Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 10th May 2025, 11:13:29 EEST

 
 
Session Overview
Session
10 SES 08 C: Language Use and Development
Time:
Wednesday, 28/Aug/2024:
17:30 - 19:00

Session Chair: Maria Pacheco Figueiredo
Location: Room 005 in ΧΩΔ 01 (Common Teaching Facilities [CTF01]) [Ground Floor]

Cap: 40

Paper Session

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
10. Teacher Education Research
Paper

Measuring Student Teacher’s Self-efficacy Beliefs About Language Stimulating Competences in Early Childhood Education

Thibaut Duthois, Ruben Vanderlinde, Maribel Montero Perez

Ghent University, Belgium

Presenting Author: Duthois, Thibaut

Research has shown that high-quality teacher-child interactions are associated with children's learning outcomes, both in terms of language development and social skills (Reyhing & Perren, 2023). High-quality interactions consist of complex teacher behaviours: providing language input, providing opportunities for language production, and providing feedback (Peleman et al., 2020; Verhallen & Walst, 2011). Rich language input can be provided by setting high expectations for children and using complex syntax and extensive vocabulary (Grifenhagen & Dickinson, 2023). Preschool teachers can create opportunities for language production by being linguistically responsive to children's interests and language output (Justice et al., 2018). Language stimulating feedback can be defined as responding positively to children's utterances and recasting or expanding them (Bradley & Reinking, 2011; Justice et al., 2018; Peleman et al., 2020). The quality of interactions has been shown to be of paramount importance, but often doesn't have a high quality (Peleman et al., 2020; Wolstein et al., 2021). To realize qualitative interactions, complex language stimulating competences are necessary.

Teacher competence goes beyond the behaviours mentioned above. Blömeke (2015) defines competence as a continuum, contextualised in the real world, in which complex intellectual characteristics, together with affect-motivational dispositions, lead to and underpin the observable behaviour. Therefore, this study aims to explore one of the affective-motivational dispositions that influences ECE student teachers' language stimulation competencies, namely self-efficacy (Wolstein et al., 2021).

Self-efficacy is an important characteristic of teachers (Holzberger et al., 2013). It acts as cognitive filter that shapes thoughts and classroom behaviour (Keppens et al., 2021). It is defined as an individual's belief in the "ability to organise and execute the courses of action required to produce given performances" (Bandura, 1977, p.3). The most used theoretical framework to describe self-efficacy is Bandura's (1977) socio-cognitive theory (De Coninck et al., 2020). Bandura (1977) argued that cognitive processes mediate change and behaviour. To complete a task or perform a behaviour in the classroom, a teacher needs knowledge, skills, and a sense of confidence (Park et al., 2016). A substantial body of research supports that teachers' self-efficacy beliefs are related to several important teacher behaviours, such as more effective teaching practices, as well as student outcomes, such as student achievement and motivation (De Coninck et al., 2020).

Previous research has shown a relationship between teachers' self-efficacy beliefs and the quality of their classroom learning interactions (Guo et al., 2012; Son & Sung, 2014; Wolstein et al., 2021). For example, teachers with higher levels of self-efficacy are more likely to interact in a sensitive and supportive manner (Guo et al., 2012). However, other studies in the early childhood context do not show a clear relationship between self-efficacy and interaction quality (Guo et al., 2010; Reyhing & Perren, 2023; Spear et al., 2018). It is noteworthy that these studies measured self-efficacy beliefs as a broad construct. For example, Reyhing & Perren (2023) defined it as the extent to which early childhood educators feel able to engage in educational practice, whereas Bandura (2005) wrote: "There is no universal measure of perceived self-efficacy (Bandura, 2005, p. 307). A “one size fits all” approach will not explain or predict performance in the context of language development because a universal test will not be as relevant as a contextualised instrument (Bandura, 2005). To fill this research gap and to gain a clearer understanding of the relationship between self-efficacy and interaction quality, there is a need for an instrument in the context of language interaction in early childhood education (ECE). This paper describes the exploration of self-efficacy and the development of a self-report survey measure of student teachers' self-efficacy beliefs about their language stimulating competences.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
Based on a literature review on language stimulating teacher competences, 20 items were developed (Bandura, 2005; Justice et al., 2018; Peleman et al., 2020), organised into three categories: providing language input, providing opportunities for language production, and providing feedback. A survey was conducted at two University Colleges in Flanders. 213 students participated as part of a compulsory course in their teacher education programme through the online platform Qualtrics. These participants were a mix of first year (2%), second year (60%) and third year (38%) students. 95% of them were female, which corresponds with the actual population of ECE teacher educations in Flanders. Cases with missing data were identified and excluded from the analysis. This resulted in a total sample size of 192 participants.

The data from the 192 participants were used to conduct an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to examine the factor structure. To obtain preliminary results, these participants were also used to calculate Cronbach's alpha to determine the internal consistency of the factors (Decuyper et al., 2023) and to report descriptive results.

The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin coefficient of sampling adequacy (Kaiser, 1974) and Bartlett's test of sphericity (Bartlett, 1951) were used to assess the suitability of the data for factor analysis (KMO=0.9 and X2=1349.508, df=190, p<0.001). Both exceeded the required cut-off value. Several statistical criteria were used to determine the number of factors to be retained (O'Connor, 2000): Kaiser's criterion (Kaiser, 1960), Catell's scree test (Cattell, 1966), Horn's parallel analysis (Horn, 1965) and Velicer’s minimum average partial technique (Velicer, 1976). An EFA was then performed in R-studio. Weighted least squares was used with direct oblimin rotation, which allows factors to be correlated and provides estimates of correlations between factors (De Coninck et al., 2020). Factor loadings of the items were examined. Following the recommendations of Stevens (1992), all items with loadings of .40 and less were excluded from further analysis. Factors with strong cross-loadings on other factors (>.25) were also removed.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The four statistical criteria did not agree on the number of factors to be considered: Kaiser's criterion (2 factors, eigenvalues of 6.67 and 1.15), screeplot (2 or 3 factors), Horn's parallel analysis (3 factors), and Velicer’s MAP technique (1 factor). As parallel analysis is the most accurate procedure for factor extraction (Henson & Robertson, 2006), an exploratory factor analysis was conducted on the 20 items, extracting three factors. The EFA revealed that only two items loaded on the third factor, whereas a stable latent variable requires at least three items (Raubenheimer, 2004). A second EFA was conducted using weighted least squares factoring with direct oblimin rotation, which required two factors, with sum of squared loadings (SS) of 5.37 (factor 1) and 1.92 (factor 2). Of the twenty items, two items had a factor loading of less than 0.40 and two items had cross loading of more than 0.25 with the other factor. This resulted in a two-factor structure with 12 items loading on Factor 1 (Cronbach’s alpha= 0.86) and four items loading on Factor 2 (Cronbach’s alpha= 0.67). The data contradict our hypothesized structure of three factors. The first factor consists of 12 items distributed across the three hypothesised theoretical concepts, thus capturing general self-efficacy in the context of language stimulating interactions. The second factor consists of four items such as 'I feel capable of fairly distributing speaking turns in my class' or 'I have at least one-to-one interaction with each preschool child during the school day', which focus on the teacher's self-efficacy in fairly distributing language stimulating opportunities.

Preliminary results show that student teachers score quite high on general self-efficacy in language stimulating interactions (mean=5.08, SD=0.62), which is in line with previous research (Guo et al., 2010), and lower on self-efficacy in fairly distributing language stimulating opportunities (mean=4.51, SD=0.71).


References
Reyhing, Y., & Perren, S. (2023). The Situation Matters! The Effects of Educator Self-Efficacy on Interaction Quality in Child Care. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2022.2161678
Peleman, B., Vandenbroeck, M., & Van Avermaet, P. (2020). Early learning opportunities for children at risk of social exclusion. Opening the black box of preschool practice. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 28(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2020.1707360
Grifenhagen, J. F., & Dickinson, D. K. (2023). Preparing Pre-Service Early Childhood Teachers to Support Child Language Development. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 44(1), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2021.2015491
Justice, L. M., Jiang, H., & Strasser, K. (2018). Linguistic environment of preschool classrooms: What dimensions support children’s language growth? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42(2018), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.09.003
Bradley, B. A., & Reinking, D. (2011). A formative experiment to enhance teacher-child language interactions in a preschool classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 11(3), 362–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798411410802
Wolstein, K., Ehm, J.-H., Peters, S., & Mischo, C. (2021). Preschool teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and interaction quality in the domain of instructional support – do professional vision competencies moderate this relation? European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 29(4), 617–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2021.1941171
Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Shavelson, R. J. (2015). Beyond Dichotomies: Competence Viewed as a Continuum. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 223(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194
Keppens, K., Consuegra, E., De Maeyer, S., & Vanderlinde, R. (2021). Teacher beliefs, self-efficacy and professional vision: Disentangling their relationship in the context of inclusive teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(3), 314–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1881167
Bandura, A. (2005). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Information Age Publishing.
Guo, Y., Piasta, S. B., Justice, L. M., & Kaderavek, J. N. (2010). Relations among preschool teachers’ self-efficacy, classroom quality, and children’s language and literacy gains. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 1094–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.005
Spear, C. F., Piasta, S. B., Yeomans-Maldonado, G., Ottley, J. R., Justice, L. M., & O’Connell, A. A. (2018). Early Childhood General and Special Educators: An Examination of Similarities and Differences in Beliefs, Knowledge, and Practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(3), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117751401
De Coninck, K., Walker, J., Dotger, B., & Vanderlinde, R. (2020). Measuring student teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs about family-teacher communication: Scale construction and validation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, 100820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100820


10. Teacher Education Research
Paper

Translanguaging and Culturally Responsive and Sustaining Education Practices in Pre-Service Teacher Training: an European Challenge

Maria Adelina Ianos1, Cristina Petreñas Caballero1, Clara Sansó Galiay1, Andrea Jardí Ferré2, Dorys Sabando Rojas2, Iona Durà Roumens1

1University of Lleida, Spain; 2University of Barcelona, Spain

Presenting Author: Ianos, Maria Adelina

Guided by its motto "United in diversity," the European Union the European Union actively promotes linguistic and cultural diversity by endorsing and safeguarding minority regional and migrant languages. Underlining the significance of plurilingual and intercultural education for fostering a democratic culture, the Recommendation (CM/Rec(2022)1) emphasizes the need for member states to adapt their policies and practices accordingly.

Reflecting this commitment, the recently enacted Spanish Law of Education (LOMLOE, Real Decreto 217/2022) has incorporated plurilingual competence as one of the key competences that students are expected to develop. At the regional level, it is noteworthy that Catalonia, one of Spain's bilingual Autonomous Communities, has implemented several measures to ensure an inclusive education system. Specifically, the Linguistic Model of the Educational System of Catalonia (Generalitat de Catalunya, 2018) establishes a plurilingual and intercultural educational framework with Catalan as the reference language. Simultaneously, the Inclusion Decree 120/2017 guarantees the presence, participation, and learning of all students, with a particular focus on those belonging to vulnerable groups, such as students of immigrant origin.

These measures are a direct response to the challenges posed by the growing immigrant population, where students of immigrant origin now constitute 17% of the student body in Primary Education and 8% in Secondary Education (IDESCAT, 2023).

However, many teachers do not feel adequately prepared to teach in culturally and linguistically diverse contexts (Acquah & Commins, 2017). OECD reviews on the education of immigrants (2015, 2019) pointed out that teachers in Spain are among those who feel the least prepared to teach in multicultural or multilingual environments. These findings were confirmed by recent studies conducted in Catalonia, where it was observed that the majority of teachers do not consider the native languages of their students as learning resources when managing the classroom (Sáenz et al., forthcoming).

Hence, it is imperative for educators to possess the requisite competencies to excel in their teaching roles within an inclusive and intercultural educational system. Additionally, there is a need to establish conceptual frameworks and pedagogies that align with the identified needs and objectives. Approaches such as culturally responsive teaching (Gay, 2018), culturally sustaining education (Paris, 2012, Alim & Paris, 2017) and translanguaging (García, 2009) can prove instrumental in this regard. These methodologies enable a critical understanding of linguistic and cultural diversity in classrooms, taking into account the varied needs, expectations, and linguistic and cultural backgrounds of all students, including those of immigrant origin. They underscore the idea that cultural and linguistic diversity is an opportunity to enhance the learning processes, thereby contributing inherently to an educational environment that cultivates citizens open to diversity and equipped to thrive in a multilingual and intercultural society.

Both approaches, integrated into the framework of initial teacher training, hold the potential to significantly impact three crucial variables aimed at enhancing language quality within the Catalan educational system: multicultural efficacy, teacher ethnocultural empathy, and cultural intelligence.

In this context, the primary objective of this study is to formulate and test a proposal for the training of pre-service primary education and secondary school teachers. This involves incorporating translanguaging practices and culturally responsive-sustaining education to elevate perceived teacher self-efficacy and improve teaching in culturally and linguistically diverse educational settings. The overarching goal is to contribute to the development of an inclusive, high-quality, and intercultural educational system.

Specifically, this study aims to answer the following research questions: (1) To what extent do pre-service teachers exhibit multicultural efficacy, ethnocultural empathy, and intercultural intelligence? (2) What effects does a training intervention on translanguaging and culturally responsive-sustaining education have on pre-service teachers' professional development?


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
A quasi-experimental mixed-design study will be conducted to analyse the effects of implementing the proposed training for pre-service teachers. By combining quantitative and qualitative data and listening to different perspectives, the aim is to capture a comprehensive picture of how translanguaging and culturally responsive-sustaining education can address the needs of a linguistically and culturally diverse educational system.  

Participants
A total of approximately 50- 60 pre-service teachers enrolled in the Primary Education Degree at a Catalan university participate in the first phase of the project.  

Instruments
The participants will answer a questionnaire in online format that assesses the following variables:
Ethnocultural Empathy: Defined as "empathy directed toward people from racial and ethnic cultural groups who are different from one’s own ethnocultural group" (Wang et al., 2003, p. 221), it will be measured using the Scale of Ethnocultural Empathy (Wang et al., 2003), comprising 31 Likert items of 6 points.
Multicultural Efficacy: This will be measured using the Multicultural Efficacy Scale (Guyton & Wesche, 2005), including three dimensions: attitudes towards diversity in education (7 items), experience with diversity (7 items), and multicultural self-efficacy (21 items).
Cultural Intelligence: Assessed through the Cultural Intelligence Scale (CQS, Ang et al., 2007, Van Dyne et al., 2015), consisting of four factors: metacognitive CQ (4 items), cognitive CQ (6 items), motivational CQ (5 items), and behavioural (5 items).
Additionally, semi-structured interviews will be conducted using the critical incidents technique (Bilbao & Monereo, 2011).

Data analysis
For the analysis of quantitative data, the statistical package SPSS v. 29 will be employed. This software allows the execution of descriptive statistical techniques, correlational techniques, group comparison tests. For the analysis of qualitative data, a content analysis by categories will be carried out using the N-VIVO 12 software.

Procedure
The research procedure adhered to rigorous ethical standards and received all necessary approvals from the ethical committee before initiation. Participants in the study were required to complete a questionnaire both before and after a comprehensive training intervention. Two groups were created: one group participated in the intervention, while another group followed the usual curriculum. This training intervention spanned one semester and consisted of two modules. The first module emphasized theoretical and conceptual learning, integrating practical applications. The second module concentrated on modelling translanguaging and culturally responsive-sustaining education. Instructors modified their syllabus to embrace linguistic and cultural diversity, ensuring it was reflected in the instructional content.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The anticipated outcomes include the results of a mixed-design ANOVA analysis, expected to be available in the coming months. This statistical analysis aims to assess the impact of the training intervention on participants' scores related to ethnocultural empathy, multicultural efficacy, and cultural intelligence. The analysis will provide insights into whether there is a statistically significant improvement in these scores following the training. Additionally, it will explore potential differences between the group that actively participated in the intervention and the group that did not. The findings from this analysis will offer valuable insights into the effectiveness of the training program in enhancing participants' attitudes and competencies in these critical domains.

The results from the interviews, also expected in the coming months, will furnish qualitative insights into how pre-service teachers have comprehended and implemented translanguaging and culturally responsive-sustaining education in their teaching practices.

Understanding the perspectives and reflections of pre-service teachers will contribute to a richer interpretation of the overall project outcomes and inform potential areas for further development or refinement of the training program.

The anticipated outcomes of this regional study hold broader implications for educational contexts beyond the immediate region. By contrasting and complementing studies on translanguaging in other European contexts, such as the Basque Country and the Netherlands (Duarte, Dekker), this study contributes to a nuanced understanding of the transferability and adaptability of pedagogical strategies. The cross-regional comparisons will enable us to identify commonalities and differences in the implementation and effectiveness of translanguaging and culturally responsive-sustaining education. Consequently, our findings can inform educators, policymakers, and researchers across Europe, providing a foundation for evidence-based practices that align with the linguistic and cultural diversity inherent in European classrooms.

References
Acquah, E., y Commins, N. (2017). Methods that matter in addressing cultural diversity with teacher candidates. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(5), 501-518.

Alim, H. S., & Paris, D. (2017). What is culturally sustaining pedagogy and why does it matter. Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world, 1, 24.

Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K. Y., Templer, K. J., Tay, C., & Chandrasekar, N. A. (2007). Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation and task performance. Management and organization review, 3(3), 335-371.

Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2017). Minority languages and sustainable translanguaging: Threat or opportunity?. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38(10), 901-912.

Duarte, J. (2019). Translanguaging in mainstream education: a sociocultural approach. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1231774

García, O. (2009). Education, multlingualism and translanguaging in the 21st century. In T. Skutnabb-Kangas, R. Phillipson, A. K. Mohanty, & M. Panda (Eds.), Social justice through multilingual education (pp. 140–158). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching. Theory, research, and practice. (3a ed.) Teachers College Press.

Generalitat de Catalunya. (2018). El model lingüístic del sistema educatiu de Catalunya. https://educacio.gencat.cat/web/.content/home/departament/publicacions/monografies/model-linguistic/model-linguistic-Catalunya-CAT.pdf

Guyton, E. M., & Wesche, M. V. (2005). The multicultural efficacy scale: Development, item selection, and reliability. Multicultural Perspectives, 7(4), 21-29.

Instituto de Estadística de Cataluña [IDESCAT]. (2023). Educación primaria. Unidades escolares y alumnos. Por titularidad del centro y sexo. Comarcas y Aran, ámbitos y provincias. https://www.idescat.cat/pub/?id=aec&n=737&lang=es

OECD (2015), Immigrant Students at School: Easing the Journey towards Integration, OECD Reviews of Migrant Education, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264249509-en.

OECD (2019), The Road to Integration: Education and Migration, OECD Reviews of Migrant Education, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d8ceec5d-en.

Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational researcher, 41(3), 93-97.

Sáenz, I., Petreñas, C., Lapresta, C. & Janés, J. (forthcoming). “They speak Arabic to make teacher angry”: high-school teachers’ (de)legitimization of heritage language in Catalonia.  

Van Dyne, L., Ang, S., & Koh, C. (2015). Development and validation of the CQS: The cultural intelligence scale. In Handbook of cultural intelligence (pp. 34-56). Routledge.

Wang, Y. W., Davidson, M. M., Yakushko, O. F., Savoy, H. B., Tan, J. A., i Bleier, J. K. (2003). The scale of ethnocultural empathy: development, validation, and reliability. Journal of counseling psychology, 50(2), 221.


10. Teacher Education Research
Paper

Exploring Pedagogical Beliefs in Language Development: A Factor Analysis in the Early Childhood Education Context

Lien Dorme, Thibaut Duthois, Ruben Vanderlinde

Ghent University, Belgium

Presenting Author: Dorme, Lien

High-quality language interactions during preschool age play a crucial role in supporting children's language development in early childhood education (ECE) (European Commission, 2018), and in particular for at-risk children (Sammons et al., 2015). Therefore, enhancing teachers' Language Stimulating (LS) competencies is a significant focus for both pre- and in-service preschool teachers. These competencies are integral to the professional identity of preschool teachers and are central in teacher education curricula. An important element in teachers’ competencies, along with knowledge, classroom behaviour and motivational aspects, is teachers’ pedagogical beliefs (Wieduwilt et al., 2023).

Teachers’ beliefs are described by Pajares (1992, p. 325) as “a filter through which new phenomena are interpreted”, shaping how teachers interpret situations, influencing their perceptions of the classroom context and subsequent behaviour (Degotardi & Gill, 2017; Pajares, 1992). Research commonly categorizes beliefs into teacher-centred and child-centred beliefs (Stipek & Byler, 1997; Wieduwilt et al., 2021). Child-centred pedagogical beliefs emphasize fostering children's autonomy and active exploration, while teacher-centred beliefs involve a more directive approach with the teacher leading in structuring children's learning. In the child-centred approach, language learning is closely tied to children's free play, with the teacher playing a responsive role (Weikart, 2000). The key distinction between both approaches lies in the degree of child engagement, with child-centred pedagogy aligning closely with constructivist approaches, and teacher-centred pedagogical beliefs with transmissive approaches (Lui & Bonner, 2016).

Pianta and colleagues (2005) suggest that child-centred beliefs are associated with higher interaction and instruction quality, and a more positive emotional climate in teacher-child interactions compared to teacher-centred beliefs (Wieduwilt et al., 2021). Furthermore, child-directed interaction, as emphasized in sociocultural research as creating shared experiences between children and teachers, is considered crucial for language development (Peleman et al., 2020; Rowe & Snow, 2020). However, while child-centred beliefs are believed to be essential for a language-stimulating environment, the literature lacks consistency on this matter, requiring more research on the specific relation between teachers' pedagogical beliefs and various quality facets (Wieduwilt et al., 2023). For example, Justice and colleagues (2018) highlight the importance of overall classroom quality, including factors like teacher-child ratio and instructional support, for children's language development in early childhood education, alongside linguistic responsivity and quality of teacher talk. It is therefore hypothesized that a certain level of teacher-centred beliefs – in combination to the child-centred beliefs, is necessary, where a teacher structures the classroom activities in such a way that many child-directed, language stimulating interactions can be realized.

Wieduwilt et al. (2021) stress the need for more empirical data on pedagogical beliefs, particularly in the context of language-related beliefs. To our knowledge, there is currently no questionnaire to capture these beliefs on stimulating language interactions in ECE. Therefore, the primary goal of this paper is to develop an instrument for capturing content-specific pedagogical beliefs on language-stimulating interaction in the ECE context. Additionally, the aim is explore the underlying structures of ECE teachers' pedagogical beliefs regarding language-stimulating interaction, assuming a twofold categorization. The final aim of this paper is to present preliminary results on the pedagogical beliefs of ECE student teachers in Flanders.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
The pedagogical beliefs scale from Wieduwilt and colleagues (2023) served as the foundation for constructing a new scale to measure beliefs on stimulating language interactions in ECE. Several items were retained and translated, and items from this scale that were not applicable for a broad, international ECE context (e.g., items about additional language programs) were omitted. Additionally, the Beliefs about Primary Education scale (BPES) from Hermans and colleagues (2008) was used to help construct new items. This process resulted in a new scale comprising 18 items on a five-point Likert scale. Additionally, experts on the topic of language in preschool education reviewed the items, and think-aloud procedures with four preschool teachers were performed to assess content validity and identify ambiguities in item wording.
The online platform Qualtrics was used to conduct a web-survey at two university colleges in Flanders, yielding 213 respondents. After identifying and excluding missing data, the final sample size comprised 190 participants. The participants represented a mix of first (2%), second (60%), and third year (38%) students from two teacher education programs for early childhood education. A significant majority were female (95%), aligning with the actual population in the teacher training. In terms of teaching experience, 57% had more than two weeks of active teaching experience, 39% had active teaching experience shorter than two weeks, and the remaining 4% had no active teaching experience in preschool.
An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was employed to examine the factor structure within the items. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin coefficient of sampling adequacy (KMO=0.9) and Bartlett's test of sphericity (X2=1349.508, df=153, p<0.001) indicated the suitability of the data for factor analysis, surpassing required cut-off values. Kraiser's criterion, Catell's scree test, Horn's parallel analysis, and Velicer's minimum average partial technique were utilized to determine the number of factors. The EFA, conducted in R-studio, employed weighted least squares with direct oblimin rotation, allowing for correlated factors and providing estimates of correlations between factors (De Coninck et al., 2020). Factor loadings of the items were examined, and items with loadings of .40 and below were excluded from further analysis (Stevens, 1992). Factors with strong cross-loadings on other factors (>.25) were also removed.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
Kaiser’s criterion, the screeplot, Horn’s parallel analysis, and Velicer's minimum average partial technique consistently favoured a two-factor structure in the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of 18 items on language-related pedagogical beliefs in Flemish Early Childhood Education (ECE). The EFA resulted in two factors with sum of squared loadings of 1.80 (factor 1) and 1.79 (factor 2). Ten items were excluded due to low factor loadings (<.40).
The data revealed a clear distinction between teacher-centred and child-centred beliefs. Four items loaded on the first factor, capturing teacher-centred pedagogical beliefs in language development (e.g.: “In a language learning moment, it is important that a preschool teacher does not deviate from the planned activity.”). On the second factor, four items loaded, capturing child-centred pedagogical beliefs in language development (e.g. “Language learning moments work best when they respond spontaneously to what preschoolers bring up verbally or non-verbally”). Internal consistency was acceptable for both factors (child-centred: α = 0.64; teacher-centred: α =0.61). While the Cronbach's alpha revealed a moderate internal consistency, the scale's development still holds major instrumental value for measuring language-related pedagogical beliefs in ECE internationally.
Participants generally favoured child-centred (M = 4.00, SD = 0.50) over teacher-centred beliefs (M = 2.10, SD = 0.60), indicating a preference for approaches that prioritize children's autonomy and active learning. Furthermore, a weak, significant negative correlation (Pearson’s correlation coefficient: -0,16, p = 0.03) was found, suggesting a tendency for participants to lean towards one approach.
In conclusion, an instrument for capturing content-specific pedagogical beliefs on language stimulating interactions in ECE was developed. Secondly, underlying structures of ECE teachers’ pedagogical beliefs about language stimulating interactions were investigated, confirming a twofold structure. Finally, preliminary results of the current pedagogical beliefs of ECE student teachers in Flanders were reported, showing a preference for child-centred approaches.

References
De Coninck, K., Walker, J., Dotger, B., & Vanderlinde, R. (2020). Measuring student teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs about family-teacher communication: Scale construction and validation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, 100820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100820
Degotardi, S., & Gill, A. (2017). Infant educators’ beliefs about infant language development in long day care settings. Early Years, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2017.1347607
European Commission. (2018). Proposal for a council recommendation on  high quality early childhood education and care systems.
Hermans, R., Van Braak, J., & Van Keer, H. (2008). Development of the Beliefs about Primary Education Scale: Distinguishing a developmental and transmissive dimension. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.007
Justice, L. M., Jiang, H., & Strasser, K. (2018). Linguistic environment of preschool classrooms: What dimensions support children’s language growth? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42, 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.09.003
Lui, A. M., & Bonner, S. M. (2016). Preservice and inservice teachers’ knowledge, beliefs, and instructional planning in primary school mathematics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.015
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy Construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
Peleman, B., Vandenbroeck, M., & Van Avermaet, P. (2020). Early learning opportunities for children at risk of social exclusion. Opening the black box of preschool practice. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 28(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2020.1707360
Rowe, M. L., & Snow, C. E. (2020). Analyzing input quality along three dimensions: Interactive, linguistic, and conceptual. Journal of Child Language, 47(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000919000655
Sammons, P., Toth, K., Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Siraj, I., & Taggart, B. (2015). The long-term role of the home learning environment in shaping students’ academic attainment in secondary school. Journal of Children’s Services, 10(3), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCS-02-2015-0007
Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (2. ed). Erlbaum.
Stipek, D. J., & Byler, P. (1997). Early childhood education teachers: Do they practice what they preach? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12(3), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(97)90005-3
Weikart, D. P. (2000). Early childhood education: Need and opportunity. UNESCO: International Institute for Educational Planning.
Wieduwilt, N., Lehrl, S., & Anders, Y. (2021). Preschool teachers’ pedagogical beliefs in the field of language education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103296
Wieduwilt, N., Lehrl, S., & Anders, Y. (2023). Preschool teachers’ language-related pedagogical beliefs and their relation to observed classroom quality. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 62, 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.08.001


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: ECER 2024
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.153+TC
© 2001–2025 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany