Conference Agenda

Session
99 ERC SES 04 I: Communities, Families, and Schooling in Educational Research
Time:
Monday, 26/Aug/2024:
14:00 - 15:30

Session Chair: Fiona Hallett
Location: Room 003 in ΧΩΔ 01 (Common Teaching Facilities [CTF01]) [Ground Floor]

Cap: 40

Paper Session

Presentations
99. Emerging Researchers' Group (for presentation at Emerging Researchers' Conference)
Paper

Co-Creating Caring Communities in our Schools

Julia Dobson

University College London, United Kingdom

Presenting Author: Dobson, Julia

This paper will draw upon the first two years of my doctoral studies in order to address an overarching question: how can caring communities be co-created in our schools?

In the context of global conflicts, polarisation of political beliefs, rising inequalities and the climate crisis, learning to live together well and collaborate are arguably the ethical imperatives of our times (Booth, 2018; Samanani, 2022; IEA, 2022). School environments hold the potential to be sites of relational learning, in which both staff and students can learn experientially about coexistence, and how we might collaborate to address common issues. Dewey conceptualises the school environment as a ‘miniature community’: a participatory space, in which we can learn through processes of co-construction and reflecting upon our interactions (1941). As well as a co-learning space, the school community also holds the potential to be an invaluable source of social, emotional and wellbeing support (The Children’s Society, 2023).

Yet the extent to which our education systems are preparing young people to grapple, collaboratively, with the challenges we are facing, and enabling schools to support the social and emotional needs of those within their care, can be called into question by urgent calls to transform education globally in light of the climate crisis, and situated reports of alienation and unhappiness in English state secondary schools (e.g. Higham, 2021; Tannock, 2021; UNESCO, 2021; The Children's Society, 2023; McPherson et al., 2023; Haraway, 1988). In the face of these international and national challenges, this paper draws upon the concepts of care, agency and community to theoretically and empirically consider the role of school communities today.

This paper explores the potential for participation, support and connection at school through the lens of care: a broad and expansive concept that connects how we relate to each other and the world around us (Dobson and Higham, paper in progress). The theoretical framework for this paper also draws upon the literature review from the first year of my doctoral study, in which I brought together literature on care and agency to theorise an agential ethic of care, elevating our capacity to act together in care in education (references include: Tronto, 1993; Owis, 2022; Noddings, 1984; Higham and De Vynck, 2019).

In order to address the central question of how we might co-create caring communities in our schools, this paper will present initial findings from my Economic and Social Research Council-funded doctoral research, which explores: how care and community are lived and experienced in state secondary schools in England at present; barriers to and opportunities for co-creating caring communities in our schools; and emergent possibilities from care and community-centred collaborative research in schools. This field work will provide a situated example of knowing with staff and students in the English context – yet the findings hold international implications, in light of the global challenges we face (Haraway, 1988).


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
This paper will invite discussion around initial findings from my doctoral field work, for which I am employing a range of methods. For this field work, I began by facilitating staff and student focus groups about care in one English state secondary school community, leading into a participatory action research project, designed to collaboratively address a particular care need or opportunity identified by co-researchers in the school. To design this field work, I am drawing upon a range of participatory methodological literature (e.g. Fine and Torre 2021; Brown, 2022; Riley, 2017). I plan to also use collaborative methodologies to engage staff and students in other selected school contexts in mixed discussions about care and collaboration, in order to build upon and further explore initial emerging themes. This paper will also draw upon focus group and observational data to explore the experience of participating in a care-and-community-centred participatory research project in a school.
Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
Emerging themes from initial focus groups indicate broader structural, relational and individual factors that can affect the extent to which students and staff feel cared for, able to care, and able to participate in their school community. They also indicate the complex balancing act of care needs and priorities, which Tronto argues elevates the need for dialogue about care (1993). Subsequent field work and analysis prior to the ECR conference will build upon and clarify the emerging themes for the paper presentation. Emergent possibilities from this collaborative research will, in combination with the theoretical framework outlined above, feed into the paper’s exploration of co-creating caring communities in our schools.

Overall, this research aims, through collaborative methodologies, to help school leaders and policymakers to understand, and act on, what helps staff and students to feel cared for, able to care, able to participate, and able to collaborate within their school community. By re-framing caring as potentially collaborative and agential, this paper seeks to respond to urgent questions of how we can learn to live together well, and how we might support, and engage, members of our school communities - while also making a contribution to theories of care in education. Staff and student perspectives on care and community in their schools, amplified through this research, will hold implications for researchers, policymakers and practitioners, indicating the relevance of and potential for reclaiming ‘schools as caring communities’ in the present-day context (e.g. Baker et al., 1997).

References
Baker, Jean A., Robert Bridger, Tara Terry, and Anne Winsor (1997). ‘Schools as Caring Communities: A Relational Approach to School Reform’. School Psychology Review 26 (4) 586–602.
Booth, A.J. (2018). 'How Should We Live Together? Choosing the Struggle for Inclusive Values'. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos em Educação, Esp. 13 (2), pp.1388–1406.
Brown, Nicole (2022). ‘Scope and Continuum of Participatory Research’. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 45, (2) pp.200–211.
Dewey, J. (1941). Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Fine, Michelle, and Torre, María Elena (2021). Essentials of Critical Participatory Action Research. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Haraway, Donna (1988). ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective’. Feminist Studies 14 (3) pp.575–99.
Higham, R. (2021) ‘Reframing Ethical Leadership in Response to Civilizational Threats’, in T. Greany and P. Earley (eds) School Leadership and Education System Reform. London, UK: Bloomsbury. Available at: https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/school-leadership-and-education-system-reform-9781350173514.
Higham, R. and De Vynck, H. (2019). 'Creating an ‘Ethic of Care’ in a Vertical Tutor Group'. In N. Mercer, R. Wegerif, and L. Major (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Dialogic Education. New York: Routledge, 2020.: Routledge, pp.622–633.
IEA (2022). 'International ‘Collaboration Gap’ Threatens to Undermine Climate Progress and Delay Net Zero by Decades'. International Energy Agency. Available at: https://www.iea.org/news/international- collaboration-gap-threatens-to-undermine-climate-progress-and-delay-net-zero-by-decades [Accessed: 3 May 2023].
McPherson, C. et al. (2023). Schools for All? Young Lives, Young Futures: King’s College London. Available at: https://www.edge.co.uk/research/projects/research-reports/schools-for-all/. [Accessed 7 June 2023].
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring, a Feminine Approach to Ethics & Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Owis, B. (2022). Queering and Trans-gressing Care: Towards a Queer Ethic of Care in QTBIPOC Education. Doctoral Thesis. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
Riley, Kathryn (2017). Place, Belonging and School Leadership: Researching to Make the Difference. London: Bloomsbury.
Samanani, F. (2022). How To Live With Each Other : An Anthropologist’s Notes on Sharing a Divided World. London: Profile Books.
Tannock, S. (2021) Educating for Radical Social Transformation in the Climate Crisis. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
The Children’s Society (2023). The Good Childhood Report 2023. London: The Children’s Society.
Tronto, J.C. (1993). Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
UNESCO (2021) Reimagining Our Futures Together: A New Social Contract for Education. Paris, France: Unesco Digital Library. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707 [Accessed:15 May 2023].


99. Emerging Researchers' Group (for presentation at Emerging Researchers' Conference)
Paper

The Influence of School Climate Assemblies in the Development of Sustainability Competences amongst High School Students

Núria Monterde

Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Spain

Presenting Author: Monterde, Núria

Current societies are characterized by their complexity and globalization, as they must face different global challenges that manifest themselves on a local and regional scale, such as the climate crisis and economic and social inequalities. In order to understand these situations, it is essential to learn how to adapt to these constant changes that seem to become more accentuated over time. Knowledge of these phenomena can help us to understand our attitudes and behaviors in the environment, to contribute so as to benefit it with favorable actions and change those that can harm it. Sustainability competencies are understood as the combination of cognitive skills, practical abilities, and ethical values and attitudes that empower individuals and communities to contribute to sustainability (Bianchi et al., 2022; Brundiers et al). The European Framework of Sustainability competences GreenComp was recently published in order to promote and enrich educational programs so that students develop habits, processes and attitudes in favor of sustainability and public health (Bianchi et al, 2022).

This research aims, on the one hand, to inform about the diversity of competences that have been assessed and plenty of instruments that have been designed, validated and applied to measure these competencies in school context and, in the other hand, to communicate about the role of climate school assemblies in the sustainability competencies students’ achievement (EDUCLIMAD project). The EDUCLIMAD project aims to implement school assemblies for the climate as an innovative, democratic and collaborative methodology to learn, deliberate, make informed decisions and search for solutions in a critical and committed way, to deal with climate change and promote sustainability at a local and regional level. Therefore, the school climate assemblies are considered as an innovative, democratic and collaborative methodology to learn, deliberate, make informed decisions and seek solutions in a critical and committed manner to address climate change and promote local and regional sustainability, as well as to achieve the competences in sustainability, established in the European GreenComp framework (Bianchi et al, 2022).

The main research questions guiding this doctoral research are: 1) What are the different sustainability competencies’ assessment approaches and tools used in Secondary Education? 2)How can effective assessment tools be designed to measure students' sustainability competencies?; 3) What is the influence of school climate assemblies in the development of sustainability competencies amongst students?. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted related to sustainability competencies’ assessment in secondary education. The evaluation resources used in the different investigations are interviews, discussion groups, workshops, drawings and pre and post questionnaires, being the latter the most used to evaluate sustainability competencies among students. These results also reflect the current state of evaluation and offer interesting implications for educators, teachers and researchers working on the development and acquisition of sustainability competencies in secondary education. Moreover, provides detailed information on the influence of climate assemblies on sustainability competencies’ assessment among students through a pre- and post-test instrument related on sustainability behaviors and contextualized situations related to the sustainability competences proposed by the European GreenComp framework (2022). To sum up, this research addresses the challenge of designing competence-based Education for Sustainability, where clear pedagogical and assessment strategies must be defined, tested and documented on how learners develop these competencies to contribute to a collective sustainable social transformation of our societies, specifically focusing on educational context.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted related to sustainability competencies’ assessment in secondary education, based on analyzing 35 original articles related to this topic. A systematic search protocol has been followed to determine eligibility criteria, sources of information, data extraction and analysis so as to ensure transparent and rigorous criteria.
This research is based on the implementation of an educational intervention that includes the methodological approach to implement climate assemblies in schools in order to promote the active engagement of students and their communities in the co-creation of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. Based on existing experiences of citizen climate assemblies, the school climate assemblies adopt a three-phase process related to their design and implementation. The first phase is preparatory and material design, including the design of a methodological guide for the creation and implementation of school climate assemblies and the creation of educational resources aligned with the European Commission's GreenComp sustainability competency framework (Bianchi et al, 2022). The second phase consists of the organization and development of school climate assemblies in high schools and the elaboration of an action plan and policy recommendations by the participating educational communities. The policy actions resulting from the students' analysis are conceptualized and a record is made of their frequency (number of times the action was voted on). The last phase contemplates the evaluation and dissemination of the results, the educational resources designed and learning derived from the project to agents of the territory including policy makers and other educational centers in the district.  Finally, the proposals generated will be presented to different educational agents, local entities and policy makers in an event that can bring them all together.
To evaluate the level of sustainability competencies of the students, a quantitative instrument has been passed to the students before and after carrying out the assemblies. This instrument consists of a questionnaire related to sustainability behaviors with 4 Likert-type response possibilities: (1) disagree, (2) neither agree nor disagree, (3) agree and (4) totally agree.  Besides, 4 contextualized situations are proposed, each of them related to the competence area established by the European GreenComp framework: Embodying sustainability values, Embracing complexity in sustainability, Envisioning sustainable futures and Acting for sustainability. Each of these situations is divided into 3 questions related to the 3 competencies included in each competence area, 12 competencies as a whole.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
In relation to the first research question (What are the different sustainability competencies’ assessment approaches and tools used in Secondary Education?), the findings show that most of the interventions used as an assessment tool was questionnaires, most of them combined with another qualitative instruments like interviews or focus groups to gain a more comprehensive understanding of sustainability competencies’ development. Answering the second research question (How can effective assessment tools be designed to measure students' sustainability competencies?) the results obtained through the designed instrument highlights the need to combine it with more qualitative resources like focus groups. Therefore, further research should, on the one hand, focus on identifying and validating additional instruments for assessing sustainability competencies in these educational levels, and on the other hand, should combine different quantitative and qualitative assessment tools focused on sustainability competencies’ development among students.
Finally, the results of the third question (What is the influence of school climate assemblies in the development of sustainability competencies amongst students?), school assemblies can contribute to the development of sustainability competencies in high school students associated with interpersonal competence and collective action, which focus on acting for change in collaboration with others and promote students' capacity and willingness to engage in democratic processes to achieve more sustainable societies. In particular, the climate school assemblies’ aspects that students highlighted as positive were active participation, new knowledge and learning, awareness, reflection, collaboration, teamwork and dynamism. This approach also has the potential to inform and influence policy making through the identification of priorities where community learning and action can make a significant contribution to addressing the challenges of climate change and sustainability. This research is considered of scientific relevance because it presents the methodological conceptualization for implementing climate assemblies in educational centers and offers valuable learning from deliberative processes on climate change for other educational institutions (Cebrián et al 2023).

References
Bianchi, G., Pisiotis, U. and Cabrera Giraldez, M. (2022). GreenComp The European sustainability competence framework, Punie, Y. and Bacigalupo, M. editor(s), EUR 30955 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2022, ISBN 978-92-76-46485-3, doi:10.2760/13286, JRC128040.
Brundiers, K., Barth, M., Cebrián, G., Cohen, M., Diaz, L., Doucette-Remington, S., Dripps, W., Habron, G., Harré, N., Jarchow, M., Losch, K., Michel, J., Mochizuki, Y., Rieckmann, M., Parnell, R., Walker, P., & Zint, M. (2021). Key competencies in sustainability in higher education—toward an agreed-upon reference framework, Sustainability Science, 16, 13-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00838-2
Cebrián, G., Boqué, A., Camarero, M., Junyent, M., Moraleda, A., Olano, JX & Renta, AI (2023). Las asambleas escolares por el clima: una herramienta para empoderar a la comunidad educativa en la acción climática, en M. Sánchez-Moreno & J. López-Yáñez (eds) Construir comunidades en la escuela. ISBN 978-84-277-3098-4
Finnegan, W. (2022). Educating for Hope and Action Competence: A study of secondary school students and teachers in England. Environmental Education Research, 29(11), 1617-1636. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2120963
Olsson, D., Gericke, N., Sass, W., & Pauw, J. B. (2020). Self-perceived Action Competence for Sustainability: the theoretical grounding and empirical validation of a novel research instrument. Environmental Education Research, 26(5), 742-760. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1736991
Sass, W., Pauw, J. B., De Mæyer, S., & Van Petegem, P. (2021). Development and validation of an instrument for measuring action competence in sustainable development within early Adolescents: the Action Competence in Sustainable Development Questionnaire (ACISD-Q). Environmental Education Research, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.1888887


99. Emerging Researchers' Group (for presentation at Emerging Researchers' Conference)
Paper

Accompanying Change: How Can Research Contribute to Social Transformation?

Rowan Coste

Université de Limoges, France

Presenting Author: Coste, Rowan

In France and within the European Union, representative democracies are in crisis due to the rise of abstention and the erosion of public confidence in the institutions. The COVID health crisis and the social distancing measures have contributed to the deterioration of physical interactions in social life. Researches on civic engagement and political participation in educational sciences and psychology tell us what engagement is, what representations individuals or institutions have of civic rights and duties (Civic Knowledge Framework, 2023). Beyond these researches, how can research contribute to positive social transformation? What challenges awaits the researcher wanting to use research as a transformative channel? Grounded in a multidisciplinary approach, the research evoked in this paper seeks to accompany changes in posture, both among elected officials and citizens, at a municipal level to recreate a participatory culture and repair frayed local social bonds. It is a qualitative longitudinal research and we have been invited into this municipality via the mayor and some of the elected representatives to follow a local experimentation on a new participation project. This is a local policy set by the elected council to involve citizens in collective projects for the municipality. Using institutional analysis (Lourau, 1970), psychosociological studies on group, crisis and the collective imaginary (Guist-Desprairies, 2009), and certain studies in political science (Amnå&Ekman, 2014), we have designed a framework to accompany a participatory council made of volunteer citizens and elected officials, and we try to help them understand and overcome conflicts and contradictions to recreate a participatory culture. The theoretical framework is based on the institutional socio-clinical approach that “aims to think together about the singular futures of subjects (their practices, their subjectivities) and institutional and political transformations.” (Monceau, 2013).

It is necessary to say that I have been following the participative council since December 2022 and a lot of steps have been taken. At the beginning of the participation project, the municipality paid a service provider to apply a new method of scientific mediation inspired by the work of Bruno Latour. The citizens gathered for the workshops. A part of those citizens became members of the participative council that emerged from the first period of the participation project.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
This study uses a variety of tools to elaborate its methodology inspired by the concept of situated knowledge which also leads to an analysis of the researcher’s “I” (Harraway, 1988). Ethnographic tools are essential because I am a participant observer. Therefore, I write a field notes journal which allows me to analyze my involvement (Monceau, 2013). I mind my emotions and reactions to my environment to be able to objectivate possible bias. I also have a clinical approach: I conducted semi-structured clinical interviews (Galletta, 2013) with elected officials and citizens about their engagement and how they think of participatory culture. Moreover, because I care about epistemic justice and ethics, I decided to transcribe the interviews and give them back so that the interviewed can modify it if they think it is necessary. We discuss the reasons for modifications together and it allows me to explain how some information could be used in my research and how it is analyzed.
Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The participative council needed to be accompanied because its members were a new consultative organization. They needed to understand why they were here, what the municipality wanted from them, and what they wanted to do with those expectations. Some citizens that came didn’t have political knowledge and the group needed to use collaborative methods to make their collective works. The researcher becomes a mediator that explains the implicit language and norms but also a trainer to help them with project methodology. Therefore, the individuals and the group can develop their empowerment and their critical thinking skills. This research seeks adult emancipation and development of civic engagement. Through this research, I have observed and I still witness a path being crafted by both the searcher that I am and the collective I take part of (participative council). This raises the following question: how does the searcher think and engage into academic research beyond the quest for results, but as an opportunity to fulfill a wider goal that recognizes the movement produced by his research and its transformative power?
References
Amnå, E. Ekman, J. (2014). Standby citizens: diverse faces of political passivity .European Political Science Review.
Galletta, A., & CROSS, W. E. (2013). Mastering the Semi-Structured Interview and Beyond: From Research Design to Analysis and Publication. NYU Press.
Giust-Desprairies, F. (2009). L’imaginaire collectif. Toulouse, France : ERES.
Giust-Desprairies, F. (2015). Penser le groupe : enjeux historiques et théoriques d'un engagement social. Dans : René Kaës éd., Crises et traumas à l'épreuve du temps : Le travail psychique dans les groupes, les couples et les institutions. Paris : Dunod, 147-176.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
Lourau, R. (1970). L’analyse institutionnelle. EditionsMinuit.
Monceau, G. (2013). Institutionnalisation de la réflexivité et obstacles à l’analyse de
l’implication. Dans : Jacques Béziat éd., Analyse de pratiques et réflexivité : Regards sur
la formation, la recherche et l’intervention socio-éducative (pp. 21-32). Paris:L'Harmattan.


99. Emerging Researchers' Group (for presentation at Emerging Researchers' Conference)
Paper

Continuing Education in the Life Course of Different Generations

Natalja Rosenfeld

National Research University Higher School of Economics, Russian Federation

Presenting Author: Rosenfeld, Natalja

The pandemic experience has solidified the knowledge of how crucial it is to periodically pursue additional education and possess soft skills, as well as being able to adjust to changing circumstances (WEF, 2020; Deloitte, 2020).

The basic concept of human capital is typically used to frame discussions about involvement in continuing education, which is meant to accumulate this form of capital and so to give profits to its owner (Korshunov, Shirkova, Gorbunova, 2023). Therefore, researchers in continuing education concentrate on adult education providers and the demographics of those who take advantage of these opportunities (Korshunov, Gaponova, Gaponova, 2019). They also study the effects of additional professional training on salary (Travkin., 2014), job satisfaction (Karmaeva, Zakharov, 2021), and the smoothness of the education and employment transition (Du Bois-Reymond, Blasco, 2003; Machin, McNally, 2007).

However, taking into account the process of creating one's own educational trajectory is overlooked. For example, education can be used to "upgrade" a current position (either on one's own initiative or at the request of an employer), but it can also be used as a means of sidestepping to occupy a different position within the labor market's structure (Kosyakova, Y., & Bills, D. B., 2021). It turns out that the cross-sectional approach does not allow us to see structural changes: from whatever sector of work people are obliged to retrain and where they are heading, which path and level of education is more self-sufficient, or, conversely, demands (or stimulates) continued education.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
We follow the paths of several age groups of Russian citizens using the data from 30 waves (1992-2022) of the "Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey, RLMS-HSE", conducted by National Research University "Higher School of Economics'' and OOO “Demoscope” together with Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (RLMS-HSE web sites: https://rlms-hse.cpc.unc.edu, https://www.hse.ru/org/hse/rlms). It is a series of yearly nationally representative surveys that collect socio-demographic data on the population, including the employment and education statistics we are interested in, similar to studies in Great Britain (BHPS), Switzerland (SHP), Germany (SOAP), Canada (SLID), Australia (HILDA) and India (HDC).
We use sequence analysis with additional clustering to create educational trajectories from a set of respondents' choices for their education (Brzinsky-Fay, 2014; Sirotin, Egorov, 2018; Monaghan, 2020). Groups of similar trajectories are used further to find out what combinations of educational programs Russians utilize at different ages and historical times, as well as which programs and majors are more relevant for continuing education.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The investigation is currently ongoing to accomplish the established goals, but the expected results will be as follows: A longitudinal methodology will help to overcome the limitations of previous studies of continuing education made on cross-sectional data and also identify whether the educational transitions were more proactive (desired) or reactive (forced) (Sullivan, Baruch, 2009; Guan et al., 2019). Moreover, the study will answer the following questions: What trends do Russians have in their educational trajectories with regard to continuing education? Which life periods correspond to the most "active" and "passive" phases of the accumulation of human capital? What connections exist between the transitions in [continuing] education and the labor market?
As a result, the findings will contribute to the discourse of nonlinear trajectories in life course and boundaryless or protean careers (Sullivan, Baruch, 2009), where the emphasis is on the individual and how they create their own paths based on their intentions (Hall, 2004)

References
Brzinsky-Fay C. (2014)The measurement of school-to-work transitions as processes: about events and sequences. European Societies, 16(2), 213–232.
Deloitte (2020) COVID-19 The upskilling imperative. Building a future-ready workforce for the AI age.
Du Bois-Reymond M., López Blasco A. (2003) Yo-Yo Transitions and Misleading Trajectories: Towards Integrated Transition Policies for Young Adults in Europe. Young People and Contradictions of Inclusion: Towards Integrated Transition Policies in Europe, 19–42.
Guan, Y., Arthur, M.B., Khapova, S.N., Hall, R.J., Lord, R.G. (2019) Career boundarylessness and career success: A review, integration and guide to future research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 390–402.
Hall, D.T. (2004) The protean career: A quarter-century journey. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 1–13.
Karmaeva N., Zakharov A. (2021) Professional Training and Non-Economic Effects for Workers in Russia. Journal of Economic Sociology, 22(2), 81–108.
Korshunov I.A., Kuzheleva K.S., Grachev B.A., Sergeev K.A. (2018) Adult education and training: In-demand programs, age and industry structures.
Korshunov, I. A., Gaponova, O. S., & Gaponova, N. S. (2019) Adult training and education in the context of economic development of regions. Economy of Region, 15(1), 107–120.
Korshunov, I. A., Shirkova, N. N., Gorbunova, M. L. (2023) Active Participation of Adults in Continuing Education: The Role of Regional Economy and Development of Key Industries. Economy of Regions, 1093–1109.
Kosyakova, Y. (2016) The regime change and social inequality : educational and job careers in the Soviet and post-Soviet Era.
Kosyakova, Y., & Bills, D. B. (2021). Formal adult education and socioeconomic inequality: Second chances or Matthew Effects? Sociology Compass, 15(9).
Machin S., McNally S. (2007) Tertiary Education Systems and LabourMarkets. Paris: Education and Training Policy Division, OECD.
Monaghan D.B. (2020) College-going trajectories across early adulthood: An inquiry using sequence analysis. The Journal of Higher Education, 91(3), 402–432.
Sirotin V.P., Egorov A.A. (2018) Methodological Aspects of Career Trajectories Analysis on Russian Labor Marketi, 25(9), 37-47.
Sullivan, S. E., Baruch, Y. (2009). Advances in Career Theory and Research: A Critical Review and Agenda for Future Exploration. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1542–1571.
Travkin, P.V. (2014). The impact of the on-the-job training on Russian worker's salary: the effect of abilities approach, 1(33), 51-70.
World Economic Forum (2020) The Future of Jobs Report.