Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 10th May 2025, 10:29:33 EEST

 
 
Session Overview
Session
27 SES 02 A: Teaching and Learning in (Linguistically) Diverse Contexts
Time:
Tuesday, 27/Aug/2024:
15:15 - 16:45

Session Chair: Laura Tamassia
Location: Room B104 in ΧΩΔ 02 (Common Teaching Facilities [CTF02]) [-1 Floor]

Cap: 85

Paper Session

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
27. Didactics - Learning and Teaching
Paper

Engaging Reluctant Readers

Magnus Svensson, Eva Hultin, Elin Sundström Sjödin

Mälardalen University, Sweden

Presenting Author: Svensson, Magnus

In many European countries, reading proficiency is declining amongst children and adolescents (Mullis et al., 2023; OECD, 2023). Furthermore, almost 20 percent of young children seem to not like reading at all. There is also a wide gap between schools and students in many countries. Children from less fortunate socioeconomic backgrounds and children with migration background are disadvantaged within the educational system. Heterogenous classrooms, with great variation of students’ levels of reading proficiency and stated interest in literature, a growing number of students that lack sufficient reading skills and interest, and classrooms where most students lack both the sufficient skills and interest in reading, raises the demand on teachers to make an even greater effort than before to engage all students in school reading. This calls for further research on how engaging literature teaching can be organized. The present study interviews 15 teachers with a focus on the questions of which kind of didactic strategies or methods teachers use to engage students in school reading as well as the teachers’ views on and experiences of student engagement in school reading. The study’s aim is to contribute knowledge about engaging literature instruction for students that are unexperienced and/or unwilling readers and who seem reluctant to participate in school reading.

Sweden serves as an interesting case in the study, with the purpose of highlighting trends in school reading, contributing to the fields of literature didactics as well as L1 research and practice all over Europe. Reading among Swedish adolescents seems to have declined in the past ten years, although the decline have flattened at a low level in recent years. Only 14 percent of Swedish 17–18-year-olds read daily, compared to 23 percent in 2012. There also seems to be a decline in students reporting that they enjoy reading, but at the same time the same students seem to think that they do not read enough (Andersson, 2023; Mullis et al., 2023; OECD, 2023). Sweden has also seen a decline in reading, both fiction and non-fiction, in the compulsory work in school. The proportion of students who read one full page or more during their school day has decreased significantly and students who never read fiction at all in grades 7-9 has increased from 44 percent in 2007 to 81 percent in 2017 (Vinterek et al., 2022). Moreover, an alarming trend is the increased difference in test results between Swedish speaking students and second language students and a widening school segregation that mirrors the societal segregation and socioeconomical gaps in Sweden (Mullis et al., 2023).

To address the current challenges, the Swedish government has launched several efforts to support and effect school reading, such as funding and legislation to guarantee students' right to staffed school libraries (Utbildningsdepartementet, 2023), and a committee, which will propose a Swedish Literature canon to be taught in schools (Kulturdepartementet, 2023). The upcoming new syllabus for Swedish in the upper secondary school also has a stronger emphasis on reading fiction and of the esthetic experience of reading (Skolverket, 2023).

This project draws on the theory of situated leaning and communities of practice developed by Lave and Wenger (Lave & Wenger, 1991; Wenger, 1998). School reading is regarded as a community of practice in its own right that does not mimic recreational reding. Furthermore, school reading is situated in educational settings thar are unique to some extent. Every school, group of subject teachers at a school and every class can be regarded as a community of practice. In line with this a qualitative focus group interview study with upper secondary teachers is carried out.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
L1 teachers at two upper secondary schools in Sweden are interviewed in focus groups of 5 – 7 participants, all in all 15 teachers. The group, or community of teachers, is more than an aggregation of individuals and therefore the group in itself is of interest. Focus group interviews have the potential to not only investigate the teachers’ personal experiences but also more general aspects of the research question (Rabiee, 2004).The question of engagement is complex as well as situated. The teachers’ views on this and on the students that are reluctant to engage might include a wide range of thoughts, opinions, attitudes, and feelings, as well as examples of more or less successful methods and strategies from daily classroom practice.  Focus group interviews can show both agreement and disagreement in views and experiences amongst the teachers, which allows for background factors to be brought to the fore (Brinkmann & Kvale, 2014; Denscombe, 2017).  

Interviews are recorded and transcribed and then analyzed thematically according to the model for focus group interview analysis proposed by Rabiee (Rabiee, 2004). The analysis will be conducted in eight steps regarding 1) words of significance, 2) context around these words, 3) internal consistency in participants opinions and positions, 4) the frequency in how often something is expressed, 5) the emotional intensity of comments, 6) specificity of responses, 7) extensiveness of opinions in the group, and 8) the big picture that evolves from the material. Although this is a qualitative study the analytic model uses a few aspects of quantitative method since frequency and extensiveness are mapped. However, in the case of a group interview, it is relevant to take into consideration how often something is being expressed and by how many, to highlight shared interests as well as conformity and diversity within the group.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The study, which is still in progress, can contribute with important teacher perspectives on student engagement in literature and school reading. The findings of the study contribute with knowledge to the field of literature didactics and will hopefully also contribute as inspiration to literature teachers at upper secondary level.  

Findings from the initial stages of the study points towards the following:  

I) Teachers are concerned with finding texts that are not too difficult to read yet complex enough to be suitable for supper secondary level Swedish.  

II) Teachers prefer book talks as a method of teaching and examining but struggle to find time to organize it in a way that they are satisfied with and not all students engage enthusiastically in book talks or other oral assignments.

III) AI poses a challenge, both in relation to submission tasks and to the fact that resources like Chat GPT provide students with summaries and analyses of literary works.    

IV) The upcoming new subject syllabus for the Swedish subject occupies a lot of collegial discussions, even before it has been implemented.

References
Andersson, Y. (2023). Ungar & medier. S. medieråd. https://mediemyndigheten.se/rapporter-och-analyser/ungar-medier/

Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2014). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.se/books?id=1DbFwAEACAAJ  

Denscombe, M. (2017). The Good Research Guide: For Small-scale Social Research Projects. Open University Press. https://books.google.se/books?id=ZU4StAEACAAJ  

Kulturdepartementet. (2023). Kommittédirektiv En svensk kulturkanon. Regeringskansliet. https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/kommittedirektiv/2023/12/dir.-2023180

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. 1. publ. University Press.  

Mullis, I. V. S., von Davier, M., Foy, P., Fishbein, B., Reynolds, K. A., & Wry, E. (2023). PIRLS 2021 International Results in Reading. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://pirls2021.org/results

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I). https://doi.org/doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en  

Rabiee, F. (2004). Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63(4), 655-660. https://doi.org/10.1079/PNS2004399  

Skolverket. (2023). Svenska Gy25. Skolverket. https://www.skolverket.se/undervisning/gymnasieskolan/laroplan-program-och-amnen-i-gymnasieskolan/gymnasieprogrammen/amne?url=-996270488%2Fsyllabuscw%2Fjsp%2Fsubject.htm%3FsubjectCode%3DSVEN%26version%3D1%26tos%3Dgy&sv.url=12.5dfee44715d35a5cdfa92a3

Utbildningsdepartementet. (2023). Regeringen vill ändra skollagen så att elever ska få tillgång till bemannade skolbibliotek. Regeringskansliet. https://www.regeringen.se/pressmeddelanden/2023/09/regeringen-vill-andra-skollagen-sa-att-elever-ska-fa-tillgang-till-bemannade-skolbibliotek/

Vinterek, M., Winberg, M., Tegmark, M., Alatalo, T., & Liberg, C. (2022). The Decrease of School Related Reading in Swedish Compulsory School : Trends Between 2007 and 2017 [article]. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(1), 119-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1833247  

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice : learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.


27. Didactics - Learning and Teaching
Paper

Studying Computer Science in a Third Language: Challenges and Solutions

Laura Baitokayeva, Irina Lipakova

NIS in Turkestan, Kazakhstan

Presenting Author: Baitokayeva, Laura; Lipakova, Irina

Nazarbayev Intellectual schools in Kazakhstan are a unique educational institution that gives learners an opportunity to study subjects in three languages.

In October 2006, the President of Kazakhstan introduced the project called “Trinity of Languages”, which was seen as the major index of the competitiveness of the country. Kazakh is a state language, Russian is a language for international communication, and English is considered as a language for successful integration into global economics (Bridges, 2014).

In Nazarbayev Intellectual schools, grade 11 and 12 students study several subjects in English. These subjects include Chemistry, Biology, Physics, and Computer Science. The subjects are conducted by local teachers who know English at a good level and by foreign teachers who provide support to local teachers.

The given research has been conducted among grade 11 students who study Computer Science specifically in the English language. Their mother tongue is either Kazakh or Russian. English for them is considered a third language. For instance, despite their main language is Kazakh, students study some subjects in Russian. Thus, Russian is their second language. English is a third language for all school students, and they are obliged to study 4 subjects in it.

Even though the tendency of studying subjects in a third language has existed for several years, there has not been much research in this field. Even De Angelis (2007) mentioned that there are studies that focus on the acquisition of the first and second languages, but the languages acquisition beyond these two are often missing.

In addition, Cenoz (2011) states that acquisition of a third language is comparatively a new field of research.

That is the reason why we have decided to investigate how grade 11 students study Computer Science in the English language, what challenges they face and how teachers try to overcome the identified challenges.

Studying literature on this research topic has been quite challenging for us because we haven’t been able to find articles or other resources that focus on studying the subject in a third language. Most of the literature mainly focuses on teaching or acquiring the third language, but not on learning the subject in it. This made us feel confident about the novelty and significance of our research.

In the school, where research has been conducted, Computer Science is taught only by a local teacher and there is no assisting native speaker teacher.

In the school, there are 2 groups of grade 11 students who are taught Computer Science in English.

All in all, 16 students (94% of all the students that study Computer Science in a third language) took part in the given research. All the participants participated in the research on a voluntarily basis and they were not chosen beforehand.

The participants’ abilities in the subject were different. There were excellent students, good students and those who struggled with understanding the subject in a third language.

The main aim of this qualitative research is to investigate the challenges of studying Computer Science in a third language and the ways students cope with them.

Research questions: 1. What are the barriers to understanding Computer Science in the English language? 2. What actions do grade 11 students take to struggle with difficulties? 3. What actions should teachers take to eliminate the identified obstacles?

The importance of the research: the lack of research on the process of studying Computer Science in a third language even though this tendency has taken place for several years, the opportunity of research results to give ideas to teachers about the difficulties of teaching the subjects in a third language and some possible solutions.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
To ensure triangulation, we used three research methods: a survey, interviews and analysis of the observation of the subject teacher. The participants of the survey were grade 11 students who were involved in studying Computer Science in English. All in all, there were 16 respondents. To be sure that the survey answers are reliable, we decided to conduct three interviews with students who have different level of acquisition of the subject.
The survey consisted of 10 questions, and they contained multiple choice questions. The main questions were about whether the language hinders learners from understanding the Computer Science course, which specific areas pose difficulties to them, what kind of additional helpful materials they use for better comprehension, which teaching approaches they find the most beneficial and how the teacher can help to make the learning process easy.
The interview was conducted with 5 students. The questions were focused at identifying what language difficulties grade 11 students experience when studying Computer Science in a third language, which language (native/English) they would prefer, how the teacher can help them for better understanding of the subject, what steps they make to help themselves, and their thoughts about whether it is beneficial to study Computer Science in the English language.
The third research method was to analyze the observation sheets of the subject teacher. There is one subject teacher who teaches Computer Science to both groups of students. The teacher’s observation was made between September and December. While observation the teacher tried to identify the barriers to understanding the subject, which were poor knowledge of the language including vocabulary, speaking and expressing opinions, inappropriate level of listening and reading skills. Reading skills are closely connected with vocabulary, and there were 8 students who struggled with understanding the material because of lack of vocabulary.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
8 survey respondents admitted they have difficulties in understanding Computer Science in a third language, while 3 interviewees out of 5 held the same opinion. The survey respondents indicated the lack of understanding the language as the main barrier to acquiring the subject material at a sufficient level. 4 interviewees out of 5 said they would still prefer studying the subject in English despite language barriers as they need this language for their future, and this helps them improve their knowledge of English.
Also, both survey and interview respondents answered that they would like the teacher to give more detailed explanation of the material in English and get the vocabulary notes for the unfamiliar words. There were students who would like the teacher to make explanations in Kazakh or Russian, which is not recommended to the teacher by the subject programme.
By the end of the research, we have come up with the following findings:
1. Despite the difficulties in understanding Computer Science in a third language, grade 11 students admit they improve their English, and they want to continue studying in this language to use it in their future.
2. Grade 11 students assume that additional helpful resources such as dictionaries, the list of terms with definitions in a simplified language and simplified explanations of the teacher can assist them in comprehending the subject in a third language.
3. To understand the subject better, students take several measures by themselves. They watch Youtube videos on the topic, translate unfamiliar words into their native language and even study the materials in their language.
4. To ensure better understanding of the subject in a third language, teachers should prepare for the lessons thoroughly taking into account the abilities of each student. Additional resources should be applied on a regular basis.

References
Bridges, D. (Ed.). (2014). Education reform and internationalisation: The case of school reform in Kazakhstan. Cambridge University Press.
Cenoz, J. (2013). The influence of bilingualism on third language acquisition: Focus on multilingualism. Language teaching, 46(1), 71-86.
De Angelis, G. (2007). Third or additional language acquisition (Vol. 24). Multilingual Matters.


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: ECER 2024
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.153+TC
© 2001–2025 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany