Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th May 2024, 07:47:32am GMT

 
 
Session Overview
Session
08 SES 04 B: Novel approaches to promoting wellbeing and relationship quality in schools
Time:
Wednesday, 23/Aug/2023:
9:00am - 10:30am

Session Chair: Monica Carlsson
Location: Joseph Black Building, A504 [Floor 5]

Capacity: 50 persons

Paper Session

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations
08. Health and Wellbeing Education
Paper

Rethinking Wellbeing Education Post Covid – a Novel Intervention for Promoting Socioemotional Learning Through Puppetry

Joanna Wincenciak, Órla Bracken, Eve Esteban

University of Glasgow, United Kingdom

Presenting Author: Wincenciak, Joanna

What should post-pandemic schools look like? To address this question, we developed and evaluated a novel art-based intervention aimed at supporting school transition and socioemotional learning in young children. The Puppetry and Emotional Resilience programme (P&ER) has been motivated by the growing need for a holistic and learner-centred approach to wellbeing education, and for offering children and teachers appropriate tools and ecosystems to support their social and emotional needs, communication, and ultimately learning.

Globally, the educational landscape in a post-pandemic recovery is undergoing a radical transformation in order to respond to the emerging challenges of poverty, socio-economic inequalities, and climate emergency. In order to equip learners with tools for active citizenship, schools across the EU have begun to integrate social and emotional education across their curricula. The post-pandemic social and emotional landscape has also further highlighted the need for a balanced, but progressive and holistic approach to education, which addresses the academic, social, emotional and mental health needs of children, staff and the community (European Commission, 2021; UNESCO, 2021; WHO, 2021). Schools do this not only by offering a physical space where children can interact with their peers, share interests and negotiate differences, but perhaps more importantly, by providing a structured environment which enables them to practice communication and problem solving, and to develop friendship, self-confidence, and emotion regulation (Colao et al., 2020).

The question now posed by local and global policymakers and education researchers is the question that motivated this research; how can post-pandemic schools promote health and wellbeing education, respond to the needs of learners, and offer them experiences and foundations for lifelong success? There is an agreement that modern schools should be inclusive, adopt a holistic approach to learning, and offer more opportunities for cooperative learning and participatory activities relying on art or theatre (Colao, et al., 2020). UNESCO (2021) is also recognising the need for integrating health literacy into the school curriculum; this includes teaching children about wellbeing and emotions. To address this need, interventions that enhance social and emotional learning have been implemented worldwide (e.g. WHO, 2021). Their success, however, depends on how well the new skills and strategies are embedded within the wider school ethos, environment, and community (O’Toole & Simovska, 2022). Interventions based on art, storytelling and puppetry (e.g. Webster-Stratton & Reid, 2004) naturally offer such a rich and embodied experience for children, as they readily accept the fantasy world around them and the apparent magic they create (O’Hare, 2005). Theories of art education, (e.g. Romanski, 2019) and social cognition (Baron-Cohen et al., 1985) illustrate the mechanism underpinning this transformative power of puppetry, which allows children to innovate, build new representations, mentalise, and discover the complexities of social relations.

The P&ER programme was developed to support school transition and to promote socioemotional learning and wellbeing education in nursery and primary school children. Based on Zins et al. (Greenberg et al., 2017; Zins et al., 2007) framework for Social and Emotional Learning (SEL), the programme utilised the power of puppetry and storytelling to promote five broad clusters of competencies in children: self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills and decision making. The strong environmental focus of this framework highlights that it is not sufficient to address individual skills development, but it is imperative to enhance the social ecosystem of the classroom, school and the community. This approach complements O’Toole & Simovska’s (2022) reimagined concept of Bildung, which notes the need to stress the mind-body-world connection in wellbeing initiatives in schools. Here, we evaluate the impact of the P&ER programme on the development of complex emotion and social competency skills in children.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
Intervention programmes based on puppetry, where hand puppets are used to model appropriate social behaviours, have been successful in improving children’s social skills such as emotional literacy, empathy, perspective taking or friendships (e.g. Webster-Stratton, et al., 2008). However, often they required to be administered by professionally-trained puppeteers or an educational psychologist. Our programme has been developed and validated to be to delivered solely by the class teachers or nursery practitioners. The programmes addresses Zins et al.’s (2007) core SEL competencies, by focusing on a key competency in each of the six weekly sessions. Teachers took part in a bespoke training in puppet theatre form with professional puppeteers and received custom-made puppets, books, games, and arts and crafts activities – all designed to promote wellbeing and SEL. The shape and scope of the evaluation of the programme has been designed as inclusive and is underpinned by the ethical values of working with vulnerable groups in research (Aldridge, 2016). It examined children’s experience of working with the puppets and the potential benefits on their social and emotional development. Delivered between October 2021 and September 2022 in seven schools and nurseries across rural and urban areas in Scotland, the programme reached over 300 children from low socio-economic backgrounds. In a mixed-methods research, we collected data from teachers (n=11), and parents and children (n=15) at two time points; before the P&ER programme was introduced to the setting and 8-12 weeks later. To measure key social and emotional competencies in children, we obtained: 1) teachers’ assessment of children’s behaviours, emotions and relationships with peers and adults using a Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ); 2) parents’ assessment of children’s affective and cognitive empathy using Griffith Empathy Measure (GEM); 3) children’s emotions recognition and Theory of Mind (ToM) skills using a computer-based emotion authenticity detection task (Wincenciak et al., 2022). In addition, we asked children to draw themselves at school to measure the relationship quality their peers and the school experience. Drawings are a useful tool for measuring children’s experience, as children use drawings as an alternative language to express their feelings and thoughts before they acquire complex communication skills and the emotional maturity to communicate these to the external world. The research was approved by the University of Glasgow College of Social Science Ethics Research Community and the local authorities’ Ethics Boards.  
Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The results of the evaluation of the programme showed both a positive response to the puppets improving the overall classroom atmosphere and school ethos, which were assessed using children’s drawings, and the positive impact on children’s socioemotional development. Analysis of within-individual changes in empathy showed an increase in empathy in all but 1 of the participating children (n=9). On average, children showed 15% more empathy following the programme, with particular benefits being observed for an affective component of empathy (e.g. emotional response towards others), with an increase of 22%. Children’s socioemotional competencies, emotion regulation and behaviour also improved following the programme, with teachers’ reporting 26% less negative symptoms (e.g. less tearfulness), 26% less peer problems (e.g. bullying), and 10% more pro-social behaviour (e.g. helping and sharing). Accuracy in recognition of the emotional states of others increased by 16% following the programme. Taken together, the P&ER programme has proven to be accessible to children and teachers and has had a positive impact on wellbeing and socioemotional learning. We believe that art-based interventions using puppetry have the potential to contribute to the development of health literacy, wellbeing, and ultimately contribute to the reduction of educational inequalities. There is an urgent need for interventions that enhance not only the academic, but also social and emotional learning in young children. Such interventions might mitigate the psychological and social impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, but most importantly, will provide a better start for children who are already at higher risk of developing emotional dysregulation and behavioural problems, and in consequence, have more negative educational outcomes.
References
Aldridge, J. (2016). Participatory Research: Working with Vulnerable Groups in Research and Practice. Policy Press.
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ? Cognition, 21(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8
Colao, A., Piscitelli, P., Pulimeno, M., Colazzo, S., Miani, A., & Giannini, S. (2020). Rethinking the role of the school after COVID-19. The Lancet Public Health, 5(7), e370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30124-9
European Commission. (2021). A systemic, whole-school approach to mental health and well-being in schools in the EU: Analytical report. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/50546
Greenberg, M. T., Domitrovich, C. E., Weissberg, R. P., & Durlak, J. A. (2017). Social and Emotional Learning as a Public Health Approach to Education. The Future of Children, 27(1), 13–32.
O’Hare, E. by M. B. and J. (2005). Puppetry in Education and Therapy: Unlocking Doors to the Mind and Heart. AuthorHouse.
O’Toole, C., & Simovska, V. (2022). Wellbeing and Education: Connecting Mind, Body and World. In R. McLellan, C. Faucher, & V. Simovska (Eds.), Wellbeing and Schooling: Cross Cultural and Cross Disciplinary Perspectives (pp. 21–33). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95205-1_2
Romanski, N. M. (2019). Reigniting the Transformative Power of Puppets Through Narrative Pedagogy, Contemporary Art, and Transdisciplinary Approaches in Art Education. Art Education, 72(4), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2019.1602496
UNESCO. (2021). Acting for recovery, resilience and reimagining education: The Global Education Coalition in action—UNESCO Digital Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379797
Webster-Stratton, C., & Reid, M. J. (2004). Strengthening Social and Emotional Competence in Young Children—The Foundation for Early School Readiness and Success: Incredible Years Classroom Social Skills and Problem-Solving Curriculum. Infants & Young Children, 17(2), 96.
WHO. (2021). Making every school a health-promoting school – Global standards and indicators. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240025059
Wincenciak, J., Palumbo, L., Epihova, G., Barraclough, N. E., & Jellema, T. (2022). Are adaptation aftereffects for facial emotional expressions affected by prior knowledge about the emotion? Cognition and Emotion, 36(4), 602–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2022.2031907
Zins, J. E., Bloodworth, M. R., Weissberg, R. P., & Walberg, H. J. (2007). The Scientific Base Linking Social and Emotional Learning to School Success. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 17(2–3), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410701413145


08. Health and Wellbeing Education
Paper

The Concept of Resonance in Education: Quality and Resonance as Reference Points for School Quality

Patricia Schuler, Esther Forrer Kasteel

Zurich University of Teacher Education, Switzerland

Presenting Author: Schuler, Patricia; Forrer Kasteel, Esther

Starting from the two concepts of resonance and resonance pedagogy the question to be discussed is, what a resonant education is and by which quality features it can be observed in school.

Resonance, a sociological concept, is criticizing the actual acceleration and disentanglement with the world (Rosa, 2019a, 2019b). This shift in paradigm seeks to redefine the quality of relationship in general and to the world, to redefine meaningfulness and the quality of life (Rosa, 2019a, 725).

It contains four characteristics: the moment of being touched, self efficacy, transformation and unavailability. A state is said to be resonant only when the first three characteristics are present - the counterpart is touched, responds self-efficaciously and is part of the change. Ultimately, the state of resonance cannot be forced, which is why resonance is always unavailable. It either happens or it doesn't (Rosa, 2019b). Resonance can be described as the "sociology of world relations". Resonance can also be well understood through his counter-concept of alienation. In the latter, subject and world are indifferently opposed to each other and "world transformation" fails. Nonetheless, resonance and alienation are not merely counter-concepts. Resonance is only possible when moments of alienation are experienced. Phases of alienation are always necessary again and again, so that new resonance relationships can emerge and stable axes of resonance can be established. Resonance as a fundamental critique of current world events (Rosa, 2019a, 725) and at the same time is a forward-looking and sustainable response to it. Resonance is not just a hype, but is confirmed by the fact, that resonance was mentioned in both the Future Report 2018 (Horx, 2018) and in the Future Report 2022 (Horx, 2022). According to this, the two concepts of "mindfulness and resonance" are key to establishing individual resilience (Horx, 2022, 150).

In the end, the concept is a description of the state that touches us, or rather, we hear it crackle.

Resonance pedagogy is the application of the resonance concept to the school setting. Rosa and Endres (2016, 16) consider the "crackling in the classroom" as an indicator of "resonance pedagogy" or "resonance in schools “. In resonance pedagogy, in addition to the four characteristics, the following stakeholders play a role in the resonance triangle: teachers, children and the content or the content or the subject (Rosa & Endres, 2016).

We rise the question of the meaning of resonance and resonance pedagogy, then outline resonant schools and resonant extended education and - based on the quality model of extended education schools according to Willems and Becker (2015, 51) - define central quality features of schools with resonance. In doing so, we prominently include the children's perspective, as the well-being of the child and the implementation of children's rights should be the guiding principles for the management of schools (Palsdottir, 2019).


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
Theoretical conceptual paper based on literature review on the resonance concept (Rosa, 2016, Rosa & Enders, 2016; Horx, 2018, 2022), quality in education (Willems & Becker, 2015) and children's participation (Palsdottir, 2019).
Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
The key to success remains the good relationship between the teacher and the children, based on this, the good relationship between the children and the learning content or tasks, and finally the organizational relationship, or the general standing in the world. To live the concept of resonance in schools and in extended education, it must be applied at all levels: at the level of leadership, at the level of staff, and at the level of interaction between teachers and children.
References
Horx, M. (Hrsg.) (2018). Zukunftsreport 2018. Das Jahrbuch für gesellschaftliche
Trends und Business-Innovationen. Frankfurt am Main: Zukunftsinstitut.
Horx, M. (Hrsg.) (2022). Zukunftsreport 2022. Das Jahrbuch für gesellschaftliche
Trends und Business-Innovationen. Frankfurt am Main: Zukunftsinstitut.
Pálsdóttir, K. (2019). Connecting Children and Leisure-Time Centre. In S. Dockett,
J. Einarsdottir, & B. Perry (Hrsg.), Listening to Children’s Advice About Starting
School and School Age Care (p. 99 – 115). London: Routledge.
Roming, A. (2020). Das Prinzip der Erlaubnis. Psychologie heute compact,
Rosa, H. (2019a). Resonanz. Eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Rosa, H. (2019b). Unverfügbarkeit. 4. Aufl. Wien: Residenz.
Rosa, H., & Endres, W. (2016). Resonanzpädagogik. Wenn es im Klassenzimmer knistert. 2. Aufl. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz.
Willems, A. S., & Becker, D. (2015). Ganztagsschulen – Qualitätsmodelle, Potenziale
und Herausforderungen für die Schulpraxis und die empirische Schul- und Unterrichtsforschung. In H. Wendt, & W. Bos (Hrsg.), Auf dem Weg zum Ganztagsgymnasium. Erste Ergebnisse der wissenschaftlichen Begleitforschung zum Projekt Ganz In (S. 32 – 66). Münster: Waxmann.


08. Health and Wellbeing Education
Paper

Singing for Wellbeing in School

Kat Lord-Watson

Queen Margaret University, United Kingdom

Presenting Author: Lord-Watson, Kat

In the global north, there is growing evidence of the increased vulnerability of children and young people to mental illness, which has become a notable public health concern (Campayo–Muñoz and Cabedo–Mas, 2017; Faulkner, 2022), and reflects the increasing prevalence of mental illness among children and young people globally (Hedemann and Frazier, 2017; Payne et al., 2020). As discussed in the Lancet Commission on Global Mental Health and Sustainable Development Report, childhood is considered a critical stage in which to build interventions to support mental health and wellbeing (Patel et al., 2018). We argue music can, and should, be one of those support mechanisms.

Music is a ubiquitous means of expression and communication that span across all ages and cultures at a global level (Angel-Alvarado et al., 2022), and there is growing evidence from empirical and experimental studies that examines the impact of music on health and wellbeing, including psychological (emotional and cognitive), physical, social and social (McConkey and Kuebel, 2022). Despite this, there has been little research into the impact that music, specifically singing, may have on the health and wellbeing of children.

This paper therefore presents a qualitative case study within Scottish primary schools that examines the development and delivery of a pilot programme, Sing4Health, designed by the researcher in partnership with a choral conductor, to teach children and their teachers how to create music, focusing on group singing. This initiative was intended to enhance children’s wellbeing, while also establishing sustainable music education by non-specialists within primary schools.

The purpose of this study was therefore twofold: (i) to analyse the impact of theSing4Health programme on the wellbeing outcomes of the primary school children participating in the programme, and; (ii) to research the pedagogic process of implementing the programme within our partner schools, in order to draw out general pedagogical principles which can then be adapted for designing a self-sustaining training programme for non-specialist teachers.

The study asked:

1) Does singing improve children’s subjective sense of wellbeing?

2) Does participation in the Sing4Health programme help children effectively respond to situations they find difficult or challenging at school?

The secondary research objective was to examine the process of implementing the programme within our partner schools and identify underlying principles of the programme delivery. To do this, the study asked:

1) What is the professional music teacher doing when teaching singing for children?

2) Are there general instructive principles that non-specialists can learn to teach singing?

In conclusion, the aim of this study was to assess the outcomes among the children participating in the Sing4Health programme and identify whether there were underlying pedagogical principles of the delivery of the programme by the musical specialist leading it that could then be adapted to build a training programme for non-specialists, in order to create sustainable school wellbeing programme able to be delivered nationally and internationally as part of teacher training initiatives among pre-service or in-service teachers.

Initial findings suggest singing does positively impact on children and their sense of wellbeing, but further research is necessary to better understand how it does this, and how singing can be taught by non-specialists to promote children’s wellbeing.


Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used
PARTICIPANT POPULATION

40 participants aged between 5 and 12 years, their teachers and the wider school staff team who work with those children, were recruited from two Scottish primary schools.

DESIGN

A grounded theory design was used, and data derived from multiple data collection methods. Interviews were conducted with the teachers and the wider school staff team. Focus groups were conducted with children. Participant observation was used to generate data on the programme development and delivery.  

MATERIALS AND PROCEDURES

- Questionnaires distributed to parents before and after the children attended the programme, assessing whether parents noticed any changes in their child’s emotional wellbeing or educational outcomes (i.e. more engaged in homework, wanting to go to school).
 - Interviews were conducted with the teachers and the wider school staff team, and assessed:
 
-Teacher & Staff Perceptions. Teachers and other school staff were asked to answer a series of questions about the children they teach or for whom they provide care.
-Academic Indicators.Teachers were asked to provide information concerning children’s literacy and numeracy attainment, alongside children’s age.
- Teacher Perceptions of Sing4Health.Teachers were asked to complete a short questionnaire concerning their perception of the programme and whether it had an impact on the mental health and wellbeing and/or academic outcomes of the participating children.
  
Data collection from participating children took place via small focus groups:
  
- Practice Items.Participants were introduced to the 5-point Likert scale used to answer the majority of the questions. Participants completed two practice items with the researcher to ensure they understood the scale.
- Self-Perceptions of mental health and wellbeing. Children were asked to respond to a series of items using the Likert scales.  
- Self-Perceptions of participating in school and doing school work. Children were asked to respond to a series of items using the Likert scales.  
- Children perceptions of Sing4Health. Children were asked to respond to a short series of questions in a focus group setting. Anonymised drawings that children had done were also be collected for analysis, with children’s assent.  

Participant observation was used by the researcher to document the Sing4Health programme in real time as it was delivered, analysing the process to identify underlying principles of the programme delivery.

DATA ANALYSIS
Data was analysed using Nvivo to perform a thematic analysis through the methodological principles of grounded theory. Excel and/or SPSS were used to conduct an analysis of descriptive statistics collected about all participants in the programme.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings
As captured by semi-structured interviews with education staff and participating children, initial findings have shown singing supports the social, emotional and academic development of children. However, further study is needed to validate these findings through additional case studies and more robust methodologies.
References
Angel-Alvarado, R., Quiroga-Fuentes, I., Gárate-González, B., 2022. Working on the dark side of the moon: overcoming music education inequities in the Chilean school system. Arts Education Policy Review 0, 1–11.

Campayo–Muñoz, E., Cabedo–Mas, A., 2017. The role of emotional skills in music education. Brit. J. Music. Ed. 34, 243–258. h

Cook, A., Ogden, J., Winstone, N., 2019. The impact of a school-based musical contact intervention on prosocial attitudes, emotions and behaviours: A pilot trial with autistic and neurotypical children. Autism 23, 933–942.

Bates, V.C., 2012. Social Class and School Music. Music Educators Journal 98, 33–37.

Broad, 2019. BROAD, S., MOSCARDINI, L., RAE, A., WILSON, A., HUNTER, K. and SMILLIE, G. (2019) What’s Going on Now? A study of Young People Learning Music Across Scotland. Scotland: Music Education Partnership Group

Brown, E.D., Sax, K.L., 2013. Arts enrichment and preschool emotions for low-income children at risk. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 28, 337–346.

Green, L., 2017. Music Education as Critical Theory and Practice: Selected Essays. Routledge, London. h

Faulkner, S.C., 2022. Rhythms of learning — a model of practice supporting youth mental health in the era of COVID-19. J. Psychol. Couns. Sch. 1–7.

Hallam, S., 2010. The power of music: Its impact on the intellectual, social and personal development of children and young people. International Journal of Music Education 28, 269–289.

Hedemann, E.R., Frazier, S.L., 2017. Leveraging After-School Programs to Minimize Risks for Internalizing Symptoms Among Urban Youth: Weaving Together Music Education and Social Development. Adm Policy Ment Health 44, 756–770.

Kim, Hyun-Sil, Kim, Hun-Soo, 2018. Effect of a musical instrument performance program on emotional intelligence, anxiety, and aggression in Korean elementary school children. Psychology of Music 46, 440–453.

McConkey, M.S., Kuebel, C.R., 2022. Emotional Competence Within the Stress Coping Strategies of Music Education Students. Journal of Research in Music Education 70, 321–338.

Moscardini, L., Barron, D.S., Wilson, A., 2013. Who gets to play? Investigating equity in musical instrument instruction in Scottish primary schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education 17, 646–662.

Moscardini, L., Wilson, A., Holstein, J., Moscardini McKenna, C., 2015. Reaching All Children : Developing Inclusive Music Education (Report). University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.

Patel, V., Saxena, S., Lund, C., Thornicroft, G., Baingana, F., Bolton, P., Chisholm, D., Collins, P.Y., Cooper, J.L., Eaton, J., 2018. The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development. The Lancet 392, 1553–1598.


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: ECER 2023
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.149+TC
© 2001–2024 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany