28. Sociologies of Education
Paper
Social Imaginaries of Present and Future in Education Initiatives for Ukrainian Refugees
Eszter Neumann
HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Hungary
Presenting Author: Neumann, Eszter
Depicting refugees as a threat to the nation, the Orbán government turned the 2015 refugee crisis into populist propaganda (Cantat&Rajaram, 2019). As part of a broader set of anti-refugee politics and policies, earlier intercultural education programs were dismantled, resources – including financial and symbolic support for local innovations and NGOs focusing on refugee education, for Hungarian language teaching, and the per capita financing for teaching non-Hungarian speakers – were withdrawn. Consequently, families entering Hungary after the breakout of Russia’s war on Ukraine faced an education system unprepared for welcoming displaced children (Ercse, 2023).
In the context of the Hungarian state’s ambiguous political communication and “organized non-responsibility” (Pries, 2019: 6), a handful of civil society and grassroots actors immediately started to provide education and childcare for Ukrainian families. My presentation focuses on interviews with representatives of “grassroots humanitarianism” (Vandevoordt & Fleischmann 2020) or “citizen aid” (Fechter and Schwittay 2019) as well as organized NGOs offering educational support and childcare for Ukrainian families. The discussion concentrates on how the problem of time and the social imaginaries of hope and uncertainty featured in the helpers’ narratives and shaped their actions. These initiatives are examples of experimental humanitarism (Thieme et al. 2020; Ramakrishnan and Thieme, 2022): solidarity work entailed constant problem-solving, yet it has not proved to be ephemeral, but so far has survived growing public disinterest.
Drawing on recent studies on the temporalities of humanitarian action (Brun 2016; Vandervoodt and Felischmann, 2020), I explore how solidarity education initiatives navigate different temporalities. Humanitarian actions responding to crises are often thought to be governed by the ‘imaginary of emergency’ and captured by the present. Critical voices argued that their preoccupation with alleviating suffering in the here and now tends to de-contextualise suffering from its long-term causes and solutions (Calhoun 2008) and depoliticize these initiatives (Braun, 2017). But equally influentially, similarly to social movements, volunteers’ imaginaries are inspired by an ideal vision of future society (Fournier 2002), and some of them deeply engage with the structural political causes of the events.
Regarding the here and now, most interlocutors conceptualized their educational services as a means of unmaking uncertainty through providing structure and safety that aims to counterweight the chaos of the war. They often emphasized that the primary objective – one related to the present – of their initiatives is to establish a safe space where the children can experience empathy and compassion.
Education is profoundly driven by the social imaginaries of the future (Facer, 2023). I will bring examples of grassroots education initiatives, typically organized by members of the host society, who understood their solidarity work as prefigurative politics (Swain, 2019), a means of modeling change for the host society. Our interlocutors viewed education as a vehicle for a transformative and ethopoietic pedagogy (Collet-Sabé&Ball), which can foster social change through the practice of the relational ethics of care. Zembylas (2020) suggests that in the context of populist politics and exclusive forms of nationalism, democratic education should be a practice of affective counter-politics, developed at the micro-level of pedagogical encounters. These solidarity initiatives can be understood as affective counter-politics driven by visions of enacting alternative modes of togetherness and “politics by other means” (Kirsch, 2016) in the context of exclusivist populist politics.
Another type of engaging with the future was primarily enacted by Ukrainian-led initiatives. Making alliances with international and non-state partners (donors and host schools providing their infrastructures), and positioning themselves in a transnational space of education, these interlocutors talked about universalistic educational objectives (sustainability, climate education) and aimed to educate transnational citizens.
Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources UsedOur team has been researching the patterns of Hungarian solidarity mobilization in crisis situations since the 2015 refugee crisis. Between June 2022 and January 2023, we conducted 28 semi-structured interviews and ethnographic observations in local communities and observed in-person and online conferences to explore bottom-up solidarity mobilizations emerging in response to the influx of Ukrainian displaced people. The data collection was complemented by the ongoing analysis of the media representation and social media activity of the studied initiatives. The semi-structured interviews concentrated on the themes of (1) the organization of solidarity and community problem-solving; (2) discourses and relations of deservingness and responsibility regarding the helping actions and in the broader societal context; (3) the public impact of solidarity initiatives and the political aspects of community support; (4) the motivational narratives of the solidarians including the economic, emotional and ideological aspects of the work of solidarity.
This presentation is based on 12 semi-structured interviews conducted with representatives of solidarity initiatives offering education support, childcare services, and material support for children. The interviews were transcribed, thematically coded, and analyzed. The current analysis moves beyond the strictly understood thematic analysis of the empirical material and looks into how the interlocutors thematize the problem of temporality and how the social imaginaries of present and future unfold in the interviews in relation to education and solidarity.
Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or FindingsThe presentation aims to contribute to the conversation in the network about the Social imaginaries of the future: the making and unmaking of certainty in education. The heart of the talk is dedicated to conceptualizing informal education spaces as forms of affective counter-politics in the context of thriving political populism and nationalism. With a long-term populist authoritarian government, Hungary is a key scene to study the social impact of populist politics and the emergence of affective counter-politics. Nevertheless, the case has wider implications across Europe and European education given the growing strength, political and policy influence of populist movements and ideologies.
ReferencesBrun, C. (2016). There is no future in humanitarianism: emergency, temporality and protracted displacement. History and anthropology, 27(4), 393–410.
Calhoun, C. (2008). The imperative to reduce suffering: charity, progress, and emergencies in the field of humanitarian action. Humanitarianism in Question: Politics, Power, Ethics, 73–97. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.
Cantat, C. and P. K Rajaram (2019). The Politics of the Refugee Crisis in Hungary: Bordering and Ordering the Nation and Its Others. In: Menjívar, Cecilia – Marie Ruiz – Immanuel Ness (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Migration Crises. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 181–196.
Collet-Sabé J. and S. J. Ball (2023). Beyond School. The challenge of co-producing and commoning a different episteme for education, Journal of Education Policy, 38(6), 895-910, DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2022.2157890
Ercse, K. (2023). Providing education to Ukrainian refugee children in Hungary – Situation report and policy recommendation package. EDUA.
Facer, Keri (2023). Possibility and the temporal imagination. Possibility Studies & Society, 1(1-2), 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/27538699231171797
Fechter, A-M. and A. Schwittay (2019). Citizen Aid: Grassroots Interventions in Development and Humanitarianism. Third World Quarterly, 40(10), 1769-1780. doi:10.1080/01436597.2019.1656062
Fournier, F. (2002) Utopianism and the cultivation of possibilities: grassroots movements of hope. The Sociological Review 50(1): 189–216.
Kirsch, T. G. (2016). Undoing Apartheid Legacies? Volunteering as Repentance and Politics by Other Means. In: Volunteer Economies. The Politics and Ethics of Voluntary Labour in Africa, hg. von Brown, Ruth & Ruth J. Prince. Oxford: James Currey, 201-221.
Pries, L. (2019). Introduction: Civil Society and Volunteering in the So-Called Refugee Crisis of 2015—Ambiguities and Structural Tensions. In: Margit Feischmidt, Ludger Pries, and Céline Cantat, Refugee protection and civil society in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. 1-23.
Ramakrishnan, K. and Thieme, T. A. (2022). Peripheral humanitarianism: Ephemerality, experimentation, and effects of refugee provisioning in Paris. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 40(5), 763-785. https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758221124603
Swain, D. (2019). Not not but not yet: present and future in prefigurative politics. Political Studies 67(1): 47–62.
Thieme, T, E. K. Kovacs and K. Ramakrishnan (2020). Refugees as new Europeans, and the fragile line between crisis and solidarity. Journal of the British Academy, 8 (Supp 1), 19-25. 10.5871/jba/008s1.019
Vandevoordt, R. and L. Fleischmann (2021). Impossible Futures? The Ambivalent Temporalities of Grassroots Humanitarian Action. Critical Sociology, 47(2), 187-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920520932655
Zembylas, M. (2020). The Affective Modes of Right-Wing Populism: Trump Pedagogy and Lessons for Democratic Education. Stud Philos Educ 39, 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09691-y
28. Sociologies of Education
Paper
Educational-social Movements and the making and Unmaking of Educational Ethos in Emergency
Lauren Erdreich1, Yuval Becker2, Rinat Levi2
1Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel; 2Nir Educational Association
Presenting Author: Erdreich, Lauren
This paper is concerned with educational-social movements' making and unmaking of educational ethos during national emergency. Based on an ethnographic study of educational social action during a national emergency, the paper considers how educational-social movements deal with existing educational inequalities and the possibility that their actions during emergency can further social transformation. This paper brings together three temporal lenses – an anthropological understanding of emergency as a mode of eventfulness(Anderson, 2017), a topological perspective on education and (in)equality, and the conceptualization of vectors and events in the temporality of social movements. How do social imaginaries of past and present accomplishments and failings of educational-social movements shape their educational praxis within the time-space of emergency? In what ways can this praxis offer possibilities for hopeful transformation of past inequalities alongside a transformative pathway out of emergency? Alternatively, are these aspirations to transformation too much to hope for?
Our study focuses on the social-educational activism of the graduate-movements of Israeli youth movements following the events of October 7 and the internal displacement of over a hundred thousand civilians. The government was slow to provide basic educational services; civic organizations stepped up to fill the void, notably, the graduate-movements. These graduate-movements constitute educational-social movements formed by nonformal educators, former members of Zionist youth movements, who are attempting to revitalize the pioneering ethos of the early socialist-Zionist movements through educational projects that stimulate social change and advance democracy, equality, social justice, and Zionist values. At displacement centers, they organized and operated nonformal youth activities, early childhood centers, schools, and neighborhood leadership groups. Though these graduate-movements have a history of educational activism in emergency in the wake of war across Europe (Huss, Ben Asher, Shahar, et al., 2021; Huss, Ben Asher, Walden, et al., 2021), national emergency at home was complicated by internal issues of inequality particularly between kibbutzim and development towns, such as educational gaps, access to nonformal educational frameworks, distribution of resources and organizational capacities.
We adopt a conceptualization of emergency as a mode of eventfulness, organized around four temporalities – exceptionalness from ordinary life, a sense of urgency to action to forestall foreseen harm of an unknown but impending future, a time-limited interval in which action is imperative, and a hope that correct action can make a difference (Anderson, 2017). Emergency indicates threat to something considered socially or historically valuable and uncertainty concerning how and if action in the present can bring about a future that is improvement on the past (Brun, 2016; Samimian-Darash, 2022). Considering specifically the role of education in emergency, we focus topologically on the ways that educational activism in emergency morphs the shape of educational governance and practice (Decuypere et al., 2022). The topological perspective directs attention to how educational practice elicits continuity and change, reformation of relations between educators and communities, and specific space-time practices that link past, present, and future educational aims. To provide nuance of the multiple temporalities at work in making and remaking educational practice and governance (Lingard & Thompson, 2017), we focus on educational-social movements. We take up Gillian's view of social movements as actors in the creation of events and his suggestion to analyze vectors – the social behavior and discourse of movements over a particular timescape – as a means for understanding the socio-political conditions and trends at work in a larger context (Gillan, 2020). In other words, the focus on educational-social movements in emergency allows us to trace how their particular educational ethos, tied as it is to a larger national ethos, morphs and reforms in the context of emergency and to ponder its possible unfoldings into the unknown future.
Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources UsedThe paper is based on an ethnographic case study of one displacement center in Israel. The displacement center is located geographically in a complex of resort hotels which are currently allocated as temporary housing for several communities –three kibbutzim and families from a major development town. Two major graduate-movements have been active in the center since immediately following October 7.
The study is an ethnographic-based interview study, which combines interviews with activists involved in a wide range of educational initiatives and observation of relevant activities. The study aims to apply the close attention of ethnography and the analysis of information in cultural context to data that is largely, but not exclusively narrative (Golden & Erdreich, 2017). Interviews are aimed to capture both generational distribution amongst activists and diversity of educational activism. To date, twenty-five interviews have been conducted with activists from age 17-50, working with kibbutzim and development towns or both, involved in establishing educational frameworks or daily maintenance, with early education to elderly populations. Observations included participation in youth activities, neighborhood leadership meetings, a group for the elderly, staff meetings, and an organizational strategic planning seminar. The study is ongoing.
Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or FindingsThis paper shows that educational-social movements can actively shape the event of emergency into a space-time for the playing out of vectors of educational change.
Our findings describe how the graduate-movements strived to create an equal distribution of educational frameworks despite inequalities in socio-economic status and organization of different communities. While displacement de-bordered the kibbutz/development town divide, educational interactions in the displacement center re-inscribed borders, forcing movement educators to reshape educational aims and methods, particularly: socialist-Zionist content and nonformal methods. The former was too specific for emergency time-space; the latter was ineffective with populations unfamiliar with these methods.
Analysis shows that emergency created a space-time that distilled educational praxis of the movements to what we identify as two basic forms: 'being there' and 'being together'. 'Being there' is an educational philosophy opposed to education as a temporary influence, achievement- or task-oriented, and encouraging individuation; rather it applauds consistent connection based in attention to basic needs, as a basis for encouragement of self-defined desires alongside sociability. 'Being together' is an educational practice of bringing together diverse populations to live in shared society. 'Being there' and 'being together' reflect an educational ethos based in the assumption that everyday relationships shape the fabric of social life and can potentially contribute to the reorganization of inequalities and the distribution of social resources (Hall, 2019). While these practices reflect movement ideology, they were made possible by the situation of war and displacement, which both brought together populations usually held separate geographically and posed common tasks of repair and common questions about the uncertain future. Within emergency, they offered an educational praxis that attended to larger socio-political vectors of educational ethos - combatting inequality and increasing resilience – while proposing a radical alternative to the emphasis of neoliberal education on individual needs, risks, and achievements.
ReferencesAnderson, B. (2017). Emergency futures: Exception, urgency, interval, hope. The Sociological Review, 65(3), 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12447
Brun, C. (2016). There is no Future in Humanitarianism: Emergency, Temporality and Protracted Displacement. History and Anthropology, 27(4), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2016.1207637
Decuypere, M., Hartong, S., & van de Oudeweetering, K. (2022). Introduction―Space-and time-making in education: Towards a topological lens. European Educational Research Journal, 21(6), 871–882. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041221076306
Gillan, K. (2020). Temporality in social movement theory: Vectors and events in the neoliberal timescape. Social Movement Studies, 19(5–6), 516–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1548965
Hall, S. M. (2019). Everyday Life in Austerity: Family, Friends and Intimate Relations. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17094-3
Huss, E., Ben Asher, S., Shahar, E., Walden, T., & Sagy, S. (2021). Creating places, relationships and education for refugee children in camps: Lessons learnt from the ‘The School of Peace’ educational model. Children & Society, 35(4), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12412
Huss, E., Ben Asher, S., Walden, T., & Shahar, E. (2021). Towards a Model for Integrating Informal and Formal Learning for Children in Refugee Camps: The Example of the Lesbos School for Peace. Social Sciences, 10(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10030111
Lingard, B., & Thompson, G. (2017). Doing time in the sociology of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2016.1260854
Samimian-Darash, L. (2022). Scenarios in a Time of Urgency: Shifting Temporality and Technology. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale, 30(4), 90–109. https://doi.org/10.3167/saas.2022.300407
28. Sociologies of Education
Paper
Uncertain futures. The (Un-)Making of Certainty in German Schools in the Context of Refugee Migration from Ukraine
Ellen Kollender1, Dorothee Schwendowius2, Anja Franz2
1Leuphana University Lüneburg, Germany; 2Otto von Guericke University of Magdeburg, Gemany
Presenting Author: Kollender, Ellen;
Schwendowius, Dorothee
In our paper, we focus on the constructions of refugee students’ futures and the associated notions of temporality and uncertainty in German schools with reference to newly arrived students who have fled to Germany in 2022 due to the war in Ukraine.
Our contribution is based on the observation that constructions of “future” in the context of (forced) migration biographies are often closely linked to notions of uncertainty. These biographies and educational paths are not only characterized by discontinuities in the (individual) past. They often also appear uncertain with regard to the future, e.g. due to unclear residence and/or return options that can hardly be planned in terms of time. Future uncertainty in this context can therefore be understood as a social construction of time, which arises through institutional regulations on migration and asylum with regard to the associated political and social discourses. However, the education system assigns additional significance to uncertain futures by translating them into individual life chances. It functions as a temporal structure for individual biographies and educational paths and, through its inherent linear temporal logic, shapes the future options for action of the subjects (Solga/Becker 2012; Scherger 2016). However, the individual temporal logic of educational processes as a lived experience can deviate from this “dominant timescape” (Facer 2023), which can be highly consequential for the future (educational) biographies of individuals (cf. Dausien/Rothe/Schwendowius 2016). For example, the (ascribed) uncertainty of students’ futures in the context of migration can be decisive for pedagogical diagnoses as well as for predicting future developments and deciding on students’ educational pathways (based on the institutional time regime). Moreover, uncertain futures are often associated with attributions and interpretations of vulnerabilities which can lead to educational practices that imply specific risks and opportunities for individuals and their educational trajectories.
In our paper, we examine how students’ uncertain futures are anticipated and constructed by educational professionals and what (temporal) expectations are associated with them. Furthermore, we ask how the educational pathways of refugee students are institutionally processed and how these practices are embedded in specific timescapes (Adam 1998). Empirically, our study is based on the analysis of documents and guided interviews with teachers, head teachers and social workers conducted at schools in Germany (in the federal states of Rhineland-Palatinate and Saxony-Anhalt). We show how dominant timescapes inform school and pedagogical practices with regard to refugee students from Ukraine, how they are entangled with constructions of uncertain futures, and how these open up or close off educational options and thus create (new) precarisation (or new opportunities for educational participation).
Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources UsedIn our qualitative study, we combine analyses of school administrative structures with analyses of school practices and the (experiential and interpretative) knowledge of educational professionals. In order to analyse these practices and knowledge, we conducted 35 guided interviews in 19 public secondary schools. These schools, which were selected according to the principle of theoretical sampling (cf. Strauss/Corbin 1990), enrolled children and young people from Ukraine at the time of the interviews. In order to shed light on the educational inequalities that are rooted in the segmented school system in Germany, our sample includes both grammar schools, community schools and comprehensive schools. Taking into account that perspectives on forced migration can vary depending on professional position (Tom Diek/Rosen 2023), interviews were conducted with school headmasters, teachers, German-as-a-second-language teachers, teachers of ‘reception classes’ and social workers.
In order to gain insights into the political framework and legal requirements for the schooling of refugee children and young people, we also analysed selected political documents on the topic of migration and integration, including regulations issued by the education ministries and authorities of the federal states of Saxony-Anhalt and Rhineland-Palatinate. In addition, we conducted guided interviews with representatives of the local school authorities.
The data analysis was initially based on a multi-stage coding process for the transcribed interviews. This process was based on the coding paradigm of Grounded Theory (cf. ibid.) and aimed to identify dominant themes and relevant attitudes as well as organisational and pedagogical practices with regard to current refugee migrations. The coding process was followed by a detailed analysis of selected minimum and maximum contrasting text sequences. We understand the professionals’ experiential and interpretative knowledge as being generated by the shared experiential space of the respective school and characterised by the "conjunctive experiential space" (Mannheim 1980) of the professional milieu as well as by biographical experiences and current socio-political discourses. The analysis focused both on the organisational and pedagogical practices of the school in the narrated situation and on the actors' reflective engagement with these practices in the interview. As part of this analytical framework, the school practices and professionals’ perspectives were related to current policy changes throughout the analysis in order to capture the interplay of policy, pedagogical practice and professional knowledge in which inclusions and exclusions of refugee children and young people in schools takes place.
Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or FindingsOur analyses show that the ways in which teachers interpret uncertain futures in relation to current forced migration are intertwined with a specific time regime of the school. This invokes a morality in which time is a 'currency' (Thompson 1967), while notions of development, of progress and “of the correct order” are crucial to how school is “constructed, and (…) lived” (Lingard/Thompson 2017). Against this backdrop, teachers face the challenge of quickly integrating newly arrived students into the school's time regime (Thoma 2023). This seems to presuppose that their ‘uncertain futures’ are translated into ‘certain futures’, because ‘the temporary’, ‘the transitory’, ‘the uncertain’ is hardly foreseen in this concept of time.
Against this background, we describe various fields of tension that arise, firstly, with regard to the institutional (im)possibilities of ‘rapid integration’ of refugee students into the school system. For example, the (partly) separate schooling of newly arrived students in German-as-a-second-language classes and reception classes proves to be a practice of participation in the “not yet” (Khakpour 2022), which works with the promise of a future that should soon enable the student to participate in ‘regular classes’ – a future that remains uncertain, however. Secondly, we focus on the ambivalences of pedagogical practices that aim to address discontinuous educational biographies of students by temporarily suspending the dominant timescape and allowing students to extend their time at school. Third, we describe tensions that arise when students who do not (yet) seem to have internalised the institutional timescape and are perceived as unwilling (or unable) to fit in with it - attitudes that are often countered by practices of culturalisation, disciplining and partial exclusion from support measures.
ReferencesAdam, B. (1998): Timescapes of modernity. London: Routledge.
Dausien, B./Rothe, D./Schwendowius, D. (2016): Teilhabe und Ausgrenzung als biographische Erfahrung. Einführung in eine biographiewissenschaftliche Analyseperspektive. In: Dausien, B./Rothe, D./Schwendowius, D. (eds.): Bildungswege. Biographien zwischen Teilhabe und Ausgrenzung. Frankfurt: Campus, pp. 25-67.
Facer, Kerri (2023): Possibility and the temporal imagination. Possibility Studies & Society, 1(1-2), pp. 60-66.
Khakpour, N.: Mit Kafka die dark side schulischer Verfahren verstehen: Deutsch-Können und neoliberale Ökonomisierung, ZDfm – Zeitschrift für Diversitätsforschung und -management, 2-2022, pp. 135-147.
Lingard, B./Thompson, G. (2017): Doing time in the sociology of education. In: British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38:1, pp. 1-12.
Mannheim, K. (1922/1980): Strukturen des Denkens. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Scherger, S. (2016): Konzeptuelle Überlegungen zum Zusammenhang von Bildungsverläufen und -strukturen: Zeitliche (De-) Standardisierung in Bildungssystemen und soziale Ungleichheit. In: Makrinus, L./ Otremba, K./ Rennert, C./ Stoeck, J. (eds.): (De)Standardisierung von Bildungsverläufen und-strukturen: Neue Perspektiven auf bildungsbezogene Ungleichheit, pp. 39-58.
Solga, H., & Becker, R. (2012): Soziologische Bildungsforschung – eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme. In: Soziologische Bildungsforschung, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie Sonderhefte, 52, pp. 7-43.
Strauss, A./Corbin, J. (1990): Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury: Sage.
Thoma, N. (2023): Pedagogy and Research Cooperations in the Neoliberal Politics of Speed: Reflections for Critical Pedagogical Professionalization in Migration Societies. In: Krause, S./Proyer, M./Kremsner, G. (eds.): The making of teachers in the age of migration. Critical perspectives on educational politic of education for refugees, immigrants and minorities. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 85-101.
Thompson, E. P. 1967. “Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism.” Past & Present 38: pp. 56–97.
Tom Dieck, F./Rosen, L. (2023): Before, in or after transition? On becoming a ‘mainstream student’ in Germany and Italy in the context of new migration. In: Subasi Singh, S./Jovanović, O./Proyer, M. (eds.): Perspectives on Transitions in Refugee Education. Ruptures, Passages, and Re-Orientations. Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Budrich, pp. 161-174.
|
