard, J. et al. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global environmental change, 21(4), 1163-1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003 Middlemiss, L. (2018). Sustainable consumption: Key issues. Routledge. Milosav, Ð., Dickson, Z., Hobolt, S. B., Klüver, H., Kuhn, T., & Rodon, T. (2026). The youth gender gap in support for the far right. Journal of European Public Policy, 33(2), 444-468. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2025.2481181 Nennstiel, R., & Hudde, A. (2025). Is there a growing gender divide among young adults in regard to ideological left–right self-placement? Evidence from 32 European countries. European Sociological Review, 41(6), 862-883, https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaf021 Thöni, C., Volk, S., & Cortina, J. M. (2021). Greater male variability in cooperation: Meta-analytic evidence for an evolutionary perspective. Psychological Science, 32(1), 50-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620956632 Thöni, C., & Volk, S. (2021). Converging evidence for greater male variability in time, risk, and social preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(23), e2026112118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.202611211 30. Environmental and Sustainability Education Research (ESER)
Poster Aligning a Grade 9 Geography Curriculum with the Sustainable Development Goals: A Qualitative Content Analysis from Kazakhstan Nazarbayev Intellectual school, Kazakhstan Presenting Author:The Fourth Industrial Revolution has accelerated technological innovation across societies; however, global environmental, economic, and social challenges continue to intensify. In response, the United Nations adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, introducing 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2015. Education (SDG 4) plays a pivotal role in achieving these goals, as it equips learners with essential knowledge, values, and competencies necessary for sustainable development. Within this context, geography education holds a distinctive position due to its integrative focus on human–environment interactions, enabling the development of sustainability literacy, global citizenship, and responsible decision-making. Internationally, Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) has been recognised as a transformative educational paradigm that promotes critical thinking, systems thinking, collaboration, and ethical reasoning (UNESCO, 2017). Geography, as a bridging discipline between natural and social sciences, has increasingly been positioned as a core subject for embedding ESD principles into secondary education curricula. Across Europe and beyond, curriculum reforms in countries such as the United Kingdom, the United States, Japan, and South Korea demonstrate varied approaches to integrating SDGs into geography education through inquiry-based learning, project-based activities, case studies, and interdisciplinary teaching (Kim & Lee, 2020; Xuan & Lindqvist, 2025). In Kazakhstan, Nazarbayev Intellectual Schools (NIS) implement a competency-based curriculum aligned with national development priorities and international educational trends, as articulated in the NIS Strategy–2035. The geography curriculum aims to foster critical thinking, research skills, environmental awareness, and global civic responsibility. Despite these intentions, the extent to which the Sustainable Development Goals are systematically and coherently integrated into the geography curriculum remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by examining the alignment between the Grade 9 NIS Geography curriculum and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. The central research question guiding this study is: The study pursues four research objectives:
The conceptual framework of this research is grounded in Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and curriculum alignment theory. Drawing on UNESCO’s ESD framework, the study conceptualises sustainability learning as the development of key competencies, including critical thinking, problem-solving, collaboration, ethical decision-making, and self-awareness. In addition, curriculum alignment is examined through four analytical criteria: relevance, explicitness, balance, and pedagogy. This framework enables a systematic evaluation of how sustainability concepts are represented, emphasised, and operationalised within curriculum documents. Methodologically, the study adopts a qualitative directed content analysis approach. Primary data consist of official Grade 9 geography curriculum documents, supported by secondary sources including the UN 2030 Agenda and UNESCO ESD policy frameworks. Curriculum learning objectives and themes are mapped against SDGs and categorised into environmental, social, and economic domains. This approach allows for both structured comparison and interpretive analysis. From an international perspective, the study contributes to comparative curriculum research by providing insights from a Central Asian educational context that remains underrepresented in ESD literature. By situating the Kazakhstani geography curriculum alongside international curriculum trends, the research offers transferable analytical tools for examining SDG alignment in secondary education systems across Europe and beyond. The findings aim to inform curriculum developers, policymakers, and geography educators seeking to strengthen sustainability education through curriculum design rather than isolated classroom interventions. Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used This study employed a qualitative research design to examine the extent to which the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are integrated into the Grade 9 geography curriculum and to assess the level of alignment between curriculum objectives and global sustainability frameworks. The primary data source for this research was the official Grade 9 Geography curriculum of the Nazarbayev Intellectual Schools (Autonomous Educational Organization “Nazarbayev Intellectual Schools”, Astana, 2023). Secondary data sources included the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (UN, 2015), UNESCO’s Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) Roadmap (UNESCO, 2020), and official teacher guides and instructional materials used in curriculum implementation. These documents provided an international policy and pedagogical context for interpreting curriculum content and learning objectives. A directed qualitative content analysis approach was adopted, following the framework proposed by Hsieh and Shannon (2005). This approach was selected as it allows for systematic analysis guided by an existing theoretical framework while remaining open to emergent insights. The analytical procedure was further structured using a three-phase coding process adapted from Elo and Kyngäs (2008), consisting of preparation, organisation, and interpretation phases. During the coding process, curriculum learning objectives and thematic units were systematically mapped against the Sustainable Development Goals. Each learning objective was coded according to its primary sustainability focus and categorised into one of three sustainability dimensions: environmental, social, or economic. This categorisation enabled the examination of thematic emphasis, balance across sustainability dimensions, and the identification of gaps or underrepresented SDGs within the curriculum. To evaluate the quality of alignment between the geography curriculum and the SDGs, four analytical criteria were applied: relevance, explicitness, balance, and pedagogy. Relevance referred to the degree to which curriculum content addressed sustainability-related issues; explicitness examined whether links to SDGs were direct or implicit; balance assessed the proportional representation of environmental, social, and economic dimensions; and pedagogy considered the extent to which learning objectives promoted sustainability-oriented competencies such as critical thinking, systems thinking, and applied problem-solving. This methodological framework enabled a structured yet flexible analysis of curriculum alignment with the SDGs and supported the generation of findings relevant to international discussions on Education for Sustainable Development in secondary geography education. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings The findings of this study reveal that the integration of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) within the Grade 9 geography curriculum is uneven and lacks coherence across sustainability dimensions. The curriculum demonstrates strong alignment with environmental sustainability, particularly through themes such as water resources, pollution, atmospheric hazards, and biodiversity conservation. These topics explicitly correspond to SDGs 6, 13, 14, and 15 and enable students to explore local and global environmental challenges. The economic dimension of sustainability is moderately represented through themes related to economic resources, sustainable development, and the Human Development Index, linked to SDGs 8, 9, and 12. However, this integration is largely theoretical, with limited emphasis on applied learning, including green technologies, sustainable production, and responsible consumption. The social dimension is the least explicitly addressed. While themes such as demographics, migration, and urbanisation indirectly relate to SDGs 3, 5, 10, and 11, their coverage remains fragmented, with minimal attention to equity, health, gender equality, and social justice. Overall, the curriculum reflects an imbalance among environmental, economic, and social dimensions of sustainability. Although it promotes critical thinking, research skills, and ICT literacy, sustainability-oriented competencies such as systems thinking, collaboration, and applied problem-solving are weakly articulated. The study is limited by its reliance on curriculum documents, and further research should examine classroom practices and teacher perspectives to better understand how SDG integration is enacted in practice. References 1.UNESCO. Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, 2017. – 56 p. 2. Catling S., Willy T. Teaching Primary Geography. London: Routledge, 2018. – 312 p. 3. Nazarbayev Intellectual Schools AEO. Grade 9 Geography Curriculum. Astana: NIS, 2023. – 72 p. 4. Brooks C., Butt G., Fargher M. The Power of Geographical Thinking. Cham: Springer, 2017. – 258 p. 5. Lambert D., Solem M. Developing learner agency through geography education. Geography. – 2020. – T. 105. – №. 2. – P. 55–68. 6. Miguel González R., Sebastián-López M. Education on Sustainable Development Goals: Geographical perspectives for gender equality in sustainable cities and communities. Sustainability. – 2022. – T. 14. – №. 7. – Art. 4042. 7. Vare P., Scott W. Learning for Change: Education and Sustainability. London: Routledge, 2019. – 198 p. 8. Tilbury D. Learning to Connect: Education for Sustainability. London: Routledge, 2018. – 240 p. 9. Miao S., Meadows M. E., Duan Y., Guo F. How does the geography curriculum contribute to education for sustainable development? Lessons from China and the U.S.A. Sustainability. – 2022. – T. 14. – №. 17. – Art. 10637. 10. Kim J., Lee Y. Integration of education for sustainable development in Asian geography curricula. Asian Education Review. – 2020. – T. 11. – №. 3. – P. 215–229. 11. Department for Education (DfE). National Curriculum for Geography: Key Stages 3 and 4. London: DfE, 2021. – 64 p. 12. Miguel González R., et al. Geography education and the SDGs in Europe. European Journal of Geography. – 2023. – T. 14. – №. 2. – P. 87–101. 13. Martínez-Hernández C., Mínguez C. The Anthropocene and the Sustainable Development Goals: Key elements in geography higher education? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. – 2023. – T. 7. – P. 1648–1667. 14. UNESCO. Education for Sustainable Development: ESD for 2030 Framework. Geneva: UNESCO & UNECE, 2023. Available at https://unece.org/sites/default/files/202305/UNESCO_B.Combes_ESD_for_2030_FINAL.pdf (accessed 12.11.2025). 15. Giancola E., Prades A., Nokala T. The crucial role of education in achieving sustainability and a low-carbon economy. BUILD UP Technical Article. – 2023. Available at: https://build-up.ec.europa.eu (accessed 12.11.2025). 16. Sposab K., Rieckmann M. Development of sustainability competencies in secondary school education: A scoping literature review. Sustainability. – 2024. – T. 16. – №. 23. – P. 1–29. 30. Environmental and Sustainability Education Research (ESER)
Poster Intercultural Learning Environment and Body's Experiences. Haute Ecole Pédagogique du Canton de Vaud Suisse, Switzerland Presenting Author:This action research is part of the initial training of primary school teachers at the Haute école pédagogique du canton de Vaud in Switzerland, and more specifically within the framework of an intercultural exchange module (PEERS) between Switzerland and Italy (University of Bologna). Through the understanding of comparative education systems and the discovery of otherness, these PEERS projects, which involve a dozen Swiss and Italian students each year, aim to develop the mobility capital of future teachers in training in order to make it operational in the classroom. The main educational theme is the issue of including student diversity.
Students involved in these projects are encouraged to take a meta-perspective on their somatic experience of moving through space by keeping a travel journal, a kind of reflective space. They start from their experience of otherness and transpose it into their professional actions and identity construction as future teachers. This experience of spatial mobility, recounted through biographical writing, is then reworked in the form of a final report upon their return from their trip. This allows them to reflect on the transformations that have taken place in their professional stance. It is therefore a somato-reflexive approach (Eddy, 2016) since corporeality is strongly involved in this tertiary education program as well as the reflexivity that reflects this, through the students' logbooks.
We will focus on the spatial nature of this professionalization program, considered as a learning environment that is enriched by the multiplicity of experiences according to mechanisms of reflexivity and interaction with the places visited. It is a training space that opens up a potential space for the development of the individual's abilities and skills. This program strongly mobilizes the sensory experience lived through the students' bodies as they confront otherness. The students are led to become more attentive and aware of their bodily perceptions in space, due to the highly immersive nature of their experience in an environment that is different from their everyday lives. This phenomenological experience of the self (Merleau-Ponty, 1976) in a specific place (space) and at a specific time (time) is made visible in the reflective writings they are asked to produce upon their return to Switzerland. The body has always been shaped and socialized by the culture in which it exists. We will observe a training situation where physicality is used to aid learning. We propose to observe how the use of the sensory and embodied experience of moving through space can serve as a tool for learning, development, and professionalization for future teachers.
In this research, we will therefore observe how a formative space can become “transformative” (Meziani, 2021). We will see how a reflective space that is created and structured will interact with an existing space: a traversed territory (the city of Bologna), a kind of immersive urban terrain. The confrontation between these two spaces will possibly give rise to a utopian space (Foucault, 1984) or at least intermediate spaces, or even a highly educational and emancipatory co-spatiality. Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used This article presents a teacher training program centered on travel as a space for training and experiential learning, with the aim of promoting openness to otherness and intercultural education. In the program, writing, first in a journal and then in a final training report, acts as a medium that promotes processes of biographization. This is an action research project that qualitatively analyzes reports written by students participating in a training program. The aim is to understand the formative and transformative effects of sensory experience across space and time in the construction of the subject. A dozen student reports, submitted between December 2023 and 2024 at the end of their PEERS mobility week in Bologna, will be considered. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings We also observe the fortuitous dimension resulting from the experience of certain places or moments that contribute to the production of so-called informal learning. The latter is linked, in particular, to the leisure activities and cultural discoveries made by Swiss students during their trips to the city of Bologna. The learning that results from this is unintentional on the part of the learners and is integrated into activities that are planned and intentional (Dewey, 2018) .The student mobility experience is therefore rich in learning, whether formal or informal, predictable or fortuitous, professional or personal. For this contribution, we focused on a training program that highlights the role of the body in higher education. To do so, we sought to demonstrate how the narrative of the experience specific to a training program, such as that offered by PEERS, enables individuals to produce and perform themselves in the world. We sought to demonstrate how identity is constructed for the subject, through and in their actions and interactions with the world, according to a spatial and somatic paradigm. Our research was based on textual analysis and a qualitative method, highlighting the notion of space. We observed how the latter can become a condition of experience and therefore of learning, by questioning, in particular, what space can offer for the subject's experience, according to a multiple understanding of spatiality (Zusman, 2021). The dimensions of corporeality and the consideration of feelings, sensory experience, and the place of the body are very present in the students' reflective assessments at the end of their mobility experience. This allowed us to observe how the integration of the body in tertiary education promotes the assimilation of experience. Taking this dimension into account also offers the opportunity to change the practice of future teachers by changing the way they see themselves and, consequently, their students (Emond, 2022). References • Bacherlard, G. (1957). The Poetics of Space. Paris: PUF. • Billeter, J.-F. (2012). A Paradigm. Paris: Allia Publishing. • Delory-Momberger, C. and Bourguigon, J.-C. (2020). Biographical medialities, practices of self and the world. Le Sujet dans la cité, Actuels 9 (1), 17-26. • Dewey, J. (2018). Democracy and education. Paris: Armand Colin. • Eddy, M. (2016). The Evolution of the Somatic Arts and Conscious Action. University of Chicago Press. • Emond, G. (2018). Learning body awareness among teachers and trainers and its influence on the internal-external coherence of their practice. (doctoral thesis). Université du Québec à Montréal. • Emond, G., Lachance, J., Vinit F. (2018). Learning to Be a Sensitive Professional. A Life-Enhancing Process Grounded in the Experience of the Body. Adult Education Quarterly 1-18. • Emond, G. (2022). Teaching while knowing how to be your body: an innovative process of coherence between oneself and others. In Capron, I., Vuichard, A. (eds.). Pedagogical Innovation: From Theory to Practice. Ed. Alphil-Swiss University Press. (pp. 161-177). • Foucault, M. (1984). Other Spaces: Heterotopias in Dits et écrits, vol. IV, Paris: Gallimard, pp. 752-762. • Foucault, M. (2001). Techniques of the Self. In M. Foucault. Dits et écrits II, 1602-1632. Paris: Gallimard. • Galvani, P. (2020). Self-training and self-knowledge, an experiential research-training method. Lyon: Chronique sociale. • Laplantine, F. (2018). Thinking about the senses. Paris: Pocket editions. • Le Breton, D. (2023). The sociology of the body. Paris: PUF. • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1976). Phenomenology of perception. Paris: Tel Gallimard. • Meziani, M., Canet, G., Bock, C. (2021). Formative and transformative spaces. An interdisciplinary approach. Nîmes: Champ social- Questions de société. • Pineau, G. (2009). Travel as an introduction to the arts of the way. In Le journal des psychanalyses. 271, 71-74. • Quéré, L. (1997). The situation always neglected? Réseaux, volume 15, no. 85, pp. 163-192. • Ricoeur, P. (1990). Oneself as another. Paris: Seuil. • Zusman, Y. (2021). Random space. Paris: PUF. 30. Environmental and Sustainability Education Research (ESER)
Poster Interdisciplinary Art and Science Education in the European Arctic Context University of Lapland, Finland Presenting Author:In environmental and sustainability education, the arts are increasingly understood as pedagogical practices that foster sensory, emotional, and participatory engagement with ecological issues. Artistic processes support experiential and inquiry-oriented learning, enabling embodied and relational encounters with environmental phenomena. From this perspective, learning is not limited to cognitive understanding but involves affective, material, and sensory dimensions that shape how learners relate to their environments. In parallel, collaboration between artists and scientists has expanded markedly since the 1990s, inspiring inter- and transdisciplinary approaches that increasingly inform educational practice. Material-based practices play a central role in such art–science collaborations, offering concrete ways to explore ecological processes and phenomena. In European Arctic contexts, where many communities live in close relationship with their natural environments, artists and educators frequently work with locally sourced materials that carry ecological and cultural significance. These practices support situated, relational, and place-responsive forms of learning that are particularly relevant to sustainability education. In Finland, the national core curriculum encourages multidisciplinary learning and phenomenon-based approaches, providing a strong foundation for integrating visual arts into environmental science education while maintaining the integrity of both disciplines. This study examines interdisciplinary art–science education in the European Arctic, focusing on how hands-on engagement with natural materials can support learning processes that integrate cognitive understanding with emotional and sensory engagement. The research asks: How do material-based art–science practices contribute to pupils’ meaning making in environmental education, and how are cognitive, emotional, and sensory dimensions of learning intertwined in these processes? The theoretical framework draws on experiential learning, embodied and relational pedagogy, and arts-based environmental education, with particular attention to material engagement and artistic symbolisation as pathways for learning. Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used The study is grounded in art-based action research, which combines arts-based pedagogical interventions with systematic inquiry through iterative research cycles. The first author designed and facilitated multiple art-based action research cycles as part of doctoral research in art education. As one cycle focused on experimental work with bilberries and their chemical transformations, using local ecological materials as a pedagogical resource to connect visual arts practices with emerging chemistry learning. Artistic symbolisation—such as working with colour change, visual composition, and material transformation—was used to support pupils’ exploration of ecological and chemical concepts. Data were collected through participatory observation, children’s artworks, field notes, photographs, and semi-structured interviews with teachers and pupils. The analysis employed thematic analysis alongside close reading of pupils’ visual and multimodal expressions, allowing attention to both verbal accounts and material–visual meaning making. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings The findings suggest that visual arts play a particularly significant role in interdisciplinary sustainability education due to their emphasis on observation, material engagement, and visual meaning making. Practices such as drawing and painting supported pupils’ attention to environmental relationships and processes when embedded in reflective and open-ended learning contexts. Artistic work enabled pupils to integrate scientific observations with emotional and sensory experiences, fostering deeper engagement with ecological themes. Visual art practice, such as drawing and environmental art, supported pupils to explore, comprehend, interpret, and communicate environmental knowledge. By situating art–science learning within Arctic ecocultural environments, this study contributes to emerging research in Arctic art education and sustainability education. It highlights the value of material-based, arts-integrated pedagogy for supporting holistic learning processes and offers insights into how interdisciplinary practices can address ecological understanding in culturally and environmentally situated ways. References Chappell, K., & Hetherington, L. (2024). Creative pedagogies in digital STEAM practices: Natural, technological and cultural entanglements for powerful learning and activism. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 19(1), 77–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-023-10200-4 Gbeve, K., Francoeur, V., Bernard, S., & Tanguay, L. (2025). Influencing pro-environmental behaviors through visual arts: A scoping review of research designs and state of knowledge. Frontiers Psychology, 16, 1712588. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1712588 Huhmarniemi, M.; Jokela, T. & Hiltunen, M. (2021). Paradigm shifts in northern art, community and environment studies for art teacher education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1), 100181, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100181 Lin, J., & Oxford, R. L. (Eds.). (2011). Transformative eco-education for human and planetary survival. IAP. Liu, C. Y., Wu, C. J., Chien, Y. H., Tzeng, S. Y., & Kuo, H. C. (2023). Examining the quality of art in STEAM learning activities. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 17(3), 382. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000404 Lanza, K., Alcazar, M., Chen, B., & Kohl III, H. W. (2023). Connection to nature is associated with social-emotional learning of children. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 4, 100083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2022.100083 Zhang, X., & Hiltunen, M. (2025). Integrating art into chemistry class: Exploring pH reactions through creative expression. International Journal of Education through Art, 21(3), 483-493. https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00213_3 Zhang, X., & Huhmarniemi, M. (2026). The bilberry experiment for Arctic STEAM education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2026.2623292 Zhang, X., Huhmarniemi, M., & Hiltunen, M. (Forthcoming 2026). Integrating art and science in education: Cultivating creative expression and inquisitive thinking. International Journal of Education and the Arts. 30. Environmental and Sustainability Education Research (ESER)
Poster Art-Based Eco-Cultural Animation for Environmental and Sustainability Education in a Time of Poly-Crisis University of Lapland, Finland Presenting Author:Ecological crises challenge education to expand its orientation toward pro-environmental values and actions. In the context of poly-crisis—including climate change, biodiversity loss and inequality—education faces the need for profound cultural transformations toward ecologically responsible ways of living. This requires both theoretical and practical approaches that can initiate and mainstream cultural sustainability transitions. This poster addresses these challenges by developing sociocultural animation into art-based eco-cultural animation. Sociocultural animation emphasizes participatory, relational, and community-oriented approaches, connecting artistic activity, learning, and social interaction within temporary or evolving communities. While such approaches have been applied internationally in urban contexts, in Northern Finland and the European Arctic they have been strongly integrated with community art, place-based art, and environmental art education, drawing on Arctic art traditions and environmental pedagogy. Within this research and practice tradition, an eco-cultural sustainability orientation supports both cultural continuity and the conscious renewal of local ecocultures in response to ecological crises. This approach aligns with futures-oriented frameworks that connect present communities with sustainable cultural practices and long-term responsibility. Research aim: To develop a theoretical framework for art-based eco-cultural animation in rural communities. Research question: What ecological, cultural, artistic, and communal principles enable impactful art-based eco-cultural animation, particularly in rural communities? Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used This poster draws on long-term art-based action research conducted by the authors. The study integrates multiple action research cycles and presents illustrative examples of community-based eco-cultural practices. Data sources include: • Documentary photos and videos • Field notes • Research diaries • Artworworks that materialize ecoculture Selected examples are presented in the poster to highlight the processes and principles of eco-cultural animation in practice. The approach emphasizes reflective, participatory, and iterative development of both theory and practice. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings Findings indicate that art-based eco-cultural animation is structured around four interrelated dimensions: 1. Ecological – engagement with local ecosystems, seasonal rhythms, and environmental processes 2. Cultural – continuity, renewal, and integration of local knowledge 3. Artistic – open-ended, multimodal artistic practices fostering meaning making, emotional processing, and embodied participation 4. Communal – collaborative, participatory, and inclusive social interaction including non-human nature The effectiveness of eco-cultural animation emerges particularly through: • Place-based engagement • Led or supported by knowledge holders / Elders • Recognition of participants’ experiential and embodied knowledge • Process-oriented and multimodal artistic practices Artistic activity deepens eco-cultural intra-action between humans, materials, places, and more-than-human agencies. The approach strengthens ecocultural well-being, cultural continuity in times of change, sustainability, and democratic participation. The poster defines art-based eco-cultural animation as a process where community-based artistic activity, connected to ecosystems and seasonal cycles, initiates or fosters sustainable culture. It integrates place-based knowledge, ecological understanding, cultural skills, and experiential communal learning. The approach is developed in the European Arctic context but has potential also for other European rural regions. References Ćwikła, Małgorzata, Góral, Anna, Bogacz-Wojtanowska, Ewa & Dudkiewicz, Magdalena 2020. Project-Based Work and Sustainable Development—A Comparative Case Study of Cultural Animation Projects. Sustainability 12 (16), 6519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166519 Huhmarniemi, Maria & Jokela, Timo (Eds.) 2025. Living with Land and people: A Handbook for artistic project and art-based action research in the Arctic. Lapin yliopisto. DOI: https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-337-505-5 Jokela, Timo 2025. Knowing with the Sea Trout: Place-Specific Artwork for Addressing Environmental Conflict. In A. Sohns (Ed.) Artistic dialogues with the Arctic North: Environmental change and identity in transition. Routledge, 94–108. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003545880 Jokela, Timo 2025b. At the River—Stepping in the Flow. In A. Sohns (Ed.) Artistic dialogues with the Arctic North: Environmental change and identity in transition. Routledge. 185–199. Jokela, Timo & Hiltunen, Mirja 2023. Community-Based Art Education: Promoting Revitalization and Eco-Cultural Resilience for Cultural Sustainability. In Ching-Chiu Lin, Anita Sinner & Rita L. Irwin (Ed.) Community Arts Education: Transversal Global Perspectives. Bristol: Intellect, 86–98. Jokela, Timo & Hiltunen, Mirja 2024. New Genre Arctic Art Education as a Way of Knowing with the North. In Timo Jokela, Maria Huhmarniemi & Kathryn Burnett (Ed.) Relate North: New Genre Arctic Art Education Beyond Borders. Viseu: InSEA Publications, 12–37. Jokela, Timo & Huhmarniemi, Maria 2022. Arctic art education in changing nature and culture. Education in the North, 29 (2), 4–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26203/55f2-1c04 Lacy, Suzanne 1995. Debated territory: Towards a critical language for public art. In Suzanne Lacy (Ed.) Mapping the terrain. New genre public art Seattle: Bay Press, 171–185. Luostarinen, Nina 2023. Building, becoming, believing: Participatory playful land art intervention for creating empathy and meliorism. International Journal of Education Through Art, 19 (1), 59–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00118_3 Matarasso, François (1997). Use or ornament. The social impact of participation in the arts. [London]: Comedia. Saatavilla https://arestlessart.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/1997-use-or-ornament.pdf (haettu 6.1.2026). Parks, Melissa M. 2020. Explicating ecoculture. Tracing a transdisciplinary focal concept. Nature and Culture, 15 (1), 54–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2020.150104 Rapport, David J. & Maffi, Luisa 2011. Eco-cultural health, global health, and sustainability. Ecological Research, 26, 1039–1049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-010-0703-5 Stephen, Kathrin 2018. Societal impacts of a rapidly changing Arctic. Current Climate Change Reports, 4 (1), 223–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0106-1 Stöckell, Antti & Luostarinen, Nina 2025. To heal the woods of the earth (and the mind) through play and art. In Antonia Sohns (toim.) Artistic dialogues with the Arctic North: Environmental change and identity in transition. Oxon: Routledge, 139–152. Wenger, Etienne 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 30. Environmental and Sustainability Education Research (ESER)
Poster Visual Methods in School, University, and Community‑based Educational Settings: Exploring Pathways to Participation in Sustainability Transitions 1: NMBU, Norway; 2: Oslo Met Presenting Author:Within Environmental and Sustainability Education (ESE) and further afield, there is growing recognition that responding to climate and sustainability challenges requires more than the transmission of knowledge. In line with both sustainability education and energy transition discourses that feed into European and international debates, we examine how participatory, relational (Sterling, 2001; 2025; Wals, 2022) and sensory practice-based (Pink & Leder-Mackley, 2015) approaches can support learners and communities to co-create pathways towards just and sustainable societies across both formal and non-formal educational settings. This poster presentation synthesises two doctoral studies that incorporated visual methods to investigate and communicate lived experiences of sustainability transitions in formal education (a school-university partnership in Norway and within non-formal contexts (public and community settings) in Scotland. The doctoral studies bring together examples of visual elicitation, auto-photography, sustainability walks, visual timelines, and digital storytelling as means to develop participatory research concerning how sustainability is learned, felt, and acted upon. The formal education strand, based in Norway, explores a school–university partnership co-developing professional learning practices in support of a whole school approach to sustainability-oriented education. The data includes photographic artefacts, co-developed professional learning activities that incorporate visual methods, visual timelines, digital stories (Mathie, 2024; Mathie et al., 2026), and a reflexive practice developed as part of the PhD involving the creation of visual artefacts grounded in artistic self‑expression (Mathie & Omholt, 2026). The non-formal community strand, based in a rural Scottish island context, examines sustainability-oriented energy transitions and how residents and stakeholders live with and make sense of changing energy landscapes. Photography is employed as a central qualitative method through visual surveying, auto-photography, and photo-elicitation. Digital storytelling and co-curated multimedia exhibitions, in turn, are also utilised to communicate complex experiences to wider public audiences and policymakers (Davey, 2024; Davey 2025). Conceptually, both studies are grounded in participatory and visual methodologies and share complementary emancipatory research aims to identify supportive mechanisms for addressing environmental and social challenges (Pink, 2013; 2022). We argue that the visual can play a central role in responding to the call for resistance pedagogy and transgressive learning (Wals, 2022). Drawing on Davis (2018) and Sand (2012), we see visuality as a lived, sensory engagement that reveals place-based values and tacit knowledge. Anchored in interpretive, critical phenomenological, and participatory traditions (Magrì & McQueen, 2022; Gubrium et al., 2016), this study values embodied, place-based knowledge and considers research and art as a continuum, including the use of exhibitions to legitimise non-propositional, affective, and relational knowing (Hawkins, 2020). By directly addressing the gap between knowing and doing (Pfeffer and Sutton, 2001), visual storytelling, in its various forms, fosters empathy and reflexivity, making research more inclusive and responsive to participants' perspectives, aiming to bridge top-down policy and theoretical framings with lived experience. The poster presentation brings the two doctoral studies into dialogue and asks: 1. How can visual methods support sustainability education in formal and non-formal contexts? 2. Which design features of visual co‑production can foster reflexivity in support of active participation in sustainability transitions? 3. How can visual dissemination formats (exhibitions, films, publications) function as research and communicate participant experiences of sustainability transitions beyond academia? Through retrospective collaborative autoethnographic inquiry (Poulos, 2021), experiences of visual participatory work across school, university, and community-based settings in Norway and Scotland are critiqued. The poster offers conceptual and practical insights into how visual methods can enrich ESE by creating spaces for participant-led meaning-making, dialogue, and collective action. We posit that visual methods and exhibition examples are relevant across European formal and non-formal education and can contribute to a broader European dialogue on the role of participatory education in sustainability transitions. Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used Using autoethnographic inquiry (Kim, 2016; Poulos, 2021) and visual‑elicitation dialogues (Harper, 2002; Pink, 2022; Gubrium et al., 2016), we conduct a retrospective cross‑case analysis of visual participatory datasets and processes from two doctoral projects. This design enables a systematic comparison of how visual practices function in both formal and non-formal educational settings. The data analysed comes from the two doctoral studies: 1: A study concerning co-developed professional development within a Norwegian school–university partnership (involving teachers, school leaders, researchers, and professional development facilitators), exploring how a whole school approach to sustainability can be integrated in practice. Data includes photographic artefacts, reflexive journals, visual timelines, and short digital stories (Mathie & Omholt 2026, 2024; Mathie et al., 2026). 2: A study in a rural Scottish island setting concerning community‑level sustainability and energy transitions involving local stakeholder groups. Data includes visual artefacts, visual surveys, photo‑elicitation dialogues, community auto‑photography, short‑film production, and co‑curated multimedia exhibitions that translate complex experiences for broad audiences (Davey, 2024; Davey, 2025). Retrospective collaborative autoethnographic inquiry spans eight months and involves the analysis of photographs, visual artefacts, journals, and analytic memos. As part of this process, we, the authors, engage in a series of (in-person) discussions (completion in June) that critically examine how participatory visual methods have shaped both our own and research participants’ understanding of sustainability transitions. The focus is on how visual co‑production (e.g., photo‑elicitation; Harper, 2002; Gubrium et al., 2016) enables participant‑led perspectives, reconfigures knowledge hierarchies, and informs design elements such as prompts, facilitation, curation, and exhibition formats. We will also critique how this can transfer across European educational and policy contexts to support just sustainability transitions. Records of this reflexive dialogue, documenting this inquiry, are analysed using the methodological frameworks of Kim (2016) and Poulos (2021). This research is part of two approved projects (reference numbers anonymised for review) assessed and approved by the Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research (SIKT, formerly NSD). All visual materials follow approved ethical protocols, including options for anonymity and withdrawal, and careful representation of participants in visuals and exhibitions. Trustworthiness is ensured through triangulation across visual, textual, and dialogic materials; documentation of visual processes; and participant‑informed interpretation (e.g., captions, co‑curation). Reflexive memos and dialogue disclose researcher assumptions and invite critique. The work follows participatory ethics (see Clark, 2012): layered consent, re‑consent for images, shared decisions on circulation and anonymity, and attention to participants’ preferences. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings Methodological outcomes: The poster will present a visually rich artefact demonstrating practice-tested participatory visual methods configured for both formal and non-formal education settings. It will identify facilitation and curation patterns (such as prompts, framing, sequencing of images, and exhibition design) that foster participation and promote personal and relational reflexivity. The intended outcomes include this poster contributing to our ongoing auto-ethnographic inquiry, which will culminate in a co-authored multimedia academic paper. This will feature a digital research story and practical resources based on the visual research methods examined in this study. Empirical outcomes: Examples from both studies offer detailed insights into how sustainability transitions are experienced visually and through the senses, revealing place-based values, tacit knowledge, and the embodied, emotional, and symbolic facets of daily life. The analysis follows how visual artefacts and specific curation choices sustain engagement. Comparing visual artefacts from a Norwegian-based formal education study with those from a Scottish-based non-formal context on energy transitions highlights shared and diverging dynamics related to broader European debates on participatory education, justice, and sustainability transitions. Significance for ESE field: The project elucidates visuality as a fundamental perspective to consider in ESE, not only in perceptions of sustainability but also in how humans perceive and emotionally engage with sustainability within specific contexts. Situated within interpretive, phenomenological, and practice-based traditions, it presents visual methods that have enhanced participants’ knowledge and legitimised affective and relational knowledge. By emphasising creative visual methodologies and lived experiences in educational settings (schools, universities, and communities), the project seeks to contribute to European and international discussions on the role visual methods can play within ESE research. It contends that participatory visual approaches can foster inclusive, responsive ESE-related research that can contribute to transforming participatory understanding into collective transgressive learning for sustainability. References Mathie, R. G. (2024). A whole school approach: A synthesis of interconnected policy, practice, and research conceptualisations. In Whole school approaches to sustainability: Education renewal in times of distress (pp. 9-33). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Mathie, R. G., & Omholt, K. (2026). The way of the researcher: integrating artistic self-expression as a reflexive partner in the study of sustainability education. Environmental Education Research, 1-22. Mathie, R. G., Eikeland, I., Sinnes, A. T., & Wals, A. E. (2026). Co-developing professional learning practices in support of a whole school approach to sustainability-oriented education. Environmental Education Research, 1-28. Davey, N. G. (2024). Altered landscapes of a post‑carbon future: Visual response imaginaries as experiences of energy infrastructure in the Orkney Islands. Energy Research & Social Science, 117, 103719. Davey, N. G. (2025). Photography as an approach in energy transitions research: Visual surveying, auto-photography & photo-elicitation in Scotland’s Orkney Islands. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24, 16094069251338907. Clark, A. (2012). Visual Ethics in a Contemporary Landscape. In S. Pink (Ed.), Advances in Visual Methodology: (pp. 17-36). Sage. Davis, W. (2018). A general theory of visual culture. Princeton University Press. Gubrium, A., Harper, K., & Otañez, M. (2016). Participatory visual and digital research in action. Routledge.Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345 Hawkins, H. (2020). Geography, art, research: Artistic research in the geohumanities. Routledge. Kim, J.-H. (2016). Understanding narrative inquiry: The crafting and analysis of stories as research. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802861 Magrì, E., & McQueen, P. (2022). Critical phenomenology: An introduction. John Wiley & Sons. Pink, S. (2022). Emerging technologies/Life at the edge of the future. Taylor & Francis. Pink, S., & Leder Mackley, K. (2015). Flow and intervention in everyday life: Situating practices. In Y. Strengers & C. Maller (Eds.), Social Practices, Intervention and Sustainability: Beyond behaviour change (pp. 163-178). Routledge. Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2001). The knowing‐doing gap: how smart companies turn knowledge into action. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 6(3), 142-143. Poulos, C. N. (2021). Essentials of autoethnography. American Psychological Association. Sand, A. (2012). Visuality. Studies in Iconography, 33, 89-95. Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education: Re‑visioning learning and change. Green Books. Sterling, S. (2025). Learning and sustainability in dangerous times. Agenda Publishing. Wals, A. E. J. (2022). Transgressive learning, resistance pedagogy and disruptive capacity building as levers for sustainability. In Higher education in the world 8 – New visions for higher education (pp. 216–222). GUNi. 30. Environmental and Sustainability Education Research (ESER)
Poster Reflect on Human Needs: The Energy-Related Needs in Middle School Science Textbooks in China East China Normal University, China Presenting Author:Following the first oil crisis in 1973, energy education has emerged as a distinct field of educational research, focusing mainly on energy educational policies, systems, industrial environment, and participation (Hu & Yang, 2024). Yet educational discussions often take energy demand for granted, paying limited attention to how school knowledge constructs and normalises particular understandings of human needs. As Canale (2022) notes, textbooks are complex and influential educational media. Existing textbook research on energy has examined aspects such as readability (Pambudi et al., 2024) and content scope (Castañeda-Garza & Valerio-Ureña, 2022). Many of these studies are guided by frameworks such as sustainability literacy, green literacy, eco-literacy (Dong et al., 2023), the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (Lasekan et al., 2024), and energy literacy (DeWaters, 2011). While these approaches acknowledge the importance of human needs, such needs are often treated as self-evident background conditions rather than as objects of critical inquiry. Even in studies that explicitly address teaching energy system transformation through perspectives such as Earth literacy (Sven Linow, 2025), limited attention has been paid to how educational materials frame, prioritise, and normalise particular needs in relation to energy use. This study focuses on human needs, drawing on frameworks that address the realities of contemporary society (Boss, 2025). Theories of human needs have long been discussed within economics and philosophy (Doyal & Gough, 1991). As energy underpins nearly all human activities, the global demand for energy has risen sharply alongside population growth (Abdalla et al., 2018). Building on the concept of Decent Living Standards (DLS) and referring to material prerequisites, Millward-Hopkins et al. (2020) quantified basic needs in terms of energy requirements. However, Petz (2025) critically questions such energy-based approaches and argues for integrating basic needs theory with a more reflective understanding of energy requirements (Millward-Hopkins et al., 2020). Drawing on this critique, this study adapts the seven challenges to energy-based approaches identified by Petz (2025) into three analytical dimensions, organized according to their distinct critical emphases: silence behind quantification (robustness, comprehensiveness, cultural appropriateness, and aggregation), suppression of agency by authority (paternalism and procedural justice, narrowing of policy space), and resourcism. Rather than rejecting the concept of human needs, this study critically examines how needs become stabilised when translated into energy-based educational discourse. The purpose of this study is to examine how energy-related human needs are constructed in school science textbooks. Specifically, it analyses textual and visual representations of energy in sixth-grade science textbooks from Shanghai using Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). The analysis reveals that energy-related human needs in these textbooks are framed as natural and inevitable, while underlying support systems, such as food supply, power supply, and fuel systems, are abstracted or omitted. These systems, which form the foundation of energy transportation and transformation, are largely invisible, and their associated energy costs are overlooked, representing "silence behind quantification". At the same time, energy crises are primarily attributed to limited resources rather than demand structures or social distribution. Furthermore, needs are implicitly framed through a business-oriented lens that positions responsibility for energy consumption with abstract “others” rather than with consumers themselves, reflecting both "suppression of agency by authority" and "resourcism". Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used The study examines two sixth-grade science textbooks from Shanghai, one for each semester, selected for three reasons: Firstly, Shanghai has consistently led educational development and reform in China. Secondly, these textbooks were published by Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers in 2024 and 2025, under the Compulsory Education Science Curriculum Standards (2022 Edition), which represent the current directions in Chinese science education. Thirdly, Grade 6 science is the stage where students first systematically encounter energy concepts before they advance to separate subjects (physics, chemistry, biology). As a result, its interdisciplinary character offers a key vantage point for analyzing how textbooks construct energy discourse. Relevant sections were first identified—those wholly about energy or containing energy-related references. Each sentence and image was coded for reference. For instance, the code G6V1U2I-P16-H1 refers to Heading 1 (H1) on page 16 (P16) in the Introduction section (I) of Unit 2 (U2) in Vision 1 (V1) of Grade 6 (G6). Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough, 1992) was applied to analyze the relationship between needs and energy. Following Fairclough’s notion of the socially "constructive" effects of discourse, we treat needs as socially constructed (Doyal & Gough, 1991). Prior applications of CDA to human–nature relationships (Sharma & Buxton, 2015) and Chinese textbook research on environmental sustainability education (Liu et al., 2024) provided methodological insights. Due to the study’s scope, we focus on discourse representation and underlying assumptions (Fairclough, 2003). For example: With the development of society and the continuous improvement of living standards for people, the demand for energy is also increasing day by day. (G6V1U2I-P16-T2) This segment employs terms such as "development" and "improvement", both implying progress from a lower to a higher level. "Society" is used in a general sense, without reference to any specific socio-economic or cultural context. Likewise, "living standards" are generalized, disregarding potential variations. This reflects a value assumption that there exists a universally acknowledged notion of a "good" standard of living—one that inherently demands increasing energy consumption. This segment ignores dimensions of human needs beyond living standards, such as security. Moreover, the use of universal standards renders issues of cultural appropriateness and aggregation invisible. Finally, the emphasis on “demand” contributes to the suppression of agency by authority, particularly in relation to procedural justice. These represent aspects of "silence behind quantification" and "suppression of agency by authority". Although "saving" is advocated later (G6V1U2S3-P35-T2, G6V1U2S4-P42-T3, G6V1U4I-P73-T1), the increasing demands are presented first in the first unit section. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings This study addresses a neglected question in textbook research: how energy-related human needs are constructed in school science textbooks. Through an analysis of two middle school science textbooks from Shanghai, the study examines how these needs are framed, with particular attention to the assumptions underpinning these portrayals. The analysis focuses primarily on social circumstances and food-related needs as they are presented in relation to energy use. At the same time, the study seeks to reveal the assumptions underlying the framing of energy-related needs. Rather than discussing how daily life serves as a source to improve students' energy literacy (Castañeda-Garza & Valerio-Ureña, 2022), this study adopts a perspective that critically examines the assumptions underlying everyday needs related to energy. The findings suggest that such needs are generally presented as universally accepted and unproblematic, thereby reproducing several of the challenges identified by Petz (2025). When the systems underpinning these needs are examined, it becomes evident that continuous, yet largely invisible, energy consumption sustains even the most basic activities. As Latour argues, "to track the terrestrials is to add conflicts of interpretation regarding what a given actor is, wants, desires, or can do, to conflicts about what other actors are, want, desire, or can do." From this perspective, continual reflection on human needs becomes essential, and energy education should include critical engagement with how needs are envisioned for future generations. The narratives identified in this limited set of textbooks also invite reflection across cultural contexts, raising the question of whether similar framings operate in science education systems worldwide. References Abdalla, A. M., Hossain, S., Nisfindy, O. B., Azad, A. T., Dawood, M., & Azad, A. K. (2018). Hydrogen production, storage, transportation and key challenges with applications: A review. Energy Conversion and Management, 165, 602–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.03.088 Boss, G. (2025). The theory and the politics of need: Introduction. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2025.2535863 Canale, G. (2022). A multimodal and ethnographic approach to textbook discourse. Taylor & Francis. Castañeda-Garza, G., & Valerio-Ureña, G. (2022). Energy literacy in elementary school textbooks in Mexico. Environmental Education Research, 29(3), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2135687 DeWaters, J. E. (2011). Energy Literacy and the Broader Impacts of Energy Education among Secondary Students in New York State. Clarkson University. Dong, X., Zhang, X., Zhang, C., & Bi, C. (2023). Building sustainability education for green recovery in the energy resource sector: A cross country analysis. Resources Policy, 81, 103385–103385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103385 Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human need. Macmillan. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press. Hu, J.-L., & Yang, P.-S. (2024). Interactive cycles between energy education and energy preferences: A literature review on empirical evidence. Energies, 17(20), 5092–5092. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17205092 Lasekan, O. A., Opazo, F., & Méndez Alarcón, C. M. (2024). Enhancing sustainable development goal integration in Chilean citizenship education: A thematic analysis of textbook content and instructional strategies. Sustainability, 16(12), 5092. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125092 Liu, Y., An, L., & Chen, S. (2024). Environmental sustainability education in twelve series of Chinese university English language textbooks. SAGE Open, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241266829 Millward-Hopkins, J., Steinberger, J. K., Rao, N. D., & Oswald, Y. (2020). Providing decent living with minimum energy: A global scenario. Global Environmental Change, 65(65), 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102168 Pambudi, N. A., Yuniar, W., Ulfa, D. K., Nanda, I. R., & Widiastuti, I. (2024). Assessing the readability of renewable energy education material from geothermal resources in vocational high school textbooks: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, 12(3), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d12.0506 Petz, D. (2025). Human beings are not toasters: Why basic needs fulfillment needs more than energy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2025.2535861 Sharma, A., & Buxton, C. A. (2015). Human-Nature relationships in school science: A critical discourse analysis of a middle-grade science textbook. Science Education, 99(2), 260–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21147 Sven Linow. (2025). On Teaching the Transformation of Our Energy System. Journal of the European Meteorological Society., 3, 100024–100024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemets.2025.100024 30. Environmental and Sustainability Education Research (ESER)
Poster VR Field Trip Experience of Circular Economy Enhances Consumers’ Environmental Awareness: Practical Survey Waseda University, Japan Presenting Author: In recent years, experiential learning using virtual reality technology (VR) has attracted attention in educational settings. VR can provide experiences that are difficult to implement in the real world when the activities involve danger or require considerable time and cost (Bailenson, 2018). One of the learning practices where VR could be useful is the field trip. Field trips can stimulate interest even among learners with no prior knowledge (Neher-Asylbekov and Wagner, 2023). At the same time, the cost of implementing field trips and the scheduling burdens have been identified as barriers (Behrendt and Franklin, 2014). These barriers can be addressed by using VR. Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used I. Pre-survey As baseline environmental awareness, the pre-survey targeted CE employees. To investigate their knowledge of waste disposal and recycling, and their interest and motivation regarding environmental issues, a questionnaire was designed based on items from Suwa et al. (2006, 2008). Respondents were 200 employees from five retail stores located in commuter cities (111 participants), designated cities (72 participants) and nature-rich local cities (17 participants). The factor analyses indicated a single-factor structure for knowledge (4 items; alpha = .90) and interest (5 items; alpha = .92), and a two-factor structure for motivation (8 items, alpha = .93; 2 items, alpha = .90). Based on the results, an “Environmental Awareness Scale for Adults” was created: four knowledge items, five interest items, eight items for Motivation for Everyday Consideration and two items for Motivation for Social Consideration. II. VFT Content Development The VFT content comprised two 360-degree videos: waste disposal and recycling. The waste disposal video records the container’s journey from purchase to the landfill. It was filmed in November 2024 with the cooperation of a store and a waste disposal plant in A prefecture. The recycling video records it from purchase to collection, reprocessing into raw material, and returning to the store as a product. It was filmed in May 2025 with the cooperation of factories in B, C, and D prefectures and a store in E prefecture. Insta360 ONE X2 was used for filming. III. Methods of Survey for VFT consumers To examine changes in environmental awareness following the VFT experience, surveys were conducted at environmental events. One of those was held for children in October 2025 at a shopping mall in C prefecture, hosted by the government of C prefecture. Another was done in November 2025 at a store in E prefecture. The VFT videos were presented to participants on Meta Quest 3 using a web application. Data collected from 39 VFT consumers were compared with the pre-survey data. First, the six-point responses were scored from 1 to 6. Second, the mean scores for each factor of the Environmental Awareness Scale for Adults were calculated. Finally, analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were conducted as follows. For the knowledge and interest categories, one-way ANOVAs were performed with participant type as the independent variable. For the motivation category, a mixed-design two-way ANOVA was done with participant type as the between-subjects factor and the two motivational factors as the within-subjects factor. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings For the knowledge category, VFT consumers scored higher than CE employees, suggesting that VFT may promote knowledge about waste disposal and recycling. VFT consumers also reported greater environmental interest than CE employees, indicating that VFT may increase environmental interest. For motivation, participant type interacted with motivational factors: VFT consumers scored higher than CE employees on both Everyday and Social ones. Within both participant types, motivation differed between Everyday and Social motivations. These suggest that the VFT experience may particularly enhance motivation toward everyday environmental consideration. This study compared the environmental awareness of employees of retail companies participating in CE initiatives (CE employees) and consumers who experienced a VFT (VFT consumers), to clarify the learning outcomes of VFTs. The analysis suggests that the VFT experience contributes to knowledge of waste disposal and recycling, that VFT consumers’ environmental interest is higher than that of CE employees, and that motivation for everyday environmental consideration is also higher. In conclusion, learners who experience the VFT may achieve higher knowledge and interest, and stronger motivation to engage in environmental behaviour, than practitioners with knowledge and practical understanding of CE initiatives. Although, this study has limitations: it compares only employees engaged in CE initiatives with consumers who experienced the VFT, and the long-term effects of VFTs on motivation remain unclear (McGivney 2025). Future research should examine the effectiveness of VFTs when introduced into school education and investigate the lasting effects of VFT experiences. References Bailenson J (2018) Experience on demand: What virtual reality is, how it works, and what it can do. W. W. Norton & Company. Behrendt M and Franklin T (2014) A Review of Research on School Field Trips and Their Value in Education. International journal of environmental and science education 9: 235-245. Bögeholz S (2006) Nature experience and its importance for environmental knowledge, values and action: recent German empirical contributions. Environmental Education Research 12(1): 65–84. Gallaud D and Laperche B (2016) Circular economy, industrial ecology and short supply chain. John Wiley & Sons. McGivney E (2025) Virtual reality field trips as enabling environments for emotions and motivation in STEM education. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 6(2025) DOI: 10.3389/frvir.2025.1669505. Neher-Asylbekov S and Wagner I (2023) Effects of Out-of-School STEM Learning Environments on Student Interest: a Critical Systematic Literature Review. Journal for STEM Education Research 6: 1-44. Pugsley J H, Howell J A, Hartley A J, Buckley S J, Chmielewska M, Naumann N, Schofield N J and Brackenridge R (2024) Quantifying Virtual Field Trip Efficiency. Journal of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science 92: 679-690. Suwa H, Yamamoto H, Okada I and Ohta T (2006) Path Analysis Model for Development of Environmental Education Program to Promote Environment-Conscious Behavior. Journal of Social Informatics 18(1): 59-70. Suwa H, Yamamoto H, Okada I and Ohta T (2008) Effect on Environmentally Conscious Behavior by Using Environment Material of Teaching Social Dilemma. Japanese Journal of Environmental Education 18(2): 15-25. Tucho GT, Kalina M and Tilley E (2024) Becoming ‘Swiss’: waste management integration among Ethiopian and Eritrean migrants in Zürich, Switzerland. Frontiers in Sustainability 5: 1326107. United Nations (2019) Circular economy: New economics for sustainable development. Available at: www.un.org/en/unen/new-economics-sustainable-development-circular-economy (accessed 20 January 2026). 30. Environmental and Sustainability Education Research (ESER)
Poster Towards Sustainable, Formal and Informal Education: at the School of Life. Haute Ecole Pédagogique du Canton de Vaud Suisse, Switzerland Presenting Author:As part of our observations and interviews exploring how being rooted in a supportive environment can support education about life and sustainability, we stayed and talked with the wider community of the Domaine du Possible, a french school located in Arles. Experiential and sensory learning are approached through the prism of complexity (Morin, 2014) in order to foster transdisciplinary teaching through fruitful connections between different areas of knowledge and the realization of creative projects. It is in this particular educational context, providing us with an original field of study, that we collected multiple testimonials in order to analyze the links between self-narrative and one's relationship to living things. In the context of the climate crisis, we will examine how the conditions for producing knowledge directly related to living things and the environment can generate knowledge that promotes and contributes to education for sustainability. This type of alternative and innovative educational context is a possible response to the poly-crisis as defined by Edgar Morin and Anne-Brigitte Kern (1999). It is also a proposal to root knowledge and learning in the territory and reality in order to escape from the digital world and the phenomenon of “off-the-ground” children. Our presentation will address the conditions for collecting statements in a school context and how these statements provide valuable information in terms of the learning process, particularly regarding the meaning given to experiences related to the environment (Cottereau, 2025). We will observe how, through the experiences of students recounted in their own words, an ecological and environmentally conscious awareness emerges. The experience of parents will highlight the links between educational choices, ethical values, and everyday practices. The experiences of teachers will raise questions about their position, their role, and the pedagogical adaptations necessary to support the transmission of knowledge in this particular educational context. Indeed, it should be noted that the Domaine du Possible is part of a new pedagogy inspired by outdoor education and the whole school approach. Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used We asked two classes, as well as parents and teachers, to write a biographical account. How did choosing this school impact their lives in terms of their thoughts, actions, and worldview? We thus seek to link educational narratives and the relationship to living things in an alternative school context through a multi-voice approach based on participant observation and an eco-educational perspective. Our approach is both biographical in terms of the data corpus, similar to the life story movement (Pineau, 1989), and anthropological in terms of our data collection method. Collecting children's voices is also a fairly novel approach, whose methodological and ethical issues warrant some precautions, which we will discuss in our presentation (Amendola, 2023, Lani-Bayle, 2014). We will examine how recounting experiences related to nature and living things promotes connection with oneself, with others, and with the environment. Although we can observe mutual learning processes referred to by Pineau as eco-training (1989), we are also curious to understand the challenges and limitations associated with this type of approach in terms of teaching posture and role (Lo Presti and Oppliger, 2019). Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings Our analysis will also highlight some areas conducive to developing experiential learning for and through nature, based on the needs identified by the stakeholders concerned (Lo Presti and Oppliger, 2025). In addition, we will examine whether it is always possible to encourage children to take an active role as student-researchers by exposing them to real-life situations with a view to educating them about sustainability. Is there not a risk of fueling feelings of eco-anxiety or discouragement in them when faced with certain observations, for example, regarding the loss of biodiversity? It would also be relevant to consider how storytelling can encourage them to develop a sense of agency and eco-citizen awareness. Interdependence will also be addressed, particularly in relation to human, environmental, and planetary health issues. This type of education could thus serve as a tool and lever for social change, better preparing future generations to face the many global challenges that await them. References Amendola, C. and Marcel, J.-F. (2023). Becoming a schoolchild. The meaning of a transition. L’esperluette Education and Training Collection. Cottereau, D. (2025). Living in the world as you are. Life stories and eco-training. L’Harmattan. Bachelard, D. (2003). Anthropology of the Sensible: The Contribution of the Ethics of Care to the “Non-Human” World. Environmental Education: Perspectives - Research - Reflections, 8, 2009, pp. 35-55. Online: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03191062/file/Education%20aux%20territoires.pdf Desbiolles, A. (2020). Eco-anxiety. Living peacefully in a damaged world. Fayard Publishing. Josso, M.-C. (2011), Life experience and training. L'Harmattan. Lo Presti, A.-M. and Oppliger, S. (2019). Biographical touches and teacher training. In M.-C. Bernard, G. Tschopp, and A. Slowik, (eds.), The paths of narrative. Biographical practices in training, intervention, and research, Éditions science et bien commun and LEL du CRIRES, 47-61. Lo Presti, A.M. and Oppliger, S. (2025). A l’école au vivant. S’éduquer par et pour la nature. [At School with the Living: Educating Oneself Through and for Nature]. Actes Sud. Lani-Bayle, M. (2014). Telling the Story of School: Listening to School Experiences in Europe and Brazil. L’Harmattan. Lausselet, N., Zosso, I. (2023). A School for Transformation? Dialogue Between Education for Sustainability and Outdoor Education. In N. Durisch Gauthier, N. Fink and A. Pache (Eds.), Training in a World in Crisis: The Didactics of the Human and Social Sciences Facing Transformations. Alphil. Morin, E. and Kern, A.-B., (2010). Earth-Homeland. Points Essais collection. Morin, E. (2014). Introduction to Complex Thought. Points Essais collection. Pierron, J.P., (2021). I is We – a philosophical inquiry into our interdependence with living beings. Actes Sud. Pineau, G. (1989). Experiential training in self-, eco- and co-training, Éducation permanente, 100/101, 23-30. Pineau, G., (2023). The Eco-training Research Group (GREF) and its collection as a means of eco-training pollination, Environmental Education [Online], Volume 18-1 | 2023, https://doi.org/10.4000/ere.9890Le. Simard, C., M.-C. Bernard, Panissal, N., and Fortin, C., (2022). Educating about life. Perspectives, research, and practices. Presses universitaires de Lyon, Vidal, J. (2022). 2030 Glorious. Living utopias. Domaine du Possible, Actes Sud. 30. Environmental and Sustainability Education Research (ESER)
Poster Beyond Calculation: How a School Carbon Project Builds Environmental Citizenship and Systemic Thinking 1: Kazakh National Women's Teacher Training University, Kazakhstan; 2: Nazarbayev Intellectual School Presenting Author:Proposal Information Topic & Problem: As a practitioner teaching sustainability, I observed a persistent shortcoming: school carbon footprint projects often culminate in a number—a technical exercise that leaves students informed but disempowered. This "calculation trap" reflects a broader deficit in Education for Sustainable Development (ESD): an overemphasis on technical literacy at the expense of cultivating the civic agency needed for real-world change (Hadjichambis & Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, 2020). This study addresses this critical gap by challenging the standard project paradigm and testing a redesigned model that explicitly targets higher-order competencies. Research Question: Our central question is: Does a civic-oriented Project-Based Learning (PBL) model, which integrates carbon auditing with systems analysis and democratic advocacy, lead to greater development of environmental citizenship attitudes and systems thinking skills in secondary school students compared to a traditional, calculation-focused carbon project? Objective & Theoretical Framework: The primary objective was to design and rigorously evaluate an intervention that moves school sustainability education "beyond calculation." We aimed to transform a common activity into a transformative civic learning experience. The study is grounded in two powerful, complementary frameworks:
EThis work directly operationalizes the EU GreenComp competence "Acting for sustainability" (Bianchi et al., 2022), translating policy into a tested classroom practice. Its core contribution is providing educators with an evidence-based, three-phase pedagogical protocol ("Audit-Analyze-Act") that demonstrably bridges the gap between knowing and doing. It offers a scalable alternative to superficial projects, equipping students to become not just calculators of problems, but analysts of systems and advocates for solutions within their own communities. Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used Methodology/Research Instruments Design: To establish robust causal evidence, we employed a cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT) design—the gold standard for evaluating educational interventions. Four intact 10th-grade classes (N=98 students) were randomly assigned at the classroom level to either the Intervention (IG, n=50) or Control (CG, n=48) condition, preventing cross-group contamination. All participants and their guardians provided informed consent. Intervention: The CG followed a Traditional Audit model: conducting a technical carbon audit and producing a calculation report. The IG engaged in the Civic PBL Model "Analyze-Advocate-Act": 1. Systems Analysis: Post-audit, students mapped resource flows and stakeholder networks within the school as an interconnected system. 2. Democratic Advocacy: They identified a leverage point and developed a specific, evidence-based policy proposal (e.g., "Green Procurement Guidelines"). 3. Action & Presentation: They prepared and delivered a formal advocacy presentation to the school's decision-making body (e.g., student council, administration). Instruments (Triangulation): 1. Quantitative Pre/Post Assessments: Environmental Citizenship Attitudes Scale (ECAS), adapted from ENEC indicators. Systems Thinking Performance Assessment (STPA), a validated scenario-based test. 2. Qualitative & Performance Data: Analytic Rubrics: Final projects were double-blind scored (0-5) for Civic Engagement (argumentation, audience targeting) and ST Complexity (interconnections, feedback loops). Structured Written Reflections: Students described key learning moments and challenges. Data Analysis: Quantitative data were analyzed using Repeated Measures ANOVA to assess within- and between-group changes. Rubric scores were compared via independent samples t-tests. Reflections underwent thematic analysis; emerging themes were reviewed with a peer researcher to ensure interpretive credibility, explaining the mechanisms behind the quantitative trends. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings Quantitative Results: The RCT yielded clear, statistically significant evidence. For Environmental Citizenship (ECAS), a significant Time x Group interaction was found (F(1, 94) = 20.45, p < .001, ηp² = .18), indicating a large treatment effect. The IG showed substantial growth (M_pre=3.1, M_post=4.1), while the CG stagnated. For Systems Thinking (STPA), a similar interaction (F(1, 94) = 14.32, p < .001, ηp² = .13) was observed, with IG scores rising from 52% to 76% correct versus minimal CG change. Project Quality was markedly superior for the IG across both Civic Engagement (M_IG=4.3/5 vs. M_CG=1.9/5, p<.001) and ST Complexity (M_IG=4.0/5 vs. M_CG=2.5/5, p<.001). Qualitative Insights (Triangulation): Thematic analysis revealed the advocacy phase as the critical catalyst. IG students described grappling with "translating data into a persuasive story for the principal," highlighting themes of "negotiation," "evidence-based persuasion," and "collective responsibility." This directly fostered the participatory dimension of Environmental Citizenship. In stark contrast, CG reflections centered solely on "calculation accuracy" and "data presentation," devoid of civic or systemic discourse. Conclusion & Implications: The civic-oriented PBL model proved decisively superior, moving students "beyond calculation" to develop core ESD competencies. The findings demonstrate that intentionally integrating democratic action and systems analysis transforms a routine assignment into a powerful civic learning engine. For practice, this study provides a validated, three-phase framework ("Audit-Analyze-Act") that any educator can adopt to cultivate not just informed students, but empowered, critical thinkers capable of advocating for systemic change within their communities. This is a practical blueprint for implementing the transformative goals of ESD and GreenComp in everyday schooling. References References Assaraf, O. B., & Orion, N. (2010). System thinking skills at the elementary school level. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 540-563. 2.Bianchi, G., Pisiotis, U., & Cabrera Giraldez, M. (2022). GreenComp: The European sustainability competence framework. Publications Office of the EU. 3.Hadjichambis, A. Ch., & Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D. (2020). Environmental citizenship: A multi-level research framework. In Conceptualizing Environmental Citizenship for 21st Century Education (pp. 1-14). Springer. 4.Schusler, T. M., Krasny, M. E., & Decker, D. J. (2017). The autonomy-authority duality in youth environmental action. Environmental Education Research, 23(4), 533-552. 5.Trott, C. D. (2021). Climate change education for transformation: Exploring affective dimensions. Environmental Education Research, 27(2), 259-278. 6.Wals, A. E. J., & Benavot, A. (2017). Can we meet the sustainability challenges? The role of education. European Journal of Education, 52(4), 404-413. 7.Chowdhury, T. B. M., Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2020). Validation of a model for elevating teachers’ socioscientific reasoning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(6), 992-1011. 8.Herman, B. C., Zeidler, D. L., & Newton, M. (2020). Impact of place-based socioscientific issues instruction. Science Education, 104(1), 1-34. | ||