Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th May 2024, 05:23:03am GMT

 
 
Session Overview
Session
99 ERC SES 03 G: Teacher Education Research
Time:
Monday, 21/Aug/2023:
11:00am - 12:30pm

Session Chair: Arnaud Dubois
Location: James McCune Smith, 639 [Floor 6]

Capacity: 90 persons

Paper Session

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
99. Emerging Researchers' Group (for presentation at Emerging Researchers' Conference)
Paper

A Policy for Practice: A Document Analysis of National Guidelines and Principles for Mentoring Newly Qualified Teachers

Remi Skytterstad Pedersen

Arctic University of Norway, UiT, Norway

Presenting Author: Skytterstad Pedersen, Remi

Introduction, research question, and theoretical framework

To meet the future needs for educated teachers it is essential that newly qualified teachers (NQTs) start and remain in their profession. Since 2017 teacher education in Norway for primary and secondary school has been reformed to a master’s degree, and NQTs graduate with both a specialization in three to four subjects, and a research and development competence (R&D). This change has created both an opportunity and a need to analyze how to support, apply and develop NQTs competence as they transition from students to working life. All the Nordic countries—including Estonia and except for Denmark—offer a five-year master’s level teacher education, consequently, the ambitions and results of this paper reach beyond the borders of Norway.

Regarding support of NQTs, a lack of mentoring is highlighted as a reason why teachers leave their profession (Ingersoll & Strong, 2011), and Thomas et al. (2019) argue that “high quality” collegial support is necessary for both job satisfaction and motivation to teach. In turn, three key factors have been described as necessary to support NQTs: skilled and educated mentors, a variety of learning activities, and contextual factors like professional development, collaboration, and teacher education (Helleve & Ulvik, 2019; Schaefer et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2008). Mentoring is however a contested concept, and Kemmis et al. (2014) outline three main archetypes of mentoring: as supervision, as support, and as collaborative self-development. However, empirical research indicates that induction practices are unpredictable concerning what kind of support and collaboration NQTs can expect (Antonsen et al., 2022), which adds to the findings that there is no clear patterns in the organization and implementation of mentoring in Norway (Rambøll, 2021). These ambiguities indicate a need for clearer principles and guidelines for mentoring, similar to how Finland has embraced collaborative self-development through their practice of “Peer-Group Mentoring” (Pennanen et al., 2020; Tynjälä et al., 2021).

Considering the necessity of mentoring practices that supports, apply, and develops NQTs competence, this paper analyzes key documents regarding Norwegian national guidelines and principles for mentoring NQTs. These key documents provide insight into the political intentions for what kind of profession and practice a new teacher is envisioned to be inducted into, and what the mentoring process entails.

Therefore, this paper’s research question is: How do the documents that comprise the overarching national guidelines and principles for mentoring articulate that schools should support NQTs with a master’s degree?

To analyze the issues outlined above, I will apply the theory of practice architecture as an analytical lens (Mahon et al., 2017), which allows me to assess and understand social realities that are subject to a professional practice.

The theory of practice architecture describes that practices are social, situated and that they are shaped by arrangements (Mahon et al., 2017). There are three mutually influencing arrangements that exist simultaneously in a professional practice (Mahon et al., 2017, s. 9-10): Cultural-discursive arrangements, which describes the space for expressions in a practice (the prevalent language and discourses), which either constrain or enable what’s relevant or fitting to say (sayings). Material-economic arrangements that deal with the resources that shape practice by determining what, when, how, or by whom something is constrained or allowed to be done (doings). Finally, social-political arrangements, which shape how individuals within the practice relate to each other (familial and professional relationships, hierarchies, etc.) and non-human objects (rules, norms, etc.), which shape relationships in a practice.

Summarized, NQTs will encounter practice architectures which will define through their three arrangements which sayings, doings and relatings enable or constrain mentoring that support, apply and develop their subject-specialization and R&D-competence.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
The paper’s methodologic approach is a qualitative content analysis (Krippendorff, 2018), and the scientific theoretical framework is hermeneutic (Gadamer, 2013), which means that the reading, data creation and the interpretation process is both reflexive, iterative, and explorative. This entails several close readings of the documents, where I read them in the context of my three main categories: sayings, doings, and relatings. Through this process different themes and patterns will emerge, which I will code into sub-categories. The data that’s been created and coded into these categories will be the object of my analysis, and I will give it meaning using the theory of practice architecture (Mahon et al., 2017), and previous research.

The documents that will be analyzed are: “National framework for mentoring of newly qualified teachers in kindergarten and school” (Kunnskapsdepartementet, 2018), "Mentoring of newly qualified teachers—how can it be done?" (UDIR, 2018), and the Norwegian Official Report 2022: 13 "With further significance—A holistic system for competence and career development in kindergarten and school" (NOU 2022: 13) (my translations). As per the hermeneutic process however, it is possible that more documents will reveal themselves as relevant when the analysis is undergoing.

In addition, it is necessary to point out that these documents exist on different levels and are of different genres. Where one document might articulate a "should", another document might articulate a "must". This is a necessary aspect to be aware of in the analysis.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
Primarily I’m expecting that the documents won’t commit to a philosophy of mentoring. This is due to the many understandings of what mentoring is, which Kemmis et al. (2014, p. 154) claim is because of a “plurality of theories”. If the documents do not commit to one, there’s reason to expect vague descriptions of guidelines and principles that lack clarity and a conflict between the three archetypes of mentoring, most likely as a product of political compromise (Afdal, 2013). As Kemmis et al. (2014, p. 163) writes: “Their choice [about which approach of mentoring ought to be used] is not just a choice of a mode of induction, it is a choice about the kind of world and the kind of profession a new teacher is inducted into.” Therefore, the documents’ philosophy of mentoring—or multiplicity of one—will be leading in the school’s practice architecture for understanding and motivation to support, apply and develop NQTs competency.

However, if the documents reproduce the Norwegian tendency to view mentoring as an individualistic practice, there’s reason to expect a practice of mentoring as supervision and support, not collaborative self-development—or practice architectures which enable an “individual learning belief” in contrast to a “”social learning perspective” (Blossing & Ertesvåg, 2011). If this is the case, I will argue that it indicates a teacher education which has developed at a faster pace than the policy documents for mentoring, and as a result, how the schools organize their practice for mentoring. The implications of this are competing discourses of sustaining NQTs.

Finally, it is expected that the documents will either not have, or not agree on, definitions of key concepts. It is reasonable to expect that a lack of standard definitions will result in less collaboration and comparative research.

References
Afdal, H. W. (2013). Policy making processes with respect to teacher education in Finland and Norway. Higher Education, 167-180.

Antonsen, Y., Jakhelln, R., Aspfors, J., & Bjørndal, K. E. W. (2022). Solo, collaborative or collective? Newly qualified teachers’ experiences of being stirred into induction practices. [Under Review].

Blossing, U., & Ertesvåg, S. K. (2011). An individual learning belief and its impact on schools’ improvement work–An Individual versus a Social Learning Perspective. Education Inquiry, 153-171.

Gadamer, H.-G. (2013). Truth and method. A&C Black.

Helleve, I., & Ulvik, M. (2019). Tutors seen through the eyes of mentors assumptions for participation in third space in teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 228-242.

Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of educational research, 201-233.

Kemmis, S., Heikkinen, H. L., Fransson, G., Aspfors, J., & Edwards-Groves, C. (2014). Mentoring of new teachers as a contested practice: Supervision, support and collaborative self-development. Teaching and Teacher education, 154-164.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.

Kunnskapsdepartementet. (2018). Veiledning av nyutdannede nytilsatte lærere i barnehage og skole.

Mahon, K., Francisco, S., & Kemmis, S. (2017). Exploring education and professional practice. Through the lens of practice architectures, 1.

NOU 2022: 13. (2022). Med videre betydning - Et helhetlig system for kompetanse- og karriereutvikling i barnehage og skole.

Pennanen, M., Heikkinen, H. L., & Tynjälä, P. (2020). Virtues of mentors and mentees in the Finnish model of teachers’ peer-group mentoring. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 355-371.

Rambøll. (2021). Evaluering av veiledning av nyutdannede nytilsatte lærere - Sluttrapport 2021 [Evaluation].

Schaefer, L., Long, J. S., & Clandinin, D. J. (2012). Questioning the research on early career teacher attrition and retention. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 106-121.

Thomas, L., Tuytens, M., Moolenaar, N., Devos, G., Kelchtermans, G., & Vanderlinde, R. (2019). Teachers’ first year in the profession: The power of high-quality support. Teachers and Teaching, 160-188.

Tynjälä, P., Pennanen, M., Markkanen, I., & Heikkinen, H. L. (2021). Finnish model of peer‐group mentoring: review of research. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 208-223.

Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2018, 10.09.2019). Veiledning av nyutdannede – hvordan kan det gjennomføres?

Wang, J., Odell, S. J., & Schwille, S. A. (2008). Effects of teacher induction on beginning teachers' teaching: A critical review of the literature. Journal of teacher education, 132-152.


99. Emerging Researchers' Group (for presentation at Emerging Researchers' Conference)
Paper

The Impact of Geographical School Location on Teacher Retention and Attrition: The Case of Early Career TESOL Teachers in Vietnam

Thu Dao, Geert Kelchtermans

KU Leuven, Belgium

Presenting Author: Dao, Thu

Educational quality largely depends on the availability of qualified teachers; consequently, teacher turnover is an important concern internationally (Hanushek et al., 2016). The induction phase – the transition from teacher education into the job – is particularly challenging and vulnerable for teacher attrition (Feiman-Nemser, 2001; Kelchtermans, 2017). The case of Vietnam is no exception. In fact, certain distinctive features of the education system may further intensify this, such as existing rigid policies and malpractices in teacher recruitment (Tran & Huynh, 2019), as well as the fact that the Ministry of Education and Training has the ultimate control on “macro-level planning” (Le, 2015). However, empirical research on the issues of teacher induction and retention in Vietnam remains scarce (Tran, 2021). This project seeks to address the research gap by analyzing the experiences of Vietnamese early career teachers (ECTs), with a focus on Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) teachers, as the outcome of the meaningful interactions between individual ECTs and the dynamic organizational contexts of the schools.

The project builds upon Kelchtermans’ research on teacher induction and ECTs’ needs for support, which calls for moving beyond the “deficit thinking” that depicts ECTs as “lacking essential professional competencies” and “formally qualified, but not yet fully capable” (Kelchtermans, 2019). In addition to the theoretical stance providing an alternative perspective on ECTs’ capabilities and potentials, this research explicitly includes the school’s geographical location as a relevant dimension in the working conditions of ECTs, thus further joining the growing volume of research on the impacts of schools’ physical locations on teacher education and professional development (see e.g. Roberts & Fuqua, 2021; White & Downey, 2021). The professional challenges for ECTs are not only related to the “what” and “how” questions, but are also influenced by the “where”. We will specifically study the impacts of starting one’s career in the remote, mountainous areas of Vietnam, where ongoing inequities in education, a serious shortage of qualified teachers, and a high rate of teacher attrition have been observed (Giacchino-Baker, 2007; World Bank, 2019). Similar to the situation in Australia (White & Kline, 2012) and European countries (Fargas-Marlet & Bagley, 2022), it is challenging to attract, recruit, and retain qualified teachers in understaffed rural, remote regions of Vietnam. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that once assigned to such areas teachers are seldomly permitted to transfer or relocate (Hamano, 2008).

This research, therefore, aims to explore and share the voices of ECTs in these demanding teaching conditions as compared to their counterparts in urban areas. Apart from the geographical perspective, the study’s theoretical framework builds on the concept of teachers’ personal interpretative framework (Kelchtermans, 2009), including their self-understanding and subjective educational theory underlying their professional judgement and agency, and the micro-political perspective (Kelchtermans & Ballet, 2002). As such our study strives towards offering a holistic depiction of the fundamental factors within ECTs’ induction period, the interrelation of these factors, and the context of the school as an organization, with an emphasis on geographical diversity of the schools’ locations (and tentatively cultural and multi-lingual diversities from local ethnic minorities). These objectives lead to the following research questions in the context of Vietnam:

  1. How do the experiences of early career TESOL teachers affect their professional self-understanding and subjective educational theory?
  2. How do the micropolitics in the school as an organization affect early career TESOL teachers’ experiences?
  3. In what way does the geographical location of the school affect early career TESOL teachers’ experiences?
  4. What are the critical elements in early career TESOL teachers’ experiences of their induction phase that are to be acknowledged and included in the design for effective support programs?

Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
As the study aims at mapping and unravelling Vietnamese early career TESOL teachers’ induction phase drawing on the theoretical framework, the interpretative analysis focuses on reconstructing and understanding ECTs’ sensemaking of their experiences in the first phase of their career. The methodological set-up is that of a multiple case-study design (Yin, 2018; Silverman, 2014), in which narrative data through semi-structured interviews constitutes the main method (Goodson, 2013; Kelchtermans, 1994). This methodology offers “practical, specific insights” into personal experiences in real life settings (Creswell, 2012), enables ECTs to comprehend their lived experiences better (Clandinin, 2013; Goodson, 2013), and consequently helps researchers discover more about teachers’ self-perceptions (Creswell & Poth, 2018).
The data collection procedure consists of a questionnaire, two biographical interviews with each ECT, interviews with the ECTs’ direct supervisors, interviews with TESOL teacher educators, and examination of official regulation documents. Firstly, a questionnaire will be sent to the ECTs to initially determine the fundamental factors of the induction stage, regarding various aspects of their professional selves, their teaching knowledge and beliefs, and their professional interests. The responses serve as a foundation to prepare the following biographical interviews’ questions. The first interview is to elicit and elaborate their narratives based on their answers to the questionnaire. The outcome of the interpretative analysis of the first interview is fed back to the teachers for member check and as the starting point for the second interview, which will focus on the respondents’ feedback on the accuracy of the re-storied versions of their narratives, as well as create an opportunity to address particular issues in more detail. Their supervisors will also be interviewed regarding ECTs’ job requirements, performances in the initial years working at the high schools, collaboration with colleagues, etc. Next, teacher educators from TESOL teacher training programs will be interviewed for their remarks on the current teacher training curriculum and their experiences of preparing pre-service TESOL teachers for different teaching contexts. The data from ECTs’ supervisors and the teacher educators serve as additional information to provide a triangulation of data sources for a better comprehension of the ECTs’ stories and the context from which they evolve. The official regulation documents that outline early career TESOL teachers’ job requirements and responsibilities, including their contracts and the Vietnamese national labor laws in education and training field, will also be examined to ensure a full comprehension of their teaching contexts.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
This doctoral research hopes to contribute the voices from Vietnam, a developing country in Southeast Asia, to the international research-based knowledge on the issue of teacher induction and teacher retention/ attrition. The findings from emerging themes will reveal the most influential factors in ECTs’ induction phase, and subsequently serve as indicators to determine the most important elements in a support program to retain qualified early career TESOL teachers in Vietnam. This support program will not only be feasible and effective but also potential to remedy the “deficit thinking” (Kelchtermans, 2019) in previous efforts to support ECTs. By specifically focusing on schools’ geographical locations, this proposed program also strives to equip ECTs with the contextual knowledge that is currently missing from the current curriculum of their pre-service training programs, such as knowledge of the school organizations, administration, school cultures (Pham, 2001; Nguyen, 2013), and especially knowledge of learners’ ethnic diversity (Nguyen & Huynh, 2021). Furthermore, the geographical lens will also contribute to the growing body of place-conscious research on (early career) teachers.
References
Clandinin, J. (2013). Engaging in narrative inquiry. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). California: SAGE Publications.
Fargas-Malet, M., & Bagley, C. (2022). Is small beautiful? A scoping review of 21st-century research on small rural schools in Europe. European Educational Research Journal, 21(5), 822-844.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055.
Hamano, T. (2008). Educational reform and teacher education in Vietnam. Journal of Education for Teaching, 34(4), 397-410.
Hanushek, E. A., Rivkin, S. G., & Schiman, J. C. (2016). Dynamic effects of teacher turnover on the quality of instruction. Economics of Education Review, 55, 132-148.
Kelchtermans, G. & Ballet, K. (2002). The micropolitics of teacher induction: A narrative-biographical study on teacher socialization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 105-120.
Kelchtermans, G. (2009). Who I am in how I teach is the message: Self-understanding, vulnerability and reflection. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15, 257-272.
Kelchtermans, G. (2017). ‘Should I stay or should I go?’: Unpacking teacher attrition/ retention as an educational issue. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(8), 961-977.
Kelchtermans, G. (2019). Early career teachers and their need for support: Thinking again. In A. Sullivan, B. Johnson, & M. Simons (Eds.), Attracting and keeping the best teachers. Singapore: Springer.
Le, V. C. (2015). English language education innovation for the Vietnamese secondary school: The project 2020. In B. Spolsky & K. Sung (Eds.), Secondary school English education in Asia. London: Routledge.
Nguyen, M. H. (2013). The curriculum for English language teacher education in Australian and Vietnamese universities. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(11), 33-53.      
Tran, H. N. L, & Huynh, N. T. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ experiences with internship-related challenges in regional schools and their career intention: Implications for teacher education programs. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 40(2), 159-176.
Tran, T. N. (2021). Navigating “Praxis Shock”: Disentangling an early career teacher’s emotions and actions in organizational socialization through a micropolitical lens. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 37(3), 103-117.
White, S., & Downey, J. (2021). International trends and patterns in innovation in rural education. In S. White & J. Downey (Eds.), Rural education across the world. Singapore: Springer.
White, S., & Kline, J. (2012). Developing a rural teacher education curriculum package. The Rural Educator, 33(2), 36-42.


99. Emerging Researchers' Group (for presentation at Emerging Researchers' Conference)
Paper

A Cross-national Study of the Practice Component of English Language Teacher Education Programmes: Algeria in the International Context

Oum Kaltoum Charrak

university of Limerick, Ireland

Presenting Author: Charrak, Oum Kaltoum

This presentation reports on an ongoing cross-national PhD research project. The research used an exploratory mixed methods survey design to explore the opportunities for practice available to student teachers in English language pre-service teacher education programmes in Algeria, Finland, Ireland and Scotland. To this end, the study draws on Grossman et al.’s (2009) framework of pedagogies of practice. More specifically, it focuses on Grossman et al.’s ‘approximations of practice’. It also aims to explore how the teaching practice component of pre-service teacher education programmes is organised in the four countries and to identify student teachers’ and teacher educators’ attitudes towards the practice compoent. The present research was guided by three research questions:

  • What are students teachers' and teacher educators’ attitudes towards different approximations of practice, and authentic practice, to facilitate student teacher’s professional development?’
  • In what ways are teacher education programmes in Ireland, Finland, Scotland and Algeria framing the practice component of language teacher education?
  • What possible learnings/adaptations can be made from Irish, Finish and Scottish’s English language teacher education to the Algerian teaching practice design?

The study explores eight approximations of practice: examining English language learners’ work; examining state, national or local curriculum; examining videos of classroom teaching; micro-teaching; roleplays; coached rehearsals; one-to-one simulations of practice and virtual simulations of practice. Based on an extended review of the literature on approximations of practice, these were the most commonly cited approximations of practice used across different contexts.

Research findings suggest that teacher quality is considered one of the main salient determiners of student success (Rivkin et al., 2005, p.449; Darling-Hammond, 2000, p.33) and the success of any educational system (Barber and Mourshed 2007, p.15). As a result, the content and curriculum of pre-service teacher education programmes in many countries are constantly being scrutinised to deliver competent graduates who are well capable of facing the realities of the twenty-first century classrooms.

The importance of practice has been widely acknowledged in teacher education literature. Research highlights that it is seen as hugely significant by student teachers, teacher educators and teachers as well as by policy makers (Tabachnick, and Zeichner 1984; Hall et al, 2018). This growing recognition of the importance of teaching practice has inspired many teacher education providers to revise their teacher preparation policies through extending teaching practice opportunities and strengthening theory-practice links (Darling-Hammond et al., 2017, p. 22). However, despite the wide agreement on the teaching practice effectiveness in developing classroom ready teachers (Batten et al. 1991), the teaching practice is not standardised, and the quality of student teachers’ experience during teaching practice can be effected by many factors (i.e. the length of the teaching practice, feedback, supervision …etc) (Ball & Cohen, 1999; Darling-Hammond et al. 2005). Some researchers also argue that not all student teachers’ experiences during school-based teaching practice are productive or positive (Feiman-Nemser and Buchmann 1985; and Turney et al. 1982).

The implementation of approximations of practice in teacher education programmes, or what Grossman et al. (2009) have defined as ‘opportunities for novices to engage in practices that are more or less proximal to the practice of a profession’ (p. 2058), has the potential of contributing to the development of student teachers (Grossman et al, 2009) hence advocating their incorporation in the teacher education curricula (Ghousseini & Herbst, 2016). However, there appears to be very scant literature on their implementation and benefits in English language teacher education and more specifically on student teachers’ and teacher educators’ attitudes towards them. This paper seeks to address this gap by reporting on the results of a cross-national research as part of an ongoing PhD project.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
This study was designed as an exploratory survey research that mixes both qualitative and quantitative data findings from questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The research draws on data from student teachers, novice teachers and teacher educators in teacher education programmes in Algeria, Finland, Ireland and Scotland in order to obtain a more complete picture of prospective teachers' experience during English language teacher education programmes. Based on an extensive review of literature on the different ways practice is enacted in pre-service teacher education, the researcher designed two online questionnaires, one for student and novice teachers and another for teacher educators. The questionnaires used open-ended questions, close-ended questions and especially designed attitudinal scales to best address the research questions. Participants were recruited following a non-probability sampling method due to its suitability for the research. Questionnaire participants who agreed to participate in the second phase of the research were interviewed following a semi-structured interview design. The interviews were conducted on Microsoft Teams and lasted from 30-60 minute. The sample consists of 80 student teachers and teacher educators from the four countries. The study data was collected through questionnaires and 8 interviews. To address the research questions, the questionnaires included 3 main sections: background data, approximations of practice and teaching practice. The approximations of practice section was further divided into 8 sub-sections. In each sub-section, participants answered  questions about how an approximation was used in their programme, when it was used and the frequency of its use. In addition, participants also responded to a 5-point Likert scale about their attitudes towards each of the approximations of practice. In the last section, different aspects of the teaching practice experience were explored to understand how the teaching practice aspect is framed in the four countries including the existence of teaching practice, the duration of the teaching practice, students’ preparedness before the teaching practice and feedback. Each of these were further explored in the interviews.
Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The analysis of the data gathered from questionnaires and interviews allow for an exploration of the research participants’ experiences of the practice component of their English language teacher education programmes including the approximations of practice and the attitudes that both student teachers and teacher educators hold towards these. The preliminary analysis of the research findings highlight that the participants hold positive attitudes towards the different ways practice is enacted that are explored in this study, which coincides with prior research on the approximations of practice. It also highlights that the teaching practice is framed differently in the different pre-service teacher education programmes in the four countries. After presenting the results of the analysis of the questionnaires and the interviews, I will discuss the differences and common elements in the four countries. The analysis focuses on the emergent themes in the research data including value, identity, teaching skills, feedback and affective factors. Although the researchers’ sample is small, the study contributes to a better understanding of the opportunities for practice available for prospective teachers in the four countries. Doing so, the research expects to draw from the research data from the three European countries (Finland, Scotland, and Ireland) to recommend the policies that could be adopted to the Algerian practice component of the curriculum design. As this PhD research’s  analysis is underway, I cannot describe in detail what the results will be in terms of possible learnings/adaptations from the European context to the Algerian English language teacher education system.
References
Ball, D., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession (pp. 3-32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world's best performing systems come out on top.  McKinsey. Batten, M., Griffin, M., & Ainley, J. (1991) Recently recruited teachers: Their views and experiences of preservice education. Professional development and teaching. Canberra, AGPS. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education policy analysis archives. 8, 1-1.  Darling-Hammond, L., Burns, D., Campbell, C., Goodwin, L., Hammerness, K., Low, E. L. & Zeichner, K. M. (2017). Empowered Educators: How high performing systems shape teaching quality around the world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass  Darling-Hammond, L., Hammerness, K., Groossman, P., Rust, F., & Shulman, L. (2005) ‘The Design of Teacher Education Programmes’, in Darling-Hammond, L., and Bransford, J. (2005) Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do, Jossey-Bass.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.  Feiman-Nemser, S. & Buchman, M. (1985) ‘Pitfalls of Experience in Teacher Preparation’ Teachers College Record, 87(1), 53-65.
Ghousseini, H., & Herbst, P. (2016). Pedagogies of practice and opportunities to learn about classroom mathematics discussions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19, 79-103. Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. W. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers college record, 111(9), 2055-2100
Hall, K., Murphy, R., Rutherford, V., & Ní Áingléis, B. (2018). School placement in initial teacher education. University College Cork. Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417-458. Tabachnick, B., & Zeichner, K. (1984). The impact of the student teaching experience on the development of teacher perspectives. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(6), 28-36.
Turney, C., Cairns, L., Eltis, K.., Hatton, N., Thew, D., Towler, J.,  & Wright, R. (1982). ‘The practicum in teacher education: Research practice and supervision’. In Eltis, K. (Eds.), Australian teacher education in review: Inaugural yearbook of the South Pacific Association for Teacher Education, Sydney, Sydney University Press.


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: ECER 2023
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.149+TC
© 2001–2024 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany