Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

 
 
Session Overview
Session
28 SES 09 A: How Can Schooling, Teacher Agency and Inclusion be Reimagined and Operationalised as Hopeful Practices for Plural, Sustainable and Participatory Futures?
Time:
Thursday, 29/Aug/2024:
9:30 - 11:00

Session Chair: Stephen Chatelier
Location: Room 038 in ΘΕE 01 (Faculty of Pure & Applied Sciences [FST01]) [Ground Floor]

Cap: 60

Panel Discussion

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
28. Sociologies of Education
Panel Discussion

How Can Schooling, Teacher Agency and Inclusion be Reimagined and Operationalised as Hopeful Practices for Plural, Sustainable and Participatory Futures?

Elke Van dermijnsbrugge1, Arda Oosterhoff1, José Middendorp1, Terrie-Lynn Thompson2

1NHL Stenden University of, Netherlands, The; 2University of Sterling, Scotland

Presenting Author: Van dermijnsbrugge, Elke; Oosterhoff, Arda; Middendorp, José

This Panel engages the question:

How can schooling, teacher agency and inclusion be reimagined and operationalised as hopeful practices for plural, sustainable and participatory futures?

Within the field of education, there is growing interest in futures discourses. Issues including the future of the planet, the opportunities and fears presented by technological developments in AI, and rising nationalisms have resulted in speculation on the future of education and its role in global society. A recent example is UNESCO’s “Reimagining our futures together: a new social contract for education” report (2021). While education does aim to offer responses to societal crises, as a field it is arguably ‘subsumed under a market logic that prioritizes the development of human capital and economic growth’ (Van dermijnsbrugge & Chatelier, 2022, p.3). As such, its orientation towards the future is too often considered to be a ‘known territory to be mapped and conquered and fought over’ (Facer, 2016, p. 70) resulting in little more than perpetuating a crisis-ridden status quo.

Through this panel, we wish to (re)orient ourselves, together with others, in relation to the field of education and to society more broadly by offering ways of being, thinking and doing that ‘not only help reveal structures and systems of violence, exploitation and domination’ (Haiven & Khasnabish, 2014, p. 85), but also by supporting ‘people’s capacity to imagine and forge paths beyond them’ (Haiven & Khasnabish, 2014, p. 85). To this end, we reimagine the concepts of schooling, teacher agency and inclusion, and the practices that underpin them. Through perspectives centered around plurality, participation and sustainability we wish to create ‘a space where an awareness of difference can lead to new ideas, alliances, solidarities and possibilities’ (Haiven & Khasnabish, 2014, p. 244).

The first project presents a reimagined perspective on schooling via a research study conducted in 2024 with a group of about 40 educators in various roles, with different levels of experience and located in diverse contexts across the globe. They applied utopia as method, a speculative and imaginative practice that goes beyond critical scholarship and requires ontological inquiry and direct action (see Van dermijnsbrugge & Chatelier, 2022), in order to generate a shared imagination of a genuinely alternative future for schooling that is better equipped to respond to society’s most pressing challenges.

The second project focuses on reimagining teacher agency. A recent research project, rooted in Actor-Network-Theory (Latour, 2005), shows how teacher agency is entangled with and often restricted by the agency of things (Oosterhoff et al, 2023). Human agency, decision making and taking action, ‘cannot be realized without an in-depth understanding of education “in its becoming”, as it unfolds and emerges’ as complex more-than-human practices (Gourlay, 2021, p. 165). This study supports educational professionals in gaining insight into the influence of objects in action that shape their profession. Through this insight, they develop a wider sense of response-ability that helps them to critically navigate increasingly complex educational practices.

The third project focuses on inclusive educational practices that are driven by a pedagogy of hope, or, in the words of Webb (2019): pedagogical tact for alternative futures. Ten teacher trainers with leadership roles and expertise in pedagogy participated in a phenomenological study (Middendorp, 2015; Van Manen, 2014) wherein they used the mirror letter as a phenomenological method (Middendorp 2015, 2023) to investigate their experiences with and perspectives on hope in inclusive practices. The mirror letter creates awareness of one's (inclusive) actions and helps to make explicit values of individuals and communities.

This Panel offers opportunities to discuss educational practices, and propose ways of thinking and doing that help offset dominant powers, whilst embracing complexity and uncertainty.


References
Facer, K (2016). Using the future in education: creating space for openness, hope and novelty. In Lees, H.E. & Noddings, N. (Eds.), The Palgrave international handbook of alternative education (pp. 63–78). Palgrave.

Gourlay, L. 2021. Posthumanism and the Digital University: Texts, Bodies and Materialities. Bloomsbury Academic.

Haiven, M. & Khasnabish, A. (2014). The radical imagination. Fernwood Publishing.

Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.

Manen, M. van (2014). Phenomenology of Practice Meaning-Giving Methods. In Phenomenological Research and Writing. Left Coast Press.

Middendorp, J. (2015). Relatie voor leer-kracht Pedagogisch tactvol handelen van leerkrachten in het basisonderwijs. De Weijer Uitgeverij.

Middendorp, J. (2023). Een hoopvolle toekomst. Hoe dan? (Inaugurele rede)
 
Oosterhoff, A., Thompson, T.L., Oenema-Mostert, I., & Minnaert, A. (2023). En/countering the doings of standards in Early Childhood education. Drawing on Actor-Network Theory to trace enactments of and resistances to emerging sociomaterial assemblages. Journal of Education Policy. DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2022.2161639.

UNESCO (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707

Van dermijnsbrugge, E. & Chatelier, S. (2022). Utopia as method: A response to education in crisis? Asia Pacific Journal of Education. DOI: 10.1080/02188791.2022.2031870
Webb, D. (2019). Utopian pedagogy: possibilities and limitations Hope, Utopia and creativity in higher education: pedagogical tactics for alternative futures, by Craig Hammond (book review) Pedagogy, Culture, & Society Volume 27, issue 3, p. 481 484.

Chair
Stephen Chatelier
schatelier@unimelb.edu.au
University of Melbourne, Australia