Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 10th May 2025, 09:38:45 EEST

 
 
Session Overview
Session
21 SES 11 A: Research Workshop 2: Giving Voice: the Group as a Way of Coping with Imbalance and Uncertainty
Time:
Thursday, 29/Aug/2024:
13:45 - 15:15

Session Chair: Sandrine Jullien Villemont
Location: Room 011 in ΧΩΔ 02 (Common Teaching Facilities [CTF02]) [Ground Floor]

Cap: 56

Research Workshop

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
21. Education and Psychoanalysis
Research Workshop

Giving Voice: the Group as a Way of Coping with Imbalance and Uncertainty

Elisa Colay

Inspé-UPEC, France

Presenting Author: Colay, Elisa

My proposal deals with the issue of uncertainty not in terms of its societal aspect, heightened by the socio-political contexts to which subjects are submitted, but as the precariousness inherent in the subject's perpetual psychological task of keeping the internal and external worlds in continuous motion. So it's more a question of 'dealing with' uncertainty, of working on the ability to accept doubt, surprise and the unforeseen despite the challenge it can represent for narcissism. In fact, the over-emotional injunctions that teachers may be subjected to in a professional situation sometimes weaken the very structure of their narcissism - based on "a certain image that the subject acquires of himself on the model of others" and which founds the ego as a "psychic unity" (Laplanche and Pontalis, 1981). This feeling of perpetual imbalance, which the clinical position based on a psychoanalytical orientation may seem to maintain for the subject-teacher, would paradoxically be a source of reassurance and construction of a certain internal security ensured by the work of psychic elaboration in the work of thought that uncertainty imposes.

Keeping thought moving requires doubt, uncertainty and imbalance, so that thought is creative and not inward-looking. Janine Puget said: « tenemos que aprender a vivir en un desequilibrio permanente » (Puget, 2020). In the field of secondary education, the observation of practice analysis groups conducted in group settings in which writing and reading aloud are used, leads me to conceive that making sense, based on the linking of experiences and secondarised thoughts, is made possible by the 'containing function' (Bion, 1962) provided by the members of the group in their psychological and physical dimensions. The psychic support provided by the group seems to offer the teachers who take part in these schemes an affirmation of their subjectivity as well as a legitimisation of their pedagogical action through the ability to welcome the unexpected and to 'remain open' within their class. It is by becoming aware of the unconscious movements and transfers that drive them within the class groups that this work of elaboration can be established, and also by the stability that the group of teachers brings to each of its members.

"Lo vincular", the "psychoanalysis of the link" - as conceptualised by Puget and Berenstein - makes it possible to observe what "is between" and to think of groups as psychic spaces that provide the subject with possible stability. Jeanine Puget explains: "Parto de la idea de que lo común, que nos hace miembros momentáneos de una situación, se crea y recrea sin cesar, pero los sujetos suelen tener la ilusión de que la pertenencia conlleva un para siempre que les aseguraría un lugar en el mundo en cuanto sujetos sociales. (...) La ilusión es la de construir conjuntos duraderos, basados en contratos inamovibles y en la armoniosa conjunción de las diferencias" (Puget, 2015).

For the teachers, these practice analysis groups are breathing spaces - where they can look back on experiences that are often enigmatic, sometimes painful - and they are times for elaboration, where the group becomes a psychic support that underpins, in that it connects the subjects while providing this function of "illusion de pertenencia" that facilitates the expression of subjectivity. This is built on the sharing of stories, metaphors and words, which often reflect the experiences of the group with the pupils, which resonate in the experience within the group of teachers: the "between" - which the group generates - generates a creative potential that invites us to move forward with others, inhabiting different spaces at the same time.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
As a foreign language teacher, I attach a great deal of importance to words, their symbolic dimension and the imaginary associations they convey. The uncertainty therefore lies in the language itself, and group work based on the written word is what would be put to work and observed as part of a workshop. Although language enables us to communicate and connect with others, it often remains opaque because of its polysemic nature and its ability to express the ambivalence that inhabits every subject.
Producing free writing (narrative, poetic, philosophical, etc.) in a group situation could be an opportunity to have an "exploratory clinical experience" based on what has been shared during the conference. Producing a free text would provide an opportunity to move away from conventional communication and reconnect with the evocative power of language: the world of sound, polyphony, polysemy and the imaginary.
Together, we could observe the effects that writing in the presence of other bodies and giving voice to personal texts can produce within the group, and perhaps perceive how reading aloud through sensitive experience not only highlights the resonance of bodies and psyches, superimposing different times for each member of the group.
The workshop has not yet been fully defined : it could be based on an initial period of sharing words in different languages (one word in English and one in another language of the group's choice), a period of free writing (narrative, argumentative text, poetic form, tract, manifesto, dialogue, etc.) in which English would be used as the main language. A time for reading aloud by the author, immediately followed by writing down key words or exchanging on what was felt, thought or associated at the end of each reading, then a time for group discussion to observe what is common or not, what has been circulated and on what elements these movements have been built.
We could observe how the imaginary images conjured up meet or are transformed and combine common experiences in the present of the conference and in the past of each of the members of the group. The reworking will then be carried out in English in order to facilitate exchanges between the various members around the associations and mental images conjured up in the listeners, even if the writing of the texts will be multilingual due to the make-up of the group.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
Beyond the concept of the construction of subjectivity based on the observation of intrapsychic life, we could, thanks to the contributions of Argentinian psychoanalysis, essentially Berenstein and Puget, observe how the "psychoanalysis of the link" in the observation of group dynamics is based in particular on the signifiers that circulate in the present situation between the psyches of each person. In the sharing of words and personal texts, symbolic representations are conveyed. They are open to the imaginary and each member of the group can grasp them in the here and now through the voice that reads and can generate sensory sensations, emotions and physical movements when receiving the texts.
The expression of poetic subjectivity within the group might make it possible to perceive and think about the extent to which the logic of the "between" goes beyond the logic of the "One", as proposed by Puget with his concept of a subjectivity that is constructed in different superimposed spaces (Puget, 1982).

References
Bion, W. R. (2014). The Complete Works of W. R. Bion. Volume I. London : Karnac Books.
Berenstein, I. & Puget, J. (1997). Lo vincular. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Bréant, F. (2014). Écrire en atelier, Pour une clinique poétique de la reconnaissance. Paris : L’Harmattan.
Cadoux B. (2003). « Le groupécriture : une petite fabrique de subjectivité », Revue de psychothérapie psychanalytique de groupe, 2003/2 no 41, p. 139-150. DOI : 10.3917/rppg.041.0139
Geffard, P., & Dubois, A. (2013, août 1). Monographies et approche clinique d’orientation psychanalytique en sciences de l’éducation. Congrès de l’Actualité de la recherche en Éducation et Formation (AREF – AECSE), Montpellier.
Kaës, R. (2004). Le groupe et le sujet du groupe. Éléments pour une théorie psychanalytique des groupes. (1993). Paris: Dunod.
Laplanche, J. & Pontalis, J.-B. (1981). Vocabulaire de la psychanalyse. Paris: PUF.
Puget, J. (1987). En la busqueda de una hipotesis. El contexto social. XXXV Congreso IPA. Montréal.
Puget, J. (2015). Subjetivación discontínua y psicoanálisis. Incertidumbre y certezas. - 1a ed. - Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires : Lugar Editorial, 2015.
Puget, J. (2020). Aprendiendo a vivir en desequilibrio permanente. Fronteras. 33º Congreso Latinoamericano de Psicoanálisis. Primer Congreso virtual FEPAL 2020.
Puget J., Wender L. (1982), Analista y paciente en mundos superpuestos, Psicoanalisis, vol. IV, no 3, p. 502-532, « El Mundo Superpuesto entre paciente y analista revisitado al cabo de los años », Revista Asociación Escuela Argentina de Psicoterapia para Graduados, 30, 2005-2006, Buenos Aires, août 2007, 69-90.
Schlemminger, G. & Boulouh, F. (2019), « Entrer en écriture dans une autre langue: la voie poétique », Horizonte — Neue Serie • Nuova Serie [En ligne], http://hdl.handle.net/21.11108/0000-0007-DA55-4.


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: ECER 2024
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.153+TC
© 2001–2025 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany