Conference Agenda

Session
04 SES 02 E: Early Childhood and Inclusive Education
Time:
Tuesday, 27/Aug/2024:
15:15 - 16:45

Session Chair: Kari Kvandal
Location: Room 118 in ΧΩΔ 02 (Common Teaching Facilities [CTF02]) [Floor 1]

Cap: 32

Paper Session

Presentations
04. Inclusive Education
Paper

Parents Impact on Inclusion in Early Childhood care

Kari Kvandal1, Wenche Langeland1, Jannice Eikefet Berland2

1NLA University College, Norway; 2HVL Univserity College, Norway

Presenting Author: Kvandal, Kari; Langeland, Wenche

Our research is based on the triangle of expectations the early educations care teachers meet from the parents, the society, and what`s best for the child; how the ethical dilemma in inclusive education is a balance between different considerations for the teacher (Afdal, 2011, Reindal, 2016, Reindal, 2019).

The Norway`s society today have a more diversity of cultures, economic, social, religions and geographic background than earlier (Morken &Karlsen, 2019). Each family has roles, traditions and a background who have an impact for their meanings of what`s important for their children’s education, different expectations to how they want to be met by the society and early childhood teachers (Wolf, 2018). The ideal of equality in Norway; that everybody have the same rights to be treated equally regardless of function and capabilities (Sen, 1993,1999), is still an important value who can make it difficult se the variety in parents and families (Bendixen, Bringslid & Vike, 2018).

The “Professional ethic for the teaching profession” (Union of Education Norway and Norwegian Union of School Employees, 2012) are an important guideline for basic values of the teaching profession. Understanding early childhood parenting and care are based on universal human rights and especially the UN convention on the rights for children. (UDF & SL, 2012). The value of “what`s children’s best?” is an important guiding principle for the teaching profession (Kunnskapsdepartementet, 2017). The principle towards corporation and understanding parents in early childhood care are the first rule and premises in Norwegian right for early childhood care § 1. (Barnehageloven, 2005, §1).

Early childhood teacher’s everyday life is in the middle of a triangle with expectations from both their own profession; whit the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989), the society`s mandate and rules act relating to kindergarten (Barnehageloven, 2005) and the parents’ mandate; whit The Universal Declaration of Human Rights §26.3 (UN,1948). In this study we wish to highlight some of the challenges, cross pressure, and ethical dilemmas these teachers face in their meeting with the normal life in early childhood care whit inclusion and corporation with parents. Our research is based on empirical data from interviews with early childhood teachers, both groups and individuals. Our understanding is based on the principle that the variety among parents, families and children are an important resource in the community that can be both a challenge and a good resource for children with special needs and for all children.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
This study is conducted with qualitative methods (Kvale & Brinkman,2015) and the aim was to research with the proposal for reflection towards inclusion in everyday life for children in Norwegian early childhood care. Kvale & Brinkman (2015) emphasizes the qualitative methods for refection and start of a new paradigm in the society.  The interviews were both in groups and individuals; and the informants has different roles in the kindergarten. The article is based on findings from the interviews and one of the prominent issues from the informers. We want to compare the finding with literature review (Creswell, 2014) and analyzing of document (Asdal & Reinertsen, 2021, Bowen,2009), in the study for this article.


Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
Our expected outcome in these studies is based on the first empiric of the informants we already have interviews results from. Our informant answers give us a strong hint that the parent`s impact on inclusion education in early childhood care is a higher issue as we believed before we started this research. Therefore, our aim is to dig deeper in this important matter for the inclusion education and parenthood. The aim of this study is reflection for early childhood teachers and the society for a better understanding of how the parents and early childhood teachers can cooperate with respect for each other and a high standard of inclusion education regardless backgrounds.
References
Asdal, K. & Reinertsen, H. (2021): Hvordan gjøre dokumentanalyse. En praksisorientert metode. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.

Alfdal, G. (2011) Veiledning som moralsk virksomhet. In: T.J. Karlsen (red.) Veiledning under vilkår. Gyldendal Akademisk.

Barnehageloven. (2005). Lov om barnehager (LOV-2005-06-17-64). Lovdata. Lov om barnehager (barnehageloven) - Kapittel I. Barnehagens formål og innhold - Lovdata.

Bendixsen,S., Bringslid, M. B. & Vike, H. (2018) (red.) Egalitarianism in Scandinavia. Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillian.

Bowen,G.A.(2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. From: Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method | Emerald Insight

Kunnskapsdepartementet (2017). Rammeplanen for barnehagens innhold og oppgaver. From: Forskrift om rammeplan for barnehagens innhold og oppgaver - 1 Barnehagens verdigrunnlag - Lovdata  

Morken, I. &Karlsen,J.(2019). Migrasjonsrelaterte lærevansker.  In: E. Befring, K-A. B. Næss & R. Tangen (red.) Spesialpedagogikk. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.  

Reindal, S. M. (2016). Discussing Inclusive Education: An Inquiry into Different Interpretations and a Search for Ethical Aspects of Inclusion Using the Capabilities Approach. European Journal of Spesial Needs Education, v31 n1 p1-12 2016.

Reindal, S. M. (2019). Spesialpedagogikk – noen etiske problemstillinger og normative teorier. In: E. Befring, K. Næss, & R. Tangen. (2019) Spesialpedagogikk. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.

Sen, A. (1993) Capabilities and well-being. In M. C. Nussbaum &A. Sen (red.), The quality of life (s.30-53) University of Utha Press.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.

United Nations General Assembly (1948) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Universal Declaration of Human Rights | United Nations

Utdanningforbundet (2012).Professional ethic for the teaching profession. From:
https://www.utdanningsforbundet.no/globalassets/larerhverdagen/profesjonsetikk/larerprof_etiske_plattform_a4.pdf

Wolf, K. D. (2018). Stakeholders’ opinions of quality in Norwegian kindergartens. Early Years. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2018.1547686


04. Inclusive Education
Paper

Inclusion-related Attitudes and Competencies of Early Childhood Teachers

Simone Breit, Monika Hofer-Rybar

University College of Teacher Education Lower Austria, Austria

Presenting Author: Breit, Simone

From a professional-theoretical perspective, the educational staff plays a central role in the quality of educational processes. Against the backdrop that early childhood educational institutions have the mission to realize an education for all, professional educational actions can be equated with inclusive educational actions (Fröhlich-Gildhoff et al., 2020). Furthermore, on a scientific basis, qualification requirements for inclusive education by elementary education professionals have been defined, and pedagogical basic competencies for inclusion have been specified (Sulzer & Wagner, 2011).

Early education in Austria is federally regulated, leading to 9 different legislations in Austria's 9 federal states. As a result, inclusion and the associated framework conditions vary significantly.

But in the nationwide educational framework, inclusion is understood as a fundamental attitude (Charlotte-Bühler-Institut, 2009). Throughout Austria, early childhood teachers (ECT) are supported in a region-specific and provider-dependent manner by Inclusive Early Childhood Teach (IECP). They have further training in inclusion, that lasts 4 terms and comprises 90 ECTS points. Their task is to 'ensure, support, and qualitatively accompany the social integration and local care of children with increased support needs' (Land Salzburg, n.d.).

This presentation initially raises the question of whether ECT and IECT differ in their attitudes and competencies regarding inclusion.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
90 educators working in the field of ECE were surveyed online through a questionnaire. All of them took part in a further professional development at the university College of Teacher Education in the academic year 2022/23 (n=27 IECT and n=63 ECT). To answer the questionnaire, a link and time for completion were provided during a course at the university college. The survey took place in October 2022. The questionnaire included items from the InkluKiT project (Weltzien et al., 2021), with scales measuring attitudes towards inclusion and action-related competencies at the levels of child, family, team, and co-operation. Additionally, demographic data on professional experience and education were collected. Approximately 15 minutes were allocated for questionnaire completion. Data analysis will be carried out using SPSS 23.0 through descriptive and inferential statistical procedures.
Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The results indicate that there is no significant difference between ECT and IECT regarding attitudes towards inclusion. However, significant differences exist in competencies at all levels of action (child, familiy, team, co-operation).
We conclude that the training for Inclusive Early Childhood Educators (IECT) conveys and the scope of duties of IECT requires inclusion-specific competencies. While the attitude as a foundation for inclusion is present in all educators working in the field of ECE, IECT possess specific knowledge, skills, and abilities.
There is a critical examination of whether, in the context of education for all, all early childhood teachers (ECT) would not need these competencies. This discourse is embedded in the debate on professionalization, as ECT and IECT in Austria do not undergo academic training.

References
Charlotte-Bühler-Institut (2009). Bundesländerübergreifender BildungsRahmenPlan für elementare Bildungseinrichtungen in Österreich. Im Auftrag der Ämter der Landesregierungen der österreichischen Bundesländer, des Magistrats der Stadt Wien und des Bundesministeriums für Unterricht, Kunst und Kultur. Verfügbar am 31.1.2024 unter: https://www.charlotte-buehler-institut.at/bundeslaenderuebergreifender-bildungsrahmenplan-fuer-elementare-bildungseinrichtungen-in-oesterreich-2/
Fröhlich-Gildhoff, K., Rönnau-Böse, M. & Tinius, C. (2020). Herausforderndes Verhalten in Kita und Grundschule. Erkennen, Verstehen, Begegnen. Kohlhammer.
Land Salzburg (n.d.). Stellenbeschreibungen für die Kinderbildung und -betreuung. Verfügbar am 31.01.2024 unter: https://www.salzburg.gv.at/bildung_/Documents/0531a%20Stellenbeschreibg%202020-WEB.pdf
Sulzer, A. & Wagner, P (2011). Inklusion in Kindertageseinrichtungen. Qualifikationsanforderungen an die Fachkräfte (WiFF-Expertise Nr. 15). Weiterbildungsinitiative Frühpädagogische Fachkräfte. Verfügbar am 08.08.2023 unter: https://www.weiterbildungsinitiative.de/fileadmin/Redaktion/Publikationen/WiFF_Expertise_Nr._15_Annika_Sulzer_Petra_Wagner_Inklusion_in_Kindertageseinrichtungen.pdf
Weltzien, D., Albers, T., Döther, S., Söhnen, S. A., Verhoeven, N. & Ali-Tani, C. (2021). Inklusionskompetenz in Kita-Teams (InkluKiT) Wissenschaftlicher Abschlussbericht. FEL Verlag Forschung - Entwicklung - Lehre.


04. Inclusive Education
Paper

School Leaders’ Views on Family-school Collaboration in Disability-inclusive Education in India

Anannya Chakraborty, Ashtamurthy Killimangalam

ACER, India

Presenting Author: Chakraborty, Anannya; Killimangalam, Ashtamurthy

Dialogue and partnerships between countries are essential for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. They provide the opportunity to learn what works in other nations and facilitate research and programmes, such as those between the European Union and Indian civil societies. Particularly, research collaborations can help to advance disability-inclusive education, as countries vary in terms of progress towards inclusion.

It is estimated that 7.8 million children live with disabilities in India (UNESCO, 2019). There are policy and legal provisions for educating students with and without disabilities in the same classroom. However, societal, systemic, school, and family level challenges often prevent full inclusion (Singal, 2019). Deep social stigma regarding disability often results in affiliate stigma among parents of a child with special needs (Patra & Patro, 2019) and can affect teachers’ beliefs (Singal, 2019).

In effective schools, there is family and community involvement (Masters, 2004). Families and schools have a shared responsibility to help students reach their full potential. Family engagements are a series of interactions between the family and schools that are dynamic and everchanging (Xu, 2020). Family involvement leads to improved academic outcomes, behaviour, and student attendance, amongst others (Jeynes, 2005; Sheldon & Epstein, 2004; Sheldon, 2007).

Family-school partnerships are particularly important to help every child succeed in disability-inclusive contexts. They have academic, social, and emotional benefits for students with disabilities (Patrikakou, 2011). However, schools are required to allocate resources, offer professional learning opportunities for teachers, create communication routines, and allow parents to observe the strategies deployed in classrooms for successful collaboration (Patrikakou, 2011).

While speaking with the lead author, eminent inclusive education expert, Dr Umesh Sharma, said in his interview on behaviour management and inclusive learning environments, that the problem arises when teachers contact parents only when students misbehave (Chakraborty, 2023). Indeed, the concern for a significant number of Indian schools, like in other parts of the world, is to create regular and institutionalised strategies for collaboration with families.

Teachers in India expressed that they need support from parents in understanding the challenges of the child, for formal diagnosis, preparation of Individual Education Plans (IEPs), training on assistive technology, and in classroom teaching and learning activities (Chakraborty, 2023). However, there is a lack of empirical research in India on understanding how family-school partnerships have been established in the context of disability-inclusive education and what the challenges are, as existing literature primarily focuses on the experiences of parenting children with disabilities (Gokhale, 2021; Chakravarti, 2008).

This paper aims to explore family-school partnerships in disability-inclusive school education in India. The central question is ‘What are the opportunities and challenges of family-school collaboration for disability-inclusive education in schools in India?’ Specifically, we ask,

(i) What are the existing family-school partnerships that promote disability inclusion in schools?

(ii) What are the challenges in building such partnerships for disability-inclusion?

(iii) How do schools collaborate with families in the context of learning assessments?

The third question is particularly relevant as learning assessments for children with disabilities and factors affecting them haven’t received much academic attention.

This qualitative study will gather the perspectives of school leaders to develop an understanding of the family-school partnership landscape in India for improving academic and co-academic outcomes for students with disability. The insights will enable policymakers and school leaders to design teacher professional learning opportunities that enable schools to strengthen their connections with families. Further, learnings from the study will promote the development of effective parent-school collaboration in disability-inclusive contexts which is emphasised in India’s National Education Policy (NEP, 2020).


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
A qualitative research approach was selected to understand the perspectives of school leaders on the efforts made to partner with families of students with disabilities and the challenges they face while creating those partnerships (Hatch, 2022). Semi-structured interviews were used to gather enriching insights into the area of family-school partnerships in disability-inclusive education (Winwood, 2019).
Around 10 school leaders were interviewed from 10 private and government schools in urban cities in India reducing the chance of apriori assumptions. Schools that have enrolled at least 10 students with disability have been included in the study. Two researchers conducted the interviews with the school leaders. Informed consent was obtained from all school leaders participating in the interviews. The interviews were corroborated by school observation.  The field work was conducted over a period of three months. Only those leaders were selected who had the experience of managing inclusive schools for more than 5 years. The participants were sampled based on purposive sampling and snowballing.
The audio tapes of the interviews will be transcribed using tools and any mismatch between the audio and text will be corrected by the researchers manually. NVivo will be used to organise, store, and analyse the data for obtaining the results of the study. The data presented in the study are anonymous, and full confidentiality was maintained in the research process.
Researchers will repeatedly read the transcripts to identify the expressions of the participants. This will be followed by a meeting for discussing the observations and notes of different researchers. The first author will code the data and group the data through an iterative process to arrive at the coding framework. NVivo will be used to derive visual representations to derive the themes, and eventually, the key findings of the study.


Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The study will describe the family-school collaborative practices in the schools of participants in the study. It will outline details such as the purposes of such collaborations, the frequency of collaborations, and the benefits of such collaborations for students with disability. It will also help to bring out the concerns of school leaders about the issues that hinder family-school collaborations including system, social, and family level challenges and what helped them overcome the challenges. However, the study will not report the effectiveness of partnerships or how the partnerships have benefited students with disabilities.
The study will also elicit information on the school level factors that have led to the success of such collaborations. These could include the school’s culture of collaboration, school councils, strong guidelines or codes of conduct for building positive family connections, directions from school leaders on setting channels of collaboration, support from special educators, and professional learning for teachers for engaging with families of students with disabilities. The study will elaborate on those nuances that helped teachers forge partnerships with families of students with disabilities.
The study will also highlight the role of teachers as communicators. Communication skills and channels are essential in formation of family-school relationships, and especially crucial in disability-inclusive education.
In addition, there will be specific information related to collaboration with families for assessments, for example, understanding how the assessment criteria is communicated, the process of deciding accommodation, and how student performance is reported to set learning goals for every child.

References
Chakraborty, A. (2023). Preventing students' disruptive behaviour in the classroom. Teacher Magazine.
Chakraborty, A. (2023). Teachers’ perceptions of formative assessment for student with a disability: A case study from India. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Chakravarti, U. (2008). Burden of caring: Families of the disabled in urban India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 15(2), 341-363.
Gokhale, C. (2021). Parenting a child with a disability: A review of caregivers’ needs in India and service implications. Birth Defects in India: Epidemiology and Public Health Implications, 335-349.
Hatch, A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. State University of New York Press.
Jeynes, W. H. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relation of parental involvement to urban elementary school student academic achievement. Urban Education, 40(3), 237-269.
Masters, G. (2004). Beyond political rhetoric: The research on what makes a school good. Online Opinion.
Ministry of Human Resource Development. (2020). National Education Policy. Government of India.
Patra, S., & Patro, B. K. (2019). Affiliate stigma among parents of children with autism in eastern India. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 44, 45-47.
Patrikakou, E. (2011). Families of children with disabilities: Building school-family partnerships. Handbook on Family and Community Engagement, 131-135.
Sheldon, S. B., & Epstein, J. L. (2004). Getting students to school: Using family and community involvement to reduce chronic absenteeism. School Community Journal, 14(2), 39-56.
Singal, N. (2019). Challenges and opportunities in efforts towards inclusive education: Reflections from India. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(7-8), 827-840.
Steven B. Sheldon (2007). Improving student attendance with school, family, and community partnerships. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(5), 267-275.
UNESCO. (2019). State of the Education Report for India 2019: Children with Disabilities.
Xu, Y. (2020). Engaging families of young children with disabilities through family-school-community partnerships. Early Child Development and Care, 190(12), 1959-1968.
Winwood, J. (2019). Using interviews. In Practical Research Methods in Education (pp. 12-22). Routledge.