Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th May 2024, 05:23:53am GMT

 
 
Session Overview
Session
33 SES 11 B: How To Teach Gender Diversity and Counteracting Sexual Harassment
Time:
Thursday, 24/Aug/2023:
1:30pm - 3:00pm

Session Chair: Oriol Rios-Gonzalez
Location: James McCune Smith, 734 [Floor 7]

Capacity: 30 persons

Paper Session

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
33. Gender and Education
Paper

Do Teachers Act as Diversity Role Models for Young People?

Johanna Pangritz

Hagen University, Germany

Presenting Author: Pangritz, Johanna

In the German-speaking area, different debates can be observed in the past 15-20 years, which can be interpreted as a sign or indicator of the relevance of diversity in the field of school. The different debates are ambivalent and partly contrary to each other. For example, there is a systematic attempt to prohibit female teachers from wearing a hijab in school and thereby counteract diversity, while on the other hand, a demand for more male teachers has been heard for decades, which is apparently intended to contribute to the diversity of masculinities (May & Rose 2014). This demand for 'more men' was also supported by education policy, so that model projects were launched with the aim of attracting male professionals to the field of education.

The origin of the call for 'more men' for the field of education was the observation that boys showed poorer school achievments compared to girls. They had to repeat a class more often or left school more often without a diploma. In this context, it is therefore also mostly spoken of as ' boys crises' (Hurrelmann & Schulz 2012). The idea behind the education policies to increase the male quota was to create male role models for boys and thus to counteract the supposedly negative 'feminisation' of the education system (Fegter 2013). The representation of different embodiments of masculinities was supposed to lead the boys to also identify more with education. In addition, it was hoped that the boys would form alternative ideas of masculinity along the role models, which would contribute to a diversity of masculinity (Cremers & Krabel 2016) and thus show a reflective approach towards gender (Budde 2014).

Even though boys and their achievements symbolise the starting point for the demands for more men, little research has subsequently dealt with boys or young people in general and their ideas of masculinity. Rather, in the German-speaking area, the focus has been on professionals and their constructions of masculinity as well as ideas (Buschmeyer 2013, Breitenbach et al. 2015, Diewald 2018). It also remains unclear whether young people choose teachers as role models. There are contradictory findings and theoretical assumptions on this (Rose 2014). In addition, it is apparent that female, non-binary and non-heteronormative young people have so far been completely left out of this discussion. Therefore, there are no findings for the German-speaking countries that provide information on how masculinity is thought of or lived outside of the male understood body.

In an ongoing research project on 'Transformed masculinities in the mirror of education', I am trying to approach these gaps. I am focusing on young people's ideas and beliefs around masculinity and the extent to which these influence their everyday lives. In addition, the focus is on whether teachers serve as role models for the young people. So far, 11 adolescents have been interviewed using episodic interviews (Flick 2022). Gender diversity was taken into account in the sample of the young people. The interviews were analysed using the documentary method (Nohl 2017).

The analyse so far shows that the young people mostly do not choose role models from the educational context. Rather, the interviews indicate that the young people feel a kind of foreignness towards their teachers. Gender role models for masculinity or other gender concepts are mostly sought outside of school or other educational institutions. With regard to ideas of masculinity, the young people have a partly confused understanding - between modernisation and tradition. Within the lecture, 2 case studies will be presented, in which different approaches of young people to masculinity and role models will be presented.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
The research project to be reported on follows a qualitative approach. So far, episodic interviews have been conducted with 11 young people aged 14-16 of different genders. The perspective of the young people was deliberately chosen in order to avoid 'talking about' and to finally let those who are affected have their say. Past discussions in German-speaking countries were mostly characterised by adults talking about and deciding what was the best thing for young people. The project therefore leans on perspectives of critical youth research and tries to avoid adultism.
A semi-strutured episodic interview (Flick 2022) served as the data collection instrument. The episodic interview is characterised by the systematic integration of narratives into an interview guideline. Two forms of knowledge are distinguished: Semantic knowledge, 'based on concepts, assumptions and relations, which are abstracted and generalized from concrete events and situations' (Flick 2022: 221) and episodic knowledge which 'is organised closer to experiences and linked to concrete situations' (Flick 2022: 221). The episodic interview thus made it possible to switch between the different forms of knowledge and to ask about concrete definitions and assumptions, but also about the young people's experiences. This was important because it formed the core of the project and was intended to ask about the abstract ideas of masculinity as well as their experiences and ways of dealing with masculinity in everyday life and in the field of school.
The interviews are analysed using the documentary method. This method was originally developed by Bohnsack (2010) to analyse group discussions. A change of perspective is achieved through the method:
„It is the change from the question what social reality is in the perspective of the actors, to the question how this reality is produced or accomplished in these actors’ everyday practice. By practice, I mean the practice of action as well as of talk, of presentation and of argumentation.“ (Bohnsack 2010: 102).
The documentary method thus makes it possible to analyse the different forms of knowledge in the episodic interview. It makes it possible to look at how the young people produce their social reality and how this is shown in their everyday activities. Nohl (2010/2017) further developed the documentary method for interviews. The episodic interview is particularly suitable for analysis with the documentary method because of its alternation between narrative and non-narrative parts.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The analysis of the interviews so far shows that young people are increasingly looking for role models outside of school and teachers are not used in this regard. It turns out that teachers in particular do not serve as role models, as they rather prevent diversity than promote it. In this context, the young people report that they experience discrimination and exclusion because of their embodiment of diversity, due to gender, social origin or migration history. In addition, school is often perceived as a space for 'measuring' or 'asserting' regarding masculinity. School thus reflects an arena in which hegemonic images of masculinity find space instead of promoting the diversity of masculinities.
This dilemma is also partly reflected in the young people's ideas of masculinity. In many cases, a heteronormative binary understanding is invoked. It can be observed that there is often a confused understanding between modernisation and tradition among the young people. Thus, an adherence to traditional norms of masculinity with simultaneous differentiation can be identified. The young people point out that school, as a place where knowledge is conveyed, teaches a certain understanding of masculinity that is more oriented towards biological characteristics. They also point out that school does not offer any space to discuss alternative views of masculinity or gender in general.
Accordingly, school shows itself to be a hegemonic space of masculinity in the transmission of knowledge about masculinity as well as in its production in social practices. Diversity and the promotion of diversity are accordingly neglected, if not prevented by discrimination and exclusion.

References
Bohnsack, Ralf (2010): Documentary Method and Group Discussions. In: Bohnsack, Ralf, Pfaff, Nicole, & Weller, Wivian (Eds.): Qualitative analysis and documentary method in international educational research. Opladen: Barbara Budrich, pp 99-124.
Breitenbach, Eva et al. (2015): Männer in Kindertageseinrichtungen. Eine rekonstruktive Studie über Geschlecht und Professionalität. Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
Budde, Jürgen (2014): Jungenpädagogik zwischen Tradierung und Veränderung. Empirische Analyse geschlechterpädagogischer Praxis. Opladen, Berlin, Tronto: Verlag Barbara Burdich.
Buschmeyer, Anna (2013): Zwischen Vorbild und Verdacht. Wie Männer im Erziehungsberuf Männlichkeit konstruieren. Wiesbaden. Springer Fachmedien.
Cremers, Michael & Krabel, Jens (2016): Mehr Männer in Kitas. Von der Wissenschaft entdeckt. In: Sozial Extra, 40 (2), S. 46-49.
Diewald, Irmgard (2018): Männlichkeiten im Wandel. Zur Regierung von Geschlecht in der deutschen und schwedischen Debatte um ‚Männer in Kitas’. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
Fegter, Susann (2013): Mehr Männer in die Soziale Arbeit? Neuordnungen von Profession und Geschlecht im aktuellen (fach-)öffentlichen Diskurs. In: Sabla, Kim-Patrick & Plößer, Melanie (Hrsg.): Gendertheorien und Theorien Sozialer Arbeit. Bezüge, Lücken und Herausforderungen. Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich, S. 145-162.
Flick, Uwe (2022): Doing Interview Research. SAGE Publications: London, Thousand Oaks, New Dehli, Singapore.
Hurrelmann, Klaus & Schultz, Tanjev (2012): Jungen als Bildungsverlierer. Brauchen wir eine Männerquote in Kitas und Schulen? Weinheim & Basel: Beltz Juventa.
Lotte, Rose & May, Michael (2014): Mehr Männer in die Soziale Arbeit!? Kontroversen, Konflikte und Konkurrenzen. Opladen, Berlin & Toronto: Barbara Budrich.
Nohl, Michael (2010): Narrative Interview and Documentary Interpretation. In: Bohnsack, Ralf, Pfaff, Nicole, & Weller, Wivian (Eds.): Qualitative analysis and documentary method in international educational research. Opladen: Barbara Budrich, pp 99-124.
Nohl, Michael (2017): Interview und Dokumentarische Methode. Anleitung für die Forschungspraxis. 5.Aufl. Springer VS: Wiesbaden.
Rose, Lotte (2014): Kinder brauchen Männer! Zur Vergeschlechtlichung von Qualitätsentwicklungsfragen in der Elementarpädagogik. In: Rose, Lotte & May, Michael (Hrsg.): Mehr Männer in die Soziale Arbeit!? Kontroversen, Konflikte und Konkurrenzen. Opladen, Berlin & Toronto: Barbara Budrich, S. 29-46.


33. Gender and Education
Paper

Mission Possible – Teachers Work of Counteracting Sexual Harassment as a part of Fostering Democratic Citizens

Liselotte Eek-Karlsson, Ragnar Olsson

Linnéuniversitetet, Sweden

Presenting Author: Eek-Karlsson, Liselotte; Olsson, Ragnar

In the beginning of the #Metoo-movement in 2017, a large number of girls and women from many countries, not least from Sweden (Swedish Gender Equality Agency, 2022) gave their experiences of being sexually harassed. These experiences of sexual harassment in an allegedly gender-equal country, underscores the importance of further studies. Within the Nordic education system, there is an overarching democratic assignment, which means that all students must be treated equally and where no one must be subjected to offensive discrimination, for example sexual harassment (Måwe, 2018). The Swedish Discrimination Act prescribes that all children have the right to be in school without risk of being exposed to violence or harassment (SFS, 2008:567). But, research shows that sexual harassment is part of everyday life for many young people and occurs at all levels in the educational system. The perpetrator is often a boy and the victims are frequently girls. Most often the harassment takes place outside the class time, for example in corridors, in school yards and in locker rooms (Gillander Gådin, 2012; 2019; Plan International, 2020; Eek-Karlsson, Berggren & Torpsten, 2022). In this study the focus is to problematize Swedish schools assignment to work for counteracting sexual harassment. The aim is to contribute with knowledge about students’ views upon teachers’ teaching regarding the work of counteracting sexual harassment. The research question guiding the study is:

  • How can students descriptions regarding teachers assignment to counteract sexual harassment be understood from a didactical perspective?’

From a didactic perspective, the prevention and promotion work can include both the teaching that formally takes place during the lessons as well as informal meetings between lessons. In this study it also includes the quality of the relationships between teacher and student, as well as how activities are organized in order to create safe learning environments. Depending on underlying values that permeate the school organization and the teacher’s teaching, different affordances will fall out (Wahlström, 2019).

The theoretical framework is based on an educational perspective and directed towards teachers’ work against oppression and towards social justice. Basically, we use Kumashiro’s theory of anti-oppressive education. He has developed four different strategies, which all have both strengths and weaknesses. The strategies are called ‘Education for the Other’, Education about the Other, Education that is critical of privileging and othering, and ‘Education that changes’ (Kumashiro, 2002). More specifically it deals with the relationships between teacher and student, teacher and the knowledge content as well as the teaching process. The concept ‘teaching’ is understood in this study as ‘teaching acts’ that are carried out both in formal teaching situations within specific lessons as well as in informal teaching situations in between the lessons (Gardesten, 2021).

Teaching in school always takes place in a social context and it is in this context conditions for learning are created. Teachers’ basic educational/pedagogical view is the starting point for how the teachers plan and stages the education. All education has a content dimension, i.e. what is to be in focus, for example knowledge, skills and understanding. In teaching there is also a process dimension, which includes how the education is staged. Linked to Kumashiro’s four approaches, they all have relational, content-oriented and process-oriented didactic perspectives. Preventing and managing the occurrence of sexual harassment in school (and in its extension the work for social jusice) can be understood in different ways. In this study the focus is on students’ views on teachers’ education, i.e. the focus is not on what really happens in practice. Nor can anything be said about teachers' own intentions behind their teaching.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
This study is part of a larger project with an overall aim to contribute knowledge about how boys and girls at different ages talk about and understand sexual harassment. The research project has been approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. The empirical data was collected through semi-structured pair interviews in school year 5, 6, 8, in compulsory school and in school year 1 and 3 in upper secondary school. Overall, 28 girls and 22 boys were interviewed.  Mostly, the students were interviewed in pairs.  The interviews lasted between 40 and 80 min, in total 18 hours and 10 minutes. All the interviews were recorded and transcribed. The youth were given fictitious names to safe- guard their anonymity. The data in the present study, consists of the students opinions concerning how teachers work to counteract sexual harassment. It is important to emphasize that the empirical basis of the present study consists of the students' opinions of the teacher's approach and teaching and not of what really happens in practice. Nor can anything be said about teachers' own intentions behind their teaching.

The analysis of the transcribed data was conducted in two steps, based on the purpose of the study and the interview question. Initially a content analysis was con- ducted, in which quotes concerning how the girls manage sexual harassment online and offline and conditions for preventing sexual harassment were put together in a separate document. Central meaning bearing units were formulated and eventually patterns appeared, concerning both research questions (Mayring, 2000). To get a deeper understanding, the next step was to analyse the data using didactical theories. In this process, three categories appeared; a ‘relationship oriented’, a ‘content oriented’ and a ‘process oriented’ perspective. Through an in-depth analysis sub categories were formulated.  

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The results show that the students have many opinions on teachers’ teaching to counteract sexual harassment. Three major didactical perspectives can be found. Teaching to counteract sexual harassment in a relational didactical perspective is the first, focusing the didactical relation between teacher and student. In this context it means that the relation has a special intention - to promote learning. The student means that teachers need several competences to be able to counteract sexual harassment. The relational competence is crucial both concerning the students' feeling of trust and the credibility of the teaching. It’s important to step forward as a safe and reliable close adult. When it comes to urgent measures the students expect teachers to act responsibly and professionally. It’s an adult responsibility to show genuine interest and ability to act.

The second perspective expressed by the students is a content oriented perspective. When the students describe their experiences of their teachers dealing with counteracting sexual harassment the importance of knowledgeable and conscious teachers applying relevant content comes into sight. The teacher has to be familiar with the students’ world as well as having good knowledge. As a good teacher it’s important to focus on equity – to work for equal rights for men and women, boys and girls.

The third didactical perspective in the present study forms a processed oriented perspective taking interest in the choices av teaching acts that teachers do when they try to counteract sexual harassments in school. A process of learning and development is established, using varying methods and many different sources of knowledge. In the eyes of the students it seems important to establish this process in a safe environment - to work with activities that create community. It’s a long-term work as it’s important to do it in a promotional and preventive way.


References
Eek-Karlsson L., Berggren, J. & Torpsten, A-C. (2022). Beating around the bush - a study of Swedish upper secondary school girls’ coping strategies and impact processes of sexual harassment. Sexuality & Culture.  
 
Gardesten, J. (2021). Ett handlingsteoretiskt perspektiv på undervisning – en essä med fritidshemmet som exempel. [An action-theoretical perspective on teaching - an essay with the leisure center as an example] Pedagogisk forskning, 6(2–3),139–148.

Gillander Gådin, K. (2012). Sexual Harassment of Girls in Elementary School: A Concealed Phenomenon Within a Heterosexual Romantic Discourse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(9), 1762–1779.

Gillander Gådin, K., & Stein, N. (2019). Do schools normalise sexual harassment? An analysis of a legal case regarding sexual harassment in a Swedish high school. Gender and Education, 31(7), 920–937

Kumashiro, K. (2002). Troubling Education. Queer Activism and Anti–Oppressive Pedagogy. New York: RoutledgeFalmer

Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1(2), 1–10.

Måwe, I. (2018). Vad säger lagen om #metoo? [What does the law says about #metoo?] Köpenhamn: NIKK, Nordisk information för kunskap om kön.

Plan International. (2020). Free to be online? Girls’ and young women’s experiences of online harassment. Working: Plan International

SFS 2008:567. (2008). Diskrimineringslagen. [The Discrimination Act]. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet [Government Offices]

Swedish Gender Equality Agency (2022). Berättelser från #Metoo-uppropen [Stories from calls for #Metoo]
https://jamstalldhetsmyndigheten.se/mans-vald-mot-kvinnor/sexuella-trakasserier/berattel- ser-fran-metoo-uppropen/ [22-06-16]

Wahlström, N. (2019). Didaktik – ett professionsbegrepp.  [Didactic - a profession concept] Malmö: Gleerups Utbildning AB.


33. Gender and Education
Paper

“You Must be Fair to Yourself”. Novice Icelandic Female Teachers Interviewed About Their Work.

Ingólfur Ásgeir Jóhannesson1, Maríanna Jónsdóttir Maríudóttir1,2, Aðalheiður Anna Erlingsdóttir1,3, Valgerður S. Bjarnadóttir1

1University of Iceland; 2Urriðaholtsskóli; 3University of Akureyri

Presenting Author: Jóhannesson, Ingólfur Ásgeir; Maríudóttir, Maríanna Jónsdóttir

In various countries, including Iceland, there is a discussion about a shortage of teachers. In many cases, this discussion centeres around the specific shortage of male teachers in preschool and the younger grades of compulsory education (e.g. Hjalmarsson & Löfdahl, 2014; Jóhannesson et al., 2002b). Another kind of discussion is about the quality and the importance of the induction of novice teachers (e.g., Estola et al., 2012; Jóhannesson et al., 2002a; Steingrímsdóttir & Engilbertsson, 2018).

Since the research group had already studied this among novice male teachers (see below), we decided to address the situation of young female teachers in Icelandic compulsory schools.

There are two main types of literature that the research is based on: theories of gender, including research about female and male teachers and the femininization of teaching; and theories and research about novice teachers.

Masculinity and feminity are key concepts about gender. Connell (2006) suggests that these concepts refer to characteristics which society believes belong to men and women. Connell (1987) has also suggested that hegemonic masculinity is possible because of emphasized feminity which subordinates women to men. Schippers (2007) has suggested that women who take control can perform pariah femininity that troubles the power relationship involved in the pair of hegemonic masculinity and emphasized feminity. Women tend to be expected to show care and male teachers to perform disciplinary actions (e.g., Hjalmarsson & Löfdahl, 2014). This is enforced with the feminization in the number of teachers worldwide (e.g., Warin & Gannerud, 2014).

In the second type of literature, research findings suggest that novice teachers need a few years – three to five – to gain competence and more time to acquire expertise (Berliner, 1992; Hammerness et al., 2005). There are indications that if the novices are not much supervised during an induction time, then they may continue to teach without necessary competence – or quit the job after a short time (e.g., Hammerness o.fl., 2005; Steingrímsdóttir, 2007). Estola et al. (2012) found that most novices meet similar challenges, importantly those that relate to the balance between work load and job satisfaction. They also find it challenging to organize the time to talk with colleagues, staff, students, and parents. Desirable forms of supervision include that each novice is at least for the first year assigned to an experienced teacher for guidance. This has only been followed to a limited extent in Iceland (Jóhannesson et al., 2022a; Steingrímsdóttir & Engilbertsson, 2018).

The study follows up on a two-year study of novice Icelandic male teachers conducted by the principal investigator and one of the cooperating researchers in this study. The findings of the study, in short, indicate that support with novice teachers is not well organized (Jóhannesson et al., 2022a) and that there are gendered expectations to the male teachers, such as being capable of “keeping discipline” in the classroom on grounds of their gender (Jóhannesson et al., 2022b).

Our focus is twofold: First, on how our interviewees had experienced their induction and, second, on the ways which issues of gender mattered in the expectations that they experienced and how these expectations interacted with the professional demands of being a teacher.

Three main questions guided the research design:

  • What is the experience of newly graduated female teachers in Icelandic compulsory schools?
  • In what ways is the experience of newly graduated female teachers gendered?
  • Are there expectations that the newly graduated female teachers perform emphasized femininity?

Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
The study began in early autumn 2021 when 11 newly graduated young (all but one between the age of 26 and 33 at the time) female teachers in Icelandic compulsory schools were interviewed. They had taught for none to three years; some of them had been teaching unlicensed for a short time. They were selected via a variety of methods: Via one of the teacher education faculties, via personal connections, via phone calls to principals in schools selected in the vicinity of where the interviewees reside. The interviewees taught in different parts of the country, such as in the urban capital city area, smaller towns, and the countryside. They all taught in schools run by municipalities, and they all followed the national curriculum of Iceland. The teachers taught at all levels of the compulsory school (grades 1¬–4, 5–7, 8–10). They were interviewed again in spring 2022 and autumn 2022 and will be interviewed for the fourth and last time in spring 2023. As three interviewees had to quit after the third interview, we expect to have altogether 41 interview.
Murrey et al. (2009) describe this method as serial interviews. The interview frames were halfopen and developed as the study progressed. This approach gives the study a longitudinal element, by allowing us to explore change and process over time (Calman et al., 2013) and to follow up on certain issues in previous interviews.
The analysis of the data follows common recommendations from Calman et al. (2013). This involves conducting both cross-sectional thematic analysis, in which all interviews are read several times to capture common themes in relation to the teachers’ gendered experience over time, as well as bringing forward narratives and experiences of individual interviewees. The analysis is to be data-driven (Braun & Clarke, 2013), focusing on capturing how gendered expectations and the professional induction of becoming a teacher evolved.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
In the first three rounds of interviews, a few preliminary themes appeared.
The first theme is that in lieu of and in addition to formal supervision, most of our interviewees were parts of formal or informal teams of teachers. This was certainly a supporting factor as in our previous study with male novices (Jóhannesson et al., 2022a).
The second theme, which is related to the first theme, covers extensive cooperation in the classrooms and outside them with other teachers, including special educators; social educators; support staff; and others. Our preliminary results focus on the challenges of working with non-professional support staff of different ages and the gendered practices and behaviors of these staff members.
The last preliminary theme is about the importance of developing a sense of easiness about letting go in order to be able to find balance between the job and private life — “be fair to yourself” in situations when it is felt that things are not “perfect”. This could include to do all preparation work in the school, although it might mean a longer workday at times.
The preliminary results support the thesis that teaching is gendered and that there may be differences in the expectations to female and male teachers, as well as to support staff. We will continue investigate the relationship between different femininities in the accounts of our interviewees, not least whether they must perform emphasized femininity within the cultures of the schools. The implications will be discussed, as well as ways to support young teachers of all genders.

References
Berliner, D. C. (1992). The nature of expertise in teaching. In F. K. Oser, A. Dick, & J.–L. Patry (ritstjórar), Effective and responsible teaching: The new synthesis (pp. 227–248). Jossey-Bass.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research. A practical guide for beginners. Sage
Calman, L., Brunton, L., & Molassiotis, A. (2013). Developing longitudinal qualitative designs: Lessons learned and recommendations for health services research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(14), 2–10
Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Stanford University Press.
Connell, R.W. (2006). Understanding men: Gender sociology and the new international research on masculinities. In C. Skelton, B. Francis & L. Smulyan (Eds.), The SAGE handbook on gender and education (pp. 18–31). Sage.
Estola, E., Syrjälä, L. & Maunu, T. (2012). The first years as a teacher. In H. Heikkinen, H. Jokinen, & P. Tynjälä (Eds.), Peer-group mentoring for teacher development (pp. 43–51). London & New York: Routledge.
Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L. & Brandsford, J. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Brandsford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358–389). Jossey-Bass.
Hjalmarsson, M. & Löfdahl, A. (2014). Being caring and disciplinary – male primary school teachers on expectations from others. Gender and Education, 26(3), 280–292. doi:10.1080/09540253.2014.901731
Jóhannesson, I. Á., Ottesen, A. R,. & Bjarnadóttir, V. S. (2022a). Factors in the compulsory school environment that support male novice teachers. Icelandic Journal of Education, 31(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.24270/tuuom.2022.31.5
Jóhannesson, I. Á., Ottesen, A. R., & Bjarnadóttir, V. S. (2022b). Natural disciplinarians or learning from the job? The first two years of seven male teachers in Icelandic compulsory schools. Education Inquiry, DOI: 10.1080/20004508.2022.2080343
Murray, S. A; Kendall, M.; Carduff, E.; Worth, A.; Harris, A.; Lloyd, A.; Cavers, D.; Grant, L., & Sheikh, A. (2009). Use of serial qualitative interviews to understand patients‘ evolving experiences and needs. BJM, 339(7727). Sótt af https://www.bmj.com/content/339/bmj.b3702
Schippers, M. (2007). Recovering the feminine other: Masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(1), 85–102.
Steingrímsdóttir, M. & Engilbertsson, G. (2018). Mat nýliða á gagnsemi leiðsagnar í starfi kennara. Netla. Retrieved from http://netla.hi.is/greinar/2018/ryn/03
Warin, J. & Gannerud, E. (2014). Gender, teaching and care: a comparative global conversation. Gender and Education, 26(3), 193–199. doi: org/10.1080/09540253.2014.928023
Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Sage


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: ECER 2023
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.149+TC
© 2001–2024 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany