Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th May 2024, 04:49:38am GMT

 
 
Session Overview
Session
01 SES 16 C: Research on Students’ Motivation and Learning
Time:
Friday, 25/Aug/2023:
1:30pm - 3:00pm

Session Chair: Aigul Suleimenova
Location: Wolfson Medical Building, Sem 1 (Yudowitz) [Floor 1]

Capacity: 78 persons

Paper Session

Session Abstract

323;

1903;

1062


Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
01.Professional Learning and Development
Paper

Growth Mindset Intervention: How Effort-based Feedback Enhances Pupils’ Learning

Nurtas Adaikhan, Ardak Taibotanova, Raushan Jumatayeva, David Were

Nazarbayev Intellectual School of PhM, Kazakhstan

Presenting Author: Adaikhan, Nurtas; Taibotanova, Ardak

Abstract

Nowadays, scientists have made enormous discoveries in the fields of neuroscience and neuropsychology. However, to translate these findings to classroom teaching and learning process in order boost academic achievements requires another branch of investigation. Consequently, teachers carried out action research to examine the usefulness of the concept in benefiting students of different age groups, culture, gender, etc. At the end, action researchers drew conclusion recommending the selective adoption of the pre-existing ideas. In his book called “how the brain learns”, David Sousa (2016) states: The cognitive belief system is a window through which we can see the world to understand it, there is a self-concept underlying the cognitive belief system. Self-concept means how we understand ourselves in the world. One of the most important components of our self-concept is a mindset. There are two basic types of mindsets: fixed mindset and growth mindset. Neuro scientist David Huberman from Sandford university explains the process-effort reward concept from the point of view of Neuroscience and in terms of the chemical neurotransmitters, and concludes that if you recognise the agitation, stress and confusion as an entry point to where you eventually want to go, it is allowed to pass through more easily, and rewarding it makes you feel joyful in the process. (David Huberman, 2021). This action research will examine the effect of the mind-set in enhancing the teaching and learning in the classroom.

Introduction

The term “growth mindset” was coined by psychologist Carol Dweck in the mid-eighties. “The “Growth Mindset” is the belief that mindset can be changed, especially in the education system, it refers to the belief that a student’s intelligence or learning ability can be improved when teachers give praise for the effort” (Carol Dweck, 2017). Dweck argued that we all have different beliefs about the underlying nature of ability; children and adults with a growth mindset believe that intelligence and abilities can be developed through effort, persistence, trying different strategies and learning from mistakes (Carol Dweck, 2017). Dweck argues that having a growth mindset can improve academic achievements.Dweck introduces simple methods for teachers to apply during lesson time to improve students’ experiences and academic achievements. She provides two simple tools to encourage students’ growth mindset in her ted-talk. She states the praising students’ effort and rewarding their process help to master their growth mindset and boost their academic achievements. (Carol Dweck 2014).

A search of the available literature found that there are currently no studies testing the value of growth mindset approaches in Kazakhstan. By analysing our own teaching experience and observing our colleagues' lessons over the years, I noticed that in most cases, students were praised for their intelligence and rewarded only for their achievements.

Despite being selected through examination, NIS school students have a wide range of abilities within each grade, even within each class. Students in Kazakhstan, especially those who have lower achievement levels, may find that using the growth mindset approach improves their learning experiences and academic achievements. To determine how the growth mindset intervention could benefit learners in Kazakhstan, called for an action research. This research will focus on the relevance of the concept to the Kazakh curriculum and possible pitfalls to avoid in the future while successfully implementing it in the classroom teaching and learning practices. To qualify the research process, the following research question was formulated:

What benefits can periodic use of “praising effort” instead of “intelligence rewarding” of achievement bring to academic achievement of year-12 students?


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
During the study in NIS PhM in Nur-Sultan, all teachers who teach any subject to the eleven-grade students were trained for growth mindset intervention. A team was created to carry out this research throughout the academic year, the team had regular weekly meeting to plan, analyse, make changes and identify next steps.

The intervention was applied to all grade 11 students, but focus group for the observation was mainly the students with lower academic achievement. Because there is no bigger room for students with higher academic achievement. (Yeager, 2019). But it is expected that high achiever students might show interest in other extra curricula activities to enrich their potentials, since there are plenty of opportunities in NIS for self-development.
Observational data was collected on first and last week of each academic term throughout the intervention period. But the observation and teacher training was taking place regularly throughout the period to make sure the intervention was taking place.
To increase the credibility and validity of research, a three-tier data collection method was employed: student survey, observation lessons (focus criteria is introduced below) and compering term final exam results. Firstly, students were asked to complete growth mindset questionnaire by Carol Dweck, which is designed to identify the level of their mindset, the survey was improved with the help of the school psychologists.  Secondly, lesson observations were made through following focus criteria:
• teachers’ phrases/ways to praise the students
• volunteering for answering the teacher’s questions
• focus levels to the tasks
• taking notes during lessons
• students’ interactions with their classmates during lessons
• performance level of their classwork
• performance level of their homework
 During the lesson observations, how teachers’ language and approaches of giving feedback supports the implementation growth mindset was analysed and training was organised in case of a lapse. Growth mindset students value the effort rather than showing off. Fixed mindset students are reluctant to put effort on learning, because they think putting too much effort means less intelligence. (Carol, 2016).  Thirdly, students’ exam results will be analysed throughout the intervention period, mainly their before and after intervention term summative exam results were compared, in addition, their results were compared to previous year students’ results in general, and their daily progress also was analysed with the help of their teachers.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
In applying growth mindset teaching methods in a (year 11) participant group, this study aims to identify potential methods for improving students’ learning experiences and academic outcomes.
This study provided insights into…
o Ways of identifying the students’ current mindset
o Student experiences and their reaction to feedback from teachers
o Teacher experiences on giving feedback to students and an analysis of what messages teachers are sending to students when they’re giving feedback.
o Methods of encouraging students to work harder
o The roles of self-esteem and delf-concept in learning
o Potential value in adopting the growth mindset method in Kazak context
From classroom observation several positive results are expected: firstly, teachers become more emphasise the student’s effort rather than the students’ achievements in their feedback, some teacher found the approaches to reward students’ learning process, which motivates them even deeper.
Consequently, there were significant improvements in students’ behaviours as well. Students gain a deeper insight into that achievement is based on a hard work, they understood that more effort can bring more success. After being periodical praised, they started to enjoy much the learning process, so hard working became a usual joyful moment for them. Secondly, there was a considerable increasing trend in students’ term final exam results, since the most noticeable changes were in the low-achieving students’ results. Thirdly, from analysis of survey result, we witnessed these:  students’ concept about hard-working students was changed, their self-esteem on their learning was improved, they became willing to take more responsible for their behaviours, they value the effort more, they will embrace challenges, they have character of persisting in face of setbacks, they will see efforts as path to mastery, they will have willing to learn from criticism, they will find inspiration from others’ success. (Carol Dweck, 2017)

References
References
1.Carol Dweck, 2017. Mindset: Changing the Way You think To Fulfil Your Potential.  Robinson.
2.David Anthony Sousa, 2016, How the Brain Learns,
3.Carol Dweck, 2014. The power of believing that you can improve, TEDx Norrkoping.
4.Yeager, D.S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G.M. et al. A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature 573, 364–369 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y
5.Zhang, J. F., Kuu- sisto, E., & Tirri, K. (2017). How Teachers’ and Students’ Mindsets in Learning Have Been Studied: Research Findings on Mind- set and Academic Achievement. Psychology, 8, 1363-1377. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2017.89089
6.Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children's motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.33

8.Hatice uluduz, Ilhan Gunbayi, ministry of national education, akdeniz university, faculty of education, Turkey. 2018. Growth mindset in the classroom. https://www.oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/1777/4417
9.Zhao Y, Niu G, Hou H, Zeng G, Xu L, Peng K and Yu F (2018) From Growth Mindset to Grit in Chinese Schools: The Mediating Roles of Learning Motivations. Front. Psychol. 9:2007.  
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02007
10.Susan Hallam * & Judith Ireson (2005) Secondary school teachers' pedagogic practices when teaching mixed and structured ability classes, Research Papers in Education, 20:1, 324,  
DOI: 10.1080/0267152052000341318
11.De Kraker-Pauw E, Van Wesel F, Krabbendam L and Van Atteveldt N (2017) Teacher Mindsets Concerning the Malleability of Intelligence and the Appraisal of Achievement in the Context of Feedback. Front. Psychol. 8:1594.  doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01594
12.Elizabeth R. Peterson, S. Earl Irving, 2008, Secondary school students' conceptions of assessment and feedback, Learning and Instruction, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.05.001
13.Xing S, Gao X, Jiang Y, Archer M and Liu X (2018) Effects of Ability and Effort Praise on Children’s Failure Attribution, Self-Handicapping, and Performance. Front. Psychol. 9:1883. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01883
14.  Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research. 2005;15(9):1277-1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
15.Ho AD, Yu CC. Descriptive Statistics for Modern Test Score Distributions: Skewness, Kurtosis, Discreteness, and Ceiling Effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2015;75(3):365-388. doi:10.1177/0013164414548576
16.Smyth, S. (2017). ‚A Growth Mindset Approach to supporting children who experience anxiety‛, University of Victoria
17.Podcast: Change Your Brain: Neuroscientist Dr. Andrew Huberman | Rich Roll Podcast, 2021


01.Professional Learning and Development
Paper

Using Storytelling at English and History Lessons with Twice Exceptional Students

Aigul Suleimenova, Gabit Mukhtaruly

Nazarbayev Intellectual School, Kazakhstan

Presenting Author: Suleimenova, Aigul

Twice exceptional students (2e students) are those young people who combine superior ability in one or more areas and disabilities that may be areas of specific learning disabilities, behavioural or attention deficits, or social impairments (Reis et al., 2014, Ronksley-Pavia et al., 2018). Based on teachers’ observation currently there are more learners who can be both gifted and possess additional exceptionality. Another observation is that there are more students who have difficulties when expressing their thoughts, understanding own emotions and following accepted behavioral patterns. Hence, it is highly important to provide differentiation strategies for 2e students as several studies report that negative school experiences have lifelong ramifications. These students continue to feel insecure, undervalued, and like they do not belong (Ronksley-Pavia et al., 2018).

Teacher collaboration is vital when searching for ways to adjust curriculum and teaching strategies. One of these experiences is described in this study. Teachers of History and English (as a foreign language) conducted a Lesson study implementing storytelling into their lessons.

Purpose of study

The study is aimed at identifying effective teaching instruments for facilitating twice exceptional students with the focus on storytelling. The following research questions were shaping this study:

How effective is the use of storytelling in meeting the needs of twice exceptional students?

What are some suggestions for school administration and teachers who are interested in meeting the needs of twice exceptional students?

Conceptual framework

There are two concepts which are shaping this study: twice exceptionality and storytelling.

Understanding the needs of twice exceptional students is a critical factor of curriculum adjustment. More than 50 articles were analyzed and important findings were taken into consideration when planning collaborative work for this study. Based on literature review storytelling teaching method, which currently is gaining popularity, can be an effective tool to help twice exceptional learners use their full potential in educational organizations.

The topic of twice exceptionality has been widely discussed by researchers mainly focusing on inclusive and special education. There is a lack of research suggesting strategies which could be employed on a wide range of subjects in regular classrooms for developing countries where inclusive education is being introduced currently (Gierczyk & Hornby, 2021, Yuying 2015, Metelski 2022). Another important finding is the difficulty in identifying 2e learners. Educators frequently are unaware or unable to identify 2e learners (Baldwin et al., 2015, Neihart, 2018, Bechard, 2019, Baldwin et al., 2015) since “some 2e learners achieve average grades because their superior talents and disabilities are counterbalanced in a manner that masks both high potential and areas of weakness” (Neihart, 2018). Therefore, there role of teachers conducting professional dialogs with their colleagues to understand the complexity of 2e nature is crucial. Since these learners can be very complex and have needs that are usually met in gifted or special education settings constant development of teachers’ skills by sharing their results and opinions through research could bring positive effects (Bechard, 2019).

Regarding storytelling teaching method, research shows that for language and History lessons storytelling can be employed in various ways and the implementation of this technique can lead to improvements in academic performance and enjoyable learning process (Atta-Alla, 2013, Xu, Park, & Baek, 2011, Gakhar & Thompson, 2007; Myatt, 2008, Schell, 2004; Nguyen, et.al., 2014). Moreover, it can lead to a positive transformation of students and improved social interactions and language outcomes (Maier & Fisher (2007). As for History, a number of educational scholars have indicated that viewing history as a story offers stronger possibilities for bringing overall coherence and interest to history instruction (Schell, 2004).


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
This qualitative study is classroom action research focusing on the development of teacher practice knowledge and improvement of learners’ academic performance (Dudley, 2011). To understand the challenges 2e students face at the lesson the collaboration of teachers who are working in the same group was required.
The cycle in the lesson study consisted of stages: meeting with colleagues, selecting teaching strategies, joint planning, teaching and observing the lesson, and discussing the results (Dudley, 2011). During pedagogical meetings similar difficulties were found out and at joint planning storytelling was selected as the most effective way to address needs of all students in that group. Lesson observation form designed by Dudley (2011) was applied. Moreover, to get a deeper understanding of students’ needs, there were interviews conducted with students, parents and other teachers. The collected data was used to adjust teaching and provide more support for 2e students and their classmates.  

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
According to Foley-Nicpon et.al. (2012) teachers’ keen observation and recommendation is the first step to discover students who have high ability but struggle with disabilities. Moreover, a good support system and collaboration at all levels can help the 2E students to be benefited in their learning experience. Therefore, the first finding is widening our pedagogical horizon when collaborating with like-minded professionals.  
This collaborative work provided a deeper understanding of students’ needs. As teachers who deliver content on another language, namely English is the third language and History is taught in Kazakh for students to whom it is their second language, we have noticed that there is a full engagement of students when storytelling is used. Tasks were adapted in accordance with learning needs of students.
By the end of this study the summative assessment results of students have leveled off. Moreover, students were engaged every lesson, and they saw connections of ideas and topics discussed at previous lessons. Finally, 2e students had more opportunities to use their potential at fullest. Surprisingly, 2e students, who never talked about emotions, showed their gratitude and started smiling more often.
Teachers used guided questions while telling stories related to topics. In case of history when talking about the beginning of XX century in Kazakhstan 2e students provide examples from World History, Art, Medicine and Literature. They helped other group members to start seeing the bigger picture of that particular period.  
However, we have noticed that safe environment is crucial. 2e students are vulnerable to any comments or sudden sounds. Therefore, every lesson teachers applied collaboration techniques making sure that everyone felt comfortable emotionally. At the end of every lesson teachers gave the link to the next lesson explaining what students should be ready for.

References
Amran, H. A., & Majid, R. A. (2019). Learning Strategies for Twice-Exceptional Students. International Journal of Special Education, 33(4), 954–976. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1219411.pdf
Bannister-Tyrrell, M., Mavropoulou, S., Jones, M., Bailey, J., O’Donnell-Ostini, A., & Dorji, R. (2018). Initial Teacher Preparation for Teaching Students with Exceptionalities: Pre-service Teachers’ Knowledge and Perceived Competence. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(6), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n6.2
Brouillette, L. (2010). Nurturing the social-emotional and cognitive development of K-2 gifted learners through storytelling and drama. Gifted Education Communicator.
Gierczyk, M., & Hornby, G. (2021). Twice-Exceptional Students: Review of Implications for Special and Inclusive Education. Education Sciences, 11(2), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020085
Jeweler, S., Barnes-Robinson, L., Shevitz, B. R., & Weinfeld, R. (2008). Bordering on Excellence: A Teaching Tool for Twice-Exceptional Students. Gifted Child Today, 31(2), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2008-760
Josephson, J. B., Wolfgang, C. H., & Mehrenberg, R. L. (2018). Strategies for Supporting Students Who Are Twice-Exceptional. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 7(2), 8.
Reis, S., Gelbar, N., & Madaus, J. (2022). Pathways to academic success: specific strength-based teaching and support strategies for twice exceptional high school students with autism spectrum disorder. Gifted Education International, 026142942211241. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294221124197
Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The Underachievement of Gifted Students: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400302
Watts, J. (2008). Benefits of Storytelling Methodologies in Fourth- and Fifth-Grade Historical Instruction. Storytelling, Self, Society, 4(3), 185–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/15505340802303519
Yuying, L. (2015). Supporting Twice exceptional Students in Regular Classrooms in the United States. Manuscript Without Identifiers Supporting.


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: ECER 2023
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.149+TC
© 2001–2024 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany