Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th May 2024, 03:04:18am GMT

 
 
Session Overview
Session
27 SES 12 A: Teaching and Learning in Preschools and Elementary Schools
Time:
Thursday, 24/Aug/2023:
3:30pm - 5:00pm

Session Chair: Unni Lind
Location: James McCune Smith, 630 [Floor 6]

Capacity: 30 persons

Paper Session

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
27. Didactics - Learning and Teaching
Paper

Diverse Responsive Teaching in Tact with Play in Preschool

Kristine Ingridz

Malmö Universitet, Sweden

Presenting Author: Ingridz, Kristine

The purpose of this paper is two folded. One is to generate knowledge about characteristics of teaching in relation to play and how content within teaching emerge between participants. The second purpose is related to methodology and analysis whereby using interaction analysis (IA) give same attention to expressions from the body as from the spoken word to understand response in diverse ways in relation to participants different ways of communicating response. Diverse ways in this study involve both verbal and/or bodily expression. Due to the emergent need of research that explore teaching in relation to multi-lingualism in an Early Childhood Education (ECE) this study aims to contribute to that field (Norling & Lillqvist, 2016; Kultti, 2021). A central aspect in this study when analyzing teaching in relation to play is the aspect of interaction between participants.

This study aims to contribute with knowledge about how teaching in relation to play can be understood by asking:

1. What can be characterized as teaching in relation to play?

- What emerge as content in teaching in relation to play?

- How is response expressed between participants?

The study is theoretically framed by Play Responsive Teaching in Early Childhood Education and Care for a social and cultural sustainability (PRECEC_SCS) in relation to pedagogical tact (Lövlie, 2007; Van Manen, 2015) and, didaktik (Klafki, 1995). Klafkis (1995) critical constructive didaktik is related to an understanding of teaching that goes from bottom-up. Which in this study signify starting from what the children seem to be interested in.

Play-responsive teaching (PRECEC) has a theoretical perspective where the concept of response is used in relation to children's play. Teachers’ response to children's play can lead to teaching of a new content this is in relation to a joint attention or make common witch is related to intersubjectivity (Barnhart, 2004; Pramling et al, 2019). According to Lövlie (2007), pedagogical tact is about an immediate action that is related to the teacher's adherence. It is sensed by a movement, a gaze, a physical action, or verbal communication, and takes place in the moment (see van Manen, 2015). Pedagogical tact is linked to what happens between people in which intersubjectivity (see. Pramling et al, 2019) and response are highly relevant.

PRECEC_SCS also orient to how participants shift within an activity by focusing on As if and As is. The concept As if, relate to fiction and As is, relates to reality and is used to analyze how the alternation between As if and As is occurs within an activity. According to Pramling et al (2019), through the combination of As If and As Is, we can understand more of the world. Engaging in the alternation between As if and As is can educate us about the world on an individual as well as a collective level. Within PRECEC_SCS the concepts are associated with responsiveness and intersubjectivity and direct understanding towards what happens within an activity with a focus on the communication and the alternations between As if and As is.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
The following study is based on ethnographic method with a video camera as a tool and field notes as a complement.  The study has been ethically reviewed and approved (210923) and all participants have given written informed consent either through themselves or through a guardian. The choice to study the question of teaching in relation to play in preschool through ethnographic method is argued against the theoretical entrance through PRECEC _SCS and an ontological understanding of teaching as an interpersonal act. When conducting research in the field one ambition is to create a narrative about the culture being studied (Hammersley & Atkinson, 1983/2007; Coffey, 2018).  Ethnography can be about providing a detailed picture of teaching realities (se Vallberg Roth, 2022) which in this study is exemplified through preschool as a place for fieldwork. The studied teaching practice, such as the preschool in this study, implies, through ethnographic method, an interest, and a curiosity for how teaching in relation to play is established or arises in preschool between preschool teachers and children.  The ethnographic method can thus tell us something about teaching practices in preschool.
 To support the ethnographic fieldwork, I have used a video camera to generate empiricism as a basis for analysis and results (see e.g. Heikkilä & Sahlström, 2003; Hadfield & Haw, 2012). As this study is interested in the interpersonal relationship where response and interaction are central, the data is analyzed with the support of interaction analysis (IA). The focus is interactions between the participants in an activity where the analyses pay equal attention to both verbal and bodily interaction (Goffman, 1981; Schieffelin & Ochs, 1986).  By evaluating all the participants' different ways of expressing themselves equally, more opportunities to understand response emerge and it opens for diverse languages to be visible in preschool.


Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
By using interaction analyzez (IA) and focus at both the verbal and expressions from the body diverse ways of communicating response emerges.
The result of the analysis indicates that, among other things, the concepts of As if and As is can be related to didaktik based on both verbal and bodily expression. As if and As is, is present in the participants play but also emerges through the teachers didaktik actions in the play.  The question of what can characterize teaching in relation to play is then related to the teacher's responsive tact in relation to the children's actions and communications, both physically and verbally. Doing something visible to the other, in teaching, can be characterized by asking questions and shifting in roles through As if and As is and here the expression of the body becomes as important as the verbal expression. Content that emerges trough teaching in relation to play is for example related to identity and creativity.


References
Albon, D. & Huf, C. (2021). What matters in early childhood education and care? The contribution of ethnographic research, Ethnographic and Education, 16:3, 243-247

Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Pennsylvania: PENN

Hadfield, M. & Haw, K. (2012). Video: modalities and methodologies. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 35:3, s. 311-324

Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (1983/2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge

Heikkilä, M. & Sahlström, F. (2003). Om användning av videoinspelning i fältarbete. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, årg 8, nr 1-2, s. 24-41

Klafki, W. (1995). On the problem of teaching and learning contents from the standpoint of critical constructive didaktik. In: Hopmann, S., & Riquarts (Eds.). Didaktik and/or Curriculum. Kiel: IPN. Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften
an der Universität Kiel.

Kultti, A. (2022) Teaching responsive to play and linguistic diversity in early childhood education: considerations on theoretical grounds, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25:8, 3037-3045, DOI: 10.1080/13670050.2021.2001426

Norling, M. & Lillvist. A (2016). Literacy-Related Play activities and Preschool Staff´s Strategies to support Children`s concept development. I:  World Journal of Teaching. Vol.6, No.5; 2016


Pramling, N., Wallerstedt, C., Lagerlöf, P., Björklund, C., Kultti, A.,Palmér, H., Magnusson, M., Thulin, S., Jonsson, A., & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2019). Play-Responsive Teaching in Early Childhood Teaching. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

Schieffelin, B. B & Ochs, E. (1986). Language Socialization. I: Annual Review of Anthroplogy, vol. 15, p. 163-191 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2155759

Vallberg Roth, A-C. (2022). Teaching in preschool: Multivocal modelling in a collaberative conceptual replication study. EDUCARE, 2022:5

Van Manen, M. (2016). Pedagogical tact. Knowing what to do When you don´t know what to do. Routledge: New York, USA


27. Didactics - Learning and Teaching
Paper

Individual Learning and Development Analysis of Basic Skills in Early Reading in the Inclusive Transition from Kindergarten to School

Helke Redersborg, Katrin Liebers

Leipzig University, Germany

Presenting Author: Redersborg, Helke

Among the United Nations' global goals is to provide inclusive and equitable quality education at all levels for all people by 2030 so that they "acquire the knowledge and skills needed to exploit opportunities and to participate fully in society" (UN General Assembly 2015, p.7). Successful educational processes require developmental guidance for children's domain-specific development, especially during transitions, as, for example, the transition to elementary school is a sensitive stage in which children are particularly vulnerable (Fabian & Dunlop 2007) and research findings point to the great importance of preschool domain-specific competencies for further educational success (Duncan et al. 2007). In order to enable a sustainable educational process for each child, the individual learning development of the children should be focused on, especially in heterogeneous inclusive contexts (Petriwskyj, Thorpe & Tayler 2014). In this context, an individual, domain-specific learning development analysis represents the basis for continuous inclusive support (Watkins 2007). Following this assumption, the diagnostic instrument ILEA-T (Geiling, Liebers, & Prengel 2015) can be used to capture domain-specific competencies in the transition from kindergarten to school. Yet, this instrument cannot adequately represent the abilities and development of children at the lower levels of competence. However, individual support of the children's educational and developmental processes is of high importance, especially for children with significant domain-specific learning and developmental challenges (SLDC), in order to enable them to acquire literacy skills of high quality and thus their participation in the general curriculum and in their environment using sign and writing systems (Erickson, Hatch & Clendon 2010). For the group of children with SLDC whose competencies are at or below the first two competency levels in the domain of early literacy according to the ILEA-T-level model (Geiling et al., 2015), there is a lack of diagnostic instruments with which their competencies can be captured in such a way that suitable educational support can be derived from them (Liebers, Geiling, Prengel 2020). Furthermore, diagnostic approaches and support in the domain of early literacy are often considered of secondary importance by pedagogical professionals (Smidt 2012, Korntheuer 2014) and existing literary competencies of children are often over- or underestimated (Dollinger 2013). Therefore, the aim of the current research project ILEA-Basis-T is to detect the domain-specific preschool competencies of children in a resource- and support-oriented manner and to derive suitable support suggestions. The focus is on early mathematical abilities and emergent literacy skills as well as on bio-psycho-social well-being. Domain-specific diagnostic tools and support suggestions are being developed and tested in the project in cooperation with partners in practice. This paper focuses on the fit of the Emergent Literacy diagnostic tool for children with SLDC. Emergent literacy includes all reading and writing behaviors and understandings that precede and develop into conventional reading and writing (Sulzby, Branz & Buhle 1993). This paper will address the content of the emergent literacy model and how emergent literacy is operationalized and validated as a diagnostic tool. The question underlying this paper is: To what extent do the scales of the trial version of the diagnostic tool for early reading skills meet traditional quality criteria and how time-efficient, developmentally sensitive and fair are they with respect to the basal skills of children? Therefore, initial findings from piloting and testing will be discussed.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
This study is initially a classic validation study. Taking into account theory and the state of research, emergent literacy was modeled as a construct, a first version of the diagnostic tools in early reading was developed, and piloted with n = 15 children. Subsequently, the item selection was revised and integrated into six "reading pictures". Items from a total of ten different scales are integrated into these (Visual Awareness, Reading Emoticons, Reading Iconic Signs, Reading Road Signs, Reading Symbols, Reading Figurative Logos, Reading Letter-Bound Logos, Recognizing Letters Among Other Signs, Reading Letters, Reading Whole Words). These will be trialed in March 2023 with n = 80 children in partner kindergartens by project staff. In addition to the newly developed diagnostic tools, other test procedures are being tested with regard to their suitability for subsequent determination of construct validity. To determine convergent validity, several scales from the Giessener Screening for the Assessment of Extended Reading Ability (GISC-EL, Koch, Euker & Kuhl 2016) and from EuLe 4-5 Capturing Narrative and Reading Competencies in 4- to 5-year-old Children (Meindl & Jungmann 2019) will be used. Furthermore, it will be tested to what extent the divergent validity can be tested in the target group with the help of the Potsdam Intelligence Test for Preschoolers (PITVA, Wyschkon & Esser 2019) or the Basic Diagnostic of Circumscribed Developmental Disorders in Preschoolers - Version III, Subtest 1 (BUEVA-III, Esser & Wyschkon 2016). After final revision, the "reading pictures" will be validated with n = 180 children. This paper will include the results of the trial in spring 2023.
Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The Pilot showed that a variety of items could be "read" by the children with SLDC. Some items had to be replaced because they were too difficult. Across all scales, the mean item difficulty was p = .41. The revised selection of items in six "reading pictures" is to be tested in a standardized survey situation with n = 80 children of the target group. Based on this, the quality of the scales and items is examined by using item analyses and a confirmatory factor analysis. At the same time, it is reported to what extent the scales prove to be suitable for making statements about convergent and divergent validity regarding the specific target group. These data will be discussed with a focus on the extent to which the scales can meet traditional validity criteria and how developmentally sensitive and fair (Watkins 2007) they are with regard to the basal competencies of children with SLDC. Furthermore, the data will be embedded in the context of the research project ILEA-Basis-T. In an insight into the further goals of the project, the prospects of this inclusive, everyday-integrated approach to diagnostics and support in the transition from kindergarten to school are presented for the international goal of inclusive and equitable quality of education at all levels for all people (UN General Assembly 2015). Transitions represent vulnerable stages regardless of national systems (Fabian & Dunlop 2007). Through individualized attendance of educational and developmental processes, children are given the opportunity to acquire domain-specific competencies of high quality at an early stage and thereby participate in the general curriculum and in their everyday world.
References
Dollinger, S. (2013). Diagnosegenauigkeit von ErzieherInnen und LehrerInnen. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P. et al. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446.
Erickson, K. A., Hatch, P. & Clendon, S. (2010). Literacy, Assistive Technology, and Students with Significant Disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 42(5).
Esser, G. & Wyschkon, A. (2016). BUEVA-III. Basisdiagnostik Umschriebener Entwicklungsstörungen im Vorschulalter – Version III. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Fabian, H. & Dunlop, A.‑W. (2007). Outcomes of good practice in transition processes for children entering primary school. Working Paper 42 (Working Papers In early Childhood Development). The Hague, The Netherlands: Bernard van Lee Foundation.
Geiling, U., Liebers, K. & Prengel, A. (Hrsg.) (2015). Handbuch ILEA T. Individuelle Lern-Entwicklungs-Analyse im Übergang. Pädagogische Diagnostik als verbindendes Instrument zwischen frühpädagogischen Bildungsdokumentationen und individuellen Lernstandsanalysen im Anfangsunterricht.
Koch, A., Euker. N. & Kuhl, J. (2016). GISC-EL. Gießener Screening zur Erfassung der erweiterten Lesefähigkeit. Bern: Hogrefe.
Korntheuer, P. (2014). Startklar fürs Lesen. Eine Checkliste zur Erfassung schriftspracherwerbsvorbereitender Umweltfaktoren und Aktivitäten in Kindertageseinrichtungen. Frühe Bildung, 3, 43 – 51.
Liebers, K., Geiling, U., Prengel, A. (2020). ILEA T - ein gemeinsames diagnostisches Instrument für die Kooperation von Kita und Grundschule beim Übergang. In: Pohlmann-Rother, S.; Lange, S. D.; Franz, U. (Hrsg.). Einblicke in die Forschung - Perspektiven für die Praxis. Köln: Carl Link. 2020. S. 453-488
Meindl, M. & Jungmann, T. (2019). EuLe 4-5. Erzähl- und Lesekompetenzen erfassen bei 4- bis 5-jährigen Kindern. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Petriwskyj, A., Thorpe, K. & Tayler, C. (2014). Towards inclusion: provision for diversity in the transition to school. International Journal of Early Years Education, 22(4), 359–379.
Smidt, W. (2012). Vorschulische Förderung im Kindergartenalltag. In G. Faust (Hrsg.), Einschulung. Ergebnisse aus der Studie "Bildungsprozesse, Kompetenzentwicklung und Selektionsentscheidungen im Vorschul- und Schulalter (BiKS)" (S. 69–82). Münster: Waxmann.
Sulzby, Branz & Buhle (1993). Repeated readings of literature and LSES black kindergartners and first graders. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 9, 183-196.
UN General Assembly (2015). Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. New York: United Nations.
Watkins, A., Ed. (2007). Assessment in Inclusive Settings: Key Issues for Policy and Practice. Odense: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education.
Wyschkon, A. & Esser, G. (2019). PITVA. Potsdamer Intelligenztest für das Vorschulalter. Göttingen: Hogrefe.


27. Didactics - Learning and Teaching
Paper

Conceptual PlayWorld as a Method of Facilitating Learning Beyond Subject Matter in Elementary School

Anne-Line Bjerknes, Ingunn Skalstad, Søren Freudenreich Räpple

University of South-Eastern Norway, Norway

Presenting Author: Bjerknes, Anne-Line; Skalstad, Ingunn

Internationally, children experience an increased focus on learning in early childhood education (ECE), reducing the time they play during ECE. At the same time, children’s free play areas are being reduced (Korkodilos, 2016), along with the opportunity for play due to organized leisure time after school (Broch et al., 2022), and because children are starting school earlier. Paradoxically, play is important for children’s learning and contributes to increased curiosity, wonder, and learning motivation. It is also important for children’s sense of belonging in society, social relationships, and physical and mental quality of life (e.g. Russ et al., 1999; Brussoni et al., 2015). In Norway, a new curriculum demands that pupils learn about increased life quality through interdisciplinary teaching but also suggests that play should be included in teaching to promote creative and meaningful learning (Ministry of Education and Research, 2017). Research shows that teachers often let pupils play, but they have little experience and knowledge of how play can both promote learning and secure the quality of life of their pupils (Bjerknes & Skalstad, 2022). By constructing a “Conceptual PlayWorld,” familiar from early childhood education in Australia (Fleer, 2019), one teacher educator and six student teachers set out to teach pupils in 2nd grade. The certified teacher was an observer together with another teacher educator. We asked, how can applying CPW as a teaching approach in science contribute to holistic learning in elementary school?

Through interviews, we asked what all adult participants experienced and observed. We then used thematic analysis to categorize the themes.

Our results show that the Conceptual PlayWorld not only taught pupils within-subject concepts and understanding but also promoted pupils’ quality of life and interdisciplinary understanding during their learning process.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
Six student teachers (STs) and their teacher educator (TE) set out to construct a CPW in a classroom with 18 pupils. They followed the CPW model for teaching science in play-based settings (Fleer, 2019). In general, this model contains five steps: 1) chose a story for the play, 2) make a PW that the pupils and teachers can enter together, 3) enter the PW, 4) plan for concepts and challenges through which learning can take place, and 5) assign the pupil and teacher roles. In this study, the CPW took place in different rooms in an imaginary hospital. In Table 1, we show how these steps were played out in our study.
The STs/TE entered the hospital rooms together with the pupils, where they had roles as assistant doctors together with the pupils (who were patients and/or doctors). The STs/TE used scientific concepts during the play. After visiting all five hospital rooms, the pupils and STs/TE exited the CPW together.
The following day, the pupils used BookCreator to write digital books in Norwegian class called “My day in the hospital.” In these books, the pupils presented their experiences during the CPW in both text and pictures. The books were used as part of the pupils’ homework to train their reading and writing skills.
We used semi-structured interviews. Semi-structured interviews offer additional depth to information supplied by questionnaires or fully structured interviews by inviting dialogic exchange. By doing so, the researcher actively constructs knowledge in partnership with the respondent, who constructs answers to questions that may require them to consider issues in a depth not explicitly previously explored (Fontana & Frey, 2000).
All three audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and anonymized before analysis. The method of thematic analysis was used to evaluate the data (Braun & Clarke, 2006), consisting of six steps: 1) familiarization with the data, 2) generating initial codes, 3) searching for themes, 4) reviewing themes, 5) defining and naming themes, and 6) producing the manuscript. Notably, this method of analysis is recursive, meaning that each subsequent step in the analysis might have prompted us to circle back to earlier steps in light of newly emerged themes or data (Kiger & Varpio, 2020).

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
Our research adds to the limited knowledge on how CPW can be used as a teaching method in school. We saw that CPW promotes learning within subjects in school and contributes to learning interdisciplinarily, authentically, and socially. Because learning was perceived as meaningful, relevant, and fun, the pupils were motivated to take part in the activities and to gain new knowledge, which may have contributed to their well-being. The fact that the CPW was perceived as relevant, as the pupils experienced that they needed the knowledge to solve the tasks, was an important factor in this respect. The CPW also contributed to positive relationships both between the pupils and between the pupils and their teacher. These positive experiences in a learning process, together with an experience of being in a safe place where they could be themselves, may have contributed to facilitating later learning. The STs, TE, and CT had positive experiences with using the method and found it to be a suitable method for elementary school. Having enough time is essential when planning to use a CPW in school. It is also important that the teacher has faith that the method works. Thus, the results show that the use of the CPW as a method for teaching science in school contributes to holistic learning in the forms of both academic and social learning. The pupils learn through practice-oriented, relevant experiences in which academic and practical learning are set in a relevant context.
References
Bjerknes, A-L. & Skalstad, I. (2022). Lek og naturfag – som hånd I hanske! Hvordan kan man lære naturfag når man leker? I S. Breive, L.T. Eik & L. Sanne (Red.), Lekende læring og lærende lek I begynneropplæringen (s. 171-194). Fagbokforlaget
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Broch, T. B., Gundersen, V., Vistad, O. I., Selvaag, S. K., & Wold, L. C. (2022). Barn og natur–Organiserte møteplasser for samvær og naturglede. NINA Temahefte 87, 5-31
Brussoni M, Gibbons R, Gray C, Ishikawa T, Sandseter EBH, Bienenstock A, Chabot G, Fuselli P, Herrington S, Janssen I, Pickett W, Power M, Stanger N, Sampson M. & Tremblay MS. (2015). What is the Relationship between Risky Outdoor Play and Health in Children? A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12(6):6423-6454. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120606423
Fleer, M. (2019). Scientific Playworlds: A model of teaching science in play-based settings. Research in Science Education, 49(5), 1257-1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9653-z    
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. Handbook of qualitative research, 2(6), 645-672.

Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical teacher, 42(8), 846-854.
Korkodilos, M. (2016). The mental health of children and young people in England. Public Health England.
Russ, S. W., Robins, A. L., & Christiano, B. A. (1999). Pretend play: Longitudinal prediction of creativity and affect in fantasy in children. Creativity Research Journal, 12(2), 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1202_5


27. Didactics - Learning and Teaching
Paper

Mapping First Grade Students’ Understandings of Societal Functions

Klas Andersson, Kristoffer Larsson

University of Gothenburg, Sweden

Presenting Author: Andersson, Klas; Larsson, Kristoffer

The aim and scope of the research project guiding this paper is to map 7-year-olds, first grade students, understandings of societal functions, such as the police, and to develop teaching with the ambition of increasing young students’ knowledge of these functions. The paper however focusses on the first part of the project, conducting interviews to create a cross section of Swedish first grade students’ understandings of societal functions. The paper is based on three key arguments. First, it is socially important to meet the equality issues that exist in the Swedish society and schools (i.e., that knowledge and civic values have different outcomes depending on student’s background and where they grow up) by studying student's different understandings of societal functions. Second, more education research in the area of ‘conceptual change’ is needed for developing the knowledge of concept understanding and concept-progress regarding societal issues among younger students. Third, as the new Swedish curricula, emphasizing student’s understandings of facts, has been launched there is a need for supporting schools and teachers work. In this paper we suggest that children’s understandings on basic societal functions is an important piece for developing social studies teaching.

The main research question is: how does first grade students understand societal functions such as the police?

The point of departure in the paper is that research on conceptual change, i.e., mapping students' different understandings of concepts/phenomena and investigating how these can be developed through teaching, is scant regarding societal issues (Barton & Levstik, 2004; Lundholm & Davis, 2013). In a review of the research Lundholm and Davis (2013) state that the societal oriented subjects are clearly underrepresented within this research orientation. The few studies made focus on broader issues like sustainable development and are mainly targeting older students (in secondary or upper secondary school) views. Compared to what is known about student’s understandings of, for example, mathematical concepts, both the empirical and theoretical research in social studies didactics needs to be developed.

The theoretical framework used in this paper is phenomenography. For several decades it’s been used for studying younger children's understandings of mathematical phenomena and concepts (Björklund et al. 2021, Kullberg et al. 2020). Phenomenography takes departure in the idea that there are different ways to understand a certain phenomenon and that these different ways might be hierarchically ordered from less powerful to more powerful ways of understanding (Marton 2015; Marton & Booth 1997; Svensson 1997). As a research approach phenomenography sets out to track these different understandings of a phenomenon and to organize them in a hierarchically ordered outcome space with different categories of description, depicting the different increasingly more powerful ways of understanding the phenomenon.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
Methodologically the paper departs from the phenomenographic research tradition seeking to map the different ways individuals understands a phenomenon. The basic research method gathering data for this task is respondent interviews focusing on generating the individuals’ ways of understanding (seeing, experiencing) the phenomenon. Each single interview adding to the so-called pool of meaning, in the end representing the populations different ways of understanding the phenomenon in question (Booth 2008).

The first step of the study was to create a strategic selection of first grade student from the population (Cohen et al. 2002). We focused on targeting schools in both rural and urban areas, and for the urban areas we differentiated with regard to socioeconomic standard. The Swedish city of Gothenburg is a segregated city with distinct low income, and high income, areas. 10 student interviews were made with students in a school in a low income area (average income below 250 000 SEK/year, 40 percent foreign born, unemployment rate of over 10 percent) and 10 in a school in a high income area (average income over 350 000 SEK/year, under 10 percent foreign born, unemployment rate of under 4 percent). 10 interviews were made with students in a school on the countryside (an agricultural area), 100 kilometers north of Gothenburg. The schools, as well as the students and student’s legal guardians, gave their informed consent for participating in the study.

The interviews were guided to reveal how students understand the police, trying to open as many aspects of their understanding as possible. In seminal research outlining the phenomenographic interview this is argued to be done by “preparing a number of entry points for the discussion of the phenomenon, varying the context for the discussion by varying the aspects of the phenomenon that are fore-grounded” (Booth, 2008). In order to accomplish this, and considering the young age of the interviewees, we turned to the research of photo interviewing (McBrien & Day, 2012; Mannay 2007). In this tradition using photos are considered to help young children, not used to be interviewed, to describe abstract issues and verbalize memories when discussing a phenomenon (Cappello, 2005). A single sheet with 10 different pictures of police-officers, police stations and police vehicles were used as entry points for the interviews opening up the conversation exhausting the student’s ways of experiencing the phenomenon. The 30 interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The results from the analysis show different ways of understanding the chosen indicator of societal function, i.e., the police. In the analysis of the 30 transcribed interviews, we used the principles of phenomenography for extracting the different understandings that appeared among to the students, grouping these understandings together in a hierarchically order outcome space with different categories of descriptions, i.e, different ways of understandings. The analysis followed key principals for the phenomenographic analysis, coding similarities and differences of expressions of meaning in single transcripts to meanings within the context of the group of transcripts (Akerlind 2005). The main focus was on determining whether a possible category of description actually reviled something distinctive about a certain way of understanding the police, compared to other formed categories, and further to determine how the categories were logically related (Marton & Booth 1997). The analysis (although yet in progress) indicates an outcome space of at least three different categories of first grade student’s understandings of the police. The first and least powerful way of understanding, we call the “fairy tail category”, seeing the police (a male police man) as a hero. The second understanding we call, “the authority category”, seeing the police as a (frightening) power. The third and most powerful way of understanding, we call “the institution category”, seeing the police as an institution in our (common) societal surrounding.    
References
Akerlind, G. S., (2005) Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods, Higher Education Research & Development, 24:4, 321-334.
Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Routledge.
Björklund, C., Ekdahl, A. L., & Runesson Kempe, U. (2021). Implementing a structural approach in preschool number activities. Principles of an intervention program reflected in learning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 23(1), 72-94.
Booth, S. (2008). Developing a phenomenographic interview.
Cappello, M. (2005). Photo interviews. Eliciting data through conversations with children. Field Methods, 17(2), 170–182.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. Routledge.
Kullberg, A., Björklund, C., Brkovic, I., & Kempe, U. R. (2020). Effects of learning addition and subtraction in preschool by making the first ten numbers and their relations visible with finger patterns. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 103(2), 157-172.
Lundholm, C. & Davis, P. (2013) Conceptual Change in Social Sciences. In International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, edited by Stella Vosniadou, Taylor & Francis Group, 2013.
McBrien, J. L., & Day, R. (2012). From here to there: Using photography to explore perspectives of resettled refugee youth. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 3(4.1), 546–568.
Mannay, D. (2010). Making the familiar strange: Can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible? Qualitative Research, 10(1), 91–111.
Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography - describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200.
Marton, F. (2015). Necessary conditions of learning. Routledge.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Svensson, L. (1997). Theoretical foundations of Phenomenography. Higher Education Research & Development, 16(2), 159–171.