Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th May 2024, 02:56:51am GMT

 
 
Session Overview
Session
23 SES 16 C: Talking the Talk, Walking the Walk: Have We Mobilised Research on Knowledge Mobilisation?
Time:
Friday, 25/Aug/2023:
1:30pm - 3:00pm

Session Chair: Nora Revai
Location: James Watt South Building, J10 LT [Floor 1]

Capacity: 55 persons

Panel Discussion

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Panel Discussion

Talking the Talk, Walking the Walk: Have We Mobilised Research on Knowledge Mobilisation?

Nora Révai1, Lou Aisenberg2, Annette Boaz3, Toby Greany4, Rien Rouw5, Kari-Elisabeth Vambeseth Skogen6

1OECD, Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, France (panel chair); 2J-PAL and Paris School of Economics, France; 3London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom; 4University of Nottingham, United Kingdom; 5Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, the Netherlands; 6Ministry of Education and Research and University of Oslo, Norway

Presenting Author: Révai, Nora; Aisenberg, Lou; Boaz, Annette; Greany, Toby; Rouw, Rien; Vambeseth Skogen, Kari-Elisabeth

A diverse body of conceptual and research work exists to understand how we can increase the use of research evidence in policy and practice, a process often known as knowledge mobilisation. But to what extent has knowledge mobilisation research itself actually been mobilised? In what ways should we (as researchers) engage with diverse actors and initiatives to mobilise knowledge mobilisation research? The panel addresses this question through the perspectives of researchers, policy makers and intermediaries who span boundaries across various communities.

Knowledge mobilisation research has provided at least three key insights over the past two decades. Firstly, conceptualisations of knowledge mobilisation have evolved. Early conceptualisations of knowledge transfer saw research use a linear process, in which evidence can simply be pushed onto perceived users. While linear activities such as dissemination and communication are relevant, research has revealed that these one-way approaches are not successful by themselves.

Research has given us a more nuanced understanding of the diversity of actors in an education system. Gone are the days of the simplistic researcher, policy maker, practitioner distinction. A diverse set of actors interact with each other across different levels of a system. Recognising this complexity means understanding the value of good relationships between actors. These relationships can result in the more effective formulation of knowledge needs, and support both pull and push mechanisms. However, creating and maintaining relationships is still not enough to drive such a complex knowledge system. Developing a culture of using research well across the whole education system necessitates a systems approach with appropriate infrastructure, incentives and co-ordination mechanisms. Yet, recent OECD data shows that most countries do not have such system-wide strategies to increase research use.

Secondly, knowledge mobilisation research has developed different conceptual models, giving a visual interpretation of various aspects of research use (e.g., by showing the whole evidence “eco”-system, connections between research production and use or different roles and processes involved in using knowledge). These come from a range of sectors and disciplines. However, it appears that many actors, such as policy makers and school leaders, do not know them or find it difficult to understand how they might be used to strengthen research engagement in education systems.

Thirdly, data (or lack thereof) shows that we need to better understand what works in research mobilisation for initiatives to become evidence-based themselves. Evaluations of initiatives to date have been scarce and we also lack detailed research on many promising avenues, such as mechanisms to support the co-production of education research.

The OECD Strengthening the Impact of Education Research project has been working over the past year to take stock of the knowledge mobilisation landscape, bring together a network of experts and explore innovative concepts such as evidence use journeys to highlight the implications of research on knowledge mobilisation for education systems. The panel will reflect on how we can better mobilise research on knowledge mobilisation. In order to talk the talk and walk the walk, it poses the following questions not just to researchers but to policy makers and actors who work across policy, research, practice and different sectors:

  • What are the lessons learnt from the research mobilisation literature over the past two decades and what key barriers do actors (including researchers) face when implementing them?
  • What can education learn from the research and experiences of knowledge mobilisation taking place in diverse sectors, such as healthcare?
  • What mechanisms and incentives can we put in place to facilitate the engagement of different actors with knowledge mobilisation research?
  • Do we need more diverse research production and how can we ensure both rigour and relevance of different methods?

References
Best, A., & Holmes, B. (2010). Systems thinking, knowledge and action: Towards better models and methods. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 6(2), 145–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/174426410X502284

Boaz, A., & Nutley, S. (2019). Using evidence. In A. Boaz, H. Davies, A. Fraser, & S. Nutley (Eds.), What Works Now? Evidence-Informed Policy and Practice (pp. 251-277). Bristol: Policy Press.

Burns, T., Köster, F., & Fuster, M. (2016). Education Governance in Action: Lessons from Case Studies. In Educational Research and Innovation. OECD Publishing, Paris. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264262829-en

Gough, D., Maidment, C., & Sharples, J. (2018). UK What Works Centres: Aims, Methods and Contexts. EPPI-Centre. Retrieved from https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=3731

Langer, L., Tripney, J., & Gough, D. (2016). The Science of Using Science Researching the Use of Research Evidence in Decision-Making. EPPI-Centre, Institute of Education, University College London.

Maxwell, B., Sharples, J., & Coldwell, M. (2022). Developing a systems‐based approach to research use in education. Review of Education, 10(3). doi:10.1002/rev3.3368

Nutley, S., Powell, A., & Davies, H. (2013). What counts as good evidence? Provocation paper for the Alliance for Useful Evidence. Alliance for Useful Evidence, University of St Andrews. Retrieved 10 18, 2019, from www.alliance4usefulevidence.org

OECD. (2022). Who Cares about Using Education Research in Policy and Practice?: Strengthening Research Engagement. In Educational Research and Innovation. OECD Publishing, Paris. doi:10.1787/d7ff793d-en

Oliver, K., Hopkins, A., Boaz, A., Guillot-Wright, S., & Cairney, P. (2022). What works to promote research-policy engagement? Evidence & Policy, 1-23. doi:10.1332/174426421x16420918447616

Powell, A., Davies, H., & Nutley, S. (2017). Facing the challenges of research-informed knowledge mobilization: ‘Practising what we preach’? Public Administration, 96(1), 36-52. doi:10.1111/padm.12365

Rickinson, M., Cirkony, C., Walsh, L., Gleeson, J., Cutler, B., & Salisbury, M. (2022). A framework for understanding the quality of evidence use in education. Educational Research, 64(2), 133-158. doi:10.1080/00131881.2022.2054452

Torres, J., & Steponavičius, M. (2022). More than just a go-between: The role of intermediaries in knowledge mobilisation. In OECD Education Working Papers. OECD Publishing, Paris. doi:10.1787/aa29cfd3-en

Chair
Nóra Révai, nora.revai@oecd.org, OECD, Centre for Educational Research and Innovation


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: ECER 2023
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.149+TC
© 2001–2024 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany