Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th May 2024, 03:03:20am GMT

 
 
Session Overview
Session
99 ERC SES 05 J: Gender and Education
Time:
Monday, 21/Aug/2023:
3:30pm - 5:00pm

Session Chair: Victoria Showunmi
Location: Wolfson Medical Building, Sem 2 (Fraser) [Floor 1]

Capacity: 60 persons

Paper Session

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
99. Emerging Researchers' Group (for presentation at Emerging Researchers' Conference)
Paper

The Value of Graduate Education: Investigation of Individual and Relational Factors

Eda Çürükvelioğlu Köksal1, S. Burcu Özgülük Üçok2

1Bartın University, Turkiye; 2Ted University, Turkiye

Presenting Author: Çürükvelioğlu Köksal, Eda

Postgraduate education which promotes the idea that members of society should always be developing their abilities plays a significant role in encouraging lifelong learning (Anderson et al.,1998). Graduate programs are regarded by many as the ideal educational opportunity since it gives students the chance to learn in-depth about a subject via thoughtful experiences. These experiences inspire thinking, help people realize who they are and what they want out of life, and give them access to methods for achievement (Johnson & Copnell, 2002; Purcell et al., 2012). As is common knowledge, undergraduate education is a crucial time for individuals to decide about their careers.

The Expectancy-Value Model (Eccles et al., 983) proposes that the two primary parts of a person's achievements are based on their choices and perseverance in completing the tasks that have been assigned to them. The success expectations and personal values of the individuals are significant preconditions of the motivation behind accomplishment in various activities (Wigfield, 1994). The individual's unique ideas about their competency in a field and belief in their ability to execute a future assignment are designated as the expectation component (Eccles et al., 1983). One example of it is believing that one will get admitted to a graduate school and successfully complete it. In this study, the researchers will examine the associations of the individual (gender and academic achievement) and relational (intention to marriage and perceived partner support) variables in explaining the valuing of graduate study from the perspective of this model.

Considering the fact that in Turkey female students are less prevalent in Turkey's graduate education programs, particularly at the master's level (Ünlü et al., 2021), it is thought that gender might be a factor to explain the valuing of graduate education. Additionally, gender disparity is a gap not just in Turkey but also in all regions of the world especially in academia (Zheng et al. 2022). This conclusion seems logical when taking into account the effects of gender roles in the process of choosing a job, as female participants imply the caregiving role of females (Ünal et al., 2018). For academic achievement, the researchers were unable to locate a prior study that looked at the relationship between academic success and valuing of graduate education. Only, according to one study (Tekin, 2022), there is a low-level association between academic achievement and the intention to pursue postgraduate study.

Taking into account the relational variables’ roles in explaining the valuing of graduate education, the intention of marriage, and perceived partner support are expected to be associated with valuing of graduate education. Since university students are in the emerging adulthood period, they tend to marry after they find a job and this situation is expected since it is a characteristic of emerging adulthood. From this perspective, it is possible for university students not to attend a graduate education to spend time on their family life. There are some studies showing that perceived psychological costs are negatively associated with graduate education intention (İlter, 2021a). Taking together the perceived cost of graduate education, the researchers speculate that the intention of marriage might be associated with the valuing of graduate education and will predict the valuing of graduate study among undergraduate students. Another variable that might be associated with the valuing of education is perceived partner support. Studies indicate that partner support has a positive role in one’s career progress (Zheng et al., 2022).

In light of the literature, the aim of this study is to determine the role of gender, academic achievement, perceived partner support, and intention of marriage in predicting the valuing of graduate education among university students.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
This study will be a quantitative study adopting a correlational design. The target sample of the current study is 800 undergraduate students meeting the eligibility criteria of (a) being 18 years old and above, (b) being in a romantic relationship for at least three months, and (c) living in Turkey. The sample will be recruited via convenient sampling, criterion sampling, and snowball sampling. After obtaining ethical permission, a demographic form in which the information on the gender and academic achievement of the students will be obtained, The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support Revised Form (MSPSS-R; Eker,  Arkar, & Yaldız, 2001), Intention of Marriage Scale (Güzel, 2020), and Value of Education Scale (İlter, 2021b) will be utilized for the data collection. The predictor variables of the current study are gender, academic achievement, perceived partner support, and the intention of marriage while the outcome variable will be the valuing of graduate education. The data will be analyzed with hierarchical regression analyses. In the first step of the analyses, gender and academic achievement will be entered and in the second step, the perceived partner support and the intention of marriage will be entered into the model. Hence, the roles of gender, academic achievement,  perceived partner support, and the intention of marriage in terms of predicting the value of graduate education will be examined. The hypotheses of the current study are as follows: (1) the students’ gender and academic achievement will predict their valuing of graduate education, and (2) perceived partner support and the intention of marriage will significantly predict students’ valuing of graduate education. The analyses will be conducted in the SPSS 2022 version.
Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The overall aim of the current study is to investigate the predictive roles of individual and relational variables in explaining undergraduate students’ value of graduate education. In this regard, individual variables were determined to be the gender and the academic achievement of the undergraduate students while relational variables were determined to be the perceived partner support and the intention of marriage. We expect that:
1) There will be significant gender differences in the valuing of graduate education.
2) There will be a significant and positive association between academic achievement and valuing of graduate education.
3) There will be a significant and positive association between perceived partner support and valuing of graduate education.
4) There will be a significant and negative association between the intention of marriage and valuing of graduate education.
5) Individual variables (gender and academic achievement) will significantly explain the variance in valuing of graduate education.
6) Relationship variables (perceived partner support and intention of marriage) will significantly explain the variance in valuing of graduate education above and beyond individual variables.


References
Battle, A., & Wigfield, A. (2003). College women’s value orientations toward family, career, and graduate school. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(1), 56-75.

Eccles (Parsons) J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., & Kaczala, C. M. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Eds.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). Freeman.

Eccles, J. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 78–89.

Eker, D., Arkar, H., & Yaldız, H. (2001). Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeği’nin Gözden Geçirilmiş Formunun Faktör Yapısı, Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği [Factorial structure, validity, and reliability of the mRevised Form of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support]. Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 12(1), 17-25.

Güzel, N. C. (2020). Evlilik ölçeği: evliliğe ilişkin niyet, evliliğe yönelik genel tutumlar ve
yönelik beklenti ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizleri [Validity and Reliability Analysis of Marriage Intention, General Attitudes Towards Marriage and Expectation of Marriage Scale], Turkish Studies - Education, 15(1), 185-197. https://dx.doi.org/10.29228/TurkishStudies.40532

İlter, İ., (2021a). Lisansüstü eğitime yönelik farkındalığın lisans öğrencilerinin lisansüstü eğitim niyetlerine etkisi [The Effect of Postgraduate Study Awareness on Undergraduate Students’ Postgraduate Study Intentions]. MANAS Journal of Social Studies, 10(3), 1592-1601.

İlter, İ. (2021b). Lisans Öğrencilerin Lisansüstü Eğitim Niyetlerinin Yordayıcıları Olarak Öznel Görev Değerleri [Subjective Task Values as Predictors of Undergraduate Students’ Intentions for Postgraduate Education]. HAYEF: Journal of Education, 19 (2), 82-92. https://doi: 10.54614/hayef.2022.22003

Ünlü, S., Kirazcı, F. & Büyükgöze-Kavas, A. (2022). Kadınların lisansüstü eğitim niyetinde aile-kariyer yönelimi ve toplumsal cinsiyetin rolü [Family-Career Orientation and Gender Roles in Women’s Intention of Graduate Education]. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 20(1), 124-142. https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.1026220


99. Emerging Researchers' Group (for presentation at Emerging Researchers' Conference)
Paper

Methodological Reflection on the Application of the Feminist Perspective.

Miriam Comet-Donoso, Maria del Pilar Folgueiras Bertomeu, Sonia Estradé Albiol

Universitat de Barcelona, Spain

Presenting Author: Comet-Donoso, Miriam

This communication is based on the research process of a PhD thesis and the question of study is to understand what a feminist perspective means. To make this proposal we must mention the ontological, epistemological, and methodological dimensions.

Ontological dimension

The ontological dimension challenges us as researchers with questions like: does reality exist? Is this reality an entity constructed by sociohistorical moments? Or is it something that can be objectified? (Folguerias-Bertomeu, 2018). The ontological dimension this feminist research is in framed is socio-critical or critical, since it considers that reality is interpretable. It is positioned in historical realism, understanding the potential for change that may exist and where subject and object are not two isolated entities, but rather interact with each other influenced by a social commitment (Guba and Lincoln, 1994).

Epistemological dimension

We position ourselves in a critical feminist epistemology. The sociocritical position within epistemology defends a praxeological epistemology, assuming that there is an interaction between the person investigating and the person being investigated; therefore, the values and beliefs of the person who is investigating are considered, as they can influence the knowledge (Folgueiras-Bertomeu, 2018). It is also an epistemology (Popkewitz, 1988) that unites theory and practice and understands knowledge as emancipating and liberating. Furthermore, it encourages researchers to carry out a constant self-reflection exercise in the research process.

About the nature of knowledge, we start from the "point of view theory" (Harding,1987; Haraway,1991), which arises from the analysis that certain groups have not been represented in the access to and production of knowledge; therefore, knowledge is only related to a minority. This theory not only argues that systemic inequalities are embedded in knowledge, but that this science is constructed within a social locus and historical context. Applying the point of view theory is necessary to enrich the endeavor of "knowledge" and to have a more complete vision of reality, because as Dorothy Smith (2004) exposes, when these social loci are highlighted, it is possible to see more, beyond or “below the ideology of the powerful”; consequently, it becomes a more reliable knowledge.

In conclusion, while avoiding a relativistic view on reality, it is also important to understand that reality can accommodate different points of view.

Methodological dimension

At this point, the contributions Harding makes in her text “Is There a Feminist Method?” are interesting and necessary. According to the author, feminist research has often highlighted novelties in method or methodology to underline the differences with non-feminist research. However, the point is not using a different method or methodology, but the way in which a change in the epistemological position makes us question them and apply them in a different manner.

Emphasizing the changes in method or methodology only can conceal the importance and depth of the epistemological shift in these investigations.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
This communication is part of the first phase of PhD thesis in a survey investigation. We can divide our methodological reflection on the application of the feminist perspective into three sections: the review of the literature for the construction of the dimensions, the elaboration and validation of the instrument and the methodological meta-reflection.

Construction of the survey dimensions
In the review of the literature and identification of the relevant dimensions, we have started from the theory of the point of view previously explained. Therefore, it has been taken into consideration from where the knowledge arose and what was the sociohistorical position of the study.
We have also been guided by the contributions of Biglia and Vergés-Bosch (2016) with questions such as "In the systematic delimitation of the topic, what criteria have been followed for the selection of the bibliography?" or “Are there research purposes that support the feminist political agenda?”, among others.

First preparation and validation of the instrument
The first elaboration of the questionnaire has been carried out in a deductive, inductive, and participatory way. As Agee (2009) points out, the questions inform about the meaning and direction in theoretical and methodological terms, so, in this part, the approaches provided by Jiménez (2021) have been considered, such as, for example, which are the questions that are being asked, what are the questions that are not being asked and why, how are the questions being asked and if there are any realities that are being excluded or marginalized.
The participatory elaboration was applied with the aim of making the informants into agents of the investigative process to break the dichotomy between object of study/researcher so criticized by some feminist researchers (Donoso-Vázquez and Velasco-Martínez, 2013).
Last, eight experts from the methodological and feminist field have taken part in the validation by judges with the aim of carrying out a review of this perspective at a specialist level.

Meta reflection through the epistemological diary
The epistemological diary is the tool used for the meta-reflection that occurs throughout the research process in a transversal way. This technique makes it possible to analyze the research process itself, to question the approaches and to capture values, beliefs, as well as self-reflections. It is also useful to externalize research processes that would remain hidden, as well as to work with the gender, race, and class as constitutive categories of the practice of analysis (Cortés, 2021).

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
In conclusion, we consider that the feminist perspective can be applied to the quantitative methodology. Although it may seem unnecessary due to the nature of this procedure, it has been reported (Biglia et al., 2022) that quantitative data have a high potential to reproduce gender inequalities. Also, the incorporation of this perspective can lead us to identify indicators that provide clarity and greater solutions to reverse inequalities.

Secondly, depending on the feminist perspective to be considered, we believe it is important to make a methodological reflection to assess from which ontological, epistemological, and methodological assumptions we are going to build our work. In this sense and following all that has been said thus far, we do not want to discuss whether there is a particular and different methodology that can be considered feminist, but we defend this epistemological rethinking in research. Furthermore, highlighting the importance of this positioning.

However, this reconsideration assumes an analysis of the methodology and methods. In relation to this, and entering the phase in which we find ourselves in the PhD thesis, our way of applying this feminist perspective has been through a review of the literature based on situated knowledge that has allowed to build the dimensions of the survey, analyzing the elaboration of the questions through instruments contributed by various feminist authors (Jiménez, 2021: Biglia and Vergés-Bosch, 2016) and making the informants into active agents of the construction of the questionnaire. The questionnaire has also undergone a validation from experts in the subject. Finally, we introduce the epistemological diary as a useful tool to examine all the processes that occur within a study and to carry out a constant exercise of self-reflection and review.

References
Agee, J. (2009). Developing qualitative research questions: A reflective process. International journal of qualitative studies in education, 22(4), 431-447.
Biglia et al. (2022) Introduint la perspectiva de gènere interseccional a les estadístiques. Guia teoricopràctica. Eines.
Biglia, B., i Vergés Bosch, N. (2016). Cuestionando la perspectiva de género en la investigación. REIRE: revista d'innovació i recerca en educació. https://10.1344/reire2016.9.2922    
Cortés, R. J. (2021). Diseño y desafíos metodológicos de la investigación feminista en ciencias sociales. Empiria: Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales, (50), 177-200. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.50.2021.30376  
Donoso-Vázquez, T., i Velasco-Martínez, A. (2013). ¿Por qué una propuesta de formación en perspectiva de género en el ámbito universitario? Profesorado. Revista de currículum y formación de profesorado, 17(1), 71-88. http://www.ugr.es/local/recfpro/rev171ART5.pdf
Folgueiras Bertomeu, P. (2018). Programa Docente e Investigador. Investigación Socioeducativa.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2, 163-194.
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs and Women. The Reinvention of Nature. Free Assn Books.
Harding, S. G. (Ed.). (1987). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Indiana University Press.
Jimenez, R. (2021). Diseño y desafíos metodológicos de la investigación feminsita en ciencias sociales. Empiria. Revista De metodología De Ciencias Sociales, (50), 177–200.  https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.50.2021.30376  
Popkewitz, T. (1988). Paradigma e ideología en investigación educativa. Mondadori.
Smith, D. E. (2004). Women’s perspective as a radical critique of sociology. The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies, 1.


99. Emerging Researchers' Group (for presentation at Emerging Researchers' Conference)
Paper

Gender-specific Subjectification Processes of Teenagers in the Informal Digital Learning and Educational Space YouTube

Verena Honkomp-Wilkens

Institute Technology and Education, University of Bremen, Germany

Presenting Author: Honkomp-Wilkens, Verena

The use of the Internet, search engines, social media and video platforms is part of everyday life for the majority of young people in Germany, as shown by the annual JIM study (Feierabend et al., 2022). Not only in Germany, but worldwide, YouTube is one of the most popular Internet offerings, not just for teenagers. In December 2022, YouTube ranked second among the world's most popular websites (Similarweb, 2022). Teenagers not only watch videos for their entertainment but also view content that provides information about leisure interests, school and education (Feierabend et al., 2022; Wolf, 2015).

The popular content on the video platform is strongly organized along stereotypical notions of gender (Döring, 2019; Wegener et al., 2020): Significantly fewer people who are perceived as female than as male can be seen on YouTube. Women discuss fewer topics, often talk about beauty, hobbies, family or relationships in an apparently private setting. In contrast, YouTubers seen as male talk about their profession and choose public spaces for their videos.

These findings are not only valid for the German but also for the international context. Döring and Mohseni (2018) describe in a comparative study of popular YouTube channels from nine countries that there are significantly more male than female YouTubers on the platform. Pattier (2021) looks at Spanish YouTube channels and discusses a gender gap among “EduYouTubers”. The analysis of Arias-Rodriquez and Sánchez-Bello (2022) shows that influencers, who are watched for the purpose of informal learning, convey sexist roles and gender stereotypes, do not use inclusive language, and do not address issues of gender equality.

The central question of my PhD project is therefore: To what extent do gender-specific subjectification processes take place in the reception of educationally relevant YouTube videos by young people?

In this study, the Internet content used by adolescents to learn about their school and leisure interests is considered educationally relevant. This approach places the reception behaviour of adolescents and their perspectives on educationally relevant content at the centre of the research. In this way, videos do not have to meet the defined didactic, formal, and design criteria of explanatory videos, tutorials, or instructional videos (Wolf, 2015).

Butler's concept of gender and the concept of the subject provide the theoretical basis for the work. The social gender, the biological sex as well as the idea of heterosexuality as a norm (desire) are discursively produced (Butler, 1991). The constructed character of gender is made invisible, gender seems to be given as natural. In the (self-) performance of YouTubers, young people receive performative processes of doing gender. Here, gender as an intersectional category (Degele, 2019), is staged and produced in constant social interaction (Butler, 1991). Thus, gender can be read and enacted based on external characteristics (e.g., clothing, language, interest); here, heteronormativity (Wagenknecht, 2007) acts as a powerful norm. The subject is formed in these repetitive processes of doing gender (West & Zimmermann, 1991). In the process of becoming a subject, the subject submits itself to these powerful norms and discourses. Subjectivation with Butler (2001) means subordination and becoming of the subject at the same time.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
To answer the research question, semi-structured, guided interviews (Helfferich, 2019) will be conducted with adolescents and young adults aged 16 and older. The interviews will be conducted on two survey dates. A first data collection already took place in 2021, the second survey is planned for summer 2023.
The interview partners for the first survey in 2021 were initially acquired by snowball sampling. Due to the Corona pandemic, the interviews were all conducted online via videoconference and lasted between 30 and 120 minutes. The interviews were transcribed using F4 software and analyzed using the MaxQDA program. The data was analyzed using the method of structuring content analysis (Kuckartz, 2018). The development of a category system, whose categories are developed both theory-guided (deductive) and directly derived from the material (inductive), has been the central focus of the analysis. With an open view on the data and the constant expansion of the sample along theoretical saturation or the further development of research questions, elements of the grounded theory are also included (Glaser & Strauss, 2010).
The interviews focused on the use of YouTube videos as a learning resource in general. The questions were structured into different thematic blocks. One thematic block dealt with the criteria young people use to select videos. It could be shown that the video protagonist and the potential to identify with him*her is a reason for choosing specific videos. In the follow-up survey, the potential to identify with the person seen in a YouTube Video will be the focus of the investigation. The interview questions will be designed accordingly and will be analyzed based on Butler's concepts of the subject and gender.
The results will be presented for discussion at the ECER conference. In doing so, I would like to reflect on the interview procedure and discuss with the plenum how gender can be discussed without asking suggestive questions or obtaining falsified results according to social desirability.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
Central findings from guided interviews with young people who use videos on YouTube as a learning resource for individual and school interests will be presented. The focus lies on gender-specific subjectification processes that are related to the reception of the videos on YouTube.
It is also important to emphasize the potential connected with YouTube to break gender stereotypes. Döring (2019) emphasizes that YouTube leaves room for different perspectives, for example for feminist content. Furthermore, Wolf (2015) describes a higher diversity in authorship (of explanatory content) on YouTube. As the video platform offers easy participation opportunities compared to professional media productions or the formal education system.
The dissertation aims to raise awareness for gender-specific subjectification processes in the informal digital learning and educational space YouTube and thus to contribute to the scientific and social discourse. The thesis follows the “Allgemeines Gleichbehandlungsgesetz”, the central regulatory framework for the implementation of European anti-discrimination directives in Germany. Its goal is to prevent and eliminate disadvantages, for example in the field of education, also on the basis of gender (AGG, 2006). This educational mandate is also anchored in the Bremen School Law. The aim is to counteract inequality of educational opportunities and reduce social disadvantages as well as to create conditions for promoting gender equality (Bremisches Schulgesetz und Bremisches Schulverwaltungsgesetz, 2005). -Students encounter images, stereotypes, but also ruptures and irritations of gender and related role concepts not only in school, but also in informal digital learning and educational spaces. For media pedagogy in and outside of school and for a discourse on education and educational science, it is therefore necessary to also consider and reflect on the digital space.

References
Allgemeines Gleichbehandlungsgesetz (AGG), (2006), https://www.antidiskriminierungsstelle.de/SharedDocs/downloads/DE/publikationen/AGG/agg_gleichbehandlungsgesetz.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
Arias-Rodriguez, A., & Sánchez-Bello, A. (2022). Informal Learning with a Gender Perspective Transmitted by Influencers through Content on YouTube and Instagram in Spain. Social Sciences, 11(8), 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11080341
Butler, J. (1991). Das Unbehagen der Geschlechter (22. Auflage 2021). Suhrkamp.
Butler, J. (2001). Psyche der Macht. Das Subjekt der Unterwerfung (11. Auflage 2021). Suhrkamp.
Bremisches Schulgesetz (2005). https://www.bildung.bremen.de/sixcms/media.php/13/SchulR%20Brosch%C3%BCre%202021-12.pdf
Degele, N. (2019). Intersektionalität: Perspektiven der Geschlechterforschung. In B. Kortendiek, B. Riegraf, & K. Sabisch (Hrsg.), Handbuch Interdisziplinäre Geschlechterforschung (S. 341–348). Springer Fachmedien. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12496-0_32
Döring, N. (2019). Videoproduktion auf YouTube: Die Bedeutung von Geschlechterbildern. In J. Dorer, B. Geiger, B. Hipfl, & V. Ratković (Hrsg.), Handbuch Medien und Geschlecht: Perspektiven und Befunde der feministischen Kommunikations- und Medienforschung (S. 1–11). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20712-0_53-1
Döring, N., & Mohseni, M. R. (2018). Male dominance and sexism on YouTube: Results of three content analyses. Feminist Media Studies, 19(4), 512–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1467945
Feierabend, S., Rathgeb, T., Kheredmand, H., & Glöckler, S. (2022). JIM-Studie 2022. Jugend, Information, Medien. Basisuntersuchung zum Medienumgang 12- 19-Jähriger. (Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest (mpfs), Hrsg.). https://www.mpfs.de/fileadmin/files/Studien/JIM/2022/JIM_2022_Web_final.pdf
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2010). Grounded Theory. Strategien qualitativer Forschung (3. unv.). Verlag Hans Huber.
Helfferich, C. (2019). Leitfaden- und Experteninterviews. In N. Baur & J. Blasius (Hrsg.), Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung (S. 669–686). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21308-4_44
Kuckartz, U. (2018). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung (4. Aufl.). Beltz Juventa.
Pattier, D. (2021). The Gender Gap Among EduTubers and the Factors Significantly Influencing It. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(2), 313. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.7.732
Similarweb (2022): Top Website-Ranking: Die meistbesuchten Webseiten: Top Website-Ranking für alle Kategorien in der Welt. https://www.similarweb.com/de/top-websites
Wegener, C., Prommer, E., & Linke, C. (2020). Gender Representations on YouTube. M/C Journal, 23(6). https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.2728
West, C., & Zimmermann, D. H. (1991). Doing Gender. In Gender Inequality.
Wagenknecht, P. (2007). Was ist Heteronormativität? Zu Geschichte und Gehalt des Begriffs. In J. Hartmann, C. Klesse, P. Wagenknecht, B. Fritzsche, & K. Hackmann (Hrsg.), Heteronormativität. Empirische Studien zu Geschlecht, Sexualität und Macht (S. 17–34). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90274-6_2
Wolf, K. D. (2015). Bildungspotenziale von Erklärvideos und Tutorials auf YouTube: AudioVisuelle Enzyklopädie, adressatengerechtes Bildungsfernsehen, Lehr-Lern-Strategie oder partizipative Peer Education? merz, 59(1), 30–36. https://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/literatur/vollanzeige.html?FId=1060103