Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

 
 
Session Overview
Session
14 SES 16 A: Reporting Youth Experiences.
Time:
Friday, 30/Aug/2024:
11:30 - 13:00

Session Chair: Julia Steenwegen
Location: Room B207 in ΧΩΔ 02 (Common Teaching Facilities [CTF02]) [-2 Floor]

Cap: 56

Paper Session

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Paper

Play-Based Methods Evidencing Young Children's Experiences of Family Life

Dimi Kaneva

University of Huddersfield, United Kingdom

Presenting Author: Kaneva, Dimi

This paper will consider play-based methods utilised to explore young children's experiences of family life as means for documenting children's voices. Family is a universal concept and experience for children across national borders. Much of the research around family conducted with children focuses on family composition and membership (e.g. Castren and Widmer 2015, Mason and Tipper 2008), but less is known about family-as-activity (Clark and Kehily 2013) and as a verb (Morgan 2011) where the practices of and within the family provide meaning and insight into how families relate and not just who they are related to. This paper explores such practices from the standpoint of young children, aged 3 to 4 years old, focusing on what families do on a day-to-day basis, on the everyday and the mundane. The research took place in three early childhood settings in the North of England, UK. Through sensory play-based activities with loose-parts resources children engaged in recreating what they do with their families, activating conversations about family practice. Children’s sense of self within the family and their positioning was documented by developing 'I-poems' using the Listening Guide (Gilligan 2015).

The research reported in this paper builds on existing early childhood practice and resources familiar to young children to offer novel ways of listening, documenting views and experiences. The research aim was to develop, test and disseminate innovative methods for listening to young children. This was achieved by enabling young children to articulate their understandings and experiences of family practice through play-based research methods and working in partnership with the participating early childhood settings to embed methods for listening to young children into practice alongside focus on (re)building partnerships with families following the Covid-19 pandemic. Children were supported to express views for themselves through play-based methods and a process of analysis foregrounding their voices.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
This research is informed by a qualitative participatory approach (Lomax 2020). The project utilised play with sensory and open-ended loose-parts resources to enable children to discuss (verbally and non-verbally) their understanding of family. Data was generated using play-based activities aiming to facilitate understanding of the experiences of family practice from a child’s perspective. Everyday activities that children partake in as part of/with their family were recreated as open-ended opportunities that engaged the children’s senses and activated conversations about what their families do. The conversations were audio-recorded and observation notes were made of children’s engagement. Children’s sense of self within the family and their positioning are illustrated through the ‘I-poems’ developed with verbal and non-verbal observational data during the play sessions.  
Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
Emphasising the experiences and voices of children (in the widest sense possible) contributes to better understanding of how they position themselves within their families and family practice. The generated knowledge about children’s understandings of family practice will strengthen partnership working within settings by adding children’s perspectives, at a time when partnerships have been affected by limited contact during the Covid-19 pandemic. Through exploring children’s understandings of family practice, stronger home-setting partnerships could be fostered, benefiting children, families, and early childhood practitioners. The methods discussed offer an effective way for practitioners to incorporate more active listening using approaches, objects and activities that are readily available in settings, thus rendering the practice cost-effective at a time of financial strain.
References
Castren, A-M. and Widmer, E.D. (2015) Insiders and outsiders in stepfamilies: Adults’ and children’s views on family boundaries. Current Sociology.  63(1): 35-56.
Clark, A. & Kehily, M. (2013) Home and family. In A. Clark (Ed.) Childhood in context. Bristol: Policy Press.
Gilligan, C. (2015) The Listening Guide Method of Psychological Inquiry. Qualitative Psychology. 2(1): 69-77.  
Lomax, H. (2020) Multimodal Visual Methods for Seeing with Children. In E.J. White (Ed.) Seeing the world through children's eyes : Visual methodologies and approaches to research in the early years. BRILL.
Mason, J. and Tipper, B. (2008) Being Related: How children define and create kinship. Childhood, 15(4): 441-460.
Morgan, D.J. (2011) Rethinking Family Practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.


14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Paper

Unveiling Sources of Resilience: Examining Resources that Support Primary School Pupils in their Neighborhoods

Julia Steenwegen, Donna de Maat, Joyce Weeland

Erasmus University, Netherlands, The

Presenting Author: Steenwegen, Julia; de Maat, Donna

The ability of a child to overcome difficulties and maintain their wellbeing is in part dependent of the systems that they are part of (Masten, 2021), including the schools, the communities, and the neighborhoods that they live in. However, little research takes an interdisciplinary approach to understand which factors support children’s wellbeing. Therefore, this research takes a transformative approach and seeks to research and to find ways to implement change (Mertens, 2017). We seek to uncover the multifaceted resources within neighborhoods that positively influence the wellbeing. The study is motivated by critical gaps in the literature, notably the prevalence of deficit-based approaches, the overlooking of children's perspectives, and the limited exploration of neighborhood resources and the complex ways in which they interact in fostering wellbeing within the school and beyond.

The neighborhoods in which children grow up impact their educational opportunities and may impede equality across their lifespan (Minh et al., 2017). At the same time, neighborhoods, which schools are a part of, may hold potential resources for children’s resilience (Ungar & Theron, 2020), or their capacity to adapt successfully to challenges (Masten & Barnes, 2018), and can possibly counter structural processes of inequality. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, children living in more cohesive and safer neighborhoods fared better than others in terms of physical and mental health (Robinette et al., 2021). After-school programs, community initiatives, and accessible meeting points can offer opportunities to offset possible threats to children's wellbeing and positively impact their educational outcomes. Overall, cohesive neighborhoods with a strong collective efficacy have a robust positive effect on children’s adjustment (Yule et al., 2019). Yet, our knowledge about which resources can be accessed and the ways through which these can be accessed remains rather limited with no in-depth explorations of how young people evaluate such resources.

How the complex ecosystems surrounding a child may support their positive adjustment remains unclear with some significant gaps in the current state of the literature. First, research tends to take a deficit-based approach and focus on the ways in which children are disadvantaged. Second, the perspective of children and their own experience of the resources they rely on is mostly overlooked. And third, research investigating the resources that support children’s resilience, or their capability to overcome difficulty, tends to mainly focus on the interpersonal networks in their families from a psychological perspective, on the relationship between teachers and pupils from an educational perspective, or on the social capital accessible to them, from a sociological perspective. In this project, we hope to go beyond this fragmented state of the literature and explore the resources that children rely on in their networks from the children’s own perspective. The research question we hope to answer is: “Which factors in the neighborhood their school is embedded have the potential to positively impact the children’s wellbeing, from their own perspective”. The research adopts an asset-based lens, which marks a departure from conventional deficit-oriented paradigms. By examining neighborhoods through the eyes of the children themselves, the focus is on identifying and understanding the diverse resources and strengths present within their immediate social and physical environments that foster resilience.

Central to the research question is the exploration of neighborhood and community factors which influence the capacity of children to overcome challenges. This extends beyond traditional educational perspectives and includes after-school programs, community initiatives, and accessible meeting points within the community. Our study seeks to uncover how these unconventional resources foster children's resilience and positively impact their educational outcomes and aspires to contribute to a transformative understanding of the ecosystems surrounding children in diverse and changing European cities.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
At the heart of this study is the recognition of children's perspectives on what resources they rely on. The research values the often-overlooked voices of children in research on their wellbeing and educational pathways. As such, it aims to uncover a more comprehensive picture of the real-life factors which shape their wellbeing and educational journeys. By centering on the experiences and perceptions of the children, the study seeks to bridge existing gaps in understanding by foregoing a deficit-based approach, centering the children’s voice, and taking into account the neighborhood as an access point to a diversity of community resources. We amplify children’s voices by using a photovoice method, which means that children take active part in recording and reflecting on their lives and the neighborhoods through which they move through photos (Sarti et al., 2018). Researchers accompany the children in their walks around the school in small groups inviting interviews (Epstein, Stevens, Mc Keever, & Baruchel, 2008). Furthermore, we conduct participant-observation and informal interviews working with children in creating an exposition of their photos and walking through the area during sessions. The data gathering consists of four subsequent sessions (in April 2024)with 8-10 children aged 9-11 years in a primary school in highly diverse neighborhood (concerning social, economic, and cultural backgrounds in the Netherlands Children are contacted through the school and voluntarily take part in the project. We emphasize the importance of reciprocity and the participating children get the opportunity to acquire skills in the field of photography as well as conducting research.  Children are invited to be involved in the interpretation of the material to increase validity of the results (Brydon-Miller, Greenwood, & Maguire, 2003). We use inductive content analysis of the data to identify recurring themes brought up by the children. Finally, the children are offered the opportunity to review the findings in a later stage and add context if they find it desirable.
Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
Research into the unequal outcomes of children with various backgrounds has long focused on the risk factors contributing to this inequality. Recent research endeavors, such as the current project, shift the focus rather on the richness of resources that are available in children’s networks. . The results (available in June 2024) from this explorative study encompass children’s own unique experiences ofthe resources available in the neighborhood surrounding their school. Insight into where the children like to come as well as which spaces they tend to avoid and whom they turn to with which queries and questions will open venture point between communities and schools. Previous research has indicated that many resources are available diverse communities and community members rely on them (Steenwegen&Clycq, 2023). However, these resources are not always recognized and valued in mainstream schooling. Simultaneously, community members have signaled that they find it difficult to establish strong working relationships with schools. The outcomes of this research project will highlight opportunities for strengthening resources of resilience for the benefit of all children.  
References
Beese, S., Drumm, K., Wells-Yoakum, K., Postma, J., & Graves, J. M. (2023). Flexible Resources Key to Neighborhood Resilience for Children: A Scoping Review. In Children (Vol. 10, Issue 11). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/children10111791
Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D., & Maguire, P. (2003). Why action research?. Action research, 1(1), 9-28.
Epstein, I., Stevens, B., McKeever, P., Baruchel, S., & Jones, H. (2008). Using puppetry to elicit children's talk for research. Nursing inquiry, 15(1), 49-56.
Masten, A. S. (2021). Resilience in developmental systems: Principles, pathways, and protective processes in research and practice. In Multisystemic Resilience: Adaptation and Transformation in Contexts of Change (pp. 113–134). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190095888.003.0007
Masten, A. S., & Barnes, A. J. (2018). Resilience in children: Developmental perspectives. Children, 5(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/children5070098
Mertens, D. M. (2017). Transformative research: personal and societal. International Journal for Transformative Research, 4(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijtr-2017-0001
Minh, A., Muhajarine, N., Janus, M., Brownell, M., & Guhn, M. (2017). A review of neighborhood effects and early child development: How, where, and for whom, do neighborhoods matter? In Health and Place (Vol. 46, pp. 155–174). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.04.012
Robinette, J. W., Bostean, G., Glynn, L. M., Douglas, J. A., Jenkins, B. N., Gruenewald, T. L., & Frederick, D. A. (2021). Perceived neighborhood cohesion buffers COVID-19 impacts on mental health in a United States sample. Social Science & Medicine, 285, 114269.
Sarti, A., Schalkers, I., Bunders, J. F. G., & Dedding, C. (2018). Around the table with policymakers: Giving voice to children in contexts of poverty and deprivation. Action Research, 16(4), 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750317695412
Ungar, M., & Theron, L. (2020). Resilience and mental health: how multisystemic processes contribute to positive outcomes. In The lancet. Psychiatry (Vol. 7, Issue 5, pp. 441–448). NLM (Medline). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30434-1
Yule, K., Houston, J., & Grych, J. (2019). Resilience in Children Exposed to Violence: A Meta-analysis of Protective Factors Across Ecological Contexts. In Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review (Vol. 22, Issue 3, pp. 406–431). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-019-00293-1