Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th May 2024, 05:24:12am GMT

 
 
Session Overview
Session
99 ERC SES 07 H: Language Education
Time:
Tuesday, 22/Aug/2023:
9:00am - 10:30am

Session Chair: Nagima Sarsenbayeva
Session Chair: Hosay Adina-Safi
Location: James McCune Smith, 630 [Floor 6]

Capacity: 30 persons

Paper Session

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
99. Emerging Researchers' Group (for presentation at Emerging Researchers' Conference)
Paper

Adult Immigrants Negotiating Identities Through Language Learning

Paulina Chavez Rodriguez

University of Turku, Finland

Presenting Author: Chavez Rodriguez, Paulina

Identity negotiation is an often-overlooked process that adult immigrants actively experience through language learning, because for adult immigrants, learning is not only a means to an end (passing a language test, obtaining citizenship, joining the work force, or gaining study rights) but a process in which our identity is redefined by newly learned linguistic and cultural norms and by interactions with proficient speakers and other learners.

Identity is to be understood as a flexible set of beliefs, thoughts, feelings, and behaviours of an individual which have been learned and are adjusted through social interaction and which influences the individual’s future actions. This understanding of identity is based on the work of Bonny Norton, who has extensively researched and discussed identity in relation to adult immigrants learning English in the US and Canadian context. Norton views language learning and identity from a poststructuralist perspective, drawing especially from Christine Weedon’s ‘subjectivity’, and from a sociological perspective, using the work of Pierre Bourdieu to highlight the power relations present in language use, learning and interactions.

Weedon uses the term ‘subjectivity’ to refer to a persons’ sense of ‘self’ including thoughts, feelings, and understandings of our relationship to the world. Language, for Weedon is where our ‘self’ is constructed, given meaning, and even challenged. Norton points out that, subjectivity also reminds us that identity and language is to be understood in relation to others and considering the power dynamic in these relationships.

Power relations in social interactions can be further understood by using the interrelated concepts of ‘habitus’, ‘capital’, and ‘field’ by Bourdieu. Habitus can be understood as a person’s history internalized into ideas, rules, language, and physical traits; Bourdieu also coined the term ‘language habitus’ as dispositions which show competences and strategies used in linguistic interactions adapted to different situations. The accumulation of this ‘history’ becomes valued ‘capital’ depending on the ‘field’ of interaction and the power relations in them. Though heavily centred in economics, the interplay between habitus, capital, and field becomes relevant in identity research with adult immigrants because it brings forth the sometimes-opposing forces present in their every interaction. Adult immigrants’ internalized history, may or may not be considered valuable in their new country; their language competences and strategies, may or may not be considered acceptable or worth responses. It is because and through these opposing forces that identities are negotiated.

Adding to Norton’s work, this research focuses on Finland and Finnish language. Unlike English, Finnish is a language that is often considered very difficult and slow to learn; it is used by a relatively small population worldwide and mostly restricted to residents; learning through other media like has only become available until recent years, and availability is still very limited. Most adult immigrants in Finland learn Finnish in intensive integration courses. The main objective is to help them integrate into work or study, but it is important to emphasize that learning a language, as stated before, affects the person as a whole, not only their status.

This is why this research aims to answer: how do adult immigrants in Finland negotiate their identities through language learning?

Even though the focus is on Finland and Finnish language, this research may be of use to other countries across the globe that may have a challenging to learn language, limited availability of language users, similar language integration courses, or overall interest in the process of identity negotiation. The research can be replicated in other contexts and results may offer a starting point for discussions about the suitability of language education for adult immigrants’ complex lives.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
This is a qualitative, longitudinal, case research, which started in 2021 and is still ongoing. Research is based in the city of Turku, Finland and, so far, involves 9 adult immigrants who are or were studying Finnish in language integration courses during 2021, 2022 and 2023. Participants have been interviewed while studying in language integration courses and some have participated in follow-up interviews once their course was completed. It is important to have more than one interview session, as it is more likely to capture differences across time as the learning progresses and the participants’ life situations change.
Interviews are semi-structured and narrative oriented, inviting participants to share as much as they want about their stories, focusing as much as possible on Finnish language learning and living as an immigrant in Finland. Analysis of the interview data is still ongoing.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
Preliminary results from the first round of interviews during the language courses illustrate the experience of participants as they arrive in Finland, their first interactions with other language learners, government officials or institutions in charge of integration, and institutions where courses take place. In the interviews, participants have mentioned conflicting subject positions with contradictory expected behaviours. For example, participants are often regarded as passive compliant students, who are told where to take courses, at what time, and for how long, and when to find a job placement. On the other hand, they are also expected to actively apply for the integration courses, often by spouses or other family members and not by authorities, or to look for job placements, often with little to no help from their language instructors or institutions, with some participants emphasizing how difficult it was to know what to expect or what to do next.
The job placement search and participation has also been mentioned by most participants as a turning point in their lives in Finland and can be taken as an example of identity negotiation. While in the job placement, participants have found new career opportunities, accepting that their previous careers or professional roles may not be sufficient or accepted in Finland they have considered continuing their studies in a different field; others have reaffirmed their identities as professionals in their field and rejected the option of changing studies or disregarding their previous education and work experience.

References
Bourdieu, P. (1977a). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice (ed.)). Cambridge U. P.
Bourdieu, P. (1977b). The Economics of Linguistic Exchanges. Information (International Social Science Council), 16(6), 645–668. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177%2F053901847701600601
Bourdieu, P. (1986). Forms of Capital. In Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258).
Centre of Expertise in Immigrant Integration. (2014). https://kotouttaminen.fi/en/centre-of-expertise
InfoFinland. (2020). Why should I study Finnish or Swedish? https://www.infofinland.fi/en/living-in-finland/finnish-and-swedish/why-should-i-study-finnish-or-swedish
Norton, B. (2013). Fact and fiction in language learning. In Identity and Language Learning: Extending the Conversation (pp. 41–57).
Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2011). Identity, language learning, and social change. Language Teaching, 44(4), 412–446. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000309
Opetushallitus. (2012). Aikuisten Maahanmuuttajien Kotoutumiskoulutuksen Opetussuunnitelman Perusteet 2012 [Principles of the Teaching Plan for Adult Migrants’ Integration Education 2012].
Peirce, B. N. (1995). Social Identity, Investment, and Language Learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587803
Weedon, C. (1991). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. In Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory (Repr.). Blackwell.


99. Emerging Researchers' Group (for presentation at Emerging Researchers' Conference)
Paper

Language-Learning Autonomy among Adult Immigrants Based in Germany

Klara Antesberger, Helga Dorner

Eötvös Loránd University, ELTE, Hungary

Presenting Author: Antesberger, Klara

In Germany, roughly 27.2% of the population (22.3 million people) has a migrant background (Statistisches Bundesamt, 2022). Integration takes place in very different ways and depends not least on the political, economic, social, cultural, and religious dimensions of the immigrants. However, even with courses and many other support initiatives, the problem remains that many immigrants do not have adequate language skills (Becker & Lauterbach, 2008). Many of those who, at least, attend courses must retake the B1 exam and only 50-60% of them pass the B1 level, which they need to obtain a permanent residence permit (BAMF-Bericht zur Integrationskursgeschäftsstatistik, 2020).

Immigrants´ language efficiency in the host country has a positive effect on labor market integration and earnings (Dustmann & van Soest, 2001) and to be able to learn the language of the host country would be essential for immigrants to achieve full integration, whereby the immigrant becomes equal with the country's residents in terms of rights, duties, and opportunities (Sezer, 2010). However, as immigrant workers and refugees often do not have good education and some of them even struggle with literacy skills in their native language, Saunders (2015) asks the question whether the preconditions are given for these immigrant adult learners to participate autonomously in shaping their learning process. These new challenges call for new learning support methods. Saunders (2015) notes that one of the current challenges in foreign language teaching is to focus on learners' needs and to promote learner autonomy.

The level of a person´s autonomous learning ability may be indicated by the use of language learning strategies, which are behaviors or actions of learners to enhance their own learning (Oxford, 1990). Language learning strategies support the improvement of language proficiency (Oxford, 1990) because they support self-directed and active involvement, which is essential for improving communicative competence. Although they play a very important role in language learning processes, research that would have looked at immigrant and refugee self-regulated learning strategy use has been scarce so far, as most studies deal with the groups of school children or students.

Therefore, the current study investigates the self-directed strategy use (Oxford, 2016) of adult immigrants based in Germany and learning German as a foreign language in Integration Courses (BAMF integration courses). BAMF is the Federal Office and a competence center for migration and integration in Germany and is responsible for carrying out asylum procedures and protecting refugees but is also the driving force behind the nationwide promotion of integration. BAMF integration courses are specifically designed for adult migrants and guide participants in 6 modules (100 hours each) from the state of no language knowledge at all to the level B1 (Council of Europe, 2001).

The purpose of the research is to investigate in a smaller group of immigrant language learners (N=18) the external and internal factors influencing their learning and their autonomous language-learning ability. We use mixed method approach with narrative interviews, self-reflection questionnaires and a self-regulated strategy use questionnaire.

The research questions are:

  1. What are participants’ perceptions about their own learning?
  2. What technics, tools and learning strategies do the participants use outside of the classroom for self-directed learning?
  3. What are their motivations, attitudes towards learning German, and what are their needs and obstacles in learning German?

Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
Volunteering adult immigrants who learn German as a foreign language in Germany in Integration Courses are the participants (N=18). We used convenience sampling as a method of sampling. This study is based on the first data collection cycle; however, we plan to have about 2 more iterations and batches. These data collection cycles follow mixed method research design, by using quantitative and qualitative research tools.
 
Research phases, tools, and methods

1. Preliminary assessment of strategic self-regulated language learning (Oxford, 2011; Habók and Magyar, 2018) – quantitative approach;
2. Narrative interviews (N=11) (Küsters, 2009) about the external and internal factors influencing the language learning of migrant learners – qualitative approach;

Further tools used in the research for ongoing monitoring of language proficiency:

- A self-reflection questionnaire about language learning development with quantitative closed questions.
- Development of language proficiency will also be monitored in every module of the course using language tests.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
This study (and the presentation, if accepted) will include results from Phases 1 and 2.
We have preliminary data from Phase 1 from the first batch of volunteers, hence, we include those results in this abstract. However, currently we are analyzing the narrative interviews, and we intend to show findings from Phase 2 by the date of the conference.
 
Our preliminary analysis (of data on frequency) shows:

- Respondents are aged between 20 and 53 years.
- Most of them have spent between 4 and 9 months in Germany in December 2022.
- There seems to be a relationship between educational background and strategy use.
- Participants seem to know that learning is better when they enjoy to do so, yet it seems that the emphasis in concrete learning is not on pleasure but on performance. Here, there could be some initial implications about teaching, because if they are not used to follow their interest in German, even if it is more difficult than in their native language, then they have no bridge to lifelong German learning.
- The higher the overall score on the strategy test, the more "courageous" participants are to communicate, even if they are afraid of making mistakes. This suggests that it may be worth practicing the general use of strategy. Therefore, based on the findings of this ongoing study, in the subsequent phases of the research, a classroom intervention will be introduced for developing strategy use and then the study will aim to investigate how strategy use and learning autonomy of adult immigrants can be improved through classroom interventions.
- Some of the answers suggest implications about refining research tools: The  strategy questionnaire at A2 level could be supplemented by further questions and it would make sense to start focus group discussions.

References
1.Becker, Rolf, Lauterbach, Wolfgang (Hrsg.) (2008). Bildung als Privileg: Erklärungen und Befunde zu den Ursachen der Bildungsungleichheit (4. Aufl.). Weinheim.
2.Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge – BAMF (2020). Bericht zur Integrationskursgeschäftsstatistik für das Jahr 2019 (Abfragestand: 01.04.2020).
3.Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Council of Europe. https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages
5.Dustmann, Christian & van Soest, Arthur. (2001). Language Fluency And Earnings: Estimation With Misclassified Language Indicators. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 83. 663-674. 10.1162/003465301753237740.
6.Habók A and Magyar A (2018). Validation of a Self-Regulated Foreign Language Learning Strategy Questionnaire Through Multidimensional Modelling. Front. Psychol. 9:1388. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01388
7.Küsters, Ivonne (2009). Narrative Interviews. Grundlagen und Anwendungen, 2. Aufl. Wiesbaden (Lehrbuch: Hagener Studientexte zur Soziologie): VS Verlag, ISBN 3-531-16153-9
8.Oxford, R. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.
9.Oxford, R. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow: Longman.
10.Oxford, R.L. (2016). Teaching and Researching Language Learning Strategies: Self-Regulation in Context, Second Edition (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315719146
11.Saunders, Constanze (2015). Online-Sprachlernberatung: Eine longitudinale Aktionsforschungsstudie. In: Böcker, Jessica, Saunders, Constanze, Koch, Lennart, Langner, Michael (Hrsg.) Beratung und Coaching zum Fremdsprachenlernen – Konzepte, Qualitätssicherung, praktische Erfahrungen Beiträge zu einer Arbeitstagung (Hannover 2015) Gießener Elektronische Bibliothek 2017.
12.Sezer, Kamuran (2010). Was ist Integration? Projekt „Migration und Integration“. Goethe-Institut.
13.Statistisches Bundesamt (2022). Press release No. 162 of 12 April 2022. https://www.destatis.de/EN/Press/2022/04/PE22_162_125.html


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: ECER 2023
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.149+TC
© 2001–2024 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany