Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th May 2024, 03:52:58am GMT

 
 
Session Overview
Session
27 SES 14 C: Research on Students' Motivation and Self-Esteem
Time:
Friday, 25/Aug/2023:
9:00am - 10:30am

Session Chair: László Horváth
Location: James McCune Smith, TEAL 607 [Floor 6]

Capacity: 102 persons

Paper Session

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
27. Didactics - Learning and Teaching
Paper

Different Perceptions of Resource-Oriented Feedback on Motivation and Self-Esteem

Romy Strobel

Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, Germany

Presenting Author: Strobel, Romy

In this study presented here, the international feedback method "Learning Stories" was implemented in the project “WEICHENSTELLUNG” (setting of the course). The aim was to foster the (intrinsic) motivation and the self-esteem of the children from the project WEICHENSTELLUNG, both basic psychological constructs for the transition process from primary school to secondary school.

The target group of the German project WEICHENSTELLUNG are children from families who cannot sufficiently support their children in the transition to secondary school. These are supported in the project by students of teaching from the fourth to the sixth grade.

The Learning Stories were established in 1996 in early childhood education in New Zealand (Carr, May & Podmore, 1998). In Germany, the approach was adapted by the German Youth Institute (Leu, Flämig, Frankenstein, Koch, Pack, Schneider & Schweiger, 2007). In addition to New Zealand and Germany, the Learning Stories are used in Switzerland (Simoni & Wustmann Seiler, 2013) and in various other European countries such as Ireland (Early Childhood Ireland, undated), but not yet in primary education as in this study.

The approach of the Learning Stories takes a resource-oriented and dialogical perspective with a focus on the development of learning dispositions. In this way, the diversity of learners can be addressed and individual support can take place. All learning dispositions can be related to (intrinsic) motivation and self-esteem (Carr, 2001).

During the transition from primary to secondary school, several studies have shown that intrinsic motivation decreases (Raufelder, 2018). According to the self-determination theory of motivation (Deci & Ryan, 2017), intrinsic motivation is a form of motivation that is not controlled by external impulses. The three basic psychological needs, the need for competence, the need for relatedness and the need for autonomy, are fundamental components of the theory and through their satisfaction intrinsic motivation is fostered. Extrinsic motivation, on the other hand, is a form of motivation that is controlled by external stimuli.

In addition to the theory of self-determination, research on self-esteem contingencies was used in this study on the construct of self-esteem. Self-esteem contingencies are factors that can influence self-esteem both externally and internally by individuals deriving their self-esteem from them (Morf & Koole, 2014). In this study, the model of Crocker and Wolfe (2001) was used. The development of self-esteem during the transition to secondary school is individual and therefore diverse. Overall, there is a risk of instability of self-esteem, as the model of Hopson and Adams (1976) shows.

This study focused on the feedback function of the Learning Stories. Overall, feedback is attested to a medium to high effect size for learning (from d=0.48 to d=0.79, Wisniewski, Zierer & Hattie, 2019). Feedback processes are influenced by the perception of the recipient (Krause, 2007), which can be applied to the “Angebot-Nutzungs” (offer-use)-model of educational research (Helmke, 2003). The Learning Stories can be understood as an offer that has a different effect on (intrinsic) motivation and self-esteem through mediating processes of perception and use, influenced by the respective learning requirements in the area of (intrinsic) motivation and self-esteem. In this way the emphasis on the individual and diverse learning prerequisites of children can be included in the feedback process.

The main question of the study is "To what extent can Learning Stories foster the (intrinsic) motivation and self-esteem of the children from the project WEICHENSTELLUNG at the transition from primary to secondary school from the point of view of the persons involved in the WEICHENSTELLUNG project?”


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
The study combines qualitative and quantitative methods, with a focus on the qualitative sub-study (Morse & Cheek, 2014). Reasons for combining both methods include adequacy as well as a holistic view of the research question (Lamnek, 2010).
The experimental group consisted of one year of the project WEICHENSTELLUNG (n=14).  As a comparison group for the quantitative sub-study (non-randomized formation, Rost, 2013), the classmates of the children from the project WEICHENSTELLUNG were used.
In the study, there are a total of four measurement dates, so it is a longitudinal study (e.g. Rost, 2013).  Two psychometric scales were used to capture the theoretical constructs of self-esteem and (intrinsic) motivation.
Prior to the transition, surveys were carried out at two points in time. At the first measurement time (T1), the experimental and comparison groups have filled in the standardized test "ALS" (“Aussagen-Liste zum Selbstwertgefühl für Kinder und Jugendliche” (list of statements on self-esteem for children and adolescents); Schauder, 2011; Cronbach's Alpha .80) and the questionnaire "SRQ-A" (Self-Regulation Questionnaire – Academic; Ryan & Connell, 1989; Cronbach's Alpha .92).  At the second measurement time, the qualitative sub-study was added to the quantitative survey by conducting problem-centered interviews (PZI) (Witzel, 1985) with the experimental group in the sense of the in-depth design according to Mayring (2001). This principle was adopted for the two measurement points after the transition. With the beginning of the two-year survey in 2018, the Learning Stories were introduced into the WEICHENSTELLUNG project and used by the students with the children over the four measurement dates.
The PZI aims "[...] on a recording of individual actions as well as subjective perceptions and processing methods of social reality that is as unbiased as possible" (Witzel, 2000, p. 2) and is thus well suited to reconstruct the perceptions of the children according to the research question.
The ALS is designed for children from 8 years to 15 years and 11 months.  The response scale is five-pointed.  There are 18 items.  Through self-statements, it is possible to make statements about the quantity of self-esteem. Schauder (2011) recommends the ALS for longitudinal studies.

The SRQ-A is an index questionnaire with 17 items (in a shorter version). Ryan and Connell (1989) designed the first SRQs to guide the different regulatory styles of motivation into an index of relative autonomy.  The response scale is four-level (Likert scale).  Here, too, children's self-statements are used.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The quantitative analyses of the study show that the self-determined motivation of the children from the WEICHENSTELLUNG project increases continuously over the course (up to T3).  The course of self-esteem, on the other hand, is unstable.

Four types could be formed from the analysis of the interviews: children who report that they did not perceive the Learning Stories as beneficial (type 1); Children who report that they perceived the Learning Stories as beneficial in terms of self-esteem (type 2); Children who report that they perceived the Learning Stories as beneficial in terms of motivation (type 3) and children who report that they perceived the Learning Stories as beneficial in terms of self-esteem and motivation (type 4). Before the transition, the types were distributed among the 14 cases as follows:
Type 1 – 6 cases; Type 2 – 3 cases; Type 3 – 2 cases; Type 4 – 5 cases (double coding results in more than 14 cases)
After the transition, the distribution is as follows:
Type 1 – 3 cases; Type 2 – 2 cases; Type 3 – 0 cases; Type 4 – 4 cases

Here, too, the picture emerges that overall (intrinsic) motivation can be better fostered by the Learning Stories than self-esteem. Nevertheless, the self-esteem is also mentioned.
From the data, hypotheses can be formed, which at the same time provide explanations for the different perceptions of the effects of the Learning Stories.
The study can provide a method that helps children from families with special challenges to keep the two important psychological constructs of motivation and self-esteem stable during the transition.
The limitations of this study are the missing control group, which could not be formed for ethical reasons. Furthermore, the study is not a representative study, but serves primarily to generate hypotheses.

References
Carr, Margaret (2001): Assessment in Early Childhood Settings. Learning Stories. London: SAGE Publications.
Carr, Margaret; May, Helen; Podmore, Val (1998): Learning and Teaching Stories. New Approaches to Assessment and Evaluation in Relation to Te Whariki. Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse.
Crocker, J.; Wolfe, C. T. (2001): Contingencies of self-worth. In: Psychological review 108 (3), S. 593–623.
Early Childhood Ireland: Learning Story of the Year 2021. Online https://conference.earlychildhoodireland.ie/learning-stories-of-the-year-award/, checked on 17.01.2023.
Helmke, Andreas (2007): Unterrichtsqualität erfassen, bewerten, verbessern. 5. Aufl. Seelze: Klett Kallmeyer.
Hopson, B., & Adams, J. (1976): Towards an Understanding of Transition: Defining Some Boundaries of Transition Dynamics. In: J. Adams, J. Hayes, & B. Hopson (Hg.): Transition: Understanding and Managing Personal Change. Montclair, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun & Co, S. 3–25.
Krause, Christina; Wiesmann, Ulrich; Hannich, Hans-Joachim (2004): Subjektive Befindlichkeit und Selbstwertgefühl von Grundschulkindern. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publ.
Lamnek, Siegfried (2010): Qualitative Sozialforschung. Lehrbuch. 5. Aufl. Weinheim: Beltz.
Leu, H. R.; Flämig, K.; Frankenstein, Y.; Koch, S.; Pack, I.; Schneider, K., Schweiger, M. (2015): Bildungs- und Lerngeschichten. 6. Auflage. Weimar: Verlag Das Netz.
Mayring, Philipp (2001): Kombination und Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Analyse. In: Forum qualitative Sozialforschung 2 (1).
Morf, C. C.; Koole, S. L. (2014): Das Selbst. In: K. Jonas, W. Stroebe und M. Hewstone (Hg.): Sozialpsychologie: Springer-Lehrbuch, S. 141–195.
Morse, Janice M.; Cheek, Julianne (2014): Making room for qualitatively-driven mixed-method research. In: Qualitative health research 24 (1), S. 3–5.
Raufelder, Diana (2018): Grundlagen schulischer Motivation. Stuttgart: UTB
Rost, Detlef H. (2013): Interpretation und Bewertung pädagogisch-psychologischer Studien. Eine Einführung. 3., neue Ausg. Bad Heilbrunn: UTB.
Ryan, R. M.; Connell, J. P. (1989): Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. In: Journal of personality and social psychology 57 (5), S. 749–761.
Ryan, Richard M.; Deci, Edward L. (2017): Self-determination theory. Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Press.
Schauder, Thomas (2011): ALS. Die Aussagen-Liste zum Selbstwertgefühl für Kinder und Jugendliche : Manual. 3., vollständig überarbeitete und neu normierte Auflage. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Wisniewski, Benedikt; Zierer, Klaus; Hattie, John (2019): The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research. In: Frontiers in psychology 10.
Witzel, Andreas (1985): Das problemzentrierte Interview. Weinheim: Beltz.
Witzel, Andreas (2000): The Problem-centered Interview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, Vol 1, No 1.
Wustmann, Corina (2013): "Bildungs- und Lerngeschichten" in der Schweiz. Umsetzungserfahrungen und Materialien. Zürich: Marie Meierhofer Institut für das Kind.


27. Didactics - Learning and Teaching
Paper

Student Preferences and Effective Learning Strategies - How to Make Learning Enjoyable and Effective? Study and Teach Based on Evidence

Sylwia Wrona, Tomasz Gajderowicz, Maciej Jakubowski

University of Warsaw, Poland

Presenting Author: Wrona, Sylwia

The purpose of teaching is to facilitate learning and make the learning process more effective. While adapting teaching to students’ learning styles may not bring the desired results, as the adopted strategies are not always the most efficient, teaching in accordance with students’ preferences may at least improve students’ well-being.

Existing studies have already extensively examined which teaching and learning strategies are effective. Ideally, the methods that have been scientifically proven to be effective would be those students prefer. Knowing the students’ preferences for specific learning and teaching strategies can help improve understanding of their behaviour and keep learners actively involved in the learning process. This in turn may lead to improved competency and better academic achievement.

The study examines students’ preferences towards learning strategies with varying degrees of effectiveness and explores preference heterogeneity patterns across subgroups defined by students’ observed characteristics (gender, academic result) as well as time left to final exams. We hypothesise that although evidence-based learning and teching strategies are often not practiced at schools, students have preferences towards them. Students' preferences towards learnn and teaching strategies may differ due to their proficiency as they may differ from the poor ones in type and regularity of practicing learning strategies (Shaffie et al. 2020), but also due to their age ( Magogwe & Oliver, 2007), and gender. Goh & Foong (1997) found that compensation and affective strategies were significantly more common among female than male students.Moreover, we aim to reveal how preerences may differ due to the conditions of education (pandemic and post-pandemic) and the moment in education (lower or final grade).

Preferences refer to a certain characteristics people like or want to have. Following common in economic theory assumption (Hausman, 2011; Nitzan, 2009), that there exists relationship between peoples’ preferences and their behavior, we can say that learning preferences relate to the tendency of students to choose the way they learn. Knowing preferences enables us to explain and predict behaviours including those related to the learning process. The preferences may differ between people due to their observable characteristics such as gender, age, type and level of education, learning goals, learning situation as well as not observable motives.

Learning strategies relate to a set of approaches and actions taken in the learning process to effectively obtain, process and retain information and skill for later use (Lublin, 2003). There are several classifications of learning strategies (Shi, 2017); they refer to both actions taken by the teacher, such as instructional delivery and the students, and may concern the organization of learning, methods of repetition, and assimilation of material and assessment. We consider the available evidence for the learning strategies widely advocated in recent years, starting with those implemented by students without assistance, including strategies analyzed by Dunlosky et al. (2013).

Literature in cognitive psychology has established learning strategies that are most effective at promoting long-term learning. The strategies with strongest empirical support are self-testing and distributing study activities over time (Black & Allen, 2019). Still, many students rely on ineffective strategies such as rereading or highlighting important points in the text (Karpicke & Blunt, 2011), which may result from the illusion of competence. Effective strategies may also be underutilized because teachers do not know them and hence also students do not implement them (Dunlosky et al. 2013) or due to numerous myths that exist about them.

In our study we consider strategies learning strategies such as mind maps, retreval practice, and traditional methods of studying. Based on the existing studies, we are able to order them according to their effectiveness Moreover we focus on the mode of class delivery (remoty, hybrid, stationary) and forms off assessment.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
The data was collected as part of the TICKS study conducted in Warsaw, the capital city of Poland, on a representative sample of secondary school students (including high schools, technical and vocational schools). In the paper, we use data from the last two editions of the TICKS, conducted in 2021 and 2022, respectively. The study was conducted via the Computer-Assisted Web Interviewing (CAWI) technique. The questionnaire administered to students consisted of three parts. The first one focused on the general background of the students. This was followed by math, science and reading comprehension assessments, which methodologically referred to the PISA study, and finally, a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). Thanks to the simultaneous analysis of competences and preferences, we were able to relate students’ preferences in terms of learning strategies with their actual educational results.
We use DCE to investigate the preferences of students for learning and teaching strategies. DCE is a stated preference method in which respondents make choices in hypothetical situations. The DCE approach is embedded in random utility theory (McFadden, 1974; Train, 2009)
In DCE each respondent was presented with a series of hypothetical choice situations consisting of two alternatives. In each situation, the students were asked to choose the preferred way of organization of the course they would attend in the next semester described by few attributes. The attributes identified as relevant to describe the learning and teaching strategies included the mode of class organization, the dominant way of working during classes, the type of assessment, how students learn, and time students spent on learning. The alternative with the desired feature should increase the utility associated with this alternative. In the selection process, respondents make a trade-off between two or more features that are assumed to generate positive utility.  
To estimate the utility and the trade-off respondents would make to study in a specific way we apply Multinomial Logistic Regression, Random Parameter Logit Model and Latent CLass analysis. The later two are used to address the issue of heterogeneity of preerences.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
Having data for two periods we find that in 2022 students shifted their priorities towards in-person education. Hybrid learning remained the preferred option over in-person schooling; however, the preferences towards this form became weaker. For the remote classes, we observed a reversal of preferences - students reported an aversion to this mode of study. There is also a certain adjustment of preferences for assessment; the strength of preferences and reluctance to use methods other than tests with open questions decreased in the post-pandemic period.
Research has shown that, indeed, students prefer learning strategies that show the highest effectiveness. The level of academic achievement was not found to be associated with preferences toward more effective strategies. Testing, a form of retrieval practice that promotes better long-term retention than rereading, note-taking, or creating mind or concept maps, is also the most preferred way for students to learn. Although, as it turns out, testing is not only one of the most effective strategies for consolidating knowledge but also preferred by students, teachers use it mostly as an assessment rather than a learning tool.
The differences in preferences arise for the type of assessment. Although males and females exhibit the same pattern, value multiple-choice tests and group projects more than open-question tests, and present negative attitudes towards oral responses, females have stronger preferences towards the first two and greater aversion to the latter than males.
As one might expect, top-performing students are significantly more willing to have classes where the teacher mainly presents the material rather than group working.

References
Abi-El-Mona I, Adb-El-Khalick F (2008) The influence of mind mapping on eighth graders’ science achievement. School Sci Math 108: 298–312 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2008.tb17843
Bawaneh, A. K. (2019). The effectiveness of using mind mapping on tenth grade students’ immediate achievement and retention of electric energy concepts. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 123-138.
Black, S., & Allen, J. D. (2019). Part 11: Learning Strategies. The Reference Librarian, 60(4), 288-303.
Buran, A., & Filyukov, A. (2015). Mind mapping technique in language learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 215-218.
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the public interest, 14(1), 4-58.
Goh, C., & Foong, K. P. (1997). Chinese ESL students’ learning strategies: A look at frequency, proficiency, and gender. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 39-53.
Hausman, D. M. (2011). Preference, value, choice, and welfare. Cambridge University Press.
Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Response to comment on “retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping”. Science, 334(6055), 453-453.
Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger III, H. L. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: do students practise retrieval when they study on their own?. Memory, 17(4), 471-479.
Long, D. J., & Carlson, D. (2011). Mind the map: How thinking maps affect student achievement. Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 13(2), 262-262.
Lublin, J. (2003). Deep, surface and strategic approaches to learning. Centre for teaching and learning, 806-825.
Machado, C. T., & Carvalho, A. A. (2020). Concept mapping: Benefits and challenges in higher education. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 68(1), 38-53.
Nashir, M., & Laili, R. N. (2021). Hybrid Learning as an Effective Learning Solution on Intensive English Program in the New Normal Era. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 9(2), 220232.
Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 76(3), 413-448.
Nitzan, S. (2009). Collective preference and choice. Cambridge University Press.
Shaffie, N., ZIN, R. M., & ISMAIL, S. (2020). ACCOUNTING STUDENTS’PREFERENCES TOWARDS LEARNING STRATEGIES IN UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA TERENGGANU. Universiti Malaysia Terengganu Journal of Undergraduate Research, 2(4), 75-88.


27. Didactics - Learning and Teaching
Paper

Influence of Role-playing Games in Language Classes on the Intrinsic Learning Motivation of High School Students: a Quantitative Study

Victoria Wurmstich, Amine Merve Ercan

Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Germany

Presenting Author: Wurmstich, Victoria

Introduction

Studies show the important effects of learning motivation and enjoyment on school success (e.g. Geis-Thöne, 2020) and how integrating gamification into the classroom can strengthen motivation and willingness to perform (Dahl, 2021) because intrinsic motivation is self-determined through joy or interest in the respective activity (Brandstätter, 2018).

There are several types of integration of gamification and one is role-playing (Kroker, 2021). Role-play games can provide an environment in which students can imitate social situations that are characterized by interactions with other people (Löffler, 1979) by imitation of real and everyday social situations (Grießhaber, 1987). The use of role-playing in language teaching improves the flexibility and creativity of the students, due to the free improvisation in the preparation. Not only the interaction with the partner expands the language activity of the learners but also performing the piece in front of other students increases and strengthens self-confidence and consequently motivation and interest towards the course (Reich, 2008).

Motivation can be divided into two: extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Extrinsic motivation is described as bringing about positive consequences and avoiding negative consequences. Extrinsic motivation can be external or self-determined (Brandstätter, Schüler, Puca, Lozo, 2018). As soon as the extrinsic factors are gone, the motivation is gone. Intrinsic motivation is the opposite of extrinsic motivation; however, it is also self-determined through joy and interest in things or activities. Humans have the desire to learn certain skills or feel content, but this is not influenced by rewards or punishments from the external environment (Fruhwirth, 2020). Learning is thus controlled consciously and purposefully by an internally controlled learning drive, such as curiosity (Krapp, 1999).

This study aims to show whether the use of role-playing games in language teaching has a positive impact on intrinsic learning motivation in German high schools. With this aim, the following research question will be examined:

-To what extent integration of role-playing games in language classes of German high schools affect the intrinsic learning motivation of students in grades 11 to 13?

To answer the research question Self-Determination Theory developed by Deci and Ryan (1993) will be integrated since its focus is on experiences, competence, autonomy, and social integration which were defined by Howes (1992)as issues that can be explored through gameplay.

The theory deal with the connection between human motivation and learning by framing motivation with autonomous and controlled factors. Based on the theory, three innate psychological needs play an important role: the experience of competence, autonomy, and social integration (Deci & Ryan, 1993). A person's experience of competence is reflected in their need to use and expand their skills. The solvability of the challenge or the task must not be too easy or too difficult. However, it must be feasible for the parties involved. People can then test and expand their skills. There is also autonomy, which is a need that allows people to act in a self-determined manner. This means that he is not pushed into his actions by external influences (Schüler, 2020). Humans can decide for themselves which actions to initiate and which to maintain (Krombaß & Harms, 2006). The last basic need is social integration. This is primarily reflected in the quality of social ties to other people and not in the frequency of this. Thus, the existence of a trusting basis plays an important role in that people can show themselves as they are and are accepted and valued by others (Frühwirth, 2020).


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
Method

This is a Quantitative Survey Research.

Deci and Ryan (2003) also developed an English-language scale "Intrinsic Motivation Inventory"  in the frame of their theory to examine motivation more closely in the respective context. In this study, the German version of this scale will be used to examine the research question. Therefore, the instrument will be a standardized validated 5-point Likert scale “die Kurzskala Intrinsischer Motivation” modified from “The Intrinsic Motivation Inventory” of Deci and Ryan (2003) by Krombass and Harms (2006) in German.

The scale consists of three parts, the first of which contains the demographics of the respective participants. The second part deals with intrinsic motivation in language teaching in general. The third part focuses on the intrinsic motivation of role-playing in language teaching. Each of the last two parts has 4 categories with 3 items each. Participants rated each statement based on their agreement as 0 “strongly disagree”, 4 “strongly agree” Filling out was done through SoSciSuryey and took about 10 minutes.

Data were obtained in Germany through snowball sampling since the participants have to meet certain criteria. This means that the test subjects who take part in this survey should be 18 years or older, are currently being taught at a high school in grades 11 to 13, and have experience with role-playing games in language classes. In addition, the participants must have a good knowledge of German. Participants who do not meet these criteria will be excluded from the study while analyzing data. The link to the scale was sent to individuals and the participants were asked to recruit other people from their circle of acquaintances by forwarding this link (Döring & Bortz, 2014).

A pilot study was conducted to avoid comprehension problems in the questionnaire for the participants. An oral survey of 5 students in Jena took place. They had the task of reading through the newly designed items and, if necessary, asking questions about the content if there were problems understanding them. The content was formulated for all students, which is why no questions were asked.

Ethical approval was obtained.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
Results

This study is still in the data collection step. The evaluation of the results of the Likert scale will be carried out with SPSS, a statistical and analysis software. First, the cases with too many missing values as well as participants who always gave the same answer options will be removed since there exist reverse items. Then indices will be created for the individual subscales “interest/enjoyment”, “perceived competencies”, “perceived freedom of choice” and “pressure/tension” from the two short scales of intrinsic motivation. These serve to combine several individual indicators, the items, into one characteristic, the subscale. The next step will be to check the internal consistency of the questionnaire using Cronbach's alpha.

The demographic data will also be evaluated descriptively. Frequency tables will be created to get a more precise overview of the sample in terms of age, gender, and experience with role-playing games.

To examine the influence of role-playing on intrinsic motivation in language teaching, a one-sample t-test will be used. It is expected to indicate parallel results to determine a significant effect of role-play games on learning motivation in the context of German high schools. Additionally, the study will provide insight to language teachers about the effects of role-play on the competence, autonomy, and social integration skills of students and help them to arrange their course curriculum based on the anticipated results.

Limitations and Future Studies

Due to snowball sampling the sample is not representative of a larger population because the first participants recruit people who have similar characteristics to them (Döring & Börtz, 2014). Since the survey took place online, there was no guarantee that subjects would take part in the study more than once (Hussy, Schreier & Echterhoff, 2013). Therefore, this study may need to be repeated in the future based on the results.

References
Brandstätter, V., Schüler, J., Puca, R. M. & Lozo, L. (2018). Intrinsische Motivation. In V. Brandstätter at al. (Hrsg.), Motivation und Emotionen (S. 113-128). Berlin: Springer.
Dahl, D. (2021). Let‘s have FUN! Gamification im Mathematikunterricht. Unveröffentlichte Dissertation, Universität Potsdam.
Deci, E. & Ryan, R. M. (1993). Die Selbstbestimmungstheorie der Motivation und ihre Bedeutung für die Pädagogik. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 39 (2), 223-238.
Deci, E. & Ryan, R. M. (2003). Intrinsic Motivation Inventory. Verfügbar unter: http://www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT/ measures/intrins.html [27.12.2022].
Döring, N. & Bortz, J. (2014). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften. 5. Auflage. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
Frühwirth, G. (2020). Die Self- Determination Theory nach Deci & Ryan. In G. Frühwirth (Hrsg.), Selbstbestimmt unterrichten dürfen – Kontrolle unterlassen können (S. 5-25). Berlin: Springer Nature.
Geis-Thöne, W. (2020). Lernmotivation und Freude an der Schule. Eine Auswertung des Nationalen Bildungspanels (NEPS). Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW), 30.
Grießhaber, W. (1987). Authentisches und zitiertes Handeln. Band 2. Rollenspiele im Sprachunterricht. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Harms, U. & Krombaß, A. (2006). Ein computergestütztes Informationssystem zur Biodiversität als motivierende und lernförderliche Ergänzung der Exponate eines Naturkundemuseums. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 12, 7-22.
Howes, C. (1992). Collaborative Construction of Pretend, The: Social Pretend Play Functions. State University of New York Press.
Hussy, W., Schreier, M. & Echterhoff, G. (2013). Forschungsmethoden in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften. 2. Auflage. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Krapp, A. (1999). Intrinsische Lernmotivation und Interesse. Forschungsansätze und konzeptuelle Überlegungen. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 45 (3), 387-406.
Kroker, B. (2021). Gamification im Unterricht. Tipps & Kritik. Betzold Blog. Verfügbar unter: https://www.betzold.de/blog/gamification/ [13.01.2023].
Löffler, R. (1979). Spiele im Englischunterricht. Vom lehrergelenkten Lernspiel zum schülerorientierten Rollenspiel. München: Urban & Schwarzenberg.
Reich, K. (2008). Rollenspiele. Methodenpool Universität Köln. Verfügbar unter: https://www.uni-koeln.de/hf/konstrukt/didaktik/download/rollenspiele.pdf [13.01.2023].
Schüler, J.  (2020). Intrinsische Motivation im Kontext Sport und Bewegung. In J. Schüler, M. Wegner & H. Plessner (Hrsg.) Sportpsychologie (S. 165-183). Berlin: Springer Nature.


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: ECER 2023
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.149+TC
© 2001–2024 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany