Conference Agenda

Doctoral experience provides both highs and lows that potentially further contribute to doctoral researcher’s wellbeing. In turn, experienced wellbeing impacts on study progress and odds for degree completion. Hence, it is no surprise that doctoral researcher’s’ wellbeing, particularly mental health issues, have gained prominence as a central concern among doctoral education policy makers, developers, and researchers. Also, effective remedies for mental health issues have been called after. Wellbeing of doctoral researchers is, however, more than the absence of negative symptoms. In fact, positive mental states provide a central resource for doctoral studies. This keynote will focus on addressing both positive and negative attributes of doctoral researcher’s wellbeing and means to promote wellbeing in the doctoral education. I will start with discussing the state of art in research on doctoral researchers’ wellbeing and impacts of wellbeing on doctoral experience. After this I will summarize evidence on effective means for promoting doctoral researcher’s wellbeing in the doctoral education. I will conclude my talk with discussing COVID-19 pandemic influences on doctoral researchers’ wellbeing and progress.

ERC Closing

Inclusive education practices have significantly increased in the last three decades and lately, equity and inclusion initiatives have also been gradually adopted. These have become key elements of educational discourse specifically regarding disability. Furthermore, in the broader social context, disability definitions can no longer be conceptualized as synonymous with impairment. By embracing the social model in the dyslexia case, problems experienced by students with dyslexia in education reflect structural inequalities, functioning as disabling barriers. Hence, identification and removal of these disabling barriers is instrumental to ensure inclusive education and progress for students with dyslexia.

Within the field of dyslexia and reading disabilities research, serious concerns have been raised globally that the traditional IQ-Achievement discrepancy identification model is a “wait-to-fail” approach, which leads to more barriers for students with dyslexia. Several reasons have led to these concerns: a) there have been psychometric limitations for students coming from minorities or low socio-economic backgrounds b) receiving adequate and appropriate instruction before the diagnosis, is not required c) traditional diagnostic testing does not provide information for the needed instruction and most importantly, d) the mean age at which the students are identified as having dyslexia is over 10 years, after they have experienced significant failure in school. Furthermore, previous early research focusing on the identification of children with dyslexia, revealed a significant relationship between time of diagnosis and socio-economic status; that is, the poorer the students the later the diagnosis.

.

An opportunity for us to take a look back at ECER 2024, Nicosia, bid farewell to all ECER 2024 participants, offer our sincere thanks to the local organisers in Nicosia and share a look forward to ECER 2025.