Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th May 2024, 06:20:06am GMT

 
 
Session Overview
Session
33 SES 16 B: Leadership and Gender Inequality in Education
Time:
Friday, 25/Aug/2023:
1:30pm - 3:00pm

Session Chair: Victoria Showunmi
Location: James McCune Smith, 734 [Floor 7]

Capacity: 30 persons

Paper Session

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
33. Gender and Education
Paper

Overcoming Gender-based Barriers: Experiences of Female Principals in Kazakhstani Mainstream Schools

Zhanna Izekenova

Nazarbayev University, Kazakhstan

Presenting Author: Izekenova, Zhanna

Context: In Kazakhstan, there is an evident gender leadership gap in general and in school leadership in particular (OECD, 2019). Women are qualified in educational terms but are constrained to access leadership positions. The government has introduced a range of policies and strategies as a response to the gender leadership gap in the public sector (Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2019). However, poor implementation of the current gender strategies has failed to create working solutions, and Kazakhstan has seen a decline in its ranking in the Global Gender Gap Index over the last decade. This suggests that the goals of gender equality policies were not met in Kazakhstan. The identification of factors constraining women from accessing school leadership is pivotal to the realization of gender equality targets set by the government of Kazakhstan. It is noticeable that in the Central and Western regions of Kazakhstan, the number of female teachers significantly exceeds the number of men, but women are underrepresented in school leadership.

There are various advantages of a gender-balanced distribution of leadership positions in schools. Women could bring other perspectives and alternatives as their skills, knowledge, and experience are currently under-utilized resources. Involving women in leadership accelerates both development and creativity in decision-making processes and intellectual stimulation (Mayer & Oosthuizen, 2020; Uusi-Kakkuri, 2017). So these benefits of promoting women to leadership positions will help improve the economy. Another positive side of advancing women in leadership is that they could be role models for the younger generation. Potential female candidates for leadership positions will inspire other women to lead. Moreover, increasing qualified female professionals could open doors to top management for other women as they will serve as mentors for the younger generation of girls.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to explore how female principals experience leadership trajectory and (2) to understand the reasons for the gender leadership gap existing in mainstream schools in Kazakhstan.

Research Question: The above aims will be achieved by exploring the following question: How do female principals experience leadership trajectory in mainstream schools in Kazakhstan in Central and Western regions of Kazakhstan?

Theoretical Framework: Exploring female school principals' experiences and understanding the gender leadership gap in Kazakhstan necessitates engaging in a broader discussion of the theoretical framework. This study is guided by two theoretical perspectives: poststructuralism and postcolonial theory. Using poststructural and postcolonial theory together will enable more nuanced interpretations of social issues in their political, economic, and cultural contexts that have created and sustained the gender leadership gap in school contexts. Additionally, there is an essential affinity between the two theories as they are both concerned with unequal power relations and aim to produce contextually relevant knowledge (Gikandi, 2004). Foucault’s understanding of these specific power relations creates a useful lens through which women are constructed by discourse in the social context. Therefore, this lens allows looking closer at how power is enacted in the local context.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
I employed a qualitative research design. Qualitative design is employed when there is little knowledge about a particular population or subject, and there is a need to explore and define the topic (Merriam & Tisdell, 2016). According to Mason (2002), the qualitative design helps to explore the range of discourses, understandings, experiences, and perceptions of research participants and the discourses of meanings that they generate. With the qualitative research design, it was possible to explore the experiences of female principals in a particular social context. Since there is no existing guiding theory or similar study and a lack of instruments to use in the school context in Kazakhstan or even in Central Asia, a qualitative research design offered an opportunity to uncover themes.
The study employed an individual semi-structured interview as an effective method for data collection. The main instrument of this method is the researcher, who is pivotal to all stages of the study. Another important instrument is an interview protocol which helped to establish a systematic approach to preparing interview questions in advance.
The participants of the study were female school principals from mainstream schools in the central and west regions of Kazakhstan. I recruited 16 female school principals from two regions from both rural and urban contexts. I chose school principals who have been in the role for 2 to 6 years. This way I was ensure that they have had leadership experience to share, but the variability in their experience was not too profound to make any comparisons difficult.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The key findings of the study include several important conclusions: female school principals experience barriers on the way and in the process of holding a leadership position. These barriers can be classified by levels, including socio-cultural, organizational and individual. The study contributes to leadership and gender studies by filling the current literature gap in the context of Kazakhstan regarding the experiences of female school principals in mainstream schools. While there have been studies exploring the relationship between gender and leadership in higher education (Kuzhabekova et al., 2018), there are no studies exploring how women experience leadership in mainstream schools in Kazakhstan, what barriers they experience in their ascension to and in enacting their leadership roles, and what their experiences say about the gender leadership gap.
References
Gikandi, S. (2004). Poststructuralism and postcolonial discourse. na. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521826942.006
Kuzhabekova, A., Janenova, S., & Almukhambetova, A. (2018). Analyzing the experiences of female leaders in civil service in Kazakhstan: Trapped between economic pressure to earn and traditional family role expectations. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(15), 1290-1301. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1387142
Mason, J. (2002). Linking qualitative and quantitative data analysis. In Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 103-124). Routledge.
Mayer, C. H., & Oosthuizen, R. M. (2020). Concepts of creative leadership of women leaders in 21st century. Creativity Studies, 13(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2020.10267
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2019). Retrieved October 24, 2021 from https://www.kz.undp.org/content/kazakhstan/en/home/library/corporate/voluntary_national_review.html
OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en
Uusi-Kakkuri, P. (2017). Transformational leadership and leading creativity. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Vaasan yliopisto.


33. Gender and Education
Paper

Why is Leading Schools for Gender Equality so Difficult?

Eva Amundsdotter

Stockholm University, Sweden

Presenting Author: Amundsdotter, Eva

Gender equality is a part of the implementation of Agenda 2030. The assignments in schools for gender equality are extensive, in laws and in curricula.

In Sweden, The School Act links the gender equality mission to human rights and democracy. Curricula formulate responsibility for active work to counteract traditional gender patterns. Curriculum changes 2022 also reinforce the gender equality mission in school, with writings on sexuality, consent, violence and oppression. Employees are expected to actively work for equality. The principal is ultimately responsible for this work. Principals are also expected to work for equality from an employee perspective, with the support of the Work Environment Act and the Discrimination Act.

The Swedish Schools Inspectorates inspection of elementary schools show that, in general, school staff works more reactive than proactive with changing limiting norms (such as gender stereotyped, sexualized language, and gender-related vulnerability). A systematic way of working with gender equality is missing (Skolinspektionen, 2020). New parts in the introducing parts of curriculum for elementary school (from fall 2022) integrates gender equality even more, addressing how schools can work with gender issues from several different perspectives (gender stereotypes, violence, safety) –according to Swedish National Agency for Education. There seems to be a lack of systematic, preventive gender equality work (Skolinspektionen, 2020). An earlier study on principals at Umeå University also shows that gender equality work is a challenge for many (Kolam, 2014). Some explanations given are that it is difficult, there is a lack of time and that the principals do not ask for results from equality work.

During several years of work with principals attending the national school leadership training program in Sweden, principals' experiences of a difficult assignment emerge.

One starting point is that in organisations, gender is intertwined with other processes like divisions, symbols, interaction and internal identity work (Acker, 1992). This means that the ‘doing gender perspective’ with the understanding that gender is created and the meaning of gender is formed through different relational activities in an organisation, is used (Acker, 1992; Gunnarsson et al, 2003; West & Zimmerman, 1987).

Gender is seen as something that is constituted through interactions (West & Zimmerman 2009). It is an ongoing activity in everyday interaction. This perspective helps to not only see individuals, but also put attention to interactional and institutional arenas, and open up possibilities for change (ibid).

An example of a lack of understanding of unreflected assumptions based on gender (Martin, 2003) is given in a research project that aimed to explore new approaches in the classroom with gender equality in focus (Berge & Ve 2000). Teachers at an elementary school engaged in exploring new ways to pedagogically challenge stereotypical assumptions about gender in the classsroom. One important outcome, was how the participating teachers themselves behaved in a way that sorted the pupils influenced by gender. One conclusion was that the design of the research should have included learning and reflections also among the teachers (ibid).

The aim of the paper is to explore principals narratives about leading schools for gender equality, both what kind of leadership is needed and how the engagement varies and why.

The results is to also inform a future action research project. In projects using Action oriented gender research, where the doing gender-perspective is combined with learning theory from action research, there has been different research projects about the concept ”Gender aware leadership” (Amundsdotter & Andersson, 2018; Argyris & Schön, 1974; Andersson & Amundsdotter 2012; Andersson et al, 2009). Some results indicates a potential to work with new inclusive practices is in the hands of middle managers.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
The empiri for the first study has been collected with 120 principals attending the national school leadership training program in Stockholm, Sweden.  
First study was done through a three-step interaction. This included individual writings, work in groups and reflections of participating school leaders. The theme was what a gender aware school leader can be, and what they have done and thoughts about their leadership.  

Second study will be done with a total of 100 principals from another group at the program, also attending the program. The aim is to explore, with an interactive approach, whether it is difficult to lead for gender equality and how it can show in the participating principals leadership. This study will also use writings, interactions between principals and a common process in the group. The group is divided in half, so 50 principals each time.

The empiri from both studies will be categorized into themes. Notes will be taken from the joint knowledge processes in the groups.
These two studies will inform the third step; which is an action oriented gender research with a group of principals. The aim is to work with developing practices for leading schools for gender equality.  
 
Research projects at universities about gender and leadership, show a similar result as the earlier mentioned project at the secondary school (Berge & Ve, 2000). Male researchers and teachers were given advantages in an unaware way (Amundsdotter et al. 2018). Through learning processes, exploring your context with different kinds of observations, and common reflection processes in the group of leaders and managers, a series of events became apparent, where assumptions and expectations of women and men showed different conditions and different possibilities. Through the joint learning processes in the group of participating leaders and the researchers, new knowledge and new ways of acting emerged, which led to new action patterns and through that new norms – assumptions and values – could develop (ibid.)  
There are challenges, working with gender awareness and new practices: gender is done often without awareness and reflection (Martin, 2003). This needs to be addressed in the design for the action research project.   
The action research project with principals will use a similar design.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
In previous projects working with common reflection processes in groups of leaders and managers, assumptions and expectations of women and men showed different conditions and different possibilities (Andersson & Amundsdotter, 2012). Through the joint learning processes between the participating leaders and the researchers, new knowledge and new ways of acting emerge, which can lead to new action patterns and, through that, new norms, assumptions and values.
In this study, we expect varied results: Some leaders will express disinterest, while some will want to learn more. Others will already be engaged with issues in an initiated way and will have seen what impact it may have on the school’s work.
Questions and comments on how to work with gender issues in single-sex environments with many women will probably arise, which can give important knowledge about how to take perspectives on gender equality in organisations dominated by one sex.
Narratives about how gender equality mission and work can be opted out, will give important knowledge about leadership in schools and pre-schools. How come that the work become more reactive than pro-active?
The results will inform further research, and also how the national training program can develop to support skills for leading for gender equality.

References
Acker, J (1992). Gendering Organizational Theory, In Mills, Albert & Tancred Peta (Eds.). Gendering Organizational Analysis. London: Sage Publications.

Amundsdotter, Eva, Andersson, Susanne, Muhonen, Tuija och Liljeroth, Cristina (2018) ”Kvinnor talar ju också mycket på möten. Så vad är problemet?”. Malmö: Malmö universitet.(”Women are also taking a lot at meetings. So whats is the problem?”)

Andersson, S, Amundsdotter, E & Svensson, M (2009) Middle managers as change agents – Action oriented Gender Research. Stockholm University/Fiber Optic Valley.

Andersson, S. & Amundsdotter, E. (2012). Developing Innovative Organisations using Action-oriented Gender Research. In Andersson, S., Berglund, K., Gunnarsson, E. & Sundin, E. (Eds) (2012). Promoting innovations. Policies, Practices and Procedures. Stockholm: VINNOVA.

Argyris, C & Schön, D (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Berge, B-M & Ve, H (2000). Action Research for Gender Equity. Buckingham:
Open University Press

Gunnarsson, E, Andersson, S, Vänja Rosell, A, Lehto, A & Salminen-
Karlsson, M (Eds.) (2003). Where Have All the Structures Gone? Doing
Gender in Organisations, Examples from Finland, Norway and Sweden. Stockholm:
Centre for Gender Studies.

Martin, P. Y. (2003). “Said and Done” Versus “Saying and Doing”, Gendering Practices, Practicing Gender. Gender & Society. 17:342-366.

Skolinspektionen. (2020) Grundskolors arbete med jämställdhet. (Primary schools’ work with gender equality, assessment from School inspection) https://www.skolinspektionen.se/beslut-rapporter-statistik/publikationer/kvalitetsgranskning/2020/grundskolors-arbete-med-jamstalldhet/

West, C, & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society 1, pp: 125-51.

West, C, & Zimmerman, D. (2009). Accounting for doing gender. Gender & Society. Vol, 23, No. 1. pp. 111-122.


33. Gender and Education
Paper

Gender Perception, Work-Family Conflict, Employment Guilt and Career Advancement Aspiration of Mothers Working in Educational Institutions

Elif Aydoğdu, Veli Deniz

Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Turkiye

Presenting Author: Aydoğdu, Elif

Individuals have to fulfill multiple roles such as childhood, motherhood, fatherhood, employee and manager throughout their lives. Individuals spend most of their lives with their families or at work. For this reason, roles related to work and family are among the most prominent roles in the lives of individuals and must be performed simultaneously in limited energy and time (Özdevecioğlu & Doruk, 2009). Work-family conflict arises when there is a mismatch between the role adopted as a member of an organization and the role adopted as a member of a family (Efeoğlu & Özgen, 2007). Greenhaus and Beutell (1985) mention three types of work-family conflict based on time, tension and behavior. Time-based conflict, where the time that individuals allocate to one role makes it difficult to participate in another role; tension-based conflict where tension in one role prevents them from participating in another role; behavioral conflict occurs when behaviors required for one role do not match behavioral expectations in another role. There are two aspects of work-family conflict: work-intervention in the family and family-intervention in work (Gutek, Searle, & Klepa, 1991). Carlson, Kacmar, and Williams (2000) tried to measure the related conflict based on a six-dimensional structure by combining these three types and two aspects

Gender role can be explained as the group expectation that society defines for women and men and expects them to fulfill in accordance with genders (Altınova & Duyan, 2013). Ellemers (2018) mentions that gender-related judgments affect both the way women and men define themselves and the way they are treated by other people by preventing the distribution of duties and responsibilities within the family and the equal benefit from the established relationship. The roles that gender imposes on women and men can affect the cognitive, affective and behavioral reactions of the individual in business and family life. Perceptions that are far from egalitarianism about gender create feelings of guilt and inadequacy in women (Bayar-Türkoğlu, Yüceer-Kardeş, Özdemir & Sever, 2022). Women who experience this feeling may limit their professional promotion opportunities and disrupt their careers by giving more importance to marriage instead of business life, and to their children instead of career life (Arslan, 2012). Career satisfaction is considered as the satisfaction of the individual with the degree of reaching the goals set in the career process (Yüksel, 2005). Aarntzen , Derks , van Steenbergen and van der Lippe (2022) revealed that internalized gender stereotypes increase the sense of guilt that working mothers attach more importance to their work than their families compared to fathers . In the study conducted by Önel (2006), it was determined that women's tendency to quit their job is more than men when it comes to work-family conflict. As it is seen, the problems experienced by female employees in the context of the responsibilities brought by their traditional roles play a role in their career development processes. In this context, in this study, it will be tried to determine the relationships between gender perception, work-family conflict, maternal employment guilt and career advancement aspiration of mothers working in educational institutions.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
In this study, it was tried to determine the relationships between working mothers' perception of gender, work-family conflict, maternal employment guilt and career advancement aspiration. The universe of this research consists of female teachers and education administrators working in a province in the Central Anatolia Region of Turkey. A total of 6767 female teachers and education administrators work in this province. The sample of this research consists of 550 female teachers and administrators. The data collection tools used in this study are:
Gender Perception Scale: This data collection tool, developed by Altınova and Duyan (2013), is a 5 - point Likert -type scale consisting of 25 items and a single dimension. The Cronbach Alpha coefficient of this scale was calculated as 0.872 by the relevant researchers.
Work-Family Conflict Scale: It consists of work-family conflict and family-work conflict parts developed by Carlson, Kacmar and Williams (2000) and adapted into Turkish by Erdoğan (2009). It consists of a total of 18 items in the form of 9 items and 3 dimensions in both parts. The Cronbach Alpha values of this 6 - point Likert -type scale are 0.891. and reported as 0.884.
Maternal Employment Guilt Scale: The scale developed by Yüce-Selvi and Kantaş (2019) consists of 15 items and a single dimension. The Cronbach Alpha value of this 6- point Likert -type scale was stated as 0.94 .
Career Advancement Aspiration Scale: Van Emmerik , Baugh , and This scale, which was developed by Euwema (2005) and adapted to Turkish by Özdaşlı , Kanten and Kanten (2009), consists of 6 items and one dimension. The reliability of this 5-point Likert-type scale was stated as 0.89 by the relevant researchers.

The hypotheses of the research are as follows:
H1: Gender perception predicts maternal employment guilt.
H2: Gender perception predicts work-family conflict.
H3: Work-family conflict predicts maternal employment guilt.
H4: Maternal employment guilt predicts career advancement aspiration.
H5: Work family conflict predicts career advancement aspiration.
H6: Work family conflict predicts the desire for career advancement aspiration through maternal employment guilt.
H7: Perception of gender predicts maternal employment guilt through work-family conflict.
H8: Perception of gender predicts career advancement aspiration through work-family conflict and maternal employment guilt.
In this study, confirmatory factor analysis will be used to ensure the structural validity of the relevant data collection tools, and the Croanbach Alpha coefficient will be calculated to ensure its reliability. In addition, correlation, regression and path analysis will be performed for the relations between the variables.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
As a result of this study, it is thought that the gender perception of working mothers may affect work-family conflict and trigger the feeling of guilt about employment in mothers. Work-family conflict, on the other hand, is the negative situation caused by the unrelated pressures and events that will arise in the work or family life of individuals (Tokmak, 2019). While women are expected to exhibit the roles of modern business life, on the other hand, the expectation of continuing their traditional roles at home causes conflict (Arslan, 2012). In the study conducted by Bayar Türkoğlu, Yüceer Kardeş, Özdemir and Sever (2022), it was stated that gender perception predicted maternal employment guilt through work-family conflict . This sense of guilt experienced by mothers is among the possible outcomes that affect their professional career decisions.
References
Aarntzen, L., Derks, B., van Steenbergen, E. & van der Lippe, T. (2022). When work–family guilt becomes a women's issue: Internalized gender stereotypes predict high guilt in working mothers but low guilt in working fathers. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1–18.
Altınova, H. H. & Duyan, V. (2013). Toplumsal cinsiyet algısı ölçeğinin geçerlik güvenirlik
çalışması. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 24(2), 9-22.
Arslan, M. (2012). İş-aile ve aile-iş çatışmalarının kadın çalışanların iş doyumları üzerindeki etkisi. Birey ve Toplum Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(1), 99-114.
Bayar-Türkoğlu, H. T., Yüceer-Kardeş, T., Özdemir, S. & Sever, M. (2022). Toplumsal
cinsiyet algısı, anne istihdam suçluluğu ve işten ayrılma niyeti ilişkisi: iş-aile çatışmasının rolü. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 33(4), 1103-1120.
Carlson, D.S., Kacmar, K.M., & Williams, L.J. (2000). Construction and validation of a
multidimensional measure of work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 249-276.
Efeoğlu, İ. E. & Özgen, H. (2007). İş-aile yaşam çatışmasının iş stresi, iş doyumu ve örgütsel bağlılık üzerindeki etkileri: ilaç sektöründe bir araştırma. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16(2), 237-254.
Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 275-298.
Greenhaus, J. H. & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88.
Gutek, B., Searle, S. & Klepa, L. (1991). Rational versus gender role-explanations for work–familyconflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 560–568.
Önel, N. (2006). İş-aile çatışmasının çalışan kadının aile içi ilişkileri üzerine etkileri. Sakarya
Özdaşlı, K., Kanten, S. & Kanten, Ö. G. P. (2009). Yöneticilerin kariyer ilerleme arzusu ile
örgütsel bağlılıklarının, akıl hocalığı eğilimlerine etkisini belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 14(3), 229-243.
Özdevecioğlu, M. & Doruk, N. Ç. (2009). Organizasyonlarda iş-aile ve aile iş çatışmalarının çalışanların iş ve yaşam tatminleri üzerindeki etkisi. Erciyes Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, (33), 69-99.
Tokmak, M. (2021). İş aile çatışması ve çalışmaya tutkunluk arasındaki ilişkiye yönelik bir
araştırma. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(1), 113-124.
Van Emmerik, H., Baugh, S. G., & Euwema, M. C. (2005). Who wants to be a mentor? An examination of attitudinal, instrumental, and social motivational components. Career Development International, 10(4), 310-324.
Yüce-Selvi, Ü. & Kantaş, Ö. (2019). The psychometric evaluation of the maternal employment guilt scale: A development and validation study. "İş, Güç": Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 21(1), 28-52.
Yüksel, İ. (2005). İş-aile çatışmasının kariyer tatmini, iş tatmini ve iş davranışları ile
ilişkisi.  Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 19(2), 301-314.


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: ECER 2023
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.149+TC
© 2001–2024 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany