Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 10th May 2025, 12:08:46 EEST

 
 
Session Overview
Session
32 SES 05.5 A: Organizational Education Poster Session
Time:
Wednesday, 28/Aug/2024:
12:45 - 13:30

Location: Anastasios G. Leventis Building Ground Floor / Outside Area and Basement Level / Open Area

ECER Poster Exhibition Area

General Poster Session

Session Abstract

Posters 468; 469


Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
32. Organizational Education
Poster

About a Research Project on Alternative Education Schools’ Cultures in Response to Ages of Uncertainty

Aleksandra Tlusciak-Deliowska, Urszula Dernowska

The Maria Grzegorzewska University, Poland

Presenting Author: Tlusciak-Deliowska, Aleksandra

The effective functioning of a modern school in an Age of Uncertainty requires conscious creation of its culture, which, when shaped, ensures the school's implementation of its mission in a dynamically changing social, economic and cultural reality. Recognizing the possibility of influencing culture and shaping it in accordance with a given direction means focusing on identifying its elements subject to modification, learning about the factors conducive to cultural change and the possibilities and ways of carrying it out. School culture highlights specific aspects of school life and brings out the importance of "who we are" and " the way we do things around here" (Deal & Peterson, 2010). Research on school culture is one of the most interesting directions in the search for factors in the development and improvement of school organization (Hoy, 1990).

Many researchers agree that school culture is a crucial variable in school improvement (Deal & Peterson, 1999; Stoll & Fink, 1996).

Scientific analyzes regarding intra-school processes, referred to as "school culture", come from various disciplines and were initially associated with the concept of school life by Waller (1932), who noted that schools have an identity of their own, with complex rituals of personal relationships, a set of folkways, mores, irrational sanctions, and moral codes (see also: Maslowski, 2006; Schoen & Teddlie, 2008). The concept of organizational culture began to receive attention in the research communities (e.g., Deal & Kennedy, 1982; Ouchi, 1981) as a factor associated with organizational performance in the 1980s. Lack of early attention by researchers may be because culture is associated with taken-for-granted values, underlying assumptions, expectations, collective memories, and definitions in an organization (Cameron & Quinn, 1999, p. 14). Over the last few decades, the discussion on the concept of school culture has become an integral part of both the educational discourse ongoing in various circles and empirical studies devoted to school. Despite different interpretations of the category of school culture itself (see e.g. Deal & Peterson, 1999; Schoen & Teddlie, 2008; ), there is consensus among researchers that its cognitive value results from a comprehensive understanding of various aspects of everyday school life and is therefore helpful in learning and understanding the nature of school life and institutionalized education.

The aim of the poster presentation will be to present a research project on the cultures of alternative education schools, to discuss its conceptual assumptions and planned methodological solutions. The project is a team effort, prepared with the intention of identifying the cultures of selected institutions, defining their specificity and analyzing the interactions between individual dimensions and cultural elements. An equally important goal of research activities will be to compare the cultures of the studied institutions - to determine whether the teaching-learning environments, which are unique examples of innovative educational ventures, are clearly different and how this is expressed.

Learning about different educational proposals is cognitively fascinating, but also in the social interest. Typical human characteristics are activity, searching for new solutions, improving the existing reality, and this, in relation to the school reality, becomes particularly important due to the need to provide high-quality modern educational services. The planned research will primarily provide new knowledge and is therefore significant for building and developing school culture theory.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
A comprehensive and accurate description and analysis of the selected schools’ cultures will be possible thanks to the case study research procedure, more precisely, multiple case study. The research will be carried out in deliberately selected schools exemplifying alternative educational proposals in Poland. The researchers want to select general education schools that represent differences in organizing educational processes and everyday practices related to teaching, including original curricula.
In the designed study, Schoen and Teddlie’s (2008) school culture model will be used to structure the analyses. This model describes school culture as being comprised of four different dimensions: (I) Professional Orientation, (II) Organizational Structure, (III) Quality of the Learning Environment, and (IV) Student-Centered Focus that exist at three different levels of abstraction: artifacts, espoused beliefs, and basic assumptions (Schein, 1985). Therefore, the model offers a framework for describing, discussing, and comparing school functions across four dimensions of school culture and also allows culture to be examined across three levels at which culture is manifested (Schein, 1985).
The above-mentioned model of school culture entails the need to design research that takes into account various data sources and methods, taking into account data on all dimensions and levels of culture, therefore various quantitative and qualitative data collection techniques and tools will be used in the own research. Maslowski (2006) also suggests triangulating a variety of qualitative and quantitative data sources to study culture, because the weaknesses of one method are compensated by similar findings with other methods. Moreover, all members of a given school community will participate in the study, i.e. students, teachers, principals, administration, and parents. A separate research strategy will be developed for each educational institution, established in consultation with the management and after becoming familiar with the organization of the school year in a given institution. Research activities in each educational institution will be carried out concurrently. The adopted solutions are intended to ensure mutual complementation of the results obtained at individual stages of the research process and to eliminate possible errors in the methods used. Moreover, the examined reality is complex and multi-aspect, therefore the use of different methods ensures obtaining different types of data. The approach used is an exemplification of the plural heterogeneous approach to the research process.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The researchers’ intention is to provide a comprehensive, coherent picture of the cultures of institutions that constitute alternative educational proposals. The aim is, first of all, to conduct an in-depth examination of the cultures of selected institutions, present their specificity, recognize dimensions and analyze the interactions between individual cultural elements. Secondly, a comparison of the cultures of the surveyed institutions will be made. It is cognitively interesting to determine whether the teaching-learning environments in various and unique examples of innovative educational projects are clearly different. The use of a wide range of methods and the data collected thanks to them, which will then be triangulated, is intended to provide a multidimensional picture of schools. In our opinion, this procedure will not only enable the search for universality, indicating the repeatability of specific elements (phenomena, behavior, situations), documenting the relationships between the overall life and functioning of the school and its effects, but will also result in rich, "dense" descriptions of everyday life in schools, understanding of individual elements or aspects of this life by people immersed in it. Research based on the school culture model used may be useful in obtaining a more complete understanding of the socio-cultural and organizational factors at the school level that facilitate school improvement, a school that functions effectively in such a difficult contemporary reality. This knowledge is a logical precursor to the reculturation of schools in order to achieve and sustain the changes currently desired.
References
Cameron, K.S., & Quinn, R.E. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture based on the competing values framework. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Deal, T.E., & Kennedy, A. (1982). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Deal, T.E., & Peterson, K. (1999). Shaping school culture: The heart of leadership. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Deal, T. E., & Peterson, K. D. (2010). Shaping school culture: Pitfalls, paradoxes, and promises. John Wiley & Sons.
Hoy, W. K. (1990). Organizational climate and culture: A conceptual analysis of the school workplace. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 1(2), 149–168.
Maslowski, R. (2006). A review of inventories diagnosing school culture. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(1), 6–35.
Ouchi, W.G. (1981). Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. Reading,
MA: Addison-Wesley.
Schein E. (1985). Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
Schoen L.T., Teddlie, Ch. (2008). A new model of school culture. A response to a call for conceptual clarity. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(2), 129-153.
Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1996). Changing our schools. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Waller W. (1932). The sociology of teaching. New York: Russell & Russell.


32. Organizational Education
Poster

Metaphor as a Way to Explore Subtle Elements of School Culture: “A School Unlike Any Other” in Students’ Metaphors

Urszula Dernowska, Aleksandra Tlusciak-Deliowska

The Maria Grzegorzewska University, Poland

Presenting Author: Dernowska, Urszula

The concept of culture as applied to schools is difficult to define as well as to operationalize in research terms. That is why there are attempts to create different models of school culture with a promise of more comprehensive and coherent approach to school culture research (e.g. Kent, 2006; Brady, 2008; Schoen & Teddlie, 2008; Torres, 2022). Undoubtedly, the study of school culture is quite a challenge, not only because of the difficulty in operationalizing the object of analysis itself, or even because of the need for interdisciplinary profiling. The study of school culture requires reaching the subtle elements of the phenomenon being explored. Elements such as values, perceptions, experiences, feelings can be difficult to accurately capture quantitatively. However, taking them into account is necessary to build a coherent, complementary picture of the school environment.

Given these difficulties, researchers turn to metaphor as a tool of knowing the culture of the school. Metaphors can play a vital role in conceptualizing and reflecting the nature of learning and are used in establishing a connection between educational theories and personal beliefs (Leavy et al., 2007). From this point of view, metaphor is a beneficial tool in close examining teachers’ and students’ thoughts on their learning and teaching environment (Martinez et al., 2001; Saban, 2013). It is also a tool in the process of organizational assessment and change (Cleary & Packard, 1992).

Lakoff and Johnson (1980, p. 5) state that person’s perceptions of concepts are based on metaphors. They argue that the essence of metaphor is understanding and experiencing one kind of thing in terms of another. Educators use metaphors as a way to attract the students’ attention through comparing objects, reflecting on them in their mind and teaching them. Although the context for the development of values by young people has grown more complex and the possibilities for choice have expanded as a result of sociocultural development and globalization, schools still operate as major social environments where pupils share their beliefs, norms, values, and fears for a substantial part of their lives (Demir, 2007).

According to the social, cultural and economic conditions of the society, different metaphors emerged in the field of education, such as the school as a figurative factory, a plant, a social center, a welfare agency etc. (Bishop, 2019; Eshenkulova & Boobekova, 2022). Metaphors not only structure the way of thinking about schools but also help create a world of the school. Some researchers (e.g. Jordan, 1996) identified several powerful metaphors for schooling and school improvement that dominate the thinking of policy-makers, scholars and practitioners (Demir, 2007).

Transferring ideas about the school to other objects allows researchers to reach subtle elements of school culture which resist quantitative approaches. The aim of the poster presentation is to show a fragment of research material collected as part of a team project. The methods and tools used in this project provides an insight into the cultures of selected institutions: their specificity and the interactions between individual dimensions and cultural elements. This, in turn, allows to compare the cultures of selected non-public primary schools – schools "other than all".

The purpose of this study is to analyze the perceptions of two primary school students of school and schooling by examining the metaphors they produce. The process of verbalizing school experiences through a metaphorical description of them is a component of communication processes, but it can also be used for consensus, decision-making or persuasion. It makes it possible to discover existing beliefs that subjectively describe the functioning of the school, and which can be used as one of the sources of knowledge about it.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
Inspired by Gareth Morgan's (1986) theoretical model of reading and understanding organizations on the basis of metaphorical analysis, we attempted to reach the perception and understanding of school reality expressed through metaphor by primary school students, while maintaining the awareness that the image of school built in this way remains, after all, partial.
Using metaphor as a textual tool to study empirically elusive elements of school culture, an attempt was made to get closer to students' ways of reading and understanding school reality. The study was conducted in two non-public primary schools, implementing an alternative education model in practice. This means that the study involved students who had been learning in the so-called open didactic environment for several years – an environment free of transmission-behavioral solutions dominant in the Polish mainstream school system.
The source of the data was a task carried out by the eighth grade students. It consisted of a text and a drawing part. The students were asked to complete the sentence: My school is like... Then to illustrate the metaphor and explain why the school was presented the way it did. The examined material (N = 22) provided data in the form of texts and drawings. The main analysis was focused on students' texts, while drawings were treated as an important support in the process of reaching the meanings attributed by young people to the school reality – its various dimensions and elements. Analytical work included the initial ordering of data (line-by-line coding), their supplementation with interpretations and suggestions for ordering metaphors. This work was carried out individually and in parallel by two researchers. Then, during the discussion, the effects of these activities were confronted and the final categorization of student metaphors was made. As a result, five categories were selected. In a separate group were placed those texts in which the school was not presented in a metaphorical way, but in a factual way (n = 2).

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
As a result of the collected material analysis, five groups of metaphors were identified: (1) culture/climate: among the analyzed metaphors, the largest number are those whose authors in their perception of the school focus on the atmosphere of the place, interpersonal relations, but also the adopted philosophy of education and the norms regulating the life of their school; (2) hybrid (collage): this group brings together metaphors that carry a wide variety of cognitive content, reflecting the complex nature of school life that can be perceived in many ways and interpreted differently, taking into account its physical, axiological or socio-didactic dimensions; (3) catastrophic: this category includes the metaphor of the Titanic or an airplane whose engine has suffered a major failure – this means a subjectively perceived difficulty, a complication of everyday school life: the daily routine is stressful, full of aggravating problem situations and, as such, often requires quick decisions and efficient actions from the student; (4) chaos: this category includes metaphors such as the museum of modern art and “random chance” and emphasizes chaos, randomness, unpredictability, and creativity in the school environment; (5) prison: this category includes metaphors exposing external coercion at school, different types of constraints and coercion.
The analysis of the data revealed a diversity of perception and inter¬pretation of school reality. It is worth adding, however, that the image of the school obtained by means of a metaphor should be approached with the criticism typical of scientific activities. In the context of this study, it is worth considering to what extent the students' metaphors accurately reflect the key features of their school's life, as well as the relationships between the various elements of the complex, multi-level structure of school organization.

References
Bishop, B.F. (2019). Gardens, prisons, and asylums: Metaphors for school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Kent State University College of Education, Health, and Human Services.
Brady, P. (2008). Working Towards a Model of Secondary School Culture. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 73, 1-26.
Cleary, C., Packard, T. (1992). The use of metaphors in organizational assessment and change. Group & Organization Management,17(3), 229-241.
Demir, C.E. (2007). Metaphors as a reflection of middle school students’ perceptions of school: A cross-cultural analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(2), 89–107.
Eshenkulova, K., Boobekova, K. (2022). Educational Metaphors: High School Students’ Perceptions of Schools in Kyrgyzstan, Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies, 73(3), 98-116.
Jordan, W. A. (1996). Crossfire education: Metaphor cultural evolution and chaos in the schools. Janham: University Press of America.
Kent, P. (2006). Finding the Missing Jigsaw Pieces: a new model for analyzing school culture. Management in Education, 20(3), 24-30.
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Leavy, A.M., McSorley F.A., Bote, L.A. (2007). An examination of what metaphor
construction reveals about the evolution of preservice teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(2007), 1217-1233.
Martinez, M.A., Saudela, N., Huber, G.L. (2001). Metaphors as Blueprints of Thinking About Teaching and Learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 965-977.
Morgan, G. (1986). Images of Organization. Sage Publications.
Saban, A. (2013). Prospective primary teachers’ metaphorical images of learning. Journal of Teaching and Education, 2(1), 195–202.
Schoen, L.T., Teddlie, Ch. (2008). A New Model of School Culture: A Response to a Call for Conceptual Clarity. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(2), 129-153.
Torres, L.L. (2022). School organizational culture and leadership: Theoretical trends and new analytical proposals. Education Sciences, 12, 254.


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: ECER 2024
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.153+TC
© 2001–2025 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany