Session | ||
10 SES 09 A: Creativity, Preparedness and Becoming a Teacher
Paper Session
| ||
Presentations | ||
10. Teacher Education Research
Paper Social Science Teachers and Their Training in the Context of Philosophy Palacký University, Czech Republic Presenting Author:The research problem of the study is undergraduate training and preparedness of social sciences teachers with a focus on philosophy. The main research objective is to analyze how future and beginning teachers of philosophy evaluate the benefits, content and sufficiency of their undergraduate training in the field of philosophy (as a partial social science discipline) in relation to their pedagogical practice. The paper is a partial output of the author's dissertation, where other objectives are to define key terms with regard to recently published professional theoretical and empirical studies from the Czech Republic and abroad. Furthermore, the aim is to map the form and content of undergraduate training at two types of faculties – education and philosophy, and to identify the variables that have an impact on the evaluation of the preparation. Additionally, undergraduate training is analysed from the point of view of developing desirable specific competencies. Last but not least, we synthesize recommendations to improve the training. According to the OECD definition (2024), a teacher is a person whose profession involves imparting knowledge, skills and attitudes (i.e. competencies) to students that are specified in a formal curriculum. In the Czech environment, the teaching profession is defined legislatively by Act No. 563/2004 Coll., on Pedagogical staff. Unlike abroad, in the Czech Republic, the teaching profession cannot be considered a full profession because it still does not exhibit certain characteristics of a profession (e.g. the existence of a professional chamber, high social prestige and economic status, ...) (Gore & Morrison, 2001; Guerriero & Deligiannidi, 2017). Spilková et al. even describe Czech education policy as de-professionalising and de-qualifying, despite the fact that trends of increasing professionalisation of teaching can be observed worldwide (Spilková, 2016, 2023; Spilková & Štech, 2023). Undergraduate training is understood as the first stage of the development of a teacher's professional career (Průcha, 2002) and is viewed as a process of developing professional competencies, which is in line with the document Competence Framework for Graduate Teachers (MŠMT, 2023). In the Czech Republic, future teachers are mainly prepared at pedagogical or philosophical faculties, and their (teachers of 2nd level of elementary school and grammar school) takes the form of a three-year Bachelor's degree and a two-year follow-up Master's degree. The goal of undergraduate training is to equip the graduate with pedagogical and professional knowledge and skills (European Commission, 2020), but going through a formal education process does not make a graduate a great teacher. In this paper, we see student preparedness as a subjective perception or feeling. According to the authors Janišová & Strouhal (2023), being prepared for the teaching profession means being prepared for the change and variability that accompany teachers on a daily basis and can be viewed from different perspectives. The research focuses both on students and their preparedness, but also on beginning philosophy teachers and their teaching. These are qualified teachers with a social sciences approbation with less than 3 years of experience teaching philosophy as a part of the school subject Basics of Social Sciences at grammar schools (Zhong, 2017; Chudý & Neumeister, 2014). Subject didactics of philosophy is only slowly developing in the Czech environment and foreign inspirations are very valuable (e.g. the competence-based approach by Tozzi or Tiedemann). Philosophy teaching in the Czech Republic takes place mostly in one year of studies at grammar schools and this issue is not a well-explored field in the world or in the Czech Republic, therefore we consider this study to be beneficial for both subject didactics of philosophy and subject didactics of social sciences, which is also not firmly anchored. Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used The research answers the main research question: How do beginning philosophy teachers and future philosophy teachers evaluate the benefits, content, and sufficiency of undergraduate philosophy preparation in relation to practice through a mixed research strategy. The methods of data collection are in-depth semi-structured interview and questionnaire survey. Both methods are used in accordance with generally accepted principles (Švaříček & Šeďová, 2014; Chráska, 2016). The data obtained from the interviews are analysed using grounded theory procedures (in line with Strauss & Corbin, 1998). Open and closed data are collected simultaneously and compared continuously. Finally, the data will be subjected to correlation. The following two research hypotheses are set: H1: The measure of subjectively perceived preparedness is at least a level higher for beginning philosophy teachers than this measure is for students. H2: There is a statistically significant relation between the subjectively perceived level of career preparedness in the context of subject didactics (practical preparedness and philosophical competencies) of philosophy and the type of faculty preparing teachers. Before the actual implementation of the interviews and distribution of the questionnaires, another method was used: content analysis of the teaching study programmes of social sciences in the Czech Republic. Subsequently, the syllabi of philosophy courses were analysed in order to analyse the content of theoretical undergraduate training in philosophy. For the research, the research sample consists of students of social sciences and beginning teachers of philosophy. Data from students are collected through a questionnaire survey, and interviews are conducted with teachers. The questionnaire focuses on students' subjectively perceived preparedness (in both theoretical and practical terms), while the interview focuses more on the form of philosophy teaching and the benefits of undergraduate preparation in philosophy. Both instruments (questionnaire, interview) are of their own construction, but nevertheless build on existing instruments investigating the development of competencies or levels of preparedness. The interview is divided into the following areas: Identification and introductory questions; Undergraduate preparation with regard to philosophy; The discipline of philosophy and the teacher's expertise; Planning, leading and reflecting on teaching philosophy; Feedback and assessment in teaching philosophy; and Self-concept, professional development and collaboration. Research is based on the collection, processing and interpretation of rather subjective opinions and representation of respondents' attitudes, therefore the ethical dimension is an obvious and essential part of the work. Respondents sign an informed consent to voluntarily participate in the research, its nature, objectives and possible consequences of their participation. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings In terms of theoretical aspects and benefits for pedagogy, we expect the concept of professional preparedness to be established on the basis of current professional terminology and the results of empirical investigations. Furthermore, it is a review and analysis of the latest knowledge about the form and state of undergraduate preparation of future teachers, which will be led by a content analysis of currently valid accredited study programmes offering social science studies with an exclusive focus on the field of philosophy, and subsequently also individual philosophically oriented subjects. This step also provides a summary of programmes in the Czech Republic that could be useful for applicants of this type of study. As far as the application aspect is concerned, we see a huge potential of research in the possibility to reformulate, and thus improve, the undergraduate preparation at faculties that are focused on the preparation of future social sciences teachers, based on research findings, within the framework of the accreditation procedure. Another benefit is the enrichment of not only the subject didactics, but especially the subject didactics of philosophy itself, which is still looking for its anchoring and systematic development in the Czech environment (Šebešová, 2017; 2023). Last but not least, the conclusions of the thesis may inspire teachers in practice and facilitate their action in teaching philosophy. The research on this issue has not yet been supported by a sufficiently documented theoretical framework in the Czech Republic, mainly due to the unanchoredness of the discipline and subject didactics itself. References European Commission. (2020). Conference on supporting key competences development: Learning approaches and environments in school education: conference report. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/287701 Gore, J. M., & Morrison, K. (2001). The perpetuation of a (semi-) profession: Challenges in the governance of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(5), 567–582. Guerriero, S. & Deligiannidi, K. (2017). ”The teaching profession and its knowledge base“. In Guerriero, S. (ed.). Pedagogical Knowledge and the Changing Nature of the Teaching Profession. OECD Publishing, Paris. Chráska, M. (2016). Metody pedagogického výzkumu. Základy kvantitativního výzkumu. Grada. Chudý, Š., & Neumeister, P. (2014). Začínajúci učiteľ a zvládanie disciplíny v kontexte 2. stupňa základnej školy. Paido. Janišová, M., & Strouhal, M. (Eds.). (2023). Učitelské vzdělávání a oborové didaktiky na Filozofické fakultě Univerzity Karlovy. Karolinum. MŠMT. (2023a). Competence Framework for Graduate Teachers. https://www.msmt.cz/file/61073_1_1/ (Accessed on 20 January 2024) OECD (2024). Teachers by age. doi: 10.1787/93af1f9d-en (Accessed on 29 January 2024) Průcha, J. (2002). Moderní pedagogika. Portál. Spilková, V. (2023). De-profesionalizační novela v mezinárodní perspektivě přístupů k učitelské profesi. Pedagogická orientace, 33, 12-45. Spilková, V. (2016). Přístupy české vzdělávací politiky po roce 1989: Deprofesionalizace učitelství a učitelského vzdělávání?. Pedagogika, 66(4), 368-385. Spilková, V., & Štech, S. (2023). Učitelství v ČR: ohrožená profese?. Pedagogická orientace, 33(1), 3-11. Šebešová, P. (2023). Hodnocení ve výuce filosofie jako výzva. In Janišová, M., & Strouhal, M. (Eds.). Učitelské vzdělávání a oborové didaktiky na Filozofické fakultě Univerzity Karlovy. Karolinum. Šebešová, P. (ed.). (2017). Proč a jak učit filosofii na středních školách. Antologie textů z německé didaktiky filosofie. Vydavatelství FF UK. Švaříček, R., & Šeďová, K. (2014). Kvalitativní výzkum v pedagogických vědách. Portál. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Zhong, Y. (2017). Professional development of new teachers: the perspective of teacher learning. Teacher development research, 4, 56–61. 10. Teacher Education Research
Paper Investigate the Link between Psychological Capital and Teaching for Creativity in Urban and Rural Teachers 1The Education University of Hong Kong; 2The University of Hong Kong; 3The Chinese University of Hong Kong Presenting Author:Teaching for creativity (TfC) is highlighted worldwide due to its crucial role in students’ learning motivation, creative performance, and academic achievement (Craft et al., 2008; Davies et al., 2013; Gajda et al., 2017). A line of research in the field of management has found that psychological capital (PsyCap) has a close relationship with individual creativity in many service settings (Huang & Luthans, 2015; Li & Wu, 2011; Rego et al., 2012; Sweetman et al., 2011). To date, few studies in education have explored whether and to what extent teachers’ PsyCap is related to their TfC behavior. To address the discussed research gaps, this study was designed to investigate the relationship between teachers’ PsyCap and their TfC behavior, by first examining the links between each of the four components of PsyCap—efficacy, hope, resilience, and optimism—and teachers’ TfC, and then by analyzing the differences in these links between urban and rural teachers. TfC emphasizes the development of creativity in students through their empowerment in the learning process. (Jeffrey & Craft, 2004; National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education, 1999). Luthans (2002) defines PsyCap as “positively oriented human resources strengths and psychological capacities that can be measured, developed, and effectively managed for performance improvement” (p. 59). From this perspective, Luthans, Avolio, et al. (2007) advanced four positive psychological resources as constituting PsyCap: efficacy, optimism, hope, and resilience. The relationship between efficacy and TfC can be addressed in three ways. Based on the previous literature, we postulated a positive relationship between efficacy and TfC. Conceptual work backed by empirical evidence indicates that hopeful individuals are apt to welcome creativity. Zhou and George (2003) argued that creativity-related performance at work requires a willingness to explore despite the possibility of failure. From this literature, we anticipated a positive association between hope and TfC among teachers. Resilience is the ability to adapt to changing contexts and life stressors, to bounce back from failure, uncertainty, and adversity, and even to move beyond resilience to achieve success (Luthans, Youssef, et al., 2007; Tugade & Fredrickson, 2004). Given that failures and challenges are inherent in creative tasks (Amabile, 1983) as well as the cultivation of student creativity (Bereczki & Kárpáti, 2018), feeling at ease in abnormal situations and persevering despite failure are prerequisites of creativity-related behavior. We postulated that the positive association between resilience and creativity found in this literature would be also applicable to TfC. Optimism refers to an individual’s generalized positive expectancy for, and attributions of, success (Scheier et al., 2001). Empirical studies have also found that optimism can enhance flexible cognition, trigger intrinsic motivation, and promote creative thinking and creativity-related performance (Fredrickson & Joiner, 2002; Sweetman et al., 2011). Based on the theory of optimism and the attendant empirical studies, we predicted that a positive association between optimism and TfC. In China, due to community poverty, isolation, and distance from the centers of political, economic, and cultural life (Sargent & Hannum, 2005), rural teachers in under-resourced schools may exhibit different features of PsyCap and face distinct challenges in TfC. we predicted that the structural relationships between efficacy, hope, resilience, and optimism to TfC are invariant across urban and rural teachers. Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used Sample and Data Collection This study used a cross-sectional survey research design to investigate studied variables. The participants were 2,309 primary school teachers (86.6% females) in Chongqing, with a mean age of 36.18 years (SD = 8.98, ranging from 21 to 60 years) and mean years of teaching experience of 14.78 years (SD = 10.26, ranging from 1 to 40 years). An online self-reported questionnaire was used to collect the data. We contacted local educational administrators and teacher educators to obtain their approval to conduct the research in their districts, and to ask for their assistance in distributing the link and QR code of the online questionnaire to teachers. Measures PsyCap Teachers’ PsyCap was measured with the 12-item Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-12; Luthans, Avolio, et al., 2007; Luthans, Youssef, et al., 2007). TfC The items developed by Author (2021) were used to measure teachers’ TfC behavior. The participants responded to all items using a 5-point Likert scale (ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Data Analysis After data cleaning, descriptive statistics were computed for all the variables and Cronbach’s alpha scores were calculated to assess the internal reliability of the multi-item subscales. Independent sample T-test was used to compare differences in PsyCap and TfC between urban teachers and rural teachers. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to examine difference in four components of PsyCap within all teachers, urban teachers and rural teachers respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis was then used to measure the construct, discriminant, and convergent validity of the scales. A measurement model was used to test the structural validity of the hypothetical model. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was performed to examine the hypothesized relationships among the studied variables, with the maximum likelihood method adopted for parameter estimation. The goodness-of-fit indices used for the model were the chi-square test (χ2), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA; should be < .08), comparative fit index (CFI; should be > .90), Tucker–Lewis index (TLI; should be > .90), and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR; should be < .08) (Keith, 2014). To compare the relationships among the studied variables between the urban and rural groups, we tested the measurement invariance of the models. After confirming measurement invariance, the structural weights and latent means were compared. Mplus 8.0 was used for data analysis. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings This study mapped the associations between four components of PsyCap and TfC among urban and rural teachers. Four major findings emerged from the analyses: (1) teachers scored highest in optimism and lowest in hope, and urban teachers had higher levels of efficacy and hope than rural teachers; (2) Efficacy and Resilience were significantly related to both urbans’ and rural teachers’ TfC performance; (3) Hope was only positively associated with urban teachers’ TfC; (4) Optimism was only positively related with rural teachers’ TfC The results of this study showed that teachers reported different levels of the four components of PsyCap. Among the four components of PsyCap, hope scored the lowest and optimism the highest for both urban and rural teachers. This supports Synder’s (1994) claim that hope and optimism differ. Combining willpower with waypower, hope represents to what extent teachers are motivated and how many pathways teachers can identify for accomplishing tasks; optimism represents generally positive expectancy and attribution. The results revealed that both urban and rural teachers held a quite optimistic perspective on their work but had limited self-motivation and a relative lack of hope in terms of identifying different ways to solve problems. The present study found that urban teachers had higher levels of general efficacy and hope than their rural counterparts. Given their limited educational and social resources, poor working conditions, and worse student performance (Sargent & Hannum, 2009; Zhao et al., 2017), rural teachers may encounter more challenges and have limited access to the resources needed to solve problems; this might decrease their self-judgments of their abilities and motivation. In addition, limited teacher training and development opportunities commonly founded in the rural schools (Sargent & Hannum, 2005) may also lead to teacher constrained confidence in their abilities. References References (abridged) Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376. Bereczki, E. O., & Kárpáti, A. (2018). Teachers’ beliefs about creativity and its nurture: A systematic review of the recent research literature. Educational Research Review, 23, 25–56. Craft, A., Chappell, K., & Twining, P. (2008). Learners reconceptualising education: Widening participation through creative engagement? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(3), 235–245. Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education: A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91. Gajda, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Exploring creative learning in the classroom: A multi-method approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 250–267. Huang, L., & Luthans, F. (2015). Toward better understanding of the learning goal orientation–creativity relationship: The role of positive psychological capital. Applied Psychology, 64(2), 444–472. Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: Distinctions and relationships. Educational Studies, 30(1), 77–87. Li, C. H., & Wu, J.-J. (2011). The structural relationships between optimism and innovative behavior: Understanding potential antecedents and mediating effects. Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 119–128. Luthans, F. (2002). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Perspectives, 16(1), 57–72. Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541–572. Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford University Press. Rego, A., Sousa, F., Marques, C., & Cunha, M. P. E. (2012). Retail employees’ self-efficacy and hope predicting their positive affect and creativity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(6), 923–945. Sweetman, D., Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., & Luthans, B. C. (2011). Relationship between positive psychological capital and creative performance. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 28(1), 4–13. Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 320–333. Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2003). Awakening employee creativity: The rOole of leader emotional intelligence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4), 545–568. 10. Teacher Education Research
Paper The Threshold to the Initial Embodiment of Becoming a Teacher Dublin City University, Ireland Presenting Author:This research grew out of a change in pre-service teacher (PST) placement practice on one undergraduate Initial Teacher Education (ITE) programme in the Republic of Ireland because of changes made during the Covid-19 pandemic and as a response to Teaching Council policy and guidance documentation (2020a; 2020b, 2021) during that period. The Year 1 PST placement experience over the period from 2020-2022, moved from a video-recorded microteaching experience (Allen and Ryan, 1969; Arsal, 2014) teaching students from a local school in the University setting, followed by a primary school placement, to an online synchronous peer teaching placement experience (Teaching Online Programme 1 - TOP1). Post-Covid, the programme academic team re-evaluated the placement experience. Team research had found that while the TOP “offered …[a chance to build] knowledge in a safe environment where risks could be taken … with technology that might not be attempted in the classroom” (Doyle et al., 2021, p.61), it was also the case that “some student-teachers … missed the real encounter with pupils in the classroom” (Doyle et al, 2021, p.58). Considering these findings and research published in response to online teaching during Covid-19 (Donlon et al., 2022; Giner-Gomis et al., 2023; White and McSharry, 2021), the team designed and implemented a re-imagined form of PST placement practice in Year 1 of the academic year 2022-2023. The research question for this qualitative study asks: What is the process that led beginning pre-service teachers to the moment of embodiment in becoming a teacher? It is concerned with the threshold moment in the becoming of a PST as experienced in this re-imagined placement experience and how this might inform PST placement practice internationally. We acknowledge that there are many different types of PST experiences across the globe, however, this research will transfer to the becoming of a teacher whatever the format (Newman, 2023). The conceptual framework for this study comes from the concept of becoming as suggested in the work of Deleuze and Guattari (2003). They define becoming as “a threshold, a middle, when things accelerate” (p.25). We will argue that year one of ITE is such a threshold or middle. There is no beginning with becoming, only middles and muddles (St Pierre, 2013) as the PST already has images and ideas of who and what a teacher might be. However, becoming is a process in which any given multiplicity “changes nature as it expands its connections” (Deleuze & Guattari, 2003). Sellers (2013) clarifies that becoming involves a dynamic process, through/with/in which an assemblage (PST) is constantly changing through connections it is making. ITE offers a variety of spaces for the pre-service teacher to make and expand these connections both on site in the university, online and in the classroom. The concept of becoming offers the concepts of multiplicity and difference which are significant in this framework. They will help interrogate how the pre-service teacher becomes something new through the inter and intra-connections of these concepts. This understanding undercuts the importance of identity and being and disrupts the thinking of a human as stable and rational, who experiences change but remains the same person. It also undercuts the search for an “identity” for the pre-service teacher and points rather to process, movement, expansion, and confluence. Stagoll (2010) suggests “one’s self must be conceived as a constantly changing assemblage of forces, an epiphenomenon arising from chance confluences of languages, organisms, societies, expectations, laws and so on” (p.27). This study will map how teacher placement works for the first-year pre-service teacher and how it acts as a threshold for the initial embodiment of their becoming as teachers. Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used Following Institutional Ethical approval, data for this study were collected through the extraction of anonymous evaluations pertaining to one first year pre-service teacher professional placement module on a concurrent ITE programme in the Republic of Ireland. Pre-service teachers (N=123) submitted the evaluations after they completed a teaching online programme (TOP1) placement followed by an in-school micro-placement (MP1). The evaluation form included 29 open-ended questions that guided students to consider their overall experience of planning, preparation and practice throughout Year 1. After the removal of incomplete data, 92 evaluations remained for analysis. A reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) approach was deemed most appropriate for this study (Braun & Clarke, 2022). RTA is a valid and reliable “method for developing, analyzing and interpreting patterns across a qualitative dataset, which involves systematic processes of data coding to develop themes” (p.4). Preliminary coding involved reading all the data to get 'a sense of the whole' and then identifying initial codes (Tesch, 1990, p.96; Emerson et al., 1995). This allowed for the possibilities of patterns, themes and tentative analysis to emerge. Next, cluster coding allowed for the classification of considered patterns and inter dependency (Woods, 1986), which led to the identification of sub and core themes. In this study, a theme “captures something important about the data concerning the research question and represents some level of patterned response or meaning within that data set” (Braun & Clark, 2006, p.82). In line with the principles underpinning our thematic framework, the initial thematic map was shared with the research team. This peer-review process checked for bias, acknowledging the importance of reflexivity in the teacher-researcher role (Quinlan, 2011). Importantly, it allowed for the co-construction of final themes, which align with the authors' beliefs that analysis involves listening to many voices for collaborative meaning-making to occur (Stiggins, 1988; Van Maanen, 2011). Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings This paper proposes a new model of PST placement through a dual online and micro-placement experience for use on ITE programmes internationally. The model allows for the becoming of the PST in all their difference and singularity. The encounter with the secondary students and the context of the classroom in a school site, constructed a new awareness of who they are, a consciousness that didn’t emerge during the online experience. The process of online experience which developed their learning in planning, preparation and technology; the sharing of feedback by peers and tutors; and the adaptation and practice of lessons, provided the scaffolding for them to confront for the first time a classroom encounter with secondary students. The presence of the schoolteachers, teacher educators and tutors, to assist in their support and scaffolding, generated a safe space so that they could embody their new identity as teachers. The partnership of the university and school in building a safe environment allowed for this emergence to be visibly evident. Findings showed that this ITE programme interrupted PSTs' epistemological, ontological and axiological understanding of teacher identity. They experienced placement as a threshold, a space of new awakening in the becoming of their identity as a teacher. This becoming was encouraged through a multiplicity of experiences not only in the knowledge of planning and preparation for lessons but through their immersion into the teaching of students in classrooms in different contexts - teaching their peers online followed by teaching secondary students in two different school contexts. This threshold of TOP1 and MP1 offers the PST a moment of embodiment in their teacher becoming in which they recognized for the first time that teachers can be made. This teacher-making event generated a new respect for who and what they might become as teachers in the future. References Allen, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1969). Microteaching. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. Arsal, Z. (2014). Microteaching and pre-service teachers’ sense of self-efficacy in teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 453–464. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage Publications Limited. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2003). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press. Donlon, E., Conroy Johnson, M., Doyle, A., McDonald, E., & Sexton, P. J. (2022). Presence accounted for? Student-teachers establishing and experiencing presence in synchronous online teaching environments. Irish Educational Studies, 41(1), 41–49. Doyle, A., Conroy Johnson, M., Donlon, E., McDonald, E., & Sexton, P. J. (2021). The role of the teacher as assessor: Developing student teacher’s assessment identity. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 46(12), 52–68. Emerson, R., Fretz, R., & Shaw, L. (1995). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press. Giner-Gomis, A., González-Fernández, R., Iglesias-Martínez, M.J., López-Gómez, E. and Lozano-Cabezas, I. (2023). Investigating the teaching practicum during COVID-19 through the lens of preservice teachers, Quality Assurance in Education, 31(1), 74-90. Newman, S. (2023) What works in Initial Teacher Education? Journal of Education for Teaching, 49(5), 747-752. Quinlan, C. (2011). Business Research Methods. Cengage Learning. Sellers, M. (2013). Young Children Becoming Curriculum: Deleuze, Te Whāriki and Curricular Understandings. Routledge. St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). The posts continue: becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education: QSE, 26(6), 646–657. Stagoll, C. (2010). Becoming. In A. Parr (Ed.), The Deleuze Dictionary (Revised Edition, pp. 25–27). Edinburgh University Press. Stiggins, R. J. (1988). Revitalizing Classroom Assessment: The Highest Instructional Priority. The Phi Delta Kappan, 69(5), 363–368. Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools. Falmer. The Teaching Council. (2020a). Céim: Standards for Initial Teacher Education. https://www.teachingcouncil.ie/assets/uploads/2023/08/ceim-standards-for-initial-teacher-education.pdf The Teaching Council. (2020b). Guidance Note for School Placement 2020-2021. https://www.teachingcouncil.ie/assets/uploads/2023/09/guidance-note-for-school-placement-2020-2021.pdf The Teaching Council. (2021). Guidance Note for School Placement 2021-2022. https://www.teachingcouncil.ie/assets/uploads/2023/09/guidance-note-for-school-placement-2021-2022.pdf Van Maanen, J. (2011). Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography (Second Edition). Chicago University Press. White, I., & McSharry, M. (2021). Preservice teachers’ experiences of pandemic related school closures: anti-structure, liminality and communitas. Irish Educational Studies, 40(2), 319–327. Woods, P. (1986). Inside Schools: Ethnography in Educational Research. Routledge. |