Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th May 2024, 03:03:51am GMT

 
 
Session Overview
Session
10 SES 09 A: Diversity, Social Justice and Pedagogical Interventions
Time:
Thursday, 24/Aug/2023:
9:00am - 10:30am

Session Chair: Giulia Filippi
Location: Rankine Building, 106 LT [Floor 1]

Capacity: 80 persons

Paper Session

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
10. Teacher Education Research
Paper

Teacher Students’ Sense of Preparedness to Teach in Diverse Lower and Upper Secondary Schools in Norway

Vander Tavares

Inland Norway University, Norway

Presenting Author: Tavares, Vander

Institutions of formal education in Europe are characterised by increased cultural and linguistic diversity when it comes to the student population. Considering that such a trend is only expected to grow due to transnationalism and globalisation, teacher education programs must be continuously re-evaluated and redesigned in order to remain relevant and responsive to sociodemographic changes. More specifically, teacher education programs must be able to prepare teacher candidates to work effectively with heterogenous groups of students in ways that support the learning of all students and affirm their identities within growing neoliberal and neoconservative discourses (Alford, 2014). In Norway, classroom composition has also become more diverse, primarily due to a higher number of students of a transnational background, whether through forced or voluntary immigration (Hilt, 2017). Indeed, this and other pressing trends have been identified by the Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research (2018) in a report titled Teacher Education 2015: National Strategy for Quality and Cooperation in Teacher Education that includes key areas for the improvement and development of teacher education in Norway.

This paper explores teacher candidates’ experiences of preparation for the changing nature of the teaching profession that is informed by increased student diversity. The guiding question for this paper is as follows: What are teacher candidates’ perceptions and experiences of the preparation they receive from their Norwegian teacher education programs in relation to teaching in diverse classrooms? To answer this question, this paper draws on a case study with four teacher candidates from a teacher education program at a Norwegian institution of higher education. A conceptual discussion of some of the fundamental tenets of a socially responsive teacher education program will be presented by considering Darling-Hammond’s (2006) conceptual work on teacher education. This includes two main areas: the “what” and the “how” of teacher education.

In the first area, the focus lies in knowledge on the part of (future) teachers that is tied to the improvement of the learning experiences of students. This includes knowledge about learners, how they learn in different contexts, what the curriculum constitutes of in terms of content and expectations, and what teaching skills should be prioritised to teach the content to students of diverse backgrounds, in diverse situations, and with different needs. The second area goes beyond simply the design of a teacher education program in terms of course selection and sequence. Opportunities for teacher candidates to integrate, reflect upon, and apply their knowledge continually and meaningfully in the classroom are of great consequence for how and why teacher candidates become teachers.

This paper will also present a review of the Norwegian context of (teacher) education. Subsequently, the methodological design of the study will be introduced. This paper is concluded with a discussion of the findings and their implications for teacher education programs in Norway and similar contexts.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
This case study is part of a larger project with teacher candidates enrolled specifically in language teacher education programs for the secondary and upper secondary grades (Norwegian: lektorutdanning i språkfag). Following ethics approval by the national research council, participants were recruited through an email invitation. The invitation was distributed to the main student organisation associated with the teacher education program at East School (pseudonym). Four students were invited to participate considering the research aim of understanding experience in-depth and the research design of describing personal experience richly (Frankel & Devers, 2000) in a manner that was also manageable in terms of the volume of data. The students were chosen on the basis of their year of study, thereby presenting an overall distribution of experience across the years constituting teacher education program: from years 1, 2, 4, and 5. All participants were studying to become teachers of English. The small sample and the case study design are not meant to generate generalisable findings.
For three months in 2022, two semi-structured interviews in English were conducted with each participant. Semi-structured interviews were employed to ensure that topics of concern were explored, while simultaneously allowing the conversation to lead to other topics (Richards, 2009). Each interview lasted approximately one hour and consisted of topics related to becoming a teacher (e.g., interests, educational background, representations of the teaching profession) and completing a teacher education program in Norway (e.g., course load and content, expectations, challenges). All interviews were transcribed and read multiple times by the researcher for familiarisation. A process of thematic coding (Braun & Clarke, 2012) was then employed to identify units of meaningful data, which were coded descriptively. The coded data were subsequently grouped thematically within each participant’s transcribed interview, thus helping to create a “profile” for each participant. Themes reflected key topics of previous research literature or emerged organically through the analysis. The analysis was concluded by reviewing themes common across participants’ interviews, or in other words, across all students’ experiences.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
Generally speaking, but to differing degrees, all students reported being satisfied with many aspects of their teacher education program. However, the analysis of interview data pointed to three overarching categories whose findings directly answer the guiding question for this paper. These categories will be reviewed individually in this paper, but are interconnected in relevance. The first category illustrates the students’ overall experiences and perceptions of learning subject content in the teacher education program. The students reported encountering a superficial presentation of course content while not having enough opportunities to engage with it meaningfully and collaboratively. The second section focuses on topics related to the practicum: it demonstrates that students felt unprepared for the practicum by lacking guidance and training in how to connect and identify concepts and situations previously learned in their courses. The final section reveals the need for better intercultural training from a pedagogical perspective. The students reported not knowing how to work with cultural and linguistic diversity and expected more intercultural training from their program.

This paper contributes to the ongoing research and discussion revolving around teacher education programs in a time of increased diversity. It is of particular relevance to institutions facing challenges in how to better prepare and retain teacher candidates in programs of teacher education in Norway and abroad. This paper offers theoretically and empirically-informed insight into areas of improvement so that teacher education programs can remain relevant and responsive to society.

References
Alford, J. H. (2014). "Well, hang on, they're actually much better than that!": Disrupting dominant discourses of deficit about English language learners in senior high school English. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 13(3), 71-88.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57-71). American Psychological Association.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300-314.

Frankel, R. M., & Devers, K. J. (2000). Study design in qualitative research—1: Developing questions and assessing resource needs. Education for Health, 13(2), 251-261. 1469–580X/online/00/020251– 11

Hilt, L. T. (2017). Education without a shared language: Dynamics of inclusion and exclusion in Norwegian introductory classes for newly arrived minority language students. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(6), 585-601.

Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research. (2018). Teacher Education 2015: National Strategy for Quality and Cooperation in Teacher Education. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/d0c1da83bce94e2da21d5f631bbae817/kd_teacher-education-2025_uu.pdf

Richards, K. (2009). Interviews. In J. Heigham & R. Croker, R. (Eds.), Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction (pp. 182-199). Palgrave MacMillan.


10. Teacher Education Research
Paper

Analysing the Notion of 'Disadvantaged' Schools in a European Context: Consequences for Pedagogical Interventions

Eva Anderson-Park, Marcus Kindlinger, Myrte van Veldhuizen, Hermann Josef Abs

University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany

Presenting Author: Anderson-Park, Eva

Even though the notion of disadvantaged schools or schools in disadvantaged areas is widely used in educational research and administration, the ways in which disadvantaged schools are characterised as well as the indicators that are used to classify them as disadvantaged differ largely by theory and between education systems (McCoy, Quail & Smyth, 2014). Once a concrete notion of disadvantaged schools is established within an education system, it is possible to conceptualise remedial educational policies. In this regard, teacher education is a prominent policy area consisting of different fields of action (Hall, Lundin & Sibbmark, 2020). One of these fields is providing professional support for novice teachers through adaptive mentoring (van Ginkel et al., 2016). However, novice teachers only have inadequate access to mentor support in many education systems (OECD, 2018). The lack of structured mentoring for novice teachers seems to contribute to high attrition rates among teachers in the first five years of their careers. Supporting novice teachers who work at disadvantaged schools is especially relevant. Teachers are more often placed at disadvantaged schools at the beginning of their career (Allen, Burgess, Mayo, 2018; Long et al., 2012) and their academic teacher qualification often does not adequately prepare them for the teaching challenges at disadvantaged schools. Therefore, they can be expected to benefit even more than others from a mentoring approach that is tailored towards their needs.

In this paper, we aim to establish a basis for the design and further development of mentor training programmes aimed at supporting novice teachers to deal with challenges they face at disadvantaged schools and to facilitate their remedial efforts. To this end, we explore the multifaceted nature of disadvantage and how it is perceived by different stakeholders. To set up any pedagogical measure it is important to understand the terminology used in the specific context, especially if the context is possibly socially tabooed. In the development of a mentor training programme tailored to the specific needs of novice teachers at disadvantaged schools it makes sense to consider the perspective of different stakeholders. We hope to gain a deeper understanding of teacher professional development needs in these settings, ensuring that the specific needs of the school community are met and the various challenges faced by teachers are addressed.

Three main objectives guide our study:

First, we examine the perspective of policy makers in education by studying the terminology used to characterize disadvantaged schools and the indicators used to classify a school as "disadvantaged" in the respective education systems. Through a comparison of the indicators used in the various education systems, we show different vantage points of disadvantage and consequentially different potential approaches of how to set up pedagogical measures such as an adaptive mentoring programme.

Second, we investigate the perspectives of novice teachers who work in schools that are classified as disadvantaged and gather insight on their perception of these school contexts. This perspective allows for a better understanding of the challenges novice teachers face in disadvantaged school contexts.

Lastly, we discuss how these analyses can inform the development of pedagogical interventions such as mentoring programmes tailored to the disadvantaged school context


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
For this paper, we used data from ex ante and interim evaluation studies of the ERASMUS+ policy experiment NEST (Novice Educator Support and Training). The project aims to establish an adaptive mentor training programme and is conducted simultaneously in Austria, Belgium (regions of Flanders and Wallonia), Bulgaria, Romania, and Spain (regions of Madrid and Catalonia).
To capture the perspective of the educational administration, we used document analyses and guided interviews with educational experts in the participating countries. All participating education systems were asked to provide documentation on an administrative level on how disadvantaged schools are classified or identified in the respective education system. To verify our understanding of the documents, we interviewed educational experts of the administrative level such as representatives from educational ministries or school inspectorates. The guided interviews focused on terminology and criteria for disadvantaged schools, support measures, and possible negative consequences for disadvantaged schools and working conditions at disadvantaged schools. All interviews were led online between October and November 2021.
To describe the novice teachers’ perspective of disadvantaged schools, we relied on questionnaire data. The NEST mentors work with two successive cohorts of novice teachers: one cohort for the school year 2021/2022, and one cohort for the school year 2022/2023. Currently we only have data available for the first teacher cohort (school year 2021/2022).
All novice teachers (N=911) had at maximum five years of teaching experience and were on average 32.4 years old with a median age of 30. The majority of novice teachers was female (73.7%).
The questionnaires we used to capture the novice teachers’ perspective included a prompt to estimate various aspects of the backgrounds of students at the novice teachers’ schools, which we adapted from TALIS (Principal Questionnaire, 2018, p. 8). Novice teachers were asked to estimate proportions regarding the composition of students at their schools. For example, novice teachers were asked to estimate the percentage of students with special needs or the percentage of students from ethnic minorities.
Additionally, the questionnaire included a set of Likert-type items on potentially missing resources hindering quality instruction (TALIS Principal Questionnaire, 2018 p. 20). Novice teachers were asked to rate to what extent their schools’ capacity to provide quality instruction is hindered by 14 different issues such as “insufficient internet access” or “shortage of support personnel” on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 4 (a lot).

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The document analyses on terminology and designating indicators used for disadvantaged schools brought several interesting results to light. First, we found a distinction between stigmatising terminology and neutral terminology for disadvantaged schools in our data. The categorisation of terminology showed that it remains difficult to find a term for disadvantaged schools that encapsulates the challenging situation of the schools without creating a stigma. Second, we found that in research literature as well as in our data, the following typology could be applied as an ordering structure to the indicators used to designate disadvantaged schools. While in research literature we only found input and output indicators to describe disadvantaged schools (Hall et al., 2020; Kyriakides et al., 2019), in our document analyses and expert interviews we also found context indicators. However, the majority of education systems base their classification of disadvantaged schools on input indicators only.
The indicators used to classify schools as disadvantaged to some extent reflect the restraints or challenges that teachers perceive at these schools. Overall, novice teachers perceived moderate restraints or challenges. If they did perceive challenges, they were mostly focused on input (perceived lack of support personnel, lack of materials). According to the novice teachers in all education systems, they perceived overall higher restraints for quality instruction through lack of human resources.
Regarding novice teachers’ perceptions of student body compositions, we found high levels of variance within education systems. This could be grounded in novice teachers’ ignorance of these data. However, it could also indicate that the student body compositions vary strongly between schools in one education system. This in turn would indicate that it is not sufficient to base interventions for disadvantaged schools on the most prevalent average challenges within an education system, but instead develop adaptive interventions better targeted to the individual school.

References
Allen, R., Burgess, S., & Mayo, J. (2018). The teacher labour market teacher turnover and disadvantaged schools: new evidence for England. Education Economics, 26(1), 4-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2017.1366425
Hall, C., Lundin, M., & Sibbmark, K. (2022). Strengthening teachers in disadvantaged schools: Evidence from an intervention in Sweden's poorest city districts. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(2), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1788154
Kyriakides, L., Charalambous, E., Creemers, H. P. M., & Dimosthenous, A. (2019). Improving quality and equity in schools in socially disadvantaged areas. Educational Research, 61(3), 274–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1642121
Long, J. S., McKenzie-Robblee, S., Schaefer, L., Steeves, P., Wnuk, S., Pinnegar, E., & Clandinin, D. J. (2012). Literature review on induction and mentoring related to early career teacher attrition and retention. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 20(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2012.645598
McCoy, S., Quail, A., & Smyth, E. (2014). The effects of school social mix: Unpacking the differences. Irish Educational Studies, 33(3), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2014.955746
OECD (2018). Education at a Glance 2018: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2018-en
OECD (2018). Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018, Principal Questionnaire. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/TALIS-2018-MS-Principal-Questionnaire-ENG.pdf
van Ginkel, G., Oolbekkink, H., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2016). Adapting mentoring to individual differences in novice teacher learning: the mentor’s viewpoint. Teachers and Teaching, 22(2), 198–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1055438


10. Teacher Education Research
Paper

Promoting Social-emotional Learning in Diverse Settings

Niva Dolev, Bat Katzman

Kinneret College on the Sea of Galilee, Israel

Presenting Author: Dolev, Niva; Katzman, Bat

Social-emotional competencies are increasingly recognized as vital for children’s positive development, for their well-being, positive relationships, academic and future career success, and ability to cope with changes and related challenges (Lang et al., 2017). Consequently, Social Emotional Learning (SEL) efforts are increasingly entering classrooms (CASEL, 2013), with positive impacts increasingly noted (Jennings & Greenberg, 2009).

Similarly, social-emotional skills have been recognized to be highly important for teachers (Nias, 1996; Anastasiou, 2020), contributing to teachers’ overall professional effectiveness (Mérida-López & Extremera, 2017); wellbeing; their ability to cope with work-related stress (Fernández-Molina et al., 2019) and with classroom challenges (Poulou, Bassett & Dunham, 2018); positive teacher-student relationships (Brackett et al., 2011); and a positive and psychologically-safe classroom climate (Harvey et al., 2012). These, in turn, impact students’ emotions, behaviors, learning capabilities, academic outcomes (Lang et al., 2020) and social-emotional skill development.

Teachers can cultivate social-emotional skills in their students both informally, by establishing positive teacher-student relationships (Brackett et al., 2011), promoting a supportive classroom climate (Harvey et al., 2012), modeling emotionally intelligent behaviors, and using daily interactions and everyday classroom events as learning opportunities (Jennings & Greenberg, 2009; Morris et al., 2013), and formally, through SEL programs.

It follows that teachers, and in particular pre-service teachers, should be provided with suitable SEL training and with opportunities to practice newly-gained SEL knowledge, skills and tools in real educational settings, in order to improve learning and internalization processes.

In particular, most SEL programs to date do not take into consideration cultural diversity among students )Jagers et al., 2018). Yet the complex task of developing pedagogies and programs that support and sustain individual cultural competencies while offering access to dominant ones is fundamental to the social and emotional well-being of children and youth in the education system (Mahfouz & Anthony-Stevens, 2020). In order to implement and facilitate effective SEL programs within diverse and multicultural settings, policies and practices related to SEL school programs need to consider the backgrounds and needs of the children, families, and communities that are being served (Hayashi et al., 2022).
In the absence of culturally sensitive SEL programs in Israel and given the diversity and multi-cultural nature of Israeli society, guided SEL practice may allow students to better implement SEL in diverse cultural settings.

The current qualitative study followed education students of diverse backgrounds who participated in a semester-long SEL training program, as part of their third-year academic studies. The program was aimed at developing students’ social-emotional skills as well as their ability to integrate EI into their educational work. In line with this latter goal, the students were asked to practice their newly-acquired SEL knowledge, skills and tools as they engaged in a year-long internship program in their respective communities, in parallel with their academic studies.

Ways by which they applied their newly-acquired SEL knowledge to their work in diverse cultural backgrounds were examined.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
Participants: The cohort included 35 third year education students, both Jewish and Arab, in one college in Israel. All were enrolled in a semester long (13 sessions) SEL training program, as well as in a year-long (96 hours) internship program, which was run in parallel to the academic courses. All but three of the participants were women, in line with the known gender ratio among education students in Israel. Ages of participants ranged from 21 to 50 years.
Procedures: The SEL training program took place during the first semester of the 2022 academic year. The program was  loosely structured, enabling participants  to be exposed to a wide variety of  SEL tools and pedagogic approaches.
Parallel to  the academic program, participants took part in a year-long internship   program in which they could put their newly-acquired SEL knowledge into practice. Internship placements included schools and/or afternoon programs  with children of different ages, and from a wide variety of socio-economic and cultural backgrounds, including many from communities where SEL education is rare.  Participants were free to decide how much SEL instruction to provide and/or incorporate into the classroom/group. They were also encouraged to adapt various SEL tools to their own specific needs, and were supported in this by  their academic instructors.
Finally, participants were asked to submit accounts of their reflections, regarding their SEL experiences, at two points in time: At the end of the SEL course (i.e. the end of the first academic semester, February, 2022),  and at the end of their internship program (July 2022).
In order to preserve participants’ anonymity, coded identification numbers were assigned to all reflection accounts prior to their thematic analysis.
Analysis: The two sets of   reflections (at the end of the SEL training program and at the end of the internship program, respectively), were organized into dyads, based on their assigned identification numbers, which were then analyzed in tandem. Thematic, deductive analysis (Weber, 1990) and the Narralizer qualitative analysis software (http://www.narralizer.com) were used. Categories and themes were identified separately for each of the two programs (academic course and internship). This enabled the authors to examine the impacts of participants’ training on their encounters with children and schools from diverse cultural backgrounds;  the degree by which academic knowledge was internalized;  and the level of retention of learned material and of newly-acquired SEL skills among participants.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
Analysis of participants’ reflections revealed that the SEL training program at the center of the present study was well-received, positively evaluated, and perceived by all participants to be interesting, engaging, relevant and important, for both  their professional and personal lives. Participants further felt that their awareness and knowledge of SEL and of its importance had been developed, that they improved their social-emotional skills and related behaviors, and had gained practical tools to further engage with SEL in the future.
A majority of participants noted subsequent and related impacts on their ability to work with children during the internship program. Furthermore, a majority of participants began implementing SEL in their classrooms/groups in the course of their internship, in parallel with their study of SEL, and continued to do so in the second semester (after completing the SEL academic program). Main SEL topics to be implemented were self-awareness, impulse control, growth mindset and well-being.
Participants noted the need to adapt tools and materials they had acquired during the SEL training program to the diverse settings of their internship programs. Main diversity dimensions that were noted to prompt such adaptations included age, system and group characteristics, general day-to-day challenges, and culture.  In particular, participants discussed the need for culturally-sensitive translations of materials; variations in levels of readiness to engage in social-emotional learning; gender stereotypes and their impacts on the ability to  engage in social-emotional learning; and conformity levels and their impacts on  group work,  authority patterns and role modeling.
An increased sensitivity to diversity among participants and progression in their ability to choose SEL topics and materials that are suitable for their students and adapt them to individual and diverse needs,  in the  time interval between the two sets of reflections,  were  both detected.  

References
Anastasiou, S. (2020). The moderating effect of age on preschool teachers' trait emotional intelligence in Greece and implications for preschool human resources management. International Journal of Education and Practice, 8(1), 26-36.
Brackett, M. A., Reyes, M. R., Rivers, S. E., Elbertson, N. A., & Salovey, P. (2011). Classroom emotional climate, teacher affiliation, and student conduct. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 46(1), 27-36.‏
CASEL (2013). CASEL guide: Effective social and emotional learning programs – Preschool and elementary school edition.
Fernández-Molina, M., Castillo, A. B., & Fernandez-Berrocal, P. (2019). Profiles of perceived emotional intelligence in future preschool teachers: Implications for teacher education. Revista electrónica interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado, 22(1).‏
Harvey, S. T., Bimler, D., Evans, I. M., Kirkland, J., & Pechtel, P. (2012). Mapping the classroom emotional environment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 628-640.‏
Hayashi, A., Liew, J., Aguilar, S. D., Nyanamba, J. M., & Zhao, Y. (2022). Embodied and social-emotional learning (SEL) in early childhood: Situating culturally relevant SEL in Asian, African, and North American contexts. Early Education and Development, 1-18.‏
Jagers, R. J., Rivas-Drake, D., & Borowski, T. (2018). Equity & social and emotional learning: A cultural analysis. Measuring SEL Framework Briefs. https://measuringsel.casel.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Frameworks-Equity.pdf
Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The pro-social classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491-525.
Lang, S. N., Mouzourou, C., Jeon, L., Buettner, C. K., & Hur, E. H. (2017). Preschool teachers’ professional training, observational feedback, child-centered beliefs and motivation: Direct and indirect associations with social and emotional responsiveness. Child & Youth Care Forum, 46(1). DOI 10.1007/s10566-016-9369-7
Mahfouz, J., & Anthony-Stevens, V. (2020). Why trouble SEL? The need for cultural relevance in SEL. Occasional Paper Series, 2020(43), 6.‏
Mérida-López, S., & Extremera, N. (2017). Emotional intelligence and teacher burnout: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 85, 121-130. ‏
Morris, C. A., Denham, S. A., Bassett, H. H., & Curby, T. W. (2013). Relations among teachers’ emotion socialization beliefs and practices and preschoolers’ emotional competence. Early Education and Development, 24(7), 979-999.‏
Nias, J. (1996). Thinking about feeling: The emotion in teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(3), 293-306.
Poulou, M. S., Bassett, H. H., & Denham, S. A. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions of emotional intelligence and social-emotional learning: Students’ emotional and behavioral difficulties in US and Greek preschool classrooms. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 32(3), 363-377.


10. Teacher Education Research
Paper

Formal Mentor Course in Pedagogical Practice: Methods and Strategies to Ensure High Quality Teacher Communication with Vulnerable Students in School.

Eva Haldammen, Eivind Aarli

University of Agder, Norway

Presenting Author: Haldammen, Eva; Aarli, Eivind

Several Norwegian studies show that the number of youths with suicidal thoughts is increasing, and that there has been an increase of 28 percent in referrals to treatment for psychological health problems (Helsedirektoratet, 2022). To meet these challenges, dialogue and relationship building are seen as vital (Spurkeland, 2011).

The approaches and techniques used in communication are important when it comes to dialogues with vulnerable students and their families. The quality of such dialogue is to a large extent dependent on the teachers’ ability to ask questions, listen actively and to use other communication methods to build and nourish crucial relationships (Spurkeland, 2011). Indeed, it is widely accepted that relational competency an important factor that contributing to learning in school, and that communication is one of the key competencies of social and relational competency.

Teacher education in Norway consists of both lectures on campus and student teaching in primary and secondary schools. All teacher education is carried out in 5-year programs resulting in a master’s degree. Mentor teachers at schools are considered an important part of teacher education, as they provide supervision during the student teaching, and the students must pass both practice periods at schools and the exams on campus to become teachers.

Some schools have applied to become teacher training schools, which means that all the teachers at these schools become mentor teachers and supervisors for student teachers during their final student teaching practice. Regulations Relating to the Framework Plan for Primary and Lower Secondary Teacher Education for grades 1-7 and grades 5-10 require that mentor teachers have at least 15 (ECTS) credits in the field of guidance and supervision (Bjerkholt, 2017). This is a quality assurance to ensure that students receive professional supervision. Supervision- competency is referred to as professional skills in teaching, observation, methods, and analytical competency while also including certain personal prerequisites (Mathisen & Høigaard, 2021).

The University of Agder offers courses in mentoring to all mentor teachers on teacher training schools that receive student teachers. The education comprises three semesters. The second semester focuses on methods, strategies, and structures in communication. More specific: question types, body language, listening, strategies that provide progression in supervision, reflection, paraphrasing, interruption, and feedback. All education takes place in the teacher training schools, not on the university campus.

A large part of teachers’ work is communication within the school, and with parents or guardians and external collaboration partners. Despite the importance of this topic, there is little focus on this during the lectures on campus. Rather this is knowledge the students acquire during school practice. Subsequently, the teachers are dependent on learning how to interact and communicate with both children, youths, parents/- guardians and other collaborators at different schools during their teacher education. The students are, so to speak, at the mercy of each mentor teacher’s skills.

The aim of this study is to gain insight into whether education for mentor teachers in guidance and supervision can affect crucial communication with vulnerable students, their families, and other collaborators. The diversity of pupils in school will be taken into consideration with respect to which students might be considered vulnerable at any given point in time.

Our research question is: How can education in supervision and guidance theory, methods and strategies strengthen the mentor teachers’ communication skills when interacting with vulnerable students and their parents/ legal guardians?


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
We have a dual role as both educators and researchers. Consequently, we will also observe as we instruct and follow the informants in the interventions and during ordinary lectures.
Our study is hermeneutic in the sense that we aim to understand thoughts and actions between people (Kovac, 2023). We will engage in two interventions at a secondary school during the spring 2023 semester in addition to reflection notes and questionnaires. We will observe as we teach the mentor course, and as we implement the interventions. There will be an explicit focus on the link between the different methodological approaches and emphasis on practical approaches to research problems (Denscombe, 2010). There are different views regarding what the perfect number of research participants should be. Postholm (2020) building on Polkinghorne (1989) suggests 5-25 participants, whereas Dukes (1984) suggests 3-10 participants. In our study, there are 6 teachers with different important functional positions who are participating.
In January, prior to the interventions, each teacher wrote a reflection note. It contained three different questions about: (1) communication with vulnerable children (2) teachers’ communication with parents/guardians of vulnerable children (3) teachers’ communication with professional collaborators in the school system regarding vulnerable children. Each of the informants also received a questionnaire with fourteen open questions to reflect on their communication skills.  The main emphasis of the questionnaire was how they use varied techniques related to communication skills.
After two interventions with focus on theory and practice, the teachers will be asked to write a reflection note and complete the same structured questionnaire as they did before the semester started. According to Engeström (2007), formative interventions need to be understood as formations of critical design agency among researchers, teachers, and students. What is
initially presented as a problem or a task is interpreted and turned into a meaningful
challenge during the intervention (Postholm, 2020).
Denscombe, (2010) refers to this process as triangulation (between-methods) to view things from more than one perspective. Analysis of the findings before and after the interventions, will provide varied information to investigate whether the teachers experienced improvement in communications skills.
The material will be analyzed in three steps. Firstly, we will gain an overview. Secondly, we will systematize the content using research questions while highlighting the most relevant and interesting information. Finally, we will analyze the findings in relation to communication and dialogue theories. We are currently in the process of collecting data.




Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
This project considers the education of mentor teachers in teacher training schools and the meaning and relevance of the knowledge they gain from the interventions.
The teachers in this study will be trained in different communication skills and will help us to understand to what extent this knowledge is important when it comes to communicating with vulnerable youths, parents/ guardians, and collaborators. An additional goal of the study is to uncover the degree to which a “communication manual” might contribute to preparing school mentors, as the project is rooted in an explicit investment in the school’s municipality.  The insight from the study may further achieve, in a broader sense, an increased capacity for including teacher education to see the need for including these communication skills in the educational programs provided both at campus and in the teacher training schools.

References
Bjerkholt, E. (2017). Profesjonsveiledning. Fra praktisk virksomhet til teoretisk felt. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
Brinkmann, S. & Tanggaard, L. (2020). Kvalitative metoder: en grundbog (3. udg.ed.). Hans Reitzel.
Denscombe M. (2007). The Good Research Guide for small-scale social research projects (3rd ed.). Open University Press.
Helsedirektoratet. (2022, March 11th ). De største utfordringene nå og i tiden fremover. https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/rapporter/folkehelse-i-et-livslopsperspektiv-helsedirektoratets-innspill-til-ny-folkehelsemelding/folkehelse-gjennom-livslopet-barn-og-unge/de-storste-utfordringene-na-og-i-tiden-fremover
Kovač V. B. (2023). Hvordan vet du det? Vitenskapelig tenkning og forskningsmetoder (1. utgave.). Fagbokforlaget.
Kvale, Brinkmann, S., Anderssen, T. M., & Rygge, J. (2021). Det kvalitative forskningsintervju (3. utg.). Gyldendal akademisk.
Mathisen, P. og Høigaard, R. (2021). Veiledningsmetodikk. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
Postholm M. B. (2020). The complementarity of formative intervention research, action research and action learning. Educational Research (Windsor)
Spurkeland, J. (2011). Relasjonspedagogikk. Samhandling og resultater i skolen. Fagbokforlaget.