Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 10th May 2025, 09:59:21 EEST

 
 
Session Overview
Session
04 SES 04 D: Digital media and Inclusive Education
Time:
Wednesday, 28/Aug/2024:
9:30 - 11:00

Session Chair: Jonas Goltz
Location: Room 113 in ΧΩΔ 02 (Common Teaching Facilities [CTF02]) [Floor 1]

Cap: 60

Paper Session

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
04. Inclusive Education
Paper

Using Digital Media for Inclusive and Creative Teaching Practices in an Uncertain World

María Begoña Vigo-Arrazola1, Pilar Lasheras-Lalana2

1University of Zaragoza, Spain; 2University of Zaragoza, Spain

Presenting Author: Vigo-Arrazola, María Begoña

AAchieving a sustainable future requires equipping people with the knowledge, skills, attitudes and values needed to adapt to an uncertain and complex world without losing sight of their well-being (UN, 2022). Digital technologies are presented as a common good that can support the achievement of SDG 4 - Education 2030 - and build a future beyond 2030 (UNESCO, 2016), which renders the combination of inclusive practices, digitalization and creativity into a key challenge for teachers in different education systems. Various publications have reported on the meaning and significance of policies along these lines (e.g. Eurydice, 2019). Previous research has shown the importance of economic, technological and educational rationalities for reconstructing conservative pedagogy and enabling the "transmission" (e.g. Sancho et al., 2020; Selwyn et al., 2017, 2022). With few exceptions, has reference been made to how policies are realised in practice in disadvantaged schools (e.g. Engel and Coll, 2022; Vigo, 2021). This paper attempts to do this. It aims to generate knowledge on how teachers can engage in their schools to address the challenges of uncertainty when making commitments toward transforming education for sustainability and equipping people with skills, attitudes, and values for their well-being in an uncertain future and complex world (UN, 2023). It addresses what teachers are doing in relation to these policies when they use digital media in schools identified as 'difficult' because of their high percentage of foreign population or their location in remote geographical areas and because of invisible global forces (Mizrav, 2023).
This paper invokes the voices of teachers who are working in segregated schools since they were positioned as ‘difficult’ because of the high percentage of abroad population or its location in remote geographic areas, using critical ethnography to present the experiences of teachers in five schools. According to Apple and Jungk(1990) we consider the relevance of knowing the experiences of teachers in order to reorganise and to actively participate in the reconstruction of these societies. However, according to the same author (2013) or Smyth et al. (2014) we can consider how people can actively participate in the reconstruction of these situations. There has sometimes been a move towards practices that recognise disadvantaged groups in order to create an education that responds to the short and long-term needs of black people that responds to the short- and long-term needs of the population in these schools (i.e. Beach and Vigo, 2020; Feito, 2020). It aims to generate knowledge on how teachers can engage in their schools to address the challenges of uncertainty when making commitments toward transforming education for sustainability and equipping people with skills, attitudes, and values for their well-being in an uncertain future and complex world (UN, 2023)


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
Data are based on a national R+D+i project on creative and inclusive practices with digital media in 5 schools with special difficulties, in Spain (PID2020-112880RB-100),
Participant observation, interviews and informal conversations have been used. However, from this critical perspective the researchers' commitment to developing trust and confidence during the research process for community members, sharing values and responsibilities such as empathy, solidarity and respect for differences is highlighted. Researchers engaged with teachers to give meaning to their experiences and knowledge for educational activism for the benefit of the community and social transformation (Beach and Vigo, 2021).

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The results add to existing knowledge about what teachers experience as important and challenging when working creatively with digital media in complex and challenging circumstances. They indicate four clear points. The first is that teachers recognise, listen to and incorporate learners' voices in curriculum development whenever they can and that they strive to make learners' voices an element of control and support for learning. The second is that teachers also express concern for the development of digital competence and for reinforcing and supporting practices linked to curricular content and the third is that they experience pressure for compliance with the curriculum and the acquisition of digital competence. The predominance of neoliberal policies that reduce the art of teaching to a mechanical and passive process (Smyth et al., 2014), using digital media for the "transmission" (e.g. Sancho et al., 2020; Selwyn et al., 2017, 2022). It is a key feature here that leads to the fourth point relating to tensions and contradictions that teachers experience related to the use of digital media.  
In addition to these results, the paper also reports on the transformative processes that took place during the research process. It highlights the need of dialogue and support for teachers to help them adopt critical reflective practices and adds new knowledge in this respect to previous critical research on the use of digital media.

References
Apple, M. W. (2013). Can education change society? Du Bois, Woodson and the politics of social transformation. Review of Education, 1(1), 32-56.
Apple, M. y Jungk (1990). No hay que ser maestro para enseñar esta unidad: la
enseñanza, la tecnología y el control del aula. Revista de Educación, 291, 149-
172.
Beach, D., & Vigo-Arrazola, M. B. (2021). Critical ethnographies of education and for social and educational transformation: A meta-ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(6), 677-688.
Beach, D., & Vigo Arrazola, M. B. (2020). Community and the education market: A cross-national comparative analysis of ethnographies of education inclusion and involvement in rural schools in Spain and Sweden. Journal of Rural Studies, 77, 199-207.
Eurydice (2019). La educación digital en los centros educativos en Europa. Informe de Eurydice. Oficina de Publicaciones de la Unión Europea.
Feito,  R.  (2020).  ¿Qué  hace  una  escuela  como  tú  en  tu  siglo  como  este?  Los  Libros  de  la  Catarata
Mizrav, E. (2023). Segregate, Discriminate, Signal: A Model for Understanding Policy Drivers of Educational Inequality. Educational Policy, 37(2), 554-581.
https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048211029026
Sancho-Gil, J. M., Rivera-Vargas, P., & Miño-Puigcercós, R. (2020). Moving beyond the predictable failure of Ed-Tech initiatives. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1666873
Selwyn, N., Nemorin, S., Bulfin, S., & Johnson, N. F. (2017). Left to their own devices: the everyday realities of one-to-one classrooms. Oxford review of Education, 43(3), 289-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1305047
Selwyn, N., Pangrazio, L., & Cumbo, B. (2022). Knowing the (datafied) student: The production of the student subject through school data. British Journal of Educational Studies, 70(3), 345-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2021.1925085
Smyth, J., Down, B., McInerney, P., & Hattam, R. (2014). Doing critical educational research: A conversation with the research of John Smyth. Peter Lang.
UNESCO (2016). Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the
implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4. Ensure inclusive and equitable
quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all. UNESCO.
UNESCO (2023). Informe de seguimiento de la educación en el mundo. Tecnología en la educación: ¿Una herramienta en los términos de quién? UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385723
Vigo-Arrazola, M. B. (2021). Desarrollo de prácticas de enseñanza creativa e inclusiva con medios digitales. En En C. Latorre & A. Quintas (Coords.). Inclusión educativa y tecnologías para el aprendizaje (129-143). Octaedro.


04. Inclusive Education
Paper

Digital technology use and competence among special education teachers: A comparison of Türkiye, Ireland and Basque Country

Itziar Kerexeta1, Nuray Gedik2, Seaneen Sloan3, Zuriñe Gaintza1, Leire Darretxe Urrutxi1, Özge Bakay4

1University of the Basque Country, Basque Country, Spain; 2Eskisehir Technical University, Türkiye; 3University College Dublin, Ireland; 4Antalya Provincial Directorate of National Education, Antalya, Türkiye

Presenting Author: Sloan, Seaneen

Sustainable Development Goal 4 highlights inclusion and equity as indicators of quality in education, with Information and Communication Technology (ICT) highlighted as an opportunity to advance educational inclusion (Pedró et al., 2019). While several studies within the field of educational technology have assessed the application of technology in vulnerable groups, students with SEN are still in a position of disadvantage (Cranmer, 2020; Trujillo, 2021). Studies show a need to incorporate a holistic pedagogical model based on Universal Design for Learning, providing accessibility and facilitating inclusion for all (Serrano et al., 2019). The opportunities of ICT in education are evident: the individualisation, the breaking down of barriers of time and space, and the permeability of technology that makes it possible to respond to the principles of UDL. However, it is evident that having ICT tools and technologies does not guarantee that the teachers will effectively use them or change their teaching practices (Pittman & Gaines, 2015). It is rather teacher competencies and beliefs that count (Almerich et al., 2016; Ertmer et al., 2012).

Digitalisation is a global priority, and, in this respect, competence frameworks have been developed from different continents, targeting both citizens at an initial stage and then teachers at all levels of education. In the European context, the DigComp framework in its different versions (Carretero et al., 2016; Vuorikari et al., 2022) has been extended and implemented as a reference model for teacher training in the design of school curricula and updating training plans. Later, the specific digital competence framework for teachers, DigCompEdu (Redecker, 2017), which was taken as a reference by governments for the adaptation of their policies and implementation plans, became the benchmark. Its accessibility has been facilitated by the development and publication of the Selfie for Teachers tool, which provides the educational community with an open and free instrument for the assessment of the perception of teachers' digital competence and is available in 29 languages (Economou, 2023).

The most relevant aspects of this framework focus on the digital competence of students and the practices that teachers and students carry out for the development of teaching-learning processes that respond to the principles of UDL. The DigCompEdu model (Redecker, 2017) presents six competence areas differentiated into: educators’ professional competences, pedagogical competences, and learners’ competences. It is competence 5, learner empowerment, that offers the greatest opportunity for vulnerable learners and students with SEN, as it focuses on personalisation, accessibility, inclusion, and active learner motivation.

In the Digital Education at School Report of the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (Eurydice, 2019), digital competence has been described as a priority area for individuals since its initial mention in European Recommendation in 2006 (European Parliament, 2006). A comparison among European countries was made in terms of curricula and approaches. The focus on special needs education related to digital competencies was embedded in the curricula of Belgium, Holland, Germany, Croatia, Austria, and Poland (Eurydice, 2019). A recent report indicates the need for access and participation for inclusion and focuses on teachers’ preparedness for learning environments (European Commission, 2023).

The aim of this study is to assess the use of ICT by teachers working with students with SEN, assess and compare their digital competencies in education, and identify predictors of their digital competency in education across three countries: Türkiye, Ireland, and the Basque Country.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
A cross-sectional survey was used to measure the use of ICT by teachers working with primary school-aged students with SEN while also assessing their digital competencies. Ethical approval was obtained from each institution.
The online questionnaire was designed and refined following piloting with 15 teachers from the three countries. Once finalised, the questionnaire was administered between March and June 2023 using the Survey Sparrow online survey platform. It took 15 to 20 minutes to complete and consisted of three sections to capture 1) the demographic and professional characteristics of participants (i.e., age, gender, level of education, length of experience with SEN); 2) the availability and use of ICT in respondents’ schools, including a rating of the technical support available in school for ICT use; and 3) self-rated digital competence using the 22-item DigCompEdu (Cabero et al., 2020a). The invitation to participate was sent via email to all primary schools within the Basque Country, the Antalya district of Türkiye, and within Ireland. A total of 270 valid responses were received; 111 from Türkiye, 63 from Ireland and 96 from the Basque Country.
Data analysis was conducted in SPSS version 27. Descriptive statistics (frequencies, means) were generated for all variables, split by country. Analysis of Variance was used to assess for differences in perceived digital competency by country. Multiple linear regression was used to identify predictors of digital competency scores, with the following independent variables: country (dummy variable); participant age in years; gender (male as the reference category); postgraduate (masters or doctoral) level of education (undergraduate education as the reference category); years of experience in SEN teaching; school setting (mainstream class as the reference category); and rating of technical support available in school.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
Participants (Mage = 42 years) were predominantly female (78%). Internet use in classrooms through broadband or wireless connections was widespread among participants in Ireland (98% sometimes or always) and the Basque Country (96% sometimes or always), compared to 59% in Türkiye. The pattern was similar in relation to computer/laptop use, with higher proportions of respondents in Ireland (98%) and the Basque Country (91%) reporting that they sometimes or always use computers/laptops, compared to Türkiye (54%). In Ireland and the Basque Country, over half of participants reported using smartboards, compared to just over a quarter in Türkiye. Tablets were used most commonly in Ireland (60% sometimes/always), compared to 31% in the Basque Country and 9% in Türkiye.
There was also variation across countries in the extent to which technical support was available in schools to assist with ICT use. In Ireland, around a quarter of respondents rated support as excellent. The proportion rating the support excellent was slightly lower in the Basque Country (16-21%), and slightly lower again in Türkiye (9-11%).
Digital competency was highest for the Basque Country (mean = 43.22). Multiple linear regression identified significant predictors of digital competency. Teachers in Ireland and the Basque Country scored significantly higher (6.66 and 7.28 points, respectively) in digital competency compared with teachers in Türkiye. Female teachers scored 6 points lower than males on digital competency (p=.02). Age (p=.59) and having a postgraduate qualification compared to an undergraduate qualification (p=.43) were not significant predictors of digital competency. Teachers based in special schools scored 10 points lower in digital competency compared to those in mainstream schools (p=.001). The availability of technical support in school was a significant predictor of digital competency, with every 1-point increase in support associated with a .76-point increase in competency (p=.01).

References
Almerich, G., Orellana, N., Suárez-Rodríguez, J., & Díaz-García, I. (2016). Teachers’ information and communication technology competences: A structural approach. Computers Education, 100, 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.002

Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The digital competence framework for citizens. https://acortar.link/V3CmYT

Cranmer, S. (2020). Disabled children’s evolving digital use practices to support formal learning. A missed opportunity for inclusion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(2), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12827

Economou, A., (2023) SELFIE for TEACHERS. Designing and developing a self-reflection tool for teachers’ digital competence., EUR 31475 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, ISBN 978-92-68-01809-5, doi:10.2760/561258, JRC131282.

Ertmer, P.A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012) Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers and Education, 59(2), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001

Eurydice. European Education and Culture Executive Agency, (2019). Digital education at school in Europe, Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2797/763

European Commission, European Education and Culture Executive Agency, (2023). Promoting diversity and inclusion in schools in Europe, Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2797/443509

Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366994.locale=es

Pittman, T., & Gaines, T. (2015). Technology integration in third, fourth and fifth grade classrooms in a Florida school district. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63, 539-554.

Redecker, C., Punnie, Y. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu, EUR 28775 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, ISBN 978-92-79-73718-3 (print),978-92-79-73494-6 (pdf), doi:10.2760/178382 (print),10.2760/159770 (online), JRC107466. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC107466

Serrano Fernández, L., Llauradó, E. V., Martínez, L. M., & García, C. R. (2022). Digital competence in the attention of students with special educational needs. An overview from the European Framework for Digital Teaching Competence “DigCompEdu.” Digital Education Review, 41, 284–305. https://doi.org/10.1344/DER.2022.41.284-305

Trujillo Sáez, F., (2021). The school year 2020-2021 in Spain during COVID-19: country report, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2021, ISBN 978-92-76-38645-2.

UNESCO (2016). Educación 2030: Declaración de Incheon y Marco de Acción para la realización del Objetivo de Desarrollo Sostenible 4: Garantizar une aducación inclusiva y equitativa de calidad y promover oportunidades de aprendizaje permanente para todos. UNESDOC Biblioteca Digital. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245656_spa

Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S. and Punie, Y., (2022). DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens - With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes, EUR 31006 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg,  ISBN 978-92-76-48883-5, doi:10.2760/490274, JRC128415 https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC128415


04. Inclusive Education
Paper

Many Minds - One Experiment. Classroom Practices with Digital Media in Inclusive Science Classes

Jessica Löser1, Jonas Goltz1, Navina Schilling2, Rolf Werning2

1University of Göttingen, Germany; 2Leibniz University Hannover

Presenting Author: Goltz, Jonas; Schilling, Navina

Current global developments, such as migration movements, go hand in hand with increasing social heterogeneity (Mecheril/Rangger 2022). Dealing with heterogeneity in school , in the sense of a broad understanding of inclusion (Löser/Werning 2015), means enabling all pupils to learn the same subject regardless of their different learning needs and backgrounds (Werning 2020). While this heterogeneity is often seen as an opportunity for learning in school cultural development processes (Budde 2015), it also comes with challenges, especially for teachers. They must prepare lessons that are sensitive to heterogeneity, especially in subjects that require complex teaching and learning processes with a high degree of abstraction. This also includes science lessons with experimentation as a core method (Stinken-Rösner et al. 2023).

When experimenting, teachers have to choose between small-step instructions, which have little cognitive activating effect, or open task formats, which can be overwhelming for students (Kleinert et al. 2021). Incremental learning aids offer a central and established solution to this requirement (ibid.): They break down complex tasks into subtasks and provide hints and solutions for each step, which students can access independently. In combination with digital media, such as an app for the tablet, they also offer further possibilities for differentiation.

The use of tablets in the classroom is an internationally researched topic (Aufenanger/Bastian 2017; Zhang/Nouri 2018). Tablets, as well as other digital media, are proving to be significant for the development of teaching and are also seen as a significant opportunity for the success of inclusive teaching (Filk/Schaumburg 2021). The user competences of teachers and students with regard to digital media are diverse and multifaceted (Engel/Jörissen 2022) and the actual use of the media remains largely dependent on the respective individuals (Aufenanger 2017). For science lessons, it has been shown that digital media have the potential to break down barriers (Stinken-Rösner et al. 2023).

This is where our research comes in. We focus the use of an app for inclusive science classes with an ethnographic approach and a special focus on its inclusive and exclusive potential. For this Lesson observations and, interviews with teachers and pupils are carried out. Our research is situated within the joint research project "DiLernProfis" (Short for: Learning process oriented diagnostics and didactis - digital incremental scaffolds as a professionalization concept for adaptive teaching), funded by the BMBF (Federal Ministry of Education and Research). The goal of “DiLernprofis” is the development of a web app that enables teachers to create and use digital learning aids. These should allow all pupils to complete complex tasks, such as experimentation, independently. In line with a broad understanding of inclusion, the focus is not on a specific group of pupils, but on the entire learning group, which is defined as heterogeneous in terms of its composition. To this end, a teacher training program is carried out and a certified training concept developed on this basis (Löser et al. 2023). The findings of our sub-project are used to further develop the app as well as the teacher training.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
The data collection of the project takes place in two research phases. In each phase, a training course is organized to prepare the participating teachers for the creation and use of the learning aids. Teachers use two evaluated learning aids for experimentation in their lessons and then develop their own learning aid. We are currently in the middle of the second research phase of the project. The teachers in this phase have attended several training sessions and are now preparing to use the evaluated learning aids. In our sub-project, ethnographic observations were carried out in all participating classes, and observation protocols were drawn up and subsequently translated into detailed protocols. The observations focused on the use of the learning aids by teachers and pupils.
The ethnographic approach makes it possible to follow the teaching process in a flexible and open way, and thus to consider a variety of practices with and around the learning aids. In addition, interviews were conducted with teachers and students after using the tool. In these they reflected on its use. In total, 45 observation protocols and 12 interview transcripts were produced. The data analysis was also characterized by openness and flexibility. It is based on the GTM (Strauss/Corbin 2010) and allows us to reconstruct key practices from the data through coding.
We adopt a practice-theoretical perspective (Schatzki 2012). From this perspective, we understand the social as emerging from practice, in which human actors and material artefacts jointly shape events, while at the same time normative orders come into play (Rabenstein 2018). In this sense, our understanding of social reality moves between poststructuralism (the dissolution of an acting subject) and theories of action (artefacts as tools) (Hirschauer 2016). This approach allows us to understand the use of the app in complex social situations, and to draw conclusions about its role in the different interactions.
Our practice-theoretical perspective, the ethnographic observations, the interviews and the analysis strategy are thus in a synergetic relationship, which proves to be a suitable framework with regard to our project objective. Findings about the actual teaching practice with the app allow us to draw conclusions regarding the further development of the app and the training concept as well as general findings regarding the use of digital media in science experiments at school.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
Our sub-project reconstructs classroom practice with regard to activities with and around the app in order to reveal its inclusive and exclusive potential. By this it supports both main concerns of “DiLernProfis”, the development of an app for inclusive science lessons as well as of a training-concept for its use.
The analysis of observation protocols and interviews revealed different ways of using and assessing the app. In many cases, the app was understood, as intended, as an optional tool to be used individually when independent task completion is otherwise unsuccessful.
At the same time, various limiting factors were observed with regard to the use of the app. Students sometimes organized the use of the app in an unintended way, for example when it was used to quickly access the solution without first working on the task. The app use was optional, so it was also completely rejected by a few students to avoid stigmatization. The experiment already represented a materially complex learning situation, which was expanded by the addition of the tablet and made it more difficult for some pupils to use the learning aids (Schilling et al. 2023).
Teachers proved to be creative when they used the app outside of the intended format and instead created and applied other task formats. At the same time, the implementation and use of the app in classroom practice proved to be challenging for teachers and students, but also proved to be used more and more routinely over time.
At ECER 2024, building on key findings from our analyses, we want to present and discuss the inclusive and exclusive potential of the project app on a case study basis. This will address the opportunities offered by digital media as well as the obstacles that need to be considered when introducing them.

References
Aufenanger, S. (2017). Zum Stand der Forschung zum Tableteinsatz in Schule und Unterricht aus nationaler und internationaler Sicht. In: J. Bastian/S.Aufenanger (ed.). Tablets in Schule und Unterricht (p.119-138). Springer VS.
Aufenanger, S., Bastian, J. (ed.) (2017). Tablets in Schule und Unterricht. Forschungsmethoden und -perspektiven zum Einsatz digitaler Medien. Springer VS.
Budde, J. (2015). Heterogenitätsorientierung. In: J. Budde/N.Blasse/A.Bossen/G.Rißler (ed.). Heterogenitätsforschung (p.19-37). Beltz.
Engel, J. & Jörissen, B. (2022). Schule und Medialität. In: T.Hascher/T.S.Idel/W.Helsper (ed.): Handbuch Schulforschung (p.1-21). Springer VS.
Filk, C. & Schaumburg, H. (2021). Editorial: Inklusiv-mediale Bildung und Fortbildung in schulischen Kontexten. In: MedienPädagogik (41), p.i-viii.
Hirschauer, S. (2016). Verhalten, Handeln, Interagieren: Zu den mikrosoziologischen Grundlagen der Praxistheorie. In H. Schäfer (ed.). Praxistheorie (p.45-68). Transcript.
Kleinert, S.I., Isaak, R.C., Textor, A., Wilde, M. (2021). Die Nutzung gestufter Lernhilfen zur Unterstützung des Experimentierprozesses im Biologieunterricht – eine qualitative Studie. In: Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften 27 (1), p.59-71.
Löser, J., Werning, R. (2015). Inklusion – allgegenwärtig, kontrovers, diffus? In: Erziehungswissenschaft 26 (51), p.17-24.
Löser, J., Demmer, C., Goltz, J., Heinrich, M, Kleinert, S.I., Koisser, S., Schilling, N., Streblow, L., Wilde, M., Werning, R. (2023). Lernprozessbegleitende Diagnostik und Fachdidaktik: Gestufte digitale Lernhilfen als Professionalisierungskonzept für adaptiven Unterricht (DiLernProfis). PraxisForschungLehrer*innenBildung. Zeitschrift für Schul- und Professionsentwicklung. 2023;5(1), p.191-203.
Mecheril, P., Rangger, M. (2022). Handeln in Organisationen der Migrationsgesellschaft. In: P.Mecheril/M.Rangger (eds.). Handeln in Organisationen der Migrationsgesellschaft (p.1-14). Springer VS.
Rabenstein, K. (2018). Ding-Praktiken. Zur sozio-materiellen Dimension von Unterricht. In M.Proske/K.Rabenstein(ed.). Kompendium Qualitative Unterrichtsforschung (p.319-348). Klinkhardt.
Schatzki, T. R. (2012). A Primer On Practices: Theory and Research. In: J.Higgs/R.Barnett/S.Billett/M.Hutchings et al. (ed.): Practice-based education: Perspectives and strategies (p.13-26). Sense Publisher.
Schilling, N., Goltz, J., Koisser, S., Demmer, C., Löser, J., Werning, R. (2023). Gestufte digitale Lernhilfen als Professionalisierungskonzept für inklusiven Naturwissenschaftsunterricht. In: Qualifizierung für Inklusion. 2023 Jul 17;5(2).
Stinken-Rösner, L., Weidenhiller, P., Nerdel, C., Weck, H., Kastaun, M. & Meier, M. (2023). Inklusives Experimentieren im naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht digital unterstützen. In: D.Ferencik-Lehmkuhl/I.Huynh/C.et al. (ed.). Inklusion digital! Chancen und Herausforderungen inklusiver Bildung im Kontext von Digitalisierung. (p.152-167) Klinkhardt.
Strauss, A.L., Corbin, J. (2010). Grounded Theory: Grundlagen Qualitativer Sozialforschung. Beltz.
Werning, R. (2020). Inklusive Didaktik – adaptiven Unterricht realisieren. In: Schule inklusiv, 8, p.4–8.
Zhang, L. & Nouri, J. (2018). A systematic review of learning and teaching with tablets. In: I.A.Sanchez/I P.Isaías/L.Rodrigues (ed.), 14th International Conference Mobile Learning 2018: Lisbon, Portugal, 14-16 April 2018 (p.80-88). Curran Associates Inc.


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: ECER 2024
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.153+TC
© 2001–2025 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany