Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 10th May 2025, 01:33:40 EEST

 
 
Session Overview
Session
21 SES 04 A: Paper Session 3
Time:
Wednesday, 28/Aug/2024:
9:30 - 11:00

Session Chair: Mej Hilbold
Location: Room 011 in ΧΩΔ 02 (Common Teaching Facilities [CTF02]) [Ground Floor]

Cap: 56

Paper Session

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
21. Education and Psychoanalysis
Paper

Increasing Awareness Through Feedback and Self-disclosure - a Psychoanalytic Approach to TA Training in ECL Context

Martha Anderson, Hanne Charlotte Helgesen

NTNU, Norway

Presenting Author: Anderson, Martha; Helgesen, Hanne Charlotte

The use of experiential collaborative learning (ECL) activities is growing in higher education (HE) across Europe. Not least as a response to the need of transdisciplinary approaches to solving complex societal and environmental problems. The university-wide compulsory course “Experts in Teamwork” (EiT) at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), constitutes one example which has inspired other HE institutions (e.g. Nordplus, 2022 and ENHANCE, 2023). In EiT master level students work in project teams to increase their collaborative skills. They are expected to reflect on and develop their group process alongside the project work. Learning assistants (LA) support the students through group facilitation and receive support themselves from teaching assistants (TA) with training aimed at enhancing their interpersonal awareness. The focus of this paper is on how TAs experience increased intra- and intersubjective awareness as helpful when supporting the LAs.

In experiential collaborative learning contexts where students are expected to pay attention to interpersonal relations within a team, their thoughts, emotions, actions and reflections make up the source of mutual learning in the team (Kolb, 2014; Veine et al., 2020). From a psychoanalytic perspective, French (1997) argues that learning situations provoke anxiety by fundamentally exposing the learner to her own and others’ evaluations, and that this exposure anxiety may intensify in an experiential collaborative learning context. Students in such learning contexts will likely need support to be able to mitigate the possibly inhibiting effects anxiety has on learning (French, 1997; Schein, 1993).

One way of supporting groups’ learning, is through facilitation (Hogan, 2002). A facilitator may act as a container for a group’s anxiety, without stripping them of their autonomy (McClure, 2005). Literature on facilitation emphasizes the need for facilitators to have knowledge of their own emotions and defenses to better understand the behaviors and emotions of others (Andreasen et al., 2020; Hogan, 2005). We assume that the same self-understanding is of significance when facilitating in an experiential collaborative learning context. This perspective is, however, lacking in literature on experiential learning in HE.

In the case of EiT, some LAs experience that they are not sufficiently prepared for all aspects of their job, despite having received practical training in group facilitation (Veine et al., 2023). Their uncertainty may activate unconscious thoughts, feelings, and action patterns, making it hard for the TAs to relate to, and understand, the different ways LAs act and react as group facilitators. This challenge makes it relevant for the TAs to be more aware of unconscious responses.

Included in the TA training in EiT is a 3 full-day self-reflection seminar designed to increase the TAs’ awareness of self and others as well as build psychological safety among the TAs. We will present narratives based on the TAs’ understanding of the relevance of the self-reflection seminar to their task of supporting the LAs in EiT. Through thematic narrative analysis we explore their stories about the outcome of their training by asking:

  • In what ways, if any, do the TAs experience the self-reflection seminar as contributing to a) enhanced understanding and awareness of themselves; b) increased awareness about their relations to others; and c) their capacity to fulfill their TA tasks?

This study contributes new knowledge on how TAs benefit from training aimed at increasing their understanding of themselves and others. This broadens the understanding of students as teachers, investigating the significance of exploring personal stories in an ECL context. Our study is a starting point for more research on the value of intra- and intersubjective awareness in the context of experiential collaborative learning.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
The approach of the self-reflection seminar rests on Johari’s Window model of interpersonal relations (Luft & Ingham, 1961), which states that feedback and disclosure are prerequisites for the development of self-understanding and interpersonal growth. The aim of the seminar is that the 14 TAs gain a deeper understanding of how their past experiences color how they are seen and perceived by the others in the TA team. Through each TA sharing some hidden or unknown (Luft & Ingham, 1961) information about themselves, they build trusting relationships as a team, and increase their understanding of themselves and others, to better serve and support others in their interpersonal training.
The seminar revolves around two main activities: feedback and personal disclosure, both presented and facilitated by two seminar leaders. Each TA receives feedback from the rest of the group, and is subsequently invited to expand on the feedback, through sharing their own understanding of why they act and behave the way they do related to their personal history and significant life experiences. The rest of the group listens and may ask questions to deepen their understanding of the other.

In March 2022 we explored 10 TAs’ experience of the outcome of the self-reflection seminar by using qualitative interviews. The informants belonged to two different informant groups, one consisting of 5 current TAs and the other of 5 former TAs having finished their studies and currently working. The interviews were conducted individually following a semi-structured guide. During the interviews, we emphasized on eliciting concrete descriptions of the situations they had experienced. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using thematic narrative analysis, thereby searching for common themes within and across interviews (Riessman, 2008). We did a preliminary analysis of some of the interviews, on which we based a conference paper for Its 21 in June 2022 in Trondheim (Anderson & Helgesen, 2022). However, our current paper represents a fresh investigation into the material, and a more informed choice of using the method narrative analysis. In narrative analysis, heuristic questions support and deepen the analysis and generation of themes (Monforte & Smith, 2023). Our analysis will be informed by psychoanalytical perspectives in a group context. We will present our results of this analysis at the ECER conference, however, we share some of our preliminary results from our prior analysis in the next section, as we expect similar themes to become relevant in our current work.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The use of TAs in higher education has increased over the years. This undertaking has been supported by its resource effectiveness and the acknowledged benefits of utilizing peer tutoring (Topping, 1996). Several studies underscore the effects of different training modules for TAs to qualify them for the task, and the effects of using TAs on student learning. In our study we explore the significance a specific training module had for the TAs. In our preliminary analysis in 2022, we saw that all 10 informants described getting significant outcome when it comes to discovering new aspects of oneself and others in a group context. For many, this was their first experience of personal disclosure within a group, and they mentioned the significance of feeling seen and accepted by the other TAs present. Especially if they disclosed challenging personal histories or aspects of themselves which they did not normally share. All the informants reported either having discovered something new or having gained a deeper understanding of themselves. Most of the informants concluded that disclosing personal histories in the seminar was challenging but rewarding, especially for the development of a trusting and safe team environment. This fostered open communication which supported the TAs in performing their tasks.
Our current study presents a novel exploration of how TAs experience training aimed to prepare them for diverse human responses that experiential collaborative learning may provoke. Looking at the material through a psychoanalytic lens, we expect to develop themes informed by the subconscious intra- and interpersonal processes that come into play in a group. Although more often elaborated on in the field of organizational psychology (Svedberg, 2002; Visholm, 2021), the psychoanalytic perspective is also highly relevant for analyzing group-processes in education (Visholm, 2018), and when using experiential collaborative learning (ECL) activities in teams.

References
Anderson M. & Helgesen H. C. (2022). The value of feedback and exploring personal
histories in the training of teaching assistants. Critical perspectives and the way forward: 6th Its21 conference: Interdisciplinary Teamwork Skills for the 21st Century https://www.ntnu.edu/its21/parallel-sessions#s6c
Andreasen, J. K., Andreasen, E. M., & Kovac, V. B. (2020). Emosjonell kompetanse i
gruppeveiledning.
ENHANCE. (2023). NTNU and the internationalisation of “Experts in Teamwork” through
the ENHANCE Alliance. https://enhanceuniversity.eu/ntnu-and-the-internationalisation-of-experts-in-teamwork-through-the-enhance-alliance/
French, R. B. (1997). The teacher as container of anxiety: Psychoanalysis and the role of
teacher. Journal of management education, 21(4), 483–495.
Hogan, C. (2005). Understanding Facilitation: Theory and Principles. Kogan Page.
https://books.google.no/books?id=Ps8aUsgOmloC
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.
Luft, J., & Ingham, H. (1961). The Johari window. Human relations training news, 5(1), 6–7.
McClure, B. A. (2005). Putting A New Spin on Groups: The Science of Chaos. Taylor &
Francis. https://books.google.no/books?id=ISN5AgAAQBAJ
Monforte, J., & Smith, B. (2023). Narrative analysis. In H. Cooper, M. N. Coutanche, L. M.
McMullen, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (2nd ed., pp. 109–129). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000319-006
Nordplus. (2022). The Nordic Experts in Teams Network.
https://nordicexpertsinteamsnetwork.org/
Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage.
Schein, E. H. (1993). How organisations learn faster the challenges of the green room? Sloan
Management Review, Winter, 82–95.
Svedberg, L. (2002). Gruppepsykologi: om grupper, organisasjoner og ledelse. Abstrakt
Forlag. https://books.google.no/books?id=WiUvNAAACAAJ
Topping, K. J. (1996). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A
typology and review of the literature. Higher education, 32(3), 321–345.
Veine, S., Anderson, M. K., Andersen, N. H., Espenes, T. C., Søyland, T. B., Wallin, P., &
Reams, J. (2020). Reflection as a core student learning activity in higher education-Insights from nearly two decades of academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 25(2), 147–161.
Veine, S., Anderson, M. K., Skancke, L. B., & Wallin, P. (2023). Educating Learning
Assistants as Facilitators: Design Challenges and Experiences of Practice. Journal of Experiential Education, 46(4), 491–512.
Visholm, S. (2021). Family Psychodynamics in Organizational Contexts: The Hidden Forces
That Shape the Workplace. Routledge. https://books.google.no/books?id=ObM7zgEACAAJ


21. Education and Psychoanalysis
Paper

Facilitating the Transformation of Uncertainty and Vulnerability Into Hope and Resilience: Applying a Narrative-Hermeneutical-Developmental Pedagogy from a Psychoanalytical Perspective

Edward Wright

Institute for Education, Malta

Presenting Author: Wright, Edward

This research study aims to investigate how the adolescent search for meaning in their lives can be facilitated through a narrative-hermeneutical-developmental pedagogical approach applied to humanistic subjects like Personal, Social and Career Development (PSCD), Media Literacy Education (MLE), and Religious Education (RE). In turn, such a search for meaning can potentially reduce significantly the uncertainty of adolescents into hope, and transform their vulnerability into strength and resilience that transpire from a sense of wellbeing, including spiritual wellbeing.

The narrative-hermeneutical approach to teaching and learning, that is being explored, seeks to nurture the re-configuration and re-imagination of life experiences, shared in a classroom context. The research is embedded in professional and pedagogical practice, employing a multimodal ethnographic approach that transpires from a hermeneutical ontology and epistemology. Moreover, it utilises individual experiences within various socio-cultural contexts that are offered by digital multimodality in both the final students’ productions and the process leading to them. Through its emphasis on the application of multimodality to students’ tasks and digital productions/artefacts created, the ethnographic approach taken makes the collection of rich data from a variety of sources and techniques possible: workshop seminars, focus groups, semi-structured in-depth interviews, and the student participants’ multimodal productions.

The research questions that this study will explore are the following:

  • How can uncertainty and vulnerability during adolescence be transformed into a sense of hope and a source of strength and resilience, respectively, through educational spaces that provide opportunities for meaning-making?
  • How can such a transformation occur through a narrative-hermeneutical-developmental approach to pedagogy that is facilitated by creative digital technologies?

The theoretical framework of this study will be inspired simulataneously by Paul Ricoeur's narrative-hermeneutical philosophical framework, Robert Kegan's model of adolescent development, and Charles Taylor's understanding of morality in education.

As this research study strives to achieve such aims and address such questions, it will also seek to explore cross-curricular initiatives that create educational spaces for various subjects to come together and address some of their learning outcomes more effectively. The results of this study can also, potentially, enlighten educators on how to make assessment for, of and as learning, more meaningful and conducive to deep critical reflection and self-reflexivity.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
This will be a qualitative research study conducted through an approach that combines multimodal ethnography as the main method of data collection, and consensual qualitative research (CQR) and Paul Ricoeur's method of interpretation as the instruments for data analysis and interpretation.

The multimodal ethnographic approach will include day workshops for students with their teachers during which they will work on tasks that address learning outcomes in the syllabi of three humanistic subjects in the curriculum, namely Media Literacy Education, Religious Education, and Personal, Social and Career Development. For these tasks the students would also be utilizing creative digital technologies to help them represent their life experiences that they would be required to reflect upon, reinterpret and reconfigure, while sharing with fellow students. The students will be then asked to produce a short multimodal production that combines their various tasks, over a few weeks, and that conveys their reflection on life experiences related to the syllabi learning outcomes. They will have an opportunity to share these multimodal productions in a separate day seminar. Three schools will be selected conveniently and purposefully for this research study. All the students in one specific secondary year will be invited to participate freely and willingly. Semi-structured in-depth interviews will also be conducted with 12 students, four from each school.

The analysis and interpretation of the data will be done using Paul Ricoeur's method of interpretation, and this will be applied in the spirit of CQR. The latter will bring together the participant educators with myself as the researcher, so that together we could code, analyze and interpret the data, and organize it in structured themes. NVivo will also be used to facilitate the data analysis.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
This research study will be expected to explore how a narrative-hermeneutical-developmental approach to humanities education, facilitated by creative digital technologies, can promote and nurture adolescent meaning making through a:

a. a pedagogy of authenticity, agency, empathy and compassion
b. a pedagogy facilitated by metaphor
c. a pedagogy facilitated by creative media technologies
d. a pedagogy of resilience, vulnerability and hope.

The findings will also be expected to enlighten educators, especially of the humanistic subjects mentioned, on how to make their assessment for, of and as learning, more student-friendly, and conducive to the adolescents' search for meaning, through reflection. This can potentially reduce their uncertainty significantly, and transform their vulnerability as a source of resilience and hope, especially when the students' works are shared and reflected upon in communities of learning.

References
Edwards, S. 2021. Digital play and technical code: What new knowledge
formations are possible? Learning, Media and Technology. Accessed at:
https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.1890612

Ferrer-Wreder, L. and Kroger, J. 2020. Identity in Adolescence: The Balance
Between Self and Other. Taylor and Francis. Fourth Edition. Kindle Edition.

Hess, M.E. 2020. Finding a Way into Empathy through Story Exercises in a
Religious Studies Classroom. In Tinklenberg, J.L. (Ed.), Spotlight on Teaching,
29-39. American Academy of Religion.

Hess, M.E. 2015. “Gameful learning and theological understanding: New
cultures of learning in communities of faith,” a presentation given to the
THEOCOM conference at Santa Clara University.

Kim, S. and Esquivel, G.B. 2011. Adolescent Spirituality and Resilience:
Theory, Research, and Educational Practices. Psychology in the Schools 48
(7), 755-765. DOI: 10.1002/pits.20582.

King, P.E. 2020. Developmental Perspectives on Spiritual and Religious
Development. Presentation delivered at the 2020 Biennial Meeting of the
Society for Research on Adolescence, March 19-20, San Diego, California.

King, L. A., Hicks, J. A., Krull, J. L. and Del Gaiso, A. K. 2006. Positive affect
and the experience of meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology 90, 179–196.

King, L. A. and Ilicks, J. A. 2009. Detecting and constructing meaning in life
events. The Journal of Positive Psychology 4, 317–330. doi:
10.1080/17439760902992316

King, P.E. and Roeser, R. W. 2009. Religion and spirituality in adolescent
development. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent
psychology: Individual bases of adolescent development, 435–478. John Wiley
& Sons Inc. Accessed at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy001014

Kress, G. 2010. Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary
communication. London, England: Routledge. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4324/978020397 0034.
Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual
Design. London/ New York: Routledge.
Kroger, J. 2015. Identity development through adulthood: The move toward
“wholeness.” In K.C. McLean and M. Syed (Eds). The Oxford handbook of
identity development, 65-80. New York: Oxford University Press.

Krok, D. 2018. When is Meaning in Life Most Beneficial to Young People?
Styles of Meaning in Life and Well-Being Among Late Adolescents. Journal of
Adult Development 25, 96–106. Accessed at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-
017-9280-y.

Krueger R.A. 1995. The future of focus groups. Qualitative Health Research 5
(4), 524– 530.

Lunde-Whitler, J.H. 2015. Paul Ricoeur and Robert Kegan in Unlikely Dialogue:
Towards a Narrative-Developmental Approach to Human Identity and its Value
for Christian Religious Education. International Journal of Philosophy and
Theology 19 (2), 292-316


21. Education and Psychoanalysis
Paper

Intentionality and Uncertainty. Theoretical Austrian Approaches to Psycho-Synthesis and Psycho-Analysis

Christian Wiesner, Kerstin Zechner

University College of Teacher Education, Baden in Lower Austria, Austria

Presenting Author: Wiesner, Christian; Zechner, Kerstin

The Paper highlights the connection between Sigmund Freud and Franz Brentano, emphasizing Brentano's epistemological influence on Freud (Barclay, 1971; Jones, 1960; Schwediauer, 2005). This connection introduced Freud to empirical and analytical phenomenalism, which led to his early acknowledgment, as early as 1898, of phenomena existing 'beyond consciousness' (Freud, 1950). This concept is one of Freud's oldest theoretical foundations, describing the 'psychologically alive' as a dynamic event and a 'play of forces'. In Freud's ideas, one can find Brentano's theory of intentionality (Brentano, 1924), which also appears in the phenomenology of Edmund Husserl – a student of Brentano – as well as in the works of Alfred Adler and Viktor Frankl, a student of Adler (Frankl, 1938). Notably, Brentano's concept of intentionality is also present in Karl Bühler's theory of signs (Bühler, 1927), who critically and constructively engaged with Freud's theories. The article aims to elucidate these connections on the foundation of intentionality, including its application in semiotics, and explore the phenomenon of uncertainty, demonstrating its impact on various theories regarding unpredictability and unforeseeability through theoretical considerations.

Intentionality is the basis of a theory of psychic relations, particularly characterized by entanglements and conflicts, as evidenced in the theoretical approaches of Freud, Adler, Frankl, Husserl, and Bühler. Freud's concept of psychic phenomena and the methodology in research align closely with the methodologies proposed by his teacher Brentano (Barclay, 1959; Gay, 1989). Freud himself stated, "the true beginning of scientific activity consists rather in describing phenomena and then in proceeding to group, classify and correlate them" (Freud, 1915, p. 117), a method typical of Brentano's understanding of science.

Brentano's influence extends beyond phenomenology to Gestalt theory, providing insights into phenomena 'beyond consciousness' through uncertainties in perception, according to Bühler (1927). Brentano's approach is particularly noted for highlighting the phenomenon of 'intentionality' (Brentano, 1874, p. 306), encompassing actions like 'I am uncertain' and 'my uncertainty'. As Charlotte Bühler (1971, p. 380) notes, "Intentionality implies both a person's focusing on a subject [object] which means or signifies something to him as well as a person's directing himself toward this subject [object]". Brentano believed that for any meaningful guidance, it is essential to focus on those situations and experiences. Intentionality involves an emergence, a connection, and a fading away in real experiences grounded in imaginations and concepts, judgments, and emotional phenomena such as acts of will, sensations, and feelings. The article will explore the origins of intentionality and attempt to demonstrate its significance for various theories and their conception of Uncertainty.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
The article employs the phenomenological method, emphasizing 'Einlegungen,' which refers to the original ideas, primal foundations, and underpinnings of theories and concepts, in order to illustrate their inherent connections. Phenomenology is understood as a "work in progress" (Dammer, 2022, p. 156) and is based on the approach described by Waldenfels (1992, p. 19): "Have the courage to use your own senses [and the signs and symbols derived from them for a theoretical perspective]." This emphasizes that all "mental events do not occur in a vacuum [especially in the context of uncertainty]; they are lived by someone" (Gallagher & Zahavi, 2008, p. 19). Phenomenology is notably "anchored to the careful description, analysis, and interpretation of lived experience" (Thompson, 2007, p. 16) – focusing on "how thinking, perceiving, acting, and feeling are experienced in one's own case." This approach highlights the subjective nature of experience, grounding theoretical concepts in the lived reality of individuals, thereby providing a deeper understanding of the intricate web of human cognition and emotion, particularly in relation to uncertainty.
Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The paper will, based on Brentano's theoretical foundation of intentionality, lay out the various developments in distinctly differentiable theories and discuss the differences from a semiotic perspective (Wiesner et al., 2024). In doing so, it will draw upon the theories of Freud, Adler, Frankl, and Bühler to highlight each theory's unique form of intentionality. A key aspect will be the ability to demonstrate each theory's concept of uncertainty. This elucidation will not occur through the individual object languages of the theories themselves, but rather through their phenomenological and semiotic foundations, which point to the phenomena underlying these theories.
References
Barclay, J. R. (1959). Franz Brentano and Sigmund Freud: A Comparative Study In The Evolution Of Psychological Thought. The University of Michigan, Education, Psychology.
Barclay, J. R. (1971). Foundations of Counseling Strategies. Wiley.
Brentano, F. (1924). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt (Edition 1973). Meiner.
Bühler, C. (1971). Basic theoretical concepts of humanistic psychology. American Psychologist, 26(4), 378–386.
Bühler, K. (1927). Die Krise der Psychologie. Fischer.
Dammer, K.-H. (2022). Theorien in den Bildungswissenschaften: Auf den Spuren von Wahrheit und Erkenntnis: eine kritische Einführung. Verlag Barbara Budrich.
Frankl, V. E. (1938). Zur geistigen Problematik der Psychotherapie (erschienen im Zentralblatt für Psychotherapie und ihre Grenzgeschichte, 10, 1938). In Grundkonzepte der Logotherapie (Edition 2015, S. 59–78). Facultas.
Freud, S. (1915). Instincts and Their Vicissitudes. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Work of Sigmund Freud. Translated from the German under the General Editorship of James Strachey. Volume XIV (1914-1916) (Edition 1957, S. 117–140). Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1950). Briefe 65—153 (1897- 1902). In Aus den Anfängen der Psychoanalyse. Briefe an Wilhelm Fließ, Abhandlungen und Notizen aus den Jahren 1887—1902. Imago.
Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2008). The phenomenological mind: An introduction to philosophy of mind and cognitive science. Routledge.
Gay, P. (1989). Freud: A Life for Our Time. Anchor.
Jones, E. (1960). Das Leben und Werk von Sigmund Freud. Die Entwicklung zur Persönlichkeit und die großen Entdeckungen: 1856-1900 (Edition 2007). Klotz.
Schwediauer, F. (2005). Brentano in Freud. Die biographische und konzeptionell-paradigmatische Bedeutung der deskriptiven Psychologie Brentanos für die Metapsychologie Freuds. In M. Benedikt, R. Knoll, & C. Zehetner (Hrsg.), Verdrängter Humanismus—Verzögerte Aufklärung. Band 5: Philosophie in Österreich 1920—1951: Im Schatten der Totalitarismen. Vom philosophischen Empirismus zur kritischen Anthropologie. (S. 377–399). Turia & Kant.
Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Harvard University Press.
Waldenfels, B. (1992). Einführung in die Phänomenologie. Fink.
Wiesner, C., Zechner, K., Dörfler, S., Karrer, H., & Schrank, B. (2024). Perspectives for unfolding well-being in the context of teacher education: Emerging well-being Insights from Theoretical Austrian Traditions. In B. Martinsone, M. T. Jensen, C. Wiesner, & K. Zechner (Hrsg.), Teachers’ professional wellbeing.  A Digital Game Based Social-Emotional Learning Intervention. Klinkhardt.


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: ECER 2024
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.153+TC
© 2001–2025 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany